Legislature(1993 - 1994)
1993-04-20 House Journal
No results found showing results without HR%20%20%206
Full Journal pdf1993-04-20 House Journal Page 1386 "Alcohol policy issues have taken up a great deal of time and attention in our State legislature in the last decade. The problems caused in our society by alcohol abuse have demanded and received consideration from our elected representatives who have adopted legislation on drunk driving, state excise tax rates, fetal alcohol syndrome, alcohol server training, and many other alcohol related issues. But this legislation has been adopted on a piecemeal basis, as a reaction to a perceived individual need of the moment, and indeed, some legislation has never been implemented. The State of Alaska Alcohol Beverage Control Board is the agency charged with enforcement of our laws dealing with the sale and use of beverage alcohol and yet is currently operating with three fewer investigators than it did in 1977, despite the growth in population and number of licenses in use. Little has been done to address the problem of the repeat drunk driving offender, the cause of most of our alcohol- related highway accidents. Legislation providing for an 'interlock' devise that would inhibit a person convicted DWI from operating a motor vehicle was adopted but never implemented. Although we as a society decry the problem of underage drinking, little has been done to curb the use of false identification used to purchase alcohol and unless tragedy results from such an incident, it is often regarded by communities as 'sowing wild oats' and shrugged off as 'a rite of passage - boys will be boys'. During 1990, the State of Alaska spent nearly $12 million on alcohol abuse treatment, yet the Office of the Ombudsman concluded in a 1993 report that the Division of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse 'fails to insure that the programs it funds are effective.' Alcohol ABUSE is a grave and disturbing dilemma facing our state and deserves to be examined on a broad level, seeking an overview of our existing policies, reconciling the conflicts in our positions, and establishing a strategy for the rational regulation of a legal product and deterrents for the abuse of that product. The Twenty-first Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reserves to the states the right to regulate alcohol issues and the State of Alaska should assume responsibility for exercising that right in a coordinated, logical manner. Examination of existing law and policies regarding alcohol as a legal product and the separate issue of laws and policies dealing with alcohol abuse is a method of assuming the State's constitutional right