SENATE BILL NO. 220 "An Act declaring a state energy policy; relating to energy efficiency and alternative energy; establishing the energy efficiency grant fund, an emerging energy technology fund, a renewable energy production tax credit, and an energy use index; and relating to a fuel purchasing cooperative, to energy codes and efficiency standards, to energy conservation targets in public buildings, to a state agency energy use reduction plan, to the alternative energy revolving loan fund, and to the renewable energy grant fund." Co-Chair Stedman noted that this was the second hearing. Co-Chair Hoffman MOVED to ADOPT the work draft to SB 220, labeled 26-LS1197\B, Kane, 4/8/10, as the work document before the committee. Co-Chair Stedman OBJECTED. 4:50:47 PM DARWIN PETERSON, STAFF, CO-CHAIR STEDMAN, spoke of multiple changes in the CS. The new CS removes the legislative policy section that was found in Section 2 of the previous version. He referred to page 7 where previous Sections 11 and 12 were removed. These sections required the administration to consider using alternative energy systems in the construction of public facilities and when purchasing equipment that uses energy. These sections were removed by the request of the administration because this work is already being done. Mr. Peterson addressed Section 10 on page 9, a new section which refers to the contractual agreements between the state and a lessee of state land. If the lessee is a public utility engaged in the production of renewable energy, the state may not negotiate an increased lease rate based on percentage of gross revenue from a renewable energy source. Section 11, page 9, creates a Southeast Energy Fund. Subsection 5 on lines 21 and 22 of page 9 is new language making the Department of Revenue the fiduciary of the fund. Subsection (c) was amended to specify that only municipalities, joint action agencies, or member-owned electric cooperatives are eligible to receive grants from this fund. Grants can only be used to finance hydroelectric projects or electric transmission lines and they must be wholly owned by the grantee. Mr. Peterson reported that the last change in this section is on page 10, line 1. The previous version required grant money to lapse back into the fund if on-going work to the project had not begun within 5 years. This change bumps that up to 7 years. 4:53:03 PM Mr. Peterson highlighted the removal of Sections 15 and 16 from the previous CS. These sections reference the existing renewable energy fund and cause concern that it would have shifted the focus of the program to projects in urban areas with better economies of scale. Section 17 of the previous version of the bill would have added a new section to AS.42.45 requiring the Alaska Energy Authority (AEA) to facilitate the organization of a statewide purchasing cooperative. That section has been deleted in the new CS at the request of the administration due to concerns about the state's involvement in private sector competition. Furthermore, nothing in statute prevents AEA from providing technical assistance if requested. Mr. Peterson continued to detail changes to the CS. There are changes in Section 12, page 10, the Emerging Energy Technology Fund, beginning with the first sentence. The language "in order to promote the expansion of energy sources available to Alaskans" was added. The second change is found on lines 16-22 on page 10. The new language narrows the focus of what the grants can be used for. Grants can only be awarded for demonstration projects of technologies that have a reasonable expectation of being commercially viable within 5 years and are designed to test emerging technology and prove existing technology, or deploy existing technology that has not been previously demonstrated in the state. The reason for the change is because the purpose of the fund is to test and deploy equipment, not to support theoretical research or studies that don't result in demonstration projects. Mr. Peterson turned to the third change in Section 12, found on page 11, lines 1 and 2. The CS instructs the university to provide data acquisition and analysis of projects to the advisory committee. The fourth change is the deletion of subsection (f) from the previous version. That section was old language taken from the now-defunct Alaska Science and Technology Foundation. It was appropriate for a grant that funds basic research that is high risk to investors. Now the program excludes these projects and the subsection no longer applies. The fifth change is found on page 11 of Section 12, subsection (i), lines 27 and 28. This new language states that members of the advisory committee cannot award themselves grants from the fund. The last change in this section is an addition of a four-year sunset date on page 18, Section 25. 4:56:11 PM Mr. Peterson pointed out that Sections 20, 21, and 51 have been deleted from the previous version of the bill. They would have created the renewable energy tax credit, which requires more in-depth analysis. Section 23 has been deleted. It would have required the state to retro-fit at least 25 percent of all public facilities by 2020. At the request of the administration, it was removed because the state is currently in the process of accomplishing this goal. Section 24 has also been deleted. It would have required AEA to conduct a public education campaign on energy efficiency. It was removed because AEA is already planning on doing this type of outreach. Mr. Peterson continued to explain that Sections 26-33 have also been deleted. These sections would have amended the Alternative Energy Revolving Loan Fund to provide loans to owners of commercial buildings for energy efficiency improvements. The administration suggested this particular loan fund has not been active since 1987 and would require a thorough review before implementing. Mr. Peterson related that Sections 26-28, beginning at the bottom of page 18, have been amended. Now, the Office of Management and Budget, the Office of the Governor, and the Department of Transportation will have sufficient time to develop their required reports. The due dates for the reports are now January 31, 2011. Also in Section 27, the CS instructs the governor's energy report to include an examination of the powers, duties, and structure of AEA and the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority (AIDEA). The intent is to help the legislature decide whether or not AEA and AIDEA could be more effective if they had separate boards of directors. Mr. Peterson reported that the CS has a new Section 30, found on page 21, which asks the Department of Revenue to submit a report to the legislature on January 31, 2011 with recommendations regarding the feasibility of a municipal energy improvements financing program. Sections 31 and 32 are also new sections. Section 31 gives the Department of Health and Social Services the authority to adopt transitional regulations. Section 32 instructs the department to replace the name "Alaska Heating Assistance Program" with "Alaska Affordable Heating Program". The new CS has an amended title to reflect the changes. 4:59:31 PM Co-Chair Stedman WITHDREW his OBJECTION to adopting Version B. There being NO further OBJECTION, it was so ordered. Co-Chair Stedman noted nine fiscal notes, some of which have to be amended or deleted. SENATOR LESIL MCGUIRE, SPONSOR, thanked the committee and their staff for their work. She termed the bill a work in progress and called it a good start. It is the first energy policy put forth in the state of Alaska. There are provisions in the bill representing suggestions from Alaskans statewide. She commended the Senate and the bi- partisan working group for addressing the issue. SENATOR BILL WIELECHOWSKI, SPONSOR, noted that the bill had been pared back quite a bit. He said that he was looking forward to passage of the bill in the Senate. 5:02:25 PM Co-Chair Stedman recalled the history of working on the state energy policy. Quite a few Senators have participated in this legislation and have traveled to various areas of the state. It is one of several pieces of legislation. He spoke of the next step to achieve the outcome. He thanked the sponsors. Senator McGuire thanked her staff and others who worked on the bill. Senator Wielechowski added his thanks to the administration. 5:04:18 PM Co-Chair Hoffman MOVED to REPORT CSSB 220 (FIN) from Committee with individual recommendations and the attached fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. CSSB 220 (FIN) was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with zero FN 3 DEC, indeterminate FN 6 DHS, two new fiscal notes by the Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development, two new zero fiscal notes by the Department of Revenue, a new zero fiscal note by the Administration, and a new fiscal note by the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities. AT-EASE 5:04:52 PM RECONVENED 5:17:01 PM