HB 135-MUNICIPAL FEES: POLICE & FIRE SERVICES Number 0076 CO-CHAIR MEYER announced that the first order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 135, "An Act relating to municipal fees for certain police protection services." [Before the committee was CSHB 135, version LS0421\F, Cook, 3/9/01, as amended.] REPRESENTATIVE GUESS, testifying as sponsor of HB 135, reminded the committee that at the last meeting a conceptual amendment was adopted that would insert language ensuring actual notice and consideration for appropriate corrective action in the ordinance. She pointed out that the committee packet should include an amendment that is based on the previously adopted conceptual amendment, this amendment was developed with the help of her office, Anchorage Assemblyman Tesche, and Tam Cook, Director, Legal and Research Services, Legislative Affairs Agency. The amendment is as follows: Page 1, line 13, following "AS 18.66.990.": Insert "An ordinance enacted under this section shall require actual notice to the property owner of police contacts and a warning that failure to take appropriate corrective action may result in the imposition of a fee. The ordinance shall also define "appropriate corrective action" and provide that the property owner is not liable for the fee if that action is promptly taken. [Original punctuation provided.] Number 0199 REPRESENTATIVE MURKOWSKI referred to the "warning" included in the amendment. She noted her appreciation of not being too specific so that the municipality can have enough flexibility to structure it for their needs. She related her understanding of the amendment as follows: "All we're saying is you've got to have actual notice, we don't care how it's delivered ..., and a warning and then we're leaving it up to the municipalities to define what appropriate corrective action can be." REPRESENTATIVE GUESS agreed with Representative Murkowski's understanding. She also agreed with Representative Murkowski that "promptly" is being left for the municipality to define. Number 0290 REPRESENTATIVE MURKOWSKI asked if this language addresses Representative Kerttula's concern regarding evictions. REPRESENTATIVE KERTTULA remarked, "It probably goes further than that because it would probably allow even things less than actual eviction." She indicated that the language seems to address her concerns. Number 0381 REPRESENTATIVE MURKOWSKI moved to report CSHB 135, version LS0421\F, Cook, 3/9/01, out of committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying zero fiscal note. There being no objection, CSHB 135(CRA) was reported from the House Community and Regional Affairs Standing Committee. The committee took a brief at-ease at 8:12 a.m. to 8:13 a.m. in order to pass the gavel to Co-Chair Morgan.