HB 353-JURY DUTY EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN TEACHERS    MS. PAT JACKSON, Staff to Representative Mary Kapsner, sponsor of HB 353, testified that this bill was introduced on behalf of Bethel's school district, but of course it would apply statewide. She explained that Bethel has a large number of jury trials in proportion to its population base. As a hub, it pulls jurors from 11 villages in the 50-mile radius as well. This has been problematic for the school district because when teachers are out of the classroom, the district has difficulty finding a certified substitute and the focus of the No Child Left Behind Act is that highly qualified teachers help students to meet the requirements. CHAIR DYSON noted that this [legislation] pertains only during the school term and only to schools designated as failing to make adequate yearly progress. MR. DOUG WOOLIVER, Administrative Attorney, Alaska Court System, testified that as with most bills, the department doesn't support or oppose the bill; however, his observation is that although these exemptions are important, when one class of potential jurors is exempted, this increases the burden on those who are left in the pool. Bethel has the highest jury trial rate in Alaska; it is third in total numbers, behind Anchorage and Fairbanks. That's a reason for the bill, and a reason why those remaining in the pool will have a higher jury duty burden, he said. SENATOR WILKEN asked if a person could respond to a jury call by asking to be "excused to time certain" so that a teacher could th ask to be excused until May 15. MR. WOOLIVER replied yes, that one may ask to be deferred. However, in rural areas, a lot of teachers are not there in the summer, which is why the deferral has not worked effectively. SENATOR DAVIS pointed out that a limited number of deferrals can be requested before one has to serve. MR. WOOLIVER responded that if one was called for jury duty in December, duty could be deferred until summertime, but it could not then be deferred again. SENATOR GRETCHEN GUESS commented that in Anchorage, notice of jury duty must be given five days in advance and duty is for five days. She asked if it is handled similarly in other Alaskan communities. MR. WOOLIVER said no, the five days applies only in Anchorage. Bethel's timeframe had been three months, which is similar to st most communities of that size. Effective January 1, Bethel's jury duty time period was reduced to one month. SENATOR GUESS moved to report CSHB 353(JUD) out of committee with individual recommendations and attached fiscal note. CHAIR DYSON asked if there was any objection. Seeing none, it was so ordered.