05/12/2022 03:30 PM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB123 | |
| HB297 | |
| HB163 | |
| HB118 | |
| HB268 | |
| HB87 | |
| Adjourn |
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 234 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 123 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 297 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 87 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 47 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 163 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 118 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 268 | TELECONFERENCED | |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
SENATE STATE AFFAIRS STANDING COMMITTEE
May 12, 2022
3:35 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Senator Mike Shower, Chair
Senator Mia Costello
Senator Roger Holland
Senator Scott Kawasaki
MEMBERS ABSENT
Senator Lora Reinbold, Vice Chair
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
HOUSE BILL NO. 123
"An Act providing for state recognition of federally recognized
tribes; and providing for an effective date."
- MOVED SCS HB 123(STA) OUT OF COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 297(HSS)(TITLE AM)
"An Act relating to the duties of the Department of Family and
Community Services; relating to child protection; and relating
to children of active duty military members."
- MOVED CSHB 297(HSS)(TITLE AM) OUT OF COMMITTEE
HOUSE BILL NO. 163
"An Act relating to vehicle title applications."
- HEARD & HELD
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 118(STA)(EFD AM)
"An Act relating to state identifications and driver's licenses
for persons in the custody of the Department of Corrections;
relating to the duties of the commissioner of corrections;
relating to living conditions for prisoners; and providing for
an effective date."
- HEARD & HELD
HOUSE BILL NO. 268 AM
"An Act relating to driver's license renewal."
- HEARD & HELD
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 87(JUD)
"An Act relating to electric-assisted bicycles."
- HEARD & HELD
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 234(STA) AM(EFD FLD)
"An Act relating to political contributions; relating to the
location of offices for the Alaska Public Offices Commission and
the locations at which certain statements and reports filed with
the commission are made available."
- SCHEDULED BUT NOT HEARD
HOUSE BILL NO. 47
"An Act renaming the Alaska Native Language Preservation and
Advisory Council as the Council for Alaska Native Languages; and
relating to the Council for Alaska Native Languages."
- SCHEDULED BUT NOT HEARD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HB 123
SHORT TITLE: STATE RECOGNITION OF TRIBES
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) ZULKOSKY
03/03/21 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
03/03/21 (H) TRB, STA
03/30/21 (H) TRB AT 8:00 AM DAVIS 106
03/30/21 (H) Heard & Held
03/30/21 (H) MINUTE(TRB)
04/01/21 (H) TRB AT 8:00 AM DAVIS 106
04/01/21 (H) Moved HB 123 Out of Committee
04/01/21 (H) MINUTE(TRB)
04/05/21 (H) TRB RPT 3DP 1NR
04/05/21 (H) DP: FIELDS, TARR, ZULKOSKY
04/05/21 (H) NR: CRONK
04/17/21 (H) STA AT 3:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
04/17/21 (H) Heard & Held
04/17/21 (H) MINUTE(STA)
04/22/21 (H) STA AT 3:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
04/22/21 (H) Moved HB 123 Out of Committee
04/22/21 (H) MINUTE(STA)
04/26/21 (H) STA RPT 5DP 1NR
04/26/21 (H) DP: VANCE, CLAMAN, STORY, TARR, KREISS-
TOMKINS
04/26/21 (H) NR: KAUFMAN
05/19/21 (H) LIMIT ALL DEBATE TO 2 MIN EACH Y23 N16
E1
05/19/21 (H) MOTION TO TABLE UC
05/19/21 (H) TAKEN FROM TABLE UC
05/19/21 (H) TRANSMITTED TO (S)
05/19/21 (H) VERSION: HB 123
01/18/22 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
01/18/22 (S) STA, CRA
02/10/22 (S) STA AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
02/10/22 (S) Heard & Held
02/10/22 (S) MINUTE(STA)
02/15/22 (S) CRA REFERRAL REMOVED
02/15/22 (S) STA AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
02/15/22 (S) Heard & Held
02/15/22 (S) MINUTE(STA)
03/03/22 (S) STA AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
03/03/22 (S) <Bill Hearing Canceled>
03/10/22 (S) STA AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
03/10/22 (S) -- MEETING CANCELED --
03/17/22 (S) STA AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
03/17/22 (S) Heard & Held
03/17/22 (S) MINUTE(STA)
03/31/22 (S) STA AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
03/31/22 (S) Heard & Held
03/31/22 (S) MINUTE(STA)
05/05/22 (S) STA AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
05/05/22 (S) Heard & Held
05/05/22 (S) MINUTE(STA)
05/12/22 (S) STA AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
BILL: HB 297
SHORT TITLE: MILITARY MEMBER CHILD PROTECTION
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) HOPKINS
