Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-03-06 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-03-06 House Journal Page 2999 HB 75 The following was read the second time: 1996-03-06 House Journal Page 3000 HB 75 SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 75 An Act relating to vehicle theft and the consequences of vehicle theft, including revocation of a driver's license, privilege to drive, or privilege to obtain a license; amending Rule 32.1, Alaska Rules of Criminal Procedure; and providing for an effective date. with the: Journal Page STA RPT 5DP 2NR 2564 9 FNS (ADM, 2-COR, 3-DHSS, LAW, 2-DPS) 2565 2 ZERO FISCAL NOTES (LAW, DPS) 2565 JUD RPT 7DP 2642 FISCAL NOTE (COURT) 2642 8 FNS (2-DPS, ADM, 2-DOC, 3-HES) 1/30/96 2642 FISCAL NOTE (LAW) 1/30/96 2642 2 ZERO FISCAL NOTES (LAW, DPS) 1/30/96 2643 FIN RPT CS(FIN) 9DP 2866 3 FISCAL NOTES (HFC/COR, ADM, DPS) 2867 3 FNS (3-DHSS) 1/30/96 2867 FISCAL NOTE (LAW) 1/30/96 2867 FISCAL NOTE (DPS #10) 1/30/96 2867 FISCAL NOTE (COURT) 1/30/96 2867 Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO.75(FIN) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that CSSSHB 75(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSSSHB 75(FIN) was read the third time. The question being: Shall CSSSHB 75(FIN) pass the House? The roll was taken with the following result: 1996-03-06 House Journal Page 3001 HB 75 CSSSHB 75(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 37 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Brice, Brown, Bunde, Davies, G.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, B.Davis, Willis And so, CSSSHB 75(FIN) passed the House. Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule change. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSSSHB 75(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.