Legislature(1993 - 1994)
1994-05-06 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1994-05-06 Senate Journal Page 4438 HB 299 CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 299(FIN) am was before the Senate in third reading on reconsideration. Senator Rieger moved and asked unanimous consent that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 1. Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading. Senators Rieger, Salo offered Amendment No. 1 : Page 1, line 9: after "that": Insert ", in conjunction with operation of a motor vehicle," Page 2, line 22: after "has": Insert ", in conjunction with operation of a motor vehicle," Page 5, line 7: after "person": Insert ", in conjunction with operation of a motor vehicle," Senator Rieger moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 1. Senator Sharp objected. Senator Sharp called the Senate. President Halford stated the call was satisfied. Senator Rieger moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be withdrawn. Without objection, it was so ordered. CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 299(FIN) am was automatically in third reading. Amendment No. 2 was not offered. Senator Lincoln moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 3. Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Lincoln offered Amendment No. 3 : Page 1, bill sec. 8: after "cause": Insert "and" 1994-05-06 Senate Journal Page 4439 HB 299 Page 2, line 21: after "cause": Insert "and" Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 3. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 299(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Jacko, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Rieger, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 3 was adopted. CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 299(FIN) am S was automatically in third reading. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 299(FIN) am S "An Act relating to revocation of a driver's license for illegal possession or use of a controlled substance or illegal possession or consumption of alcohol by a person at least 14 but not yet 21 years of age; to fees for reinstatement of a driver's license; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 299(FIN) am S Third Reading - On Reconsideration Effective Date YEAS: 17 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 1994-05-06 Senate Journal Page 4440 HB 299 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Halford, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Lincoln, Little, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff Nays: Jacko, Rieger, Salo Duncan changed from "Nay" to "Yea". and so, CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 299(FIN) am S passed the Senate on reconsideration. Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered. CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 299(FIN) am S was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.