01/31/22 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
01/31/22 (H) MLV, HSS
02/22/22 (H) MLV AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
02/22/22 (H) Heard & Held
02/22/22 (H) MINUTE(MLV)
02/24/22 (H) MLV AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
02/24/22 (H) Moved CSHB 297(MLV) Out of Committee
02/24/22 (H) MINUTE(MLV)
02/28/22 (H) MLV RPT CS(MLV) 6DP
02/28/22 (H) DP: CLAMAN, TARR, STORY, NELSON, SHAW,
TUCK
03/08/22 (H) HSS AT 3:00 PM DAVIS 106
03/08/22 (H) Heard & Held
03/08/22 (H) MINUTE(HSS)
03/10/22 (H) HSS AT 3:00 PM DAVIS 106
03/10/22 (H) Moved CSHB 297(HSS) Out of Committee
03/10/22 (H) MINUTE(HSS)
03/14/22 (H) HSS RPT CS(HSS) 5DP 2NR
03/14/22 (H) DP: MCCARTY, SPOHNHOLZ, FIELDS,
ZULKOSKY, SNYDER
03/14/22 (H) NR: KURKA, PRAX
03/24/22 (H) SESSION CANCELED 3/23 - ON 3/24
CALENDAR
03/24/22 (H) TECHNICAL SESSION 3/24 - ON 3/28
CALENDAR
03/28/22 (H) ADJOURNED TO 3/29 CALENDAR
03/31/22 (H) SESSION CANCELED 3/29 - ON 3/30
CALENDAR
03/31/22 (H) SESSION CANCELED 3/30 - ON 3/31
CALENDAR
03/31/22 (H) TECHNICAL SESSION 3/31 - ON 4/4
CALENDAR
04/04/22 (H) TRANSMITTED TO (S)
04/04/22 (H) VERSION: CSHB 297(HSS)(TITLE AM)
04/06/22 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
04/06/22 (S) STA, HSS
05/03/22 (S) HSS AT 1:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
05/03/22 (S) <Pending Referral>
05/03/22 (S) STA AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
05/03/22 (S) Heard & Held
05/03/22 (S) MINUTE(STA)
05/12/22 (S) STA AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
BILL: HB 163
SHORT TITLE: FORM OF SIGNATURE ON VEHICLE TITLE
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) SCHRAGE
04/05/21 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
04/05/21 (H) CRA, STA
04/13/21 (H) CRA AT 8:00 AM BARNES 124
04/13/21 (H) Heard & Held
04/13/21 (H) MINUTE(CRA)
04/15/21 (H) CRA AT 8:00 AM BARNES 124
04/15/21 (H) Moved HB 163 Out of Committee
04/15/21 (H) MINUTE(CRA)
04/16/21 (H) CRA RPT 6DP
04/16/21 (H) DP: MCCABE, PRAX, MCCARTY, DRUMMOND,
SCHRAGE, HANNAN
04/27/21 (H) STA AT 3:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
04/27/21 (H) Heard & Held
04/27/21 (H) MINUTE(STA)
04/29/21 (H) STA AT 3:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
04/29/21 (H) Heard & Held
04/29/21 (H) MINUTE(STA)
05/04/21 (H) STA AT 3:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
05/04/21 (H) Moved HB 163 Out of Committee
05/04/21 (H) MINUTE(STA)
05/05/21 (H) STA RPT 3DP 4NR
05/05/21 (H) DP: CLAMAN, STORY, KREISS-TOMKINS
05/05/21 (H) NR: EASTMAN, KAUFMAN, VANCE, TARR
05/05/21 (H) FIN REFERRAL ADDED AFTER STA
05/05/21 (H) BILL REPRINTED
05/14/21 (H) FIN RPT 9DP
05/14/21 (H) DP: ORTIZ, LEBON, CARPENTER, THOMPSON,
JOSEPHSON, JOHNSON, RASMUSSEN, MERRICK,
05/14/21 (H) FOSTER
05/14/21 (H) FIN AT 9:00 AM ADAMS 519
05/14/21 (H) Moved HB 163 Out of Committee
05/14/21 (H) MINUTE(FIN)
05/17/21 (H) TRANSMITTED TO (S)
05/17/21 (H) VERSION: HB 163
05/18/21 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
05/18/21 (S) STA
05/10/22 (S) STA AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
05/10/22 (S) -- MEETING CANCELED --
05/12/22 (S) STA AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
BILL: HB 118
SHORT TITLE: EXPANDING PRISONER ACCESS TO COMPUTERS
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) KREISS-TOMKINS
03/01/21 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
03/01/21 (H) STA
03/18/21 (H) STA AT 3:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
03/18/21 (H) Heard & Held
03/18/21 (H) MINUTE(STA)
03/23/21 (H) STA AT 3:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
03/23/21 (H) Heard & Held
03/23/21 (H) MINUTE(STA)
04/01/21 (H) STA AT 3:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
04/01/21 (H) Heard & Held
04/01/21 (H) MINUTE(STA)
04/27/21 (H) STA AT 3:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
04/27/21 (H) Heard & Held
04/27/21 (H) MINUTE(STA)
05/11/21 (H) STA AT 3:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
05/11/21 (H) -- MEETING CANCELED --
05/13/21 (H) STA AT 3:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
05/13/21 (H) Moved CSHB 118(STA) Out of Committee
05/13/21 (H) MINUTE(STA)
05/14/21 (H) STA RPT CS(STA) 6DP 1NR
05/14/21 (H) DP: CLAMAN, STORY, KAUFMAN, VANCE,
TARR, KREISS-TOMKINS
05/14/21 (H) NR: EASTMAN
02/02/22 (H) TECHNICAL SESSION 2/2 - ON 2/4 CALENDAR
02/04/22 (H) TRANSMITTED TO (S)
02/04/22 (H) VERSION: CSHB 118(STA)(EFD AM)
02/08/22 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/08/22 (S) STA
05/10/22 (S) STA AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
05/10/22 (S) -- MEETING CANCELED --
05/12/22 (S) STA AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
BILL: HB 268
SHORT TITLE: DRIVER'S LICENSE RENEWAL:MILITARY MEMBERS
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) MERRICK
01/18/22 (H) PREFILE RELEASED 1/14/22
