Legislature(1993 - 1994)
1994-04-22 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1994-04-22 Senate Journal Page 3882 SB 377 The question being: "Is Amendment No. 1 germane?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1994-04-22 Senate Journal Page 3883 SB 377 CSSB 377(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 Is Amendment No. 1 germane? YEAS: 17 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Halford, Kerttula, Leman, Lincoln, Little, Miller, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff Nays: Jacko, Kelly, Pearce and so, Amendment No. 1 was germane to the bill. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 377(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 6 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Halford, Kerttula, Leman, Lincoln, Little, Miller, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff Nays: Jacko, Kelly, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo and so, Amendment No. 1 was adopted. Senators Donley, Ellis, Little offered Amendment No. 2 : Page 2, line 30: Delete "*Sec. 4" Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 2 Senator Pearce objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1994-04-22 Senate Journal Page 3884 SB 377 CSSB 377(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Jacko, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 2 failed. Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent that CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 377(FIN) am be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Without objection, it was so ordered. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 377(FIN) am was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 377(FIN) am "An Act relating to state agency fiscal procedures, including procedures related to the assessment and collection of certain taxes; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 377(FIN) am Third Reading - Final Passage Effective Date YEAS: 16 NAYS: 4 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Halford, Kerttula, Leman, Lincoln, Little, Miller, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff Nays: Jacko, Kelly, Pearce, Salo and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 377(FIN) am passed the Senate. 1994-04-22 Senate Journal Page 3885 SB 377 Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Senator Kelly objected. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 377(FIN) am Effective Date Vote YEAS: 17 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Halford, Kerttula, Leman, Lincoln, Little, Miller, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff Nays: Jacko, Kelly, Pearce and so, the effective date clause was adopted. Senator Pearce gave notice of reconsideration. Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent that the reconsideration on CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 377(FIN) am be taken up at this time. Senator Pearce objected. Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent that his motion to take up the reconsideration be withdrawn. Without objection, it was so ordered.