CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 121(FIN) "An Act relating to the examinations, board, loans, and records of the Alaska Commercial Fishing and Agriculture Bank; and providing for an effective date." 10:24:11 AM MICHAEL PASCHALL, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE ERIC FEIGE, introduced himself, and stated that he was willing to respond to questions. Co-Chair Meyer queried the relationship of the bank with the state. Mr. Paschall responded that the establishment was formed to help the fishing and agriculture industry. It was given a privileged tool to use limited entry permits as collateral. Therefore, there was a specific statute that granted the authority, even though they were created as a private bank. The only relationship they had with the state was as an agent of the state with the ability to use limited entry permits as collateral. The governor appointed two board members from within the members of the bank to assure the interest was followed. Co-Chair Meyer wondered if two board members were appointed by the governor. Mr. Paschall responded in the affirmative. Co-Chair Meyer queried the total number of board members. Mr. Paschall replied that the board member numbers could be changed by the corporation. He assumed there were between 5 and 9 members of the board. Senator Hoffman stressed that two board members were appointed by the governor. Mr. Paschall agreed. Senator Olson queried the reasoning of the incorporation of the recent amendment related to lobbyists. Mr. Paschall replied that the bank had requested the ability to hire a lobbyist. The state had an ownership interest in the bank when it was initially created, so the bank could not have a lobbyist at that time. The state no longer had an ownership interest in the bank, so the bank was facing a logistical issue of maintaining involvement with the legislative process. Co-Chair Meyer surmised that the bank had a very specific interest, because they were statutory obligated to the state. He felt that they still had a strong tie to government, so there was question as to the appropriateness to have a lobbyist to influence law making. He wondered if the amendment was made in the other body. Mr. Paschall replied that the amendment was made in the other body. 10:29:32 AM Co-Chair Meyer wondered if the bank had a government affairs employee. Mr. Paschall replied in the negative, because they only had ten employees. Co-Chair Meyer asked if the bank was reviewed every three years. Mr. Paschall responded that the bank was not currently reviewed by the Banking Commission, because it was excluded from all banking laws that apply to other banks. The statutes regulating the bank were the only regulating statutes for the bank, which was why they were asking to be reviewed. It helped their ability to obtain credit from other lenders. Senator Dunleavy remarked that the bank may be the only outfit that did not employ a lobbyist. Co-Chair Meyer was not concerned with whether or not the bank had a lobbyist. Vice-Chair Fairclough queried the definition of "resident." Mr. Paschall replied that the resident status referred to the general statute, which was a resident for one year with the intention of staying in the state. CSHB 121(FIN) was HEARD and HELD in committee for further consideration.