01/18/22 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
01/18/22 (H) MLV
02/01/22 (H) MLV AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
02/01/22 (H) -- MEETING CANCELED --
02/08/22 (H) MLV AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
02/08/22 (H) Moved HB 268 Out of Committee
02/08/22 (H) MINUTE(MLV)
02/09/22 (H) MLV RPT 7DP
02/09/22 (H) DP: RAUSCHER, TARR, STORY, SHAW,
NELSON, CLAMAN, TUCK
02/14/22 (H) TRANSMITTED TO (S)
02/14/22 (H) VERSION: HB 268 AM
02/15/22 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/15/22 (S) STA
05/10/22 (S) STA AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
05/10/22 (S) -- MEETING CANCELED --
05/12/22 (S) STA AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
BILL: HB 87
SHORT TITLE: ELECTRIC-ASSISTED BICYCLES
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) WOOL
02/18/21 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/18/21 (H) TRA, JUD
04/20/21 (H) TRA AT 1:00 PM BARNES 124
04/20/21 (H) Heard & Held
04/20/21 (H) MINUTE(TRA)
04/27/21 (H) TRA AT 1:00 PM BARNES 124
04/27/21 (H) Moved HB 87 Out of Committee
04/27/21 (H) MINUTE(TRA)
04/28/21 (H) TRA RPT 4DP 2NR
04/28/21 (H) DP: DRUMMOND, HANNAN, MCKAY, MCCABE
04/28/21 (H) NR: CRONK, HOPKINS
05/03/21 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
05/03/21 (H) Heard & Held
05/03/21 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
05/05/21 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
05/05/21 (H) Heard & Held
05/05/21 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
05/07/21 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
05/07/21 (H) Moved CSHB 87(JUD) Out of Committee
05/07/21 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
05/10/21 (H) JUD RPT CS(JUD) 5DP 2AM
05/10/21 (H) DP: VANCE, KREISS-TOMKINS, DRUMMOND,
SNYDER, CLAMAN
05/10/21 (H) AM: EASTMAN, KURKA
05/19/21 (H) LIMIT ALL DEBATE TO 2 MIN EACH Y23 N16
E1
05/19/21 (H) TRANSMITTED TO (S)
05/19/21 (H) VERSION: CSHB 87(JUD)
05/19/21 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
05/19/21 (S) TRA, STA
02/03/22 (S) TRA AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
02/03/22 (S) Moved CSHB 87(JUD) Out of Committee
02/03/22 (S) MINUTE(TRA)
02/04/22 (S) TRA RPT 4DP 1NR
02/04/22 (S) DP: MYERS, BISHOP, MICCICHE, KIEHL
02/04/22 (S) NR: SHOWER
05/12/22 (S) STA AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
WITNESS REGISTER
REPRESENTATIVE TIFFANY ZULKOSKY
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Sponsor of HB 123.
REPRESENTATIVE GRIER HOPKINS
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Sponsor of HB 297.
REPRESENTATIVE CALVIN SCHRAGE
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Sponsor of HB 163.
RYAN JOHNSTON, Staff
Representative Calvin Schrage
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Presented the sectional analysis for HB 163
on behalf of the sponsor.
ED GRAVLEY, Chief Operations Officer (COO)
Matanuska Valley Federal Credit Union
Palmer, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified by invitation in support of HB
163.
DANIEL MCCUE
Alaska Credit Union League
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified by invitation in support of HB
163.
STEVE ALLWINE, Member
Alaska Auto Dealers Association (AADA)
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified by invitation in support of HB
163.
JEFFREY SCHMITZ, Director
Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV)
Department of Administration (DOA)
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the hearing on HB
163.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHATHAN KREISS-TOMKINS
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Sponsor of HB 118.
KELLY GOODE, Deputy Commissioner
Office of the Commissioner
Department of Corrections (DOC)
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the hearing on HB
118.
CLAIRE GROSS, Staff
Representative Jonathon Kreiss-Tomkins
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Presented the sectional analysis for HB 118.
REPRESENTATIVE KELLY MERRICK
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Sponsor of HB 268.
SORCHA HAZELTON, Staff
Representative Kelly Merrick
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Presented the sectional analysis for HB 268
on behalf of the sponsor.
JEFFREY SCHMITZ, Director
Division of Motor Vehicle
Department of Administration (DOA)
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the hearing on HB
268.
REPRESENTATIVE ADAM WOOL
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Sponsor of HB 87.
ASHLEY CARRICK, Staff
Representative Adam Wool
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Presented the sectional analysis and slide
presentation for HB 87 on behalf of the sponsor.
BRICE WILBANKS
Mayor Bronson's Office
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Suggested an amendment during the hearing on
HB 87.
