1995-04-30                     Senate Journal                      Page 1366
SB 171                                                                       
The question being: "Shall the bill be advanced to third reading?"             
The roll was taken with the following result:                                  
                                                                               
CSSB 171(RES)                                                                  
Advance from Second to Third Reading?                                          
                                                                               
YEAS:  12   NAYS:  6   EXCUSED:  2   ABSENT:  0                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips,          
Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson                                               
                                                                               
Nays:  Adams, Donley, Duncan, Lincoln, Salo, Zharoff                           
                                                                               
Excused:  Ellis, Hoffman                                                       
                                                                               
and so, the bill failed to advance to third reading.                           
                                                                               
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 171(RES) will appear on the May 1                       
calendar.                                                                      
                                                                               
                                                                               
                        THIRD READING OF SENATE BILLS                        
                                                                               
SB 81                                                                        
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 81(FIN) "An Act amending the Fish                       
and Game Code by removing 'wolf' from the definition of 'big                   
game'; relating to the classification and taking of wolves; and                
providing for a harvest incentive on wolves taken in areas designated          
by the Board of Game" was read the third time.                                 
                                                                               
The question being:  "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 81(FIN)                     
"An Act amending the Fish and Game Code by removing 'wolf'                     
from the definition of 'big game'; relating to the classification and          
taking of wolves; and providing for a harvest incentive on wolves              
taken in areas designated by the Board of Game" pass the Senate?"              
The roll was taken with the following result: