HB 296-MUNICIPAL MERGER AND CONSOLIDATION  CHAIRMAN TORGERSON announced the bill was heard the previous week and since Mr. Waring from the Local Boundary Commission wasn't available to testify, the bill was held. Mr. Waring was again unavailable to comment but members received a copy to his letter to the Chairman dated April 10, 2002 and a copy is in the bill file. CHAIRMAN TORGERSON called attention to the supplemental packet for HB 296 that contained three amendments. Amendment #1 was pending from the April 10, 2002 meeting. There was discussion about changing the amendment to allow a merger to move forward if one municipality voted to not join in the merger. Proposed amendment #2 would do that. He asked for a motion to withdraw amendment #1. SENATOR AUSTERMAN made a motion to withdraw amendment #1. There was no objection. SENATOR AUSTERMAN made a motion to adopt amendment #2, version \F.4 Cook. There being no objection, amendment #2 was adopted. CHAIRMAN TORGERSON stated amendment #3, version \F.3 Cook affects applicability. It doesn't affect any petition that is currently pending before the Department of Community and Regional Affairs. SENATOR AUSTERMAN made a motion to adopt amendment #3, version \F.3 Cook. There being no objection, amendment #3 was adopted. CHAIRMAN TORGERSON asked for the will of the committee. SENATOR AUSTERMAN made a motion to move SCS HB 296(CRA). There being no objection, it was so ordered.