Legislature(1999 - 2000)
1999-05-04 House Journal
No results found showing results without HB%20176
Full Journal pdf1999-05-04 House Journal Page 1166 HB 176 HB 176 Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 21 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 5 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Cowdery, Davis, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Nays: Barnes, Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Coghill, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Grussendorf, Kemplen, Kerttula, Moses, Murkowski, Smalley Excused: Austerman, Bunde, Joule, Kapsner, Kookesh And so, HB 176 passed the House. Representative Green moved that the court rule changes be adopted. The question being: "Shall the court rule changes be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 176 Third Reading Court Rules YEAS: 21 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 5 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Foster, Green, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Nays: Barnes, Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Grussendorf, Kemplen, Kerttula, Morgan, Moses, Murkowski, Smalley Excused: Austerman, Bunde, Joule, Kapsner, Kookesh And so, lacking the necessary 27 votes, the court rule changes were not adopted and the new title appears below: