CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 264(CRA) "An Act allowing a deferral of municipal property taxes on the increase in the value of real property attributable to subdivision of that property; and providing for an effective date." 9:31:14 AM Co-Chair Hoffman MOVED to ADOPT the proposed committee substitute for CSHB 264(CRA), Work Draft 27-LS1090\X (Bullard, 4/14/12). Mr. Peterson stated that Sections 1 to 3 of the committee substitute would exclude the value of the lease-hold interest on the properties for the purpose of determining the full and true value by the state, only if local government chooses to exempt that property from taxation. Co-Chair Stedman REMOVED his OBJECTION. There being NO FURTHER OBJECTION, Work Draft 27-LS1090\X was ADOPTED. 9:32:19 AM AT EASE 9:33:22 AM RECONVENED CHRISTOPHER CLARK, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE CATHY MUNOZ, looked at Sections 1 and 4, and stated that the property deferral was an option allowed to municipalities. Municipalities could defer any tax increase associated with subdivided property. The intent was to encourage housing development. You could defer the tax increase for up to five years, and the deferral would end as soon as a lot was sold or a new home or commercial building was built on the lot. He stated that Sections 5 and 6 related to the municipal tax cap. 9:35:15 AM Co-Chair Stedman discussed the fiscal notes in the members' packets. JOHANNA BALES, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, TAX DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (via teleconference), testified the DOR and the governor were against Sections 5 and 6 of the bill. Those Sections removed the municipal tax cap on petroleum property and other property within municipality's jurisdiction. RANDY HOFFBECK, CHIEF OF STAFF, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH, spoke to Sections 5 and 6 of the bill. He stated that the tax cap did not limit the total amount of money in tax that could be collected by a municipality, but parse it into two sections: operation and debt. The provision would remove the 225 percent cap, and allow the municipalities more flexibility to use the money in the most efficient manner possible. Currently, in order to collect a portion of the debt, the North Slope Borough had to cycle money through a bond market by selling general obligation debt. Senator Olson pointed out that he had a letter from the mayor of Juneau that expressed support of the legislation. Senator Olson MOVED to report SCS CSHB 264(FIN) out of committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. SCS CSHB 264(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with a previously published zero fiscal note: FN2(DCCED), and a new zero fiscal note by the Senate Finance Committee for the Department of Revenue.