ACTION NARRATIVE
3:35:07 PM
CHAIR MIKE SHOWER called the Senate State Affairs Standing
Committee meeting to order at 3:35 p.m. Present at the call to
order were Senators Kawasaki, Holland, Costello, and Chair
Shower.
HB 123-STATE RECOGNITION OF TRIBES
3:35:51 PM
CHAIR SHOWER announced the consideration of HOUSE BILL NO. 123
"An Act providing for state recognition of federally recognized
tribes; and providing for an effective date."
He stated that the committee adopted an amendment during the
last hearing and his intention today was to move the bill from
committee. He asked Representative Zulkosky if she had any final
comments.
3:36:24 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TIFFANY ZULKOSKY, Alaska State Legislature,
Juneau, Alaska, sponsor of HB 123, said it's been a privilege to
carry HB 123 and she appreciated the thoughtful hearings the
committee held about what the bill means to the Alaska Native
community and the State of Alaska. She opined that strengthening
the relationship between the state and tribes was long overdue.
CHAIR SHOWER commented that the process cleared up a lot of
misconceptions, but he believes there is more work to be done.
Finding no questions or comments, he solicited the will of the
committee.
3:37:55 PM
SENATOR HOLLAND moved to report HB 123, work order 32-LS0438\A,
as amended, from committee with individual recommendations and
attached fiscal note(s).
3:38:15 PM
CHAIR SHOWER found no objection and SCS HB 123(STA) was reported
from the Senate State Affairs Standing Committee.
3:38:20 PM
At ease
HB 297-MILITARY MEMBER CHILD PROTECTION
3:40:19 PM
CHAIR SHOWER reconvened the meeting and announced the
consideration of CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 297(HSS)(title am) "An
Act relating to the duties of the Department of Family and
Community Services; relating to child protection; and relating
to children of active duty military members."
He noted that this was the second hearing and the intention was
to move the bill from committee. He asked the sponsor if he had
any final comments.
3:40:54 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRIER HOPKINS, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau,
Alaska, sponsor of HB 297, recapped that the U.S. Department of
Defense (DoD) urges the state to pass this legislation. He noted
that, as requested, he reached out to former Representative
Tammie Wilson for her opinion of the bill. Her letter stating
strong support for the bill was forwarded to the committee on
th
May 42022.
CHAIR SHOWER said he'd like to hear any important points that
she might have made.
REPRESENTATIVE HOPKINS read the following from former
Representative Tammie Wilson:
After working with parents for many years, I know the
sooner wrap around services can be put into place, it
significantly lowers the chance that their children
will be removed. This will allow the Family Advocacy
Program to address any potential child abuse or
neglect allegations early on. It will not be a
duplication of services. ... Many of these services
can be provided through the Family Advocacy Program.
Please support this legislation.
CHAIR SHOWER said it provides him significant comfort to know
that she supports the legislation. He noted that DoD also
supports the legislation.
REPRESENTATIVE HOPKINS said the idea came from DoD and his
office was working with DoD on coordination.
3:42:55 PM
SENATOR HOLLAND expressed appreciation for the background that
provided context for why the Office of Children's Services may
have to get involved.
CHAIR SHOWER found no further questions or comments and
solicited the will of the committee.
3:43:47 PM
SENATOR HOLLAND moved to report HB 297, work order 32-
LS1249\I.A, from committee with individual recommendations and
attached fiscal note(s).
CHAIR SHOWER found no objection and CSHB 297(HSS)(title am) was
reported from the Senate State Affairs Standing Committee.
3:44:17 PM
At ease
HB 163-FORM OF SIGNATURE ON VEHICLE TITLE
3:45:44 PM
CHAIR SHOWER reconvened the meeting and announced the
consideration of HOUSE BILL NO. 163 "An Act relating to vehicle
title applications."
He noted that this was the first hearing.
3:46:22 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CALVIN SCHRAGE, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau,
Alaska, sponsor of HB 163, introduced the bill with a very brief
summary of the sponsor statement that read as follows:
House Bill 163 eliminates the current requirement for
ink signatures on applications for titles and title
transfers within the Department of Motor Vehicles. HB
163 gives flexibility to the DMV to begin using
electronic signatures.
HB 163 does not force the use of electronic
signatures. AS 28.10.211(b) states that "applications
for title or transfer of title must contain the
signature in ink of the owner, or if there is more
than one owner, the signature in ink of at least one
of the owners and the name of each owner stated in the
conjunctive or in the disjunctive." HB 163 deletes the
words "in ink" in both places.
Under the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act of 2004
(AS 09.80.010-09.80.195) electronic signatures satisfy
the general definition of a signature unless otherwise
prohibited. Since the current statute explicitly
requires "ink" signatures for title applications, the
DMV cannot accept electronic signatures.
HB 163 will give the Department the latitude to
determine for itself if it wants to accept electronic
signatures in the cases of title transfers and title
applications. Covid has taught us that electronic
signatures can provide extra convenience to Alaskans
in remote or rural parts of the state and can provide
long-term efficiencies for the DMV.
3:47:07 PM
SENATOR HOLLAND asked if there was a problem signing titles in
pencil.
