SENATE BILL NO. 16 "An Act regarding oil discharge prevention and cleanup involving self-propelled nontank vessels exceeding 400 gross registered tonnage and railroad tank cars and related facilities and operations and requiring preparation and implementation of oil discharge contingency plans for those nontank vessels and railroad tank cars; amending the definition of 'response action' that relates to releases or threatened releases of oil and thereby amending the duties and liabilities of response action contractors; and authorizing compliance verification for nontank vessels and for trains and related facilities and operations; and providing for an effective date." This was the third hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance Committee. Co-Chair Kelly drew member's attention to the sponsor statement from the Taskforce on Motorized Oil Transport that was prepared since the previous hearing. Co-Chair Donley expressed that his lack of further questions at this time should not be mistaken for support of the fiscal notes. He stated that while concerns were raised at the previous hearing he had yet to find solutions. Senator Ward offered a motion to move from Committee, SB 16 with Department of Transportation and Public Facilities zero fiscal noted, dated February 7, 2001, and $78,000 fiscal note from the Department of Environmental Conservation dated February 9, 2001. Co-Chair Donley requested the motion be severed to exclude fiscal notes. Senator Ward restated the motion as to apply to the bill only. Without objection, SB 16 MOVED from Committee. Co-Chair Donley moved for adoption of the aforementioned fiscal notes. He spoke against the addition of four positions to state government that these fiscal notes provide. He stressed that he hoped future finance committees would reexamine the situation in the event that the Department of Environmental Conservation requests even more positions to perform the prescribed duties. He opined that the department should be able to accomplish the duties with existing staff. He qualified that the legislation itself is important and suggested designating the added positions toward the accomplishment of the goals of this legislation. At the same time, he continued, the adoption of the fiscal note should not be construed as an endorsement for an increased level of funding for the department. He explained that if the budget subcommittee is able to identify how this job could be done using existing staff, adjustments should be made. He summarized that while the fiscal note creates four additional positions, by the end of the legislative session, there may not actually be four new employees depending upon the merits of the existing positions. Co-Chair Donley commented that the sponsor statement was well prepared. There was no objection and the fiscal notes MOVED from Committee with the bill.