HOUSE BILL NO. 298 An Act relating to the distribution of appropriations from the Alaska permanent fund under art. IX, sec. 15(b), Constitution of the State of Alaska, and making conforming amendments; and providing for an effective date. Co-Chair Harris MOVED to ADOPT work draft #23-LS1075\C, Cook, 4/6/04, as the version of the bill before the Committee. There being NO OBJECTION, it was adopted. PETE ECKLUND, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE BILL WILLIAMS, explained changes made to work draft version "V". Page 3, Section 3, language provides a 5-year rolling average and insures that the Legislature will not eat into the principle and will not remove more from the Permanent Fund real rate of return. He pointed out that Page 3, Line 6, had been amended adding the language: "The first 10 of the 11 fiscal years". That technical change was made to insure that the year-end data would add an additional fiscal year. In that way, by using the 11 years, the Legislature would be able to look back and take the 10-years in order to have the complete data for using as a comparison. He pointed out that on Page 3, Line 19, the Committee had previously adopted an amendment indicating that not more than 50% be allocated for public education and that language was left in the draft. Page 5, Line 18, Paragraph 2, provides notification language. The permanent fund check stub indicates that "X" amount of the check goes toward inflation proofing by the Legislature. If the Percent of Market Value is adopted, there will no longer be a principle to inflation proof, only the fund. The language was changed to read: (2) Disclose the amount of each dividend attributable to [Income earned by the Permanent Fund from] deposits to that fund required under art.IX, sec. 15. Constitution of the State of Alaska." Co-Chair Harris stated for the record that he maintains the percentage should be 60% for dividends and 40% to be used for education rather than the proposed 50/50 split. He said that he was not offering that as an amendment but wanted the record to indicate his intent. Representative Hawker concurred with Co-Chair Harris, stating that he looked forward to continuing the debate. He added, consideration should be made to the possibility of municipal revenue sharing. Representative Foster MOVED to report CS HB 298 (FIN) out of Committee with individual recommendations and with the accompanying fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. CS HB 298 (FIN) was reported out of Committee with "no recommendation" and with a new zero note by the Department of Revenue and zero note #1 by the Department of Revenue.