REPRESENTATIVE SCHRAGE said he didn't believe a pencil signature
would be acceptable.
3:47:37 PM
RYAN JOHNSTON, Staff, Representative Calvin Schrage, Alaska
State Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, stated that HB 163 has one
section that removes the words "in ink" in two places from AS
28.10.211(b), which is for the application for title or transfer
of title of a vehicle. He advised that the fiscal note was
indeterminate because the Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV)
initially was unsure of the intent of the bill. The sponsor
clarified that the intent was to allow DMV to move at its own
pace in transitioning to electronic signatures. With that
information, DMV has been on the record stating that the bill
would have no fiscal impact.
CHAIR SHOWER turned to invited testimony.
3:48:48 PM
ED GRAVLEY, Chief Operations Officer (COO), Matanuska Valley
Federal Credit Union, Palmer, Alaska, testified by invitation in
support of HB 163. He said the credit union currently is able to
help credit union members do business regardless of where they
are in the state by using e-signatures. It's easier and a cost
saving measure. The missing link is to be able to use e-
signatures for DMV documents.
CHAIR SHOWER asked for an explanation of the process for the
credit union to use e-signatures.
MR. GRAVLEY said the credit union uses the service called
DocuSign that handles the entire process. It has out of bounds
questions that the members must authenticate and it records,
tracks, and stores the e-signatures. It's the same basic process
that is used for the permanent fund dividend applications.
CHAIR SHOWER commented that it's basically multi-factor
identification.
MR. GRAVLEY agreed and restated that out of bounds questions are
required.
3:51:17 PM
CHAIR SHOWER asked if the industry had any security concerns
about transitioning to e-signatures.
MR. GRAVLEY offered his belief that it was more secure when
there were out of bounds questions.
3:51:59 PM
DANIEL MCCUE, Alaska Credit Union League, Anchorage, Alaska,
testified by invitation in support of HB 163. He said this
change will open the door to technology changes that will
enhance the ability for the credit union to provide more timely
service to its members. This will also address the uncomfortable
situation that lenders faced during the pandemic when there was
a backlog of unprocessed titles because offices weren't open. He
called the bill a smart change that will allow DMV to look at
alternatives that will enhance its service to Alaskans.
CHAIR SHOWER asked if he concurred with Mr. Gravley's responses
to his questions.
MR. MCCUE said he covered it well; technology requires all
parties to ensure that security is at the highest level
possible. It's part of the review process.
3:53:47 PM
STEVE ALLWINE, Member, Alaska Auto Dealers Association (AADA),
Juneau, Alaska, testified by invitation in support of HB 163. He
said that striking the word "ink" from the application for title
statute will modernize, streamline, and provide greater
convenience to the motor vehicle purchase process. It also
enhances the ability of automotive retailers and lenders to
provide better service to people living in outlying areas of the
state. Electronic signatures are secure and lenders and
automotive retailers are already using them for the security
agreements and financial contracts, which are more important.
Allowing e-signatures falls in line with the steps that have
already been taken.
3:55:32 PM
SENATOR HOLLAND acknowledged that he was belaboring the point
about losing the permanent mark on a title. He asked Jeffrey
Schmitz with DMV if there were any implications to no longer
having a signature in ink on a vehicle title. He also asked if
there was anything in regulation about signatures in ink.
3:56:09 PM
JEFFREY SCHMITZ, Director, Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV)
Department of Administration (DOA), Anchorage, Alaska, stated
that there are more than 60 places in current Alaska statutes
that refer to certificate of title as an application for title
signed in ink. He said this is an exciting first step and he
understands the enthusiasm that industry has, but it's important
to be clear about what the bill does and does not do. HB 163
only removes the requirement for the title to be signed in ink.
This opens the door to the possibility for DMV to look at other
solutions, but this is not required. DMV's analysis is that a
feasibility study would need to be done before making any
changes. The requirement for a signature in ink serves as a
roadblock that impedes DMV's ability to look at any future
solutions.
SENATOR HOLLAND asked if DMV supports HB 163.
MR. SCHMITZ replied that DMV has a neutral stance on the bill.
CHAIR SHOWER asked if DMV had identified any problems it would
have in transitioning to electronic signatures on vehicle
titles.
MR. SCHMITZ replied that's difficult to ascertain in the absence
of a feasibility study. He relayed that multiple states are
conducting pilot programs and Alaska could possibly look at some
of those electronic solutions if the bill were to pass. He
acknowledged that this was a wave of the future and that there
likely was a solution but he didn't know what that might be at
this point.
CHAIR SHOWER asked if it was fair to say that a fiscal note from
DMV would include a study and whatever else might need to be
implemented.
MR. SCHMITZ responded that DMV submitted an indeterminate fiscal
note because implementing electronic signatures for vehicle
titles would entail more than the removal of "in ink" from the
statutes. DMV's estimate to build an electronic titling system
is in the neighborhood of $3.5 million. It would require a well
thought out and detailed project.
4:00:47 PM
SENATOR KAWASAKI asked if he envisions that an electronic
signature would be required on both the bill of sale and the
title transfer.
MR. SCHMITZ replied that DMV needs the signed title document to
perform the title transfer. He acknowledged that there was a
process if the title was missing.
