Legislature(2001 - 2002)
2002-05-13 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2002-05-13 House Journal Page 3647 SB 363 The following was read the second time: CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 363(STA) am "An Act relating to communications and elections, to reporting of contributions and expenditures, and to campaign misconduct in the second degree; relating to disclosure by individuals of contributions to candidates; and providing for an effective date." 2002-05-13 House Journal Page 3648 with the: Journal Page JUD RPT HCS(JUD) 2DP 4NR 3516 FN2: ZERO(GOV) 3517 FN4: ZERO(H.JUD/ADM) 3517 RLS RPT HCS(RLS) 3DP 3NR 1AM 3621 FN2: ZERO(GOV) 3621 FN4: ZERO(ADM) 3621 Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 363(RLS) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Mulder: Page 4, line 29: Delete "automatic telemarketing," Representative Mulder moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Berkowitz objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 363(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Chenault, Fate, Green, Halcro, Harris, James, Kott, Lancaster, McGuire, Meyer, Mulder, Murkowski, Rokeberg, Stevens, Williams, Wilson 2002-05-13 House Journal Page 3649 Nays: Berkowitz, Bunde, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Foster, Guess, Hayes, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Morgan, Porter, Scalzi, Whitaker Excused: Ogan Absent: Kookesh, Masek, Moses And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Berkowitz: Page 5, line 14, following "importance": Insert ", and does not support or oppose a candidate for election to public office" Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Objection was heard and withdrawn. There being no further objection, it was so ordered. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS CSSB 363(RLS) am H be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 363(RLS) am H was read the third time. The question being: "Shall HCS CSSB 363(RLS) am H pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 363(RLS) am H Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 36 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 3 2002-05-13 House Journal Page 3650 Yeas: Berkowitz, Bunde, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Davies, Dyson, Fate, Foster, Green, Guess, Halcro, Harris, Hayes, Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott, Lancaster, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Excused: Ogan Absent: Croft, Kookesh, Moses And so, HCS CSSB 363(RLS) am H passed the House. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Kerttula gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on HCS CSSB 363(RLS) am H.