Legislature(1997 - 1998)
1998-05-07 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1998-05-07 Senate Journal Page 3845 HB 257 CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 257(FIN) am An Act relating to elections, to election officials and election workers, to voter registration, and to candidates for election; and providing for an effective date was read the second time. Senator Sharp moved and asked unanimous consent for the adoption of the Finance Senate Committee Substitute offered on page 3834. Senator Duncan objected. Senator Mackie called the Senate. The call was satisfied. The question being: Shall the Finance Senate Committee Substitute be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 257(FIN) am Second Reading Adopt Finance Senate Committee Substitute? YEAS: 15 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Nays: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln 1998-05-07 Senate Journal Page 3846 HB 257 and so, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 257(FIN) was adopted and read the second time. Senator Duncan offered Amendment No. 1 : Page 9, following line 12: Delete Section 14 Delete Section 15 Delete Section 16 Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Senator Duncan moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 1. Senator Halford objected. Senator Green moved and asked unanimous consent that she be allowed to abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest. Objections were heard and Senator Green was required to vote. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 257(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 1 failed. Senator Duncan offered Amendment No. 2 : 1998-05-07 Senate Journal Page 3847 HB 257 Page 9, line 26: Delete section 15 Page 10, following line 2: Delete section 16 Renumber the following bill section accordingly. Senator Duncan moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 2. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 257(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 2 failed. Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent that the bill be engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Senator Duncan objected. The question being: Shall the bill be advanced to third reading? The roll was taken with the following result: 1998-05-07 Senate Journal Page 3848 HB 257 SCS CSHB 257(FIN) Advance from Second to Third Reading? YEAS: 15 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Nays: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln and so, the bill advanced to third reading. SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 257(FIN) was read the third time. The question being: Shall SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 257(FIN) An Act relating to elections, to election officials and election workers, to voter registration, and to candidates for election; and providing for an effective date pass the Senate? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 257(FIN) Third Reading - Final Passage Effective Date YEAS: 15 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Nays: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln and so, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 257(FIN) passed the Senate. Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered. 1998-05-07 Senate Journal Page 3849 HB 257 Senator Taylor gave notice of reconsideration on SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 257(FIN) and moved and asked unanimous consent that it be taken up at this time. Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was before the Senate on reconsideration. The question to be reconsidered: Shall SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 257(FIN) An Act relating to elections, to election officials and election workers, to voter registration, and to candidates for election; and providing for an effective date pass the Senate? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 257(FIN) Third Reading - On Reconsideration Effective Date YEAS: 15 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Nays: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln and so, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 257(FIN) passed the Senate on reconsideration. Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.