SENATE BILL NO. 289 An Act relating to home energy conservation and weatherization for purposes of certain programs of the Alaska Housing and Finance Corporation. 1:54:02 PM Representative Kelly asked how the $300 million would be spent in the first years of the project. DAN FAUSKE, CEO/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ALASKA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, thought $20-40 million would be spent the first year. He said the goal is to get people involved as soon as possible. BOB BREAN, ALASKA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (testified via teleconference), emphasized that there would be a ramping up period. The Alaska Housing Finance Corporation (AHFC) was looking at twenty contractors. Mr. Fauske added that he had spoken to vendors and wanted to take into consideration the barge schedule to remote areas. 1:56:28 PM Representative Thomas asked if there was a cap on the grant. Mr. Fauske responded that the loan amount would be $30,000. People would borrow money and there would be a rebate at the $5,000 level. Representative Thomas asked about the grant portion. BRYAN BUTCHER, LEGISLATIVE LIAISON, ALASKA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION, said the rebate program would be capped at the number that would give incentives to Alaskans to use the program. The $5,000 amount is flexible. In terms of the weatherization, AHFC is looking at an average amount. Funds are limited, so the average would around $4,000. With more funding, the program could do more in individual homes, but the average would still only be around $8,000. Representative Thomas asked if there were restrictions since the value of the house would be increased. Mr. Butcher answered that the goal of the program is to make houses more energy efficient. If the person sold the home, it would still be more energy efficient. Representative Thomas reiterated concerns about people taking advantage of the program to increase the re-sale value of homes. He suggested a restriction such as not being able to sell the home for two years. Mr. Brean said that in the early days, there were no restrictions and people took advantage of loopholes to install solariums and hot tubs. A lot was learned. The uses of the money have been reconfigured to focus more accurately on energy efficiency. There are no restrictions on the sale of the home. The value is the return on investment to the State. Energy efficient homes benefit the State as a whole. This could be adjusted if there were strong concerns. 2:00:53 PM Representative Thomas wanted the issue to be looked at so that people could not take advantage of the program. Mr. Fauske thought a pre-payment penalty on a loan could be built into the regulations. Representative Kelly thought that it would help to have a list of all the programs that provide assistance for heating, listing the number of people impacted. He was concerned about fraud. PUBLIC TESTIMONY CLOSED. SB 289 was HEARD and HELD by the Committee for further consideration.