SENATOR KAWASAKI said he didn't know whether DMV needed
direction from the legislature or the administration, but this
was the wave of the future and the state would do well to start
in that direction.
CHAIR SHOWER said he understands why the fiscal note is
indeterminate, but that leads to the question of whether the
legislature would need to provide an allocation to do the study.
He asked the sponsor if that had come up in discussion.
REPRESENTATIVE SCHRAGE replied that the understanding from the
start was that there would be a fiscal cost to transitioning to
e-signatures on vehicle transfers. HB 163 is a step in that
direction by simply removing the current requirement for the
signature to be in ink. He said the bill does not mandate DMV to
take this project on, but he would note that 36 other states had
removed the signature in ink requirement and 26 of those states
had looked at how to develop and enact such a process. HB 163
leaves the decision to DMV about when and whether to start the
process to put an electronic system in place.
CHAIR SHOWER said that makes sense.
4:04:22 PM
CHAIR SHOWER asked the sponsor if he had any final comments.
REPRESENTATIVE SCHRAGE restated that HB 163 removes the term "in
ink" from the statutes.
4:04:34 PM
CHAIR SHOWER held HB 163 in committee for future consideration.
HB 118-EXPANDING PRISONER ACCESS TO COMPUTERS
4:04:58 PM
CHAIR SHOWER announced the consideration of CS FOR HOUSE BILL
NO. 118(STA)(efd am) "An Act relating to state identifications
and driver's licenses for persons in the custody of the
Department of Corrections; relating to the duties of the
commissioner of corrections; relating to living conditions for
prisoners; and providing for an effective date."
4:05:20 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHATHAN KREISS-TOMKINS, Alaska State
Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, sponsor of HB 118, stated that the
bill is the result of informational hearings the House State
Affairs Committee held in conjunction with the Department of
Corrections to address recidivism and recidivism reduction.
There was complete agreement that it was in the best interest of
Alaska and society to have lower rates of offense and a few
changes could promote that outcome. He continued the
introduction of HB 118 speaking to the following sponsor
statement:
The intent of this bill is to remove the restriction
prohibiting a prisoner from possessing a computer in
their cell, expanding access to safe and secure
internet for purposes of rehabilitation and
reintegration, and provide prisoners with easier
access to state identification upon release.
HB 118 creates an easier process of reentry and
rehabilitation for inmates and lessens the risk of
reoffending. By allowing access to safe and secure
internet, inmates are better able to prepare
themselves for reentry into the outside world.
According to a study released by the Department of
Justice, 68% of prisoners are arrested again within
three years, 83% during the following nine years. One
of the key reasons for reoffending is the difficulty
prisoners face securing employment post incarceration.
Access to online job training, therapy and visitation
helps to alleviate the risk of reoffending.
Another important element of this bill is it provides
easier access to identification for prisoners upon
release, allowing them an important tool for
reintegration. Both expanding internet access for
prisoners and providing prisoners with easier access
to state identification help ease the difficulties of
reentry and will help to lower the risk of recidivism.
CHAIR SHOWER asked if there were questions for the bill sponsor.
SENATOR COSTELLO offered her understanding that the legislature
had passed legislation that stipulated that anyone who is
released from incarceration will be provided a state ID.
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS said he wasn't aware of that, but
he would defer to the representative from the Department of
Corrections (DOC).
4:08:36 PM
KELLY GOODE, Deputy Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner,
Department of Corrections (DOC), Anchorage, Alaska, stated that
there is nothing in statute that requires DOC to ensure that
prisoners have obtained a state ID before they are released from
prison. However, the department generally tries to help
individuals understand the process for getting a state ID after
they're released. It is in statute that DOC must provide a
voucher that individuals can take to DMV to pay for their
license or state ID.
SENATOR KAWASAKI referenced Section 3 and said it looks like the
existing statute says
(a) The commissioner shall
(11) assist a prisoner in obtaining a valid state
identification card if the prisoner does not have a
valid state identification card before the
prisoner's release;
He asked if that is what has been happening and if HB 118 places
sideboards on exactly what must be done.
MS. GOODE offered her view that it's the opposite. The "shall"
in the existing language refers to the voucher system, which
ensures that DOC provides an avenue for anyone who needs a state
ID to receive one. She added that the commissioner looked at
this extensively last year and learned that the number of people
who are released and do not already have an ID is very small.
She also reminded the committee that a significant number of
individuals who are incarcerated suffer from mental illness and
some of those individuals will never want an ID. Others have
alternative IDs that they prefer to use.
MS. GOODE said she believes the sponsor's intent is to ensure
that the Department of Corrections (DOC) works with the
Department of Administration (DOA) to find more ways to ensure
that prisoners being released have IDs if they want one.
CHAIR SHOWER requested the sectional analysis.
4:12:34 PM
CLAIRE GROSS, Staff, Representative Jonathon Kreiss-Tomkins,
Juneau, Alaska, read the sectional analysis for HB 118, version
I.A into the record.
Section 1
AS 18.65.310 Identification Cards
Amends AS 18.65.310 to require that the Department of
Administration (DOA) mail a state identification card
to a Department of Corrections (DOC) address upon
request by an applicant who is serving an active term
of imprisonment of more than 120 days.
