Legislature(1997 - 1998)
1997-05-06 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1997-05-06 House Journal Page 1557 HB 212 The following was read the second time: 1997-05-06 House Journal Page 1558 HB 212 HOUSE BILL NO. 212 "An Act relating to determination of an established village for purposes of regulating the sale, use, and possession of alcoholic beverages in the unorganized borough; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page CRA RPT 2DP 3NR 1009 ZERO FISCAL NOTE (DCRA) 1010 JUD REFERRAL WAIVED 1494 Title Amendment was offered by Representative Kubina: Page 1, lines 2-3: Delete "in the unorganized borough" Representative Kubina moved and asked unanimous consent that the title amendment be adopted. There being no objection, it was so ordered and the new title appears below: HOUSE BILL NO. 212(title am) "An Act relating to determination of an established village for purposes of regulating the sale, use, and possession of alcoholic beverages; and providing for an effective date." Representative Porter moved and asked unanimous consent that HB212(title am) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HB 212(title am) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall HB 212(title am) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 212(title am) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 37 NAYS: 2 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 1997-05-06 House Journal Page 1559 HB 212 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cowdery, Croft, Davies, Davis, Dyson, Elton, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Hodgins, Hudson, Ivan, James, Joule, Kelly, Kemplen, Kott, Kubina, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Nicholia, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Williams Nays: Kohring, Vezey Excused: Kookesh Ogan changed from "Nay" to "Yea". And so, HB 212(title am) passed the House. Representative Porter moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HB 212(title am) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.