SENATOR WARD moved to adopt CSSB 116(HES) as the working document of the committee (Version J). There being no objection, the motion carried. CHAIRWOMAN GREEN asked Mr. Jim Nordlund to come forward. MR. JIM NORDLUND, Director of the Division of Public Assistance, DHSS, explained that the only difference between Version J and the previous version adopted by the committee is the addition of language on page 1, line 11, that reads, "unless the second needy parent is determined under regulations of the department to be physically or mentally unable to perform gainful activity." He explained that language is the status quo of the way both the AFDC and ARAP programs operated. If one parent is incapacitated in a two-parent family, the benefit will not be cut in half during the summer months. Number 2183 SENATOR LEMAN asked what standard is used by the Division of Public Assistance to determine physical or mental disability for purposes of work. MR. NORDLUND replied that definition is in regulation and is in committee members' packets. CHAIRWOMAN GREEN noted it is in 7 AAC 45.235. She asked if, when the legislature passed its welfare reform legislation several years ago, it was ahead of Congress and, by the time the federal government implemented its law, Alaska's law was a little bit askew. Although DHSS has used the standard in the federal law, the court has said the statute must be corrected so this language confirms what DHSS has been doing. MR. NORDLUND said that is correct. He pointed out the critical issue in the court case was removing the language that refers to the unemployment of the family's principal wage earner. That is the last remnant of the old AFDC law. When that "bath water" was thrown out, the "baby" went with it, the "baby" being a category of folks that had always been exempted. CHAIRWOMAN GREEN said she has worked closely with DHSS to get this legislation to the point where DHSS can live with it until next year, when this subject will be revisited. There being no further discussion, SENATOR WARD moved CSSB 116(HES) from committee with individual recommendations. There being no objection, the motion carried.