Legislature(2005 - 2006)
2006-03-30 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2006-03-30 House Journal Page 2958 HB 441 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 441 "An Act relating to operating or driving a motor vehicle, aircraft, or watercraft while under the influence; relating to mitigating factors in sentencing; amending Rule 35, Alaska Rules of Criminal Procedure; and providing for an effective date." 2006-03-30 House Journal Page 2959 with the: Journal Page JUD RPT 3DP 2NR 2644 FN1: ZERO(ADM) 2645 FN2: ZERO(CRT) 2645 FN3: ZERO(LAW) 2645 FIN RPT CS(FIN) NT 9DP 1NR 2790 FN1: ZERO(ADM) 2790 FN2: ZERO(CRT) 2790 FN3: ZERO(LAW) 2790 FN4: ZERO(ADM) 2790 FN5: ZERO(COR) 2790 FN6: ZERO(HSS) 2790 FN7: ZERO(DPS) 2790 Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 441(FIN) "An Act relating to operating or driving a motor vehicle, aircraft, or watercraft while under the influence; relating to court-ordered treatment programs for certain offenders and offenses; amending Rule 35, Alaska Rules of Criminal Procedure; and providing for an effective date." There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 441(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 441(FIN) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 441(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 441(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 35 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 3 2006-03-30 House Journal Page 2960 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Guttenberg, Harris, Joule, Kapsner, Kelly, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas Excused: Gruenberg, Wilson Absent: Hawker, Holm, Weyhrauch And so, CSHB 441(FIN) passed the House. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule change. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 441(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.