Legislature(2005 - 2006)
2005-05-08 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2005-05-08 House Journal Page 1773 SB 130 Representative Kott moved and asked unanimous consent that reconsideration of HCS CSSB 130(JUD) am H be taken up on the same day. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 130(JUD) am H was again before the House in third reading. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall HCS CSSB 130(JUD) am H pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2005-05-08 House Journal Page 1774 HCS CSSB 130(JUD) am H--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 35 NAYS: 4 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Weyhrauch, Wilson Nays: Anderson, Kelly, Kohring, Rokeberg Absent: Gruenberg And so, HCS CSSB 130(JUD) am H passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule change. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 130(JUD) am H was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.