Section 2
AS 28.15.101 Expiration and Renewal of Driver's
License
Amends AS 28.15.101 to require that the DOA mail a
driver's license renewed by mail to a DOC address upon
request by an applicant who is serving an active term
of imprisonment of more than 120 days. This section
does not require the DOA to issue new driver's
licenses
Section 3
AS 33.30.011 Duties of Commissioner
Amends AS 33.30.011 to require the DOC Commissioner
and the DOA Commissioner to make a good faith effort
to ensure prisoners serving an active term of
imprisonment of more than 120 days have a state
identification card upon release.
Section 4
AS 33.30.015 Living Conditions for Prisoners
Amends AS 33.30.015(a) by deleting the word "computer"
from the list of items a prisoner may not possess in
their cell, and by adding language to allow prisoners
to use a computer for purposes that facilitate their
rehabilitation or compliance with a reentry or case
plan, for legal reference materials, visitation, or
health care.
Section 5
AS 33.30.095 Duties of Commissioner Before Release of
Prisoner
Amends [AS 33.30.095] by requiring the program to
provide instruction on obtaining a state
identification if one or more prisoners will not
otherwise possess a valid state identification card
upon release.
Section 6
Establishes an effective date of January 1, 2023.
CHAIR SHOWER asked Ms. Gross to go over the fiscal note.
MS. GROSS stated that the Department of Corrections (DOC)
submitted a zero fiscal note for HB 118. DOC will be able to use
current technology to implement the bill. The analysis includes
the following statement:
Coordination with DOA regarding state identification
cards for prisoners can also be accomplished with no
fiscal impact. Therefore, a zero fiscal note is being
submitted.
4:15:37 PM
CHAIR SHOWER commented that it seems as though there would be
some cost associated with additional computer use and that
brings up the need to ensure they are secure and don't allow
access to such things as pornography.
He asked Ms. Goode to comment.
MS. GOODE said inmates already have access to computers in the
law library and education rooms. The bill doesn't affect those
computers. The bill addresses a computer in a cell. The No Frill
Prisons Act from the 1990s stated that an inmate could not have
a computer in their cell. DOC does not intend to have computers
in cells, but would like the ability to offer tablets that are
specially made for inmates. There is no cost because this would
go through the procurement process, and the inmate would pay for
their use, unless they were indigent. In that case, DOC would
pick up the cost. The system would be as safe as possible
because these special tablets have an internal wireless system
that is managed and monitored. The idea is to allow an inmate to
do things from their cell such as take an education program, an
anger management program, or finish their GED. The cost is
contained in the program itself.
CHAIR SHOWER asked who manages and monitors the system and if
there wouldn't be a cost to go through an RFP to a vender.
4:19:15 PM
MS. GOODE confirmed that DOC would go through the RFP
procurement process. A number of companies in the Lower 48
provide this service. The cost will be picked up by the inmates
who will pay to use the tablets. DOC has not implemented this in
the individual cells but could have them in general population
areas.
CHAIR SHOWER asked if the usage was already in the DOC budget.
MS. GOODE answered no; the inmates would pay for the tablets
when they pay to use the system.
CHAIR SHOWER asked how the inmates would pay.
MS. GOODE replied that would be determined based on the
procurement process, but it would work the same way that inmates
currently pay for phone calls.
CHAIR SHOWER asked how the inmates pay.
MS. GOODE replied there are several options. Many inmates work
at jobs within the facility and their earnings are booked and
available for use in the commissary, to make phone calls, and to
make orders that are within policy. Many inmates also receive
outside funding from any number of sources.
CHAIR SHOWER said he assumes that indigent prisoners would be
accommodated.
MS. GOODE answered yes, just as indigent inmates are
accommodated now with phone calls.
CHAIR SHOWER remarked that he believes this is an important part
of the rehabilitation process that may help to lower recidivism
rates.
4:23:13 PM
CHAIR SHOWER asked the sponsor if he had any additional
comments.
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS agreed with Ms. Goode that use of
these special tablets would be handled in the same way as the
prison phone call system, and that there is precedent from other
states about the successful use of these tablets in correctional
facilities.
CHAIR SHOWER asked what percentage of inmates are anticipated to
want to use one of these special tablets, and if there is any
data on how this may affect recidivism.
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS said that would be a good question
for the reentry community.
CHAIR SHOWER said it'd be nice to have that data from other
states.
He asked Ms. Goode what percentage of the prison population DOC
envisions might take advantage of this program.
MS. GOODE said she didn't have any data but anecdotal evidence
from other states that have implemented tablets is that there is
significant interest. She wasn't aware of data about recidivism,
but it's probably a good tool for inmates.
CHAIR SHOWER commented that his experience going through reentry
training made him aware of how difficult it is to succeed and
how easy it is to fail.
SENATOR COSTELLO noted the January 1, 2022 effective date needed
to be updated.
4:27:48 PM
At ease
4:28:42 PM
CHAIR SHOWER reconvened the meeting and held HB 118 in
committee.
HB 268-DRIVER'S LICENSE RENEWAL:MILITARY MEMBERS
4:28:51 PM
CHAIR SHOWER announced the consideration of HOUSE BILL NO. 268
am "An Act relating to driver's license renewal."
