Legislature(2001 - 2002)

2002-05-14 House Journal

No results found showing results without SCR%2040

Full Journal pdf

2002-05-14                     House Journal                      Page 3760
Representative James moved that the House concur in the Senate                                      
amendment to CSSSHB 254(FIN), thus adopting SCS CSSSHB
254(RLS), and recommended that the members vote yes.                                                
                                                                                                    
The question being:  "Shall the House concur in the Senate                                          
amendment to CSSSHB 254(FIN)?"  The roll was taken with the                                         
following result:                                                                                   
                                                                                                    
SCS CSSSHB 254(RLS)                                                                                 
Concur                                                                                              
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  37   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  2                                                   
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Berkowitz, Bunde, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft,                                
Davies, Dyson, Fate, Foster, Green, Guess, Halcro, Harris, Hayes,                                   
Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott, Lancaster,                                  
Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Mulder, Murkowski, Porter,                                            
Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson                                               
                                                                                                    
Excused:  Ogan                                                                                      
                                                                                                    
Absent:  Kookesh, Morgan                                                                            
                                                                                                    
And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment, thus adopting                                  
SCS CSSSHB 254(RLS).                                                                                
                                                                                                    
Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                     
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                             
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                
                                                                                                    
The Chief Clerk was instructed to so notify the Senate.                                             
                                                                                                    
SCS CSSSHB 254(RLS) was referred to the Chief Clerk for                                             
enrollment.                                                                                         
                                                                                                    
                        SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS                                                
                                                                                                    
SCR 40                                                                                            
Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                     
following be taken up as a Special Order of Business at this time:                                  
                                                                                                    
     SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 40                                                            
     Suspending Rules 24(c), 35, 41(b), and 42(e), Uniform Rules of