Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1995-05-04 House JournalFull Journal pdf
1995-05-04 House Journal Page 1876 HB 78 Representative Mackie brought up the reconsideration of CSHB78(FIN)am(efd pfld) (page 1838). The following was again before the House in third reading: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 78(FIN) am "An Act relating to certain licenses and applications for licenses for persons who are not in substantial compliance with orders, judgments, or payment schedules for child support; relating to the duty to support children of minor parents; relating to the program of aid to families with dependent children, including the payment of aid in the case of pregnant minors and minors who are parents and the maximum amount of assistance that may be granted; proposing special demonstration projects within the program of aid to families with dependent children and directing the Department of Health and Social Services to seek waivers from the federal government to implement the projects; amending Alaska Rule of Civil Procedure 90.3; and providing for an effective date." Representative Mackie moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 78(FIN) am be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 10. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 10 was offered by Representative Mackie: Page 1, lines 5 and 6 (title amendment): Delete "and the maximum amount of assistance that may be granted" 1995-05-04 House Journal Page 1877 HB 78 Page 24, lines 18-29: Delete all material. Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Representative Mackie moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 10 be adopted. Representative Parnell objected and withdrew the objection. There being no further objection, it was so ordered. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CSHB 78(FIN) am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 78(FIN) am--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 38 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Brown, Bunde, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Mackie, MacLean, Martin, Masek, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Absent: Moses, Sanders And so, CSHB 78(FIN) am passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule change. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clauses. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 78(FIN) am was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.