HSTA - 03/18/95 HB 201 - PRISONER LITIGATION AND APPEALS LAURIE OTTO, Deputy Attorney General, Criminal Division, Department of Law, presented HB 201. She explained the Criminal Division, under her supervision, is comprised of District Attorney's Offices, the Department of Public Safety, and the Department of Corrections. When Governor Knowles took office he instructed her to find areas where she could cut back, and she realized the area of corrections' litigations had seen a 20 percent increase every year for the past 6 years. In looking at what other states had done, she discovered this has been a growing problem nationwide, with bored prisoners filing recreational litigation. She added if "you or I" file a civil suit, we pay filing fees and are at financial risk, whereas a prisoner is indigent, pays no filing fees, and is at no financial risk. Other states, New York being the first, have imposed minimal filing fees on prisoners, even if they are indigent. New York saw a 50 percent decrease in the number of cases filed. This is the first focus of HB 201. It imposes a filing fee of 20 percent of the 6-month average monthly balance in a prisoner's inmate account, thus creating a financial stake on the part of the person filing a lawsuit. She added HB 201 also requires a signed statement that the suit is not malicious or frivolous or brought in bad faith. Number 686 MS. OTTO continued, the second focus of HB 201 is to put some finality in judgments in criminal cases by stating requests for post-conviction relief must be filed within two years of the date of conviction or within one year after the conclusion of an appeal, and by placing a limit on the number of relief applications which can be filed in state court. Throughout the bill, she said, they have tried to balance prisoners' rights of access to the courts in cases of legitimate need while getting the state out from under the burden of having to respond to excessive petitions. MS. OTTO concluded that third, the bill puts a limit on sentence appeals filed by prisoners, aiming at appeals the courts do not usually accept, but which "clog up the system and cost a lot of money." TAPE 95-30, SIDE A Number 000 MS. OTTO added if a prisoner tries to withdraw a plea before sentence, it is treated the same as in current law. If a prisoner tries to withdraw a plea after sentencing, it is moved into the time limits just outlined in the section on post-conviction relief applications. Number 036 REPRESENTATIVE GREEN commented it sounded like a good bill, and asked if a person convicted for 20 years could not request reduction of sentence. MS. OTTO replied if a person makes an agreement with the state to plead guilty with the understanding the sentence cannot exceed 20 years, that person cannot file an appeal to have the sentence reduced to less than 20 years. Number 084 REPRESENTATIVE GREEN made a motion to move HB 201 from committee with individual recommendations and zero fiscal notes. Hearing no objection, the bill passed out of committee.