1996-05-04                     Senate Journal                      Page 3932
HJR 61                                                                       
The question being: Shall HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 61                        
Opposing the proposed changes in the functions of the federal Office           
of Veterans Affairs in Anchorage, pass the Senate?  The roll was               
taken with the following result:                                               
                                                                               
HJR 61                                                                         
Third Reading - Final Passage                                                  
                                                                               
YEAS:  19   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  0                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Green, Halford, Hoffman,                  
Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Salo,               
Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Zharoff                                              
                                                                               
Excused:  Adams                                                                
                                                                               
and so, HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 61 passed the Senate,                       
was signed by the President and Secretary and returned to the House.           
                                                                               
HJR 66                                                                       
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 66 am Relating to opposing the                      
American Heritage Areas Program, was read the second time.                     
                                                                               
Senator Halford moved and asked unanimous consent that the                     
resolution be advanced to third reading and placed on final passage.           
Objections were heard.                                                         
                                                                               
The question being: Shall the resolution be advanced to third                  
reading?  The roll was taken with the following result:                        
                                                                               
HJR 66am                                                                       
Advance from Second to Third Reading?                                          
                                                                               
YEAS:  12   NAYS:  7   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  0                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce,                    
R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson                                   
                                                                               
Nays:  Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Salo, Zharoff                  
                                                                               
Excused:  Adams                                                                
                                                                               
and so, the resolution failed to advance to third reading.