Legislature(2001 - 2002)
2002-05-10 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2002-05-10 Senate Journal Page 3305 HB 405 HOUSE BILL NO. 405 "An Act relating to the prosecution of criminal offenses committed on or against ferries and other watercraft owned or operated by the state; and providing for an effective date" was read the second time. Senator Taylor, Chair, moved and asked unanimous consent for the adoption of the Judiciary Senate Committee Substitute offered on page 2948. Without objection, SENATE CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 405(JUD) "An Act relating to the prosecution of criminal offenses committed on or against aircraft owned or operated by the state or ferries and other watercraft owned or operated by the state; and providing for an effective date" (Title change authorized by SCR 35) was adopted and read the second time. Senators Leman, Donley, Taylor, Elton, Cowdery moved and asked unanimous consent to be shown as cross sponsors on the bill. Without objection, it was so ordered. Senator Leman moved and asked unanimous consent that the bill be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Without objection, it was so ordered. SENATE CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 405(JUD) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall SENATE CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 405(JUD) "An Act relating to the prosecution of criminal offenses committed on or against aircraft owned or operated by the state or ferries and other watercraft owned or operated by the state; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS HB 405(JUD) Third Reading - Final Passage Effective Date YEAS: 19 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 2002-05-10 Senate Journal Page 3306 Yeas: Austerman, Cowdery, Davis, Donley, Ellis, Elton, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Leman, Lincoln, Olson, Phillips, Stevens, Taylor, Therriault, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Absent: Kelly and so, SENATE CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 405 (JUD) passed the Senate. Senator Leman moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.