Legislature(1997 - 1998)
1997-05-02 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1997-05-02 House Journal Page 1483 SJR 16 The following, which had been held in second reading to today's calendar (page 1453), was before the House with Amendment No. 1 moved and pending: 1997-05-02 House Journal Page 1484 SJR 16 CS FOR SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 16(RES) am Relating to reauthorization and reform of the Endangered Species Act. Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw Amendment No. 1. There being no objection, it was so ordered. New Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 1, line 10: Delete "often created" Insert "occasionally contributed to" Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that New Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Ogan objected. The question being: "Shall New Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSJR 16(RES) am Second Reading New Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 10 Yeas: Berkowitz, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Vezey Absent: Barnes, Brice, Bunde, Cowdery, Kookesh, Martin, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Williams And so, New Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. 1997-05-02 House Journal Page 1485 SJR 16 Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 1, lines 16-17: Delete "often misused" Insert "occasionally been perceived to misuse" Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative James objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSJR 16(RES) am Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 19 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 13 Yeas: Berkowitz, Croft, Davies, Elton, Joule, Kemplen, Moses, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Davis, Foster, Green, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kott, Kubina, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Vezey Absent: Barnes, Brice, Bunde, Cowdery, Dyson, Grussendorf, Hanley, Kohring, Kookesh, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Williams And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 2, line 1, following "for": Delete "many" Insert "some" Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. 1997-05-02 House Journal Page 1486 SJR 16 Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSJR 16(RES) am Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 18 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 13 Yeas: Berkowitz, Croft, Davies, Elton, Joule, Kemplen, Kubina, Moses, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Davis, Foster, Green, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg Absent: Barnes, Brice, Bunde, Cowdery, Dyson, Grussendorf, Hanley, Kookesh, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 2, lines 5-6: Delete all material. Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 4 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSJR 16(RES) am Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 17 1997-05-02 House Journal Page 1487 SJR 16 Yeas: Croft, Davies, Elton, Hudson, Joule, Kemplen, Kubina, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Davis, Foster, Green, Hodgins, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter Absent: Barnes, Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cowdery, Dyson, Grussendorf, Hanley, Kookesh, Kott, Moses, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted. Amendment No. 5 was not offered. Amendment No. 6 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 2, line 31, following "recover": Delete "," Insert "and" Page 2, line 31, following "implementation", through page 3, line1: Delete ", and the public interest" Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 6 be adopted. Representative Ogan objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSJR 16(RES) am Second Reading Amendment No. 6 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 19 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 12 Yeas: Berkowitz, Bunde, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh 1997-05-02 House Journal Page 1488 SJR 16 Nays: Austerman, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hodgins, Ivan, James, Kohring, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Nicholia, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Vezey Absent: Barnes, Brice, Cowdery, Hanley, Hudson, Kelly, Kott, Kubina, Moses, Sanders, Therriault, Williams And so, Amendment No. 6 was not adopted. Amendment No. 7 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 3, line 6, following "authority;": Insert "and" Page 3, lines 7-8: Delete all material. Renumber the following paragraph accordingly. Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 7 be adopted. Representative James objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 7 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSJR 16(RES) am Second Reading Amendment No. 7 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 9 Yeas: Berkowitz, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Bunde, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Vezey 1997-05-02 House Journal Page 1489 SJR 16 Absent: Barnes, Brice, Cowdery, Hanley, Kott, Moses, Sanders, Therriault, Williams And so, Amendment No. 7 was not adopted. Amendment No. 8 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 3, line 6, following "authority": Insert "and" Page 3, line 8: Delete "; and" Insert "." Page 3, lines 9-10: Delete all material. Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 8 be adopted. Representative Ogan objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 8 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSJR 16(RES) am Second Reading Amendment No. 8 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 8 Yeas: Berkowitz, Croft, Davies, Elton, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kubina, Nicholia Nays: Austerman, Bunde, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Vezey Absent: Barnes, Brice, Cowdery, Hanley, Moses, Sanders, Therriault, Williams And so, Amendment No. 8 was not adopted. 1997-05-02 House Journal Page 1490 SJR 16 Amendment No. 9 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 3, line 11, following "to": Insert "the Honorable Bill Clinton, President of the United States; and to" Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 9 be adopted. Representative James objected and withdrew the objection. There being no further objection, Amendment No. 9 was adopted. Representative Porter moved and asked unanimous consent that CSSJR 16(RES) am H be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSSJR 16(RES) am H was read the third time. Representative Kubina placed a call of the House and lifted the call. Representative Brice placed a call of the House and lifted the call. The question being: "Shall CSSJR 16(RES) am H pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSJR 16(RES) am H Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 28 NAYS: 6 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 6 Yeas: Austerman, Brice, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Joule, Kelly, Kohring, Kookesh, Kubina, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Vezey, Williams Nays: Berkowitz, Croft, Davies, Elton, Kemplen, Nicholia Absent: Barnes, Grussendorf, Hanley, Kott, Moses, Therriault Kubina changed from "Nay" to "Yea". 1997-05-02 House Journal Page 1491 SJR 16 And so CSSJR 16(RES) am H passed the House and was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.