HB 79 DAMAGE TO PROPERTY BY MINORS REPRESENTATIVE ULMER asked why the particular amount of $10,000 was selected. REPRESENTATIVE BUNDE, PRIME SPONSOR OF HB 79, advised members that the $10,000 was a compromise amount. The original bill was written to allow whatever district court currently allows; that amount, however, turns out to be $50,000. Many people were concerned that $50,000 was too much and that $2,000 was not enough to go to court. An alternative of $5,000 was offered, but malicious damage usually totals more than $5,000. He said $10,000 was an even compromise between victim's rights and parental responsibility. REPRESENTATIVE ULMER asked if there was any discussion of not having a cap on the dollar figure - perhaps a recovery of the actual amount of the damages. REPRESENTATIVE BUNDE replied that no dollar figure was his original intent. There has been considerable concern that $50,000 is too high and if someone has an uncontrollable child who is still a minor who wanted to victimize their parents, they could do considerable damage and create another victim. (Rep. G. Phillips arrived at 4:09 p.m.) REPRESENTATIVE BUNDE continued. He said the amount was $50,000 when the bill went to the Finance Committee and they reduced it to $5,000. A compromise would be to raise it to $10,000. REPRESENTATIVE BARNES moved to adopt the committee substitute (CS) for HB 79. CSHB 79(RLS) was ADOPTED. REPRESENTATIVE BARNES moved to pass CSHB 79(RLS) from committee with individual recommendations. CSHB 79(RLS) was MOVED with INDIVIDUAL RECOMMENDATIONS.