2003-05-21                     House Journal                      Page 2076
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?"  The roll                                  
was taken with the following result:                                                                
                                                                                                    
CSSB 202(FIN)                                                                                       
Second Reading                                                                                      
Amendment No. 1                                                                                     
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  16   NAYS:  22   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  1                                                  
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Anderson, Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Gara,                                          
Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kookesh, Masek, Moses,                                    
Ogg, Weyhrauch, Wolf                                                                                
                                                                                                    
Nays:  Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Harris,                                   
Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kohring, Kott, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer,                                          
Morgan, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Whitaker, Wilson                                        
                                                                                                    
Excused:  Joule                                                                                     
                                                                                                    
Absent:  Williams                                                                                   
                                                                                                    
And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted.                                                            
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
Amendment No. 2 was offered  by Representative Gara:                                                 
                                                                                                    
Page 2, following line 18:                                                                          
 Insert a new section to read:                                                                      
   "* Sec 4. In the case where a district's ADM decreases from a prior                            
year, the prior year's ADM shall be utilized in determining the amount                              
under AS 14.09.010 unless the Department makes the following                                        
finding:  that pupil transportation costs have decreased by an amount                               
proportionate to the decrease in ADM."                                                              
                                                                                                    
Renumber the remaining bill section.                                                                
                                                                                                    
Representative Gara moved and asked unanimous consent that                                          
Amendment No. 2 be adopted.                                                                         
                                                                                                    
Representative Meyer objected.                                                                      
                                                                                                    
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?"  The roll                                  
was taken with the following result: