CHAIRMAN HALFORD brought SJR 52 (BUDGET RESERVE FUND AMENDMENT) before the committee as the final order of business. He requested that Senator Rieger explain the difference between the proposed Rules CS and the Finance CS. Senator Rieger directed attention to page 1, line 7 of the Senate Finance CS and the phrase "money in the budget reserve fund shall be treated as general funds", which was intended to refer to the manner of appropriation of the fund. Tam Cook, Director of the Division of Legal Services, raised concern that the phrase might raise questions of how it is invested, etc. Senator Rieger suggested changing "shall be treated" to "may be appropriated" to make it clear that it is only referring to the manner in which the money is appropriated. Senator Rieger said there was also a sentence in the Finance CS that read "For the purpose of this section money from the budget reserve fund shall be considered to be the last used in a fiscal year", which was an attempt to make sure that the general fund monies were used before using monies from the budget reserve. A number of questions were raised that showed it is somewhat impractical, and he suggested removing that language altogether. Senator Rieger also recommended changing "prior year's level" to "prior fiscal year's level." CHAIRMAN HALFORD asked for the pleasure of the committee on the proposed Rules CS. SENATOR RIEGER moved that CSSJR 52(RLS) be adopted. Hearing no objection, the motion carried. SENATOR RIEGER moved that CSSJR 52(RLS) be passed out of committee with individual recommendations. Hearing no objection, it was so ordered. SENATOR RIEGER moved and asked unanimous consent that CSSJR 52(RLS) be approved for calendaring at the Chair's discretion. Hearing no objection, it was so ordered.