SB 324-MUNICIPAL PUB.UTIL.COMPETING W/TELECOM CHAIR KOTT announced that the final order of business would be CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 324(L&C), "An Act providing that a utility or electric operating entity owned and operated by a political subdivision of the state competing directly with a telecommunications utility is not subject to the Alaska Public Utilities Regulatory Act." RANDY RUARO, Staff to Representative Bill Williams, Alaska State Legislature, explained that SB 324 continues to allow municipally operated utilities to continue to be exempt from regulation by the Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA) when the utility faces competition from a telecommunications utility. Therefore, regulations for municipally operated utilities would continue to be done at the local level by the citizen utility boards and elected municipal officials. That system of regulation has been in Ketchikan for at least 50 years. Mr. Ruaro noted that the RCA has submitted a letter that does not oppose the bill. He informed the committee that the states of Oregon and Washington maintain exceptions for utilities. REPRESENTATIVE BERKOWITZ asked if this legislation applies only to the Ketchikan utility. MR. RUARO clarified that the statute is drafted to apply statewide to any utility. In further response to Representative Berkowitz, Mr. Ruaro said that he has heard that there are two other municipal utilities that are operating up North. Furthermore, it's possible for any municipality to form a utility any time in the future. REPRESENTATIVE McGUIRE asked what prompted this legislation. Number 2313 KARL AMYLON, General Manager, Ketchikan Public Utilities, answered that this legislation attempts to preserve a level playing field for the different utility components of the Ketchikan Public Utilities. Without this legislation, if a telecommunications company comes to Ketchikan, "we potentially risk all of our utilities ... becoming regulated." Furthermore, there are different degrees of regulations. He explained that if a lightly regulated telecommunications company enters Ketchikan, Ketchikan Public Utilities would face becoming fully rate regulated and the associated expenses. REPRESENTATIVE McGUIRE inquired as to why a utility owned by a political subdivision of the state should not be regulated while the others should. MR. AMYLON clarified that the aforementioned isn't [Ketchikan Public Utilities'] position. He specified that the desire is to treat competing utilities within the Ketchikan political subdivision equally. In response to Representative Berkowitz, Mr. Amylon related his belief that Alaska Power & Telephone did make comments on this legislation, although they aren't directly competing with Ketchikan Public Utilities at the present time. TAPE 02-15, SIDE B CHAIR KOTT, determining no one else wished to testify, closed the public testimony. Number 2385 REPRESENTATIVE PORTER moved to report CSSB 324(L&C) out of committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying zero fiscal note. There being no objection, CSSB 324(L&C) was reported from the House Rules Standing Committee.