HB 150 RECEIPTS FOR BAIL FORFEITURES  There being no further testimony of CSSB 95 (L&C), the committee took up HB 150. CHRIS CHRISTENSEN, general counsel to the Judicial Branch, stated HB 150, HB 151, and HB 153 are housekeeping measures introduced at the request of the Supreme Court. MR. CHRISTENSEN explained the Legislature enacted a system in the 1970s by which persons cited for traffic offenses could mail in the amount specified on the citation in lieu of appearing in court. This statute originally required the court system to mail a receipt to those individuals paying fines by mail. Because there were 45,000 receipts per year, a receipt stamp placed on the back of each check was used, to save time and reduce the cost of mailing separate receipts. The receipt requirement was repealed by the Legislature in 1987, and instead, a receipt is provided on request. Over the years, other mail-in bail statutes were passed by the Legislature, authorizing the payment of fines by mail without a court appearance for non-traffic offenses. Currently there are five statutes patterned after the original traffic bail schedule, requiring the court to provide a receipt. These include birth defect warning signs, fish and game violations, smoking in public violations, park and recreational facility violations, and oversize vehicle violations. There are a total of 10,000 of these violations per year. These statutes were not amended to eliminate the receipt requirement so receipt stamps are placed on the back of all checks. Banks have notified the court system that the receipt stamp is in violation of new federal banking regulations. HB 150 amends the five statutes to require the court system to provide a receipt if requested. SENATOR TAYLOR questioned whether the amended language was grammatically correct. After some discussion, the committee decided to refer the matter to the Division of Legal Services. SENATOR GREEN moved HB 150 out of committee with individual recommendations. There being no objections, the motion carried.