CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 304(FIN) "An Act relating to the Alaska microloan revolving loan fund and loans from the fund." 3:31:51 PM Co-Chair MacKinnon conveyed that the committee had heard the Senate version of the bill on April 10, 2018. The committee had heard a presentation on the bill and had opened and closed the public hearing and had reviewed the fiscal notes. Co-Chair MacKinnon relayed that her office heard a concern regarding the time-frame of whether the loans were revolving or not based on the length of the loan being proposed on page 2 of the bill. She asked for committee discussion before amendments were considered. There were members who wanted a time frame of 10 years, and others that proposed 12 years. 3:33:33 PM Senator von Imhof recalled previous discussions on the bill. She understood the state's perspective of wanting to increase the term from six years to 15 years in order to allow for cash flow to develop in the industry; as well as provide time for the borrower to afford to make payments on the loan. She referenced a lack of loan applicants and the idea that increasing the amortization schedule would increase the affordability of the loan. She considered that the longer the term, the higher the risk was for the state. She thought there could be a compromise between 10 and 15 years. Senator Micciche stated that he was in accord with a term of twelve years. He observed that other state loan funds had significantly longer terms. He hoped to see more use of the loan fund and more economic development from the fund. Senator von Imhof MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 1: Page 2, line 2, following "term of" DELETE "15" INSERT "12" There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. Amendment 1 was ADOPTED. Ms. Cioni-Haywood expressed that the department was supportive of the amendment, which still allowed flexibility within the program. There would be no associated changes to the fiscal note. 3:36:40 PM AT EASE 3:37:02 PM RECONVENED Vice-Chair Bishop discussed FN 1, which was a zero fiscal note from Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development. He read from the Analysis on page 2 of the fiscal note: If this legislation were to pass a regulations project would be required; the minimal costs associated can be absorbed by current budgetary authorization. There is no anticipated fiscal impact to the Division of Economic Development from this bill. Vice-Chair Bishop MOVED to ADOPT MOVED to report SCS CSHB 304(FIN) out of Committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. SCS CSHB 304(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with one previously published zero fiscal note: FN 1(CED). 3:38:14 PM AT EASE 3:40:55 PM RECONVENED Co-Chair MacKinnon discussed the agenda for the following day.