SENATE BILL NO. 19 "An Act relating to the crime of conspiracy." Representative Grussendorf expressed concern that the fiscal impact note by the Alaska Court System was reduced to zero. Representative Brown provided members with Amendment 1 (copy on file). She explained that Amendment 1 would prevent defendants from being convicted for the crime and the conspiracy of the crime. DEAN GUANELI, CHIEF ASSISTANT ATTORNEY, DEPARTMENT OF LAW spoke in opposition to Amendment 1. He pointed out that conspiracy is a separate crime. He emphasized that prosecutors may only be able to get a conviction for a separate lesser charge, although strong evidence of a conspiracy exists. He added that if a defendant's conviction is overturned on appeal there would be no penalty unless a second conviction exists. Mr. Guaneli pointed out that conspiracy would not be subjected to mandatory consecutive sentencing. (Tape Change, HFC 94-7, Side 2) SENATOR DONELY noted that charges could be stacked. Mr. Guaneli acknowledged that the judicial process will determine the interpretation of the sentencing for multiple count convictions including conspiracy. He noted that the Court of Appeals prevents excessive sentencing. He continued to discuss consecutive sentencing practices. Representative Brown MOVED to ADOPT AMENDMENT 1. Representative Hanley OBJECTED. A roll call vote was taken on the motion. IN FAVOR: Brown, Hoffman OPPOSED: Foster, Grussendorf, Hanley, Martin, Navarre, 6 Parnell, Therriault, Larson, MacLean Representative Martin was not present for the vote. The MOTION FAILED (2-8). Representative Brown provided members with Amendment 2 (copy on file). Representative Brown explained that Amendment 2 would provide that the prosecution would have to prove that a defendant communicated their agreement to others involved in the conspiracy. She observed that, under the current legislation, guilt could be inferred through circumstances. Mr. Guaneli spoke against Amendment 2. He pointed out that it is difficult to prove what words were spoken when the action takes place in secret. Representative Hanley expressed concern that the amendment would weaken the legislation. Senator Donely interjected that a defendant could be found to agree if they do not actively disagree. Members expressed concern that an individual's failure to share knowledge of a crime, due to fear of personal injury, would be interpreted as an agreement. BRANT MCGEE, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF PUBLIC ADVOCACY, DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION testified via the teleconference network from Anchorage. He suggested that "agree" be changed to "communicate agreement." Mr. Guaneli estimated that the change suggested by Mr. McGee would probably have the same effect as Amendment 2. Mr. Guaneli assured members that a defendants mere presence during contemplation of a crime would not be sufficient to obtain a conviction. Representative Brown MOVED to ADOPT AMENDMENT 2. Representative Hanley OBJECTED. A roll call vote was taken on the motion to ADOPT AMENDMENT 2. IN FAVOR: Brown, Hoffman, Grussendorf, Navarre, MacLean OPPOSED: Foster, Hanley, Martin, Parnell, Therriault, Larson The MOTION FAILED (5-6). HCS CSSB 19 (FIN)am was HELD in Committee for further discussion. 7