He asked Representative Merrick to introduce the bill.
4:29:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KELLY MERRICK, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau,
Alaska, sponsor of HB 268, stated this legislation came about
after a military member from Eagle River experienced difficulty
renewing his driver's license when he needed to after he
received orders to be stationed in Germany. Existing statute
allows a driver's license to be renewed within one year of
expiration. However, Germany required him to have a valid
driver's license for the full two years of his stay.
HB 268 will allow members of the military and their families to
renew their driver's license within two years of expiration if
they are stationed or on orders to be stationed abroad.
CHAIR SHOWER asked Ms. Hazelton to present the sectional.
4:30:08 PM
SORCHA HAZELTON, Staff, Representative Kelly Merrick, Alaska
State Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, presented the sectional
analysis for HB 268 on behalf of the sponsor.
Section 1 amends AS 28.15.101(a) to allow the renewal
of a driver's license within two years of expiration
for a member of the military and their family members
if the military member is deployed abroad, stationed
abroad, or under orders to be deployed abroad.
Section 2 adds a definition of military to Title 28.
In response to a question from the Chair, Ms. Hazelton confirmed
the fiscal note for HB 268 was zero.
SENATOR HOLLAND asked whether amending the statute to within two
years of expiration of the license for military members and
their families was sufficiently broad to cover other duty
stations abroad, not just Germany.
MS. HAZELTON replied that HB 268 was less about the duration of
the license after it's renewed and more about the time a
military member and their family are able to renew their license
before it expires.
SENATOR HOLLAND said he appreciates the bill but wonders about
catering too much to the military.
CHAIR SHOWER asked Mr. Schmitz if he had any response to Senator
Holland's question.
4:33:00 PM
JEFFREY SCHMITZ, Director, Division of Motor Vehicle (DMV),
Department of Administration (DOA), Anchorage, Alaska, stated
that DMV had been unable to confirm what had been reported about
the license requirements for military members being deployed or
stationed in Germany. He said this seems to be an isolated case.
4:34:06 PM
SENATOR HOLLAND said he worries about changing the statute for
what could be just one service member.
REPRESENTATIVE MERRICK agreed that the bill probably wouldn't
apply to very many service members, but since Alaska has one of
the largest military communities of any state, she thought it
was appropriate to help resolve issues service members may have
when and however possible.
SENATOR HOLLAND stated that he will support the bill.
CHAIR SHOWER said he agrees with Senator Holland's point about a
single member bill, but it can be a life altering event when
that one person has that particular problem. He relayed a
personal experience of being pulled over and nearly arrested in
England for driving with the wrong plates on his car. He stated
support for the bill as a way to make life easier for members of
the military and their families who have a problem that they
didn't cause.
4:37:05 PM
CHAIR SHOWER asked the sponsor if she had any closing comments.
REPRESENTATIVE MERRICK thanked the Chair and Senator Holland for
their service to the country and expressed hope that HB 268
would help service members who may encounter this problem.
4:37:36 PM
CHAIR SHOWER held HB 268 in committee.
HB 87-ELECTRIC-ASSISTED BICYCLES
4:37:55 PM
CHAIR SHOWER announced the consideration of CS FOR HOUSE BILL
NO. 87(JUD) "An Act relating to electric-assisted bicycles."
He noted that this was the first hearing.
4:38:13 PM
At ease
4:40:13 PM
CHAIR SHOWER reconvened the meeting.
4:40:33 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ADAM WOOL, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau,
Alaska, sponsor of HB 87, stated that this legislation defines
"electric bicycle" in statute as a mode of transportation that
does not have to be registered with the Division of Motor
Vehicles (DMV). E-bikes are separated from "electric personal
motor vehicle," "motor driven cycle," including motorcycles,
motor scooters, and "motor bicycles."
He relayed that 37 other states use this same standard language
and it is used by the Municipality of Anchorage.
CHAIR SHOWER asked whether Anchorage really needed this
legislation.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL replied that the Municipality of Anchorage
has already adopted this definition language, and the bill will
spread that definition statewide.
4:43:37 PM
ASHLEY CARRICK, Staff, Representative Adam Wool, Alaska State
Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, presented the sectional analysis
for HB 87 on behalf of the sponsor.
This bill amends Titles 19, 28, and 41 of the Alaska
Statutes.
Section 1 (page 1) Amends AS 19.10.399(9) to state
that the definition of motor vehicle excludes
electric-assisted bicycles
Section 2 (page 1) Amends AS 19.10.399 (16) to state
that electric-assisted bicycles are to be regulated as
bicycles in regards to operation on a way, path, or
area
Section 3 (page 1-2) Amends AS 28.05.011(a) states
that electric-assisted bicycles should be regulated as
bicycles in regards to rules of the road; also
includes electric-assisted bicycles under an existing
provision allowing municipal ordinances to separately
regulate in this area
Section 4 (page 2-3) Amends AS 28.10.011 to state that
an electric-assisted bicycle is not required to be
registered as a vehicle
Section 5 (page 3) Amends AS 28.90.990(a)(12) to state
that an electric-assisted bicycle does not fall under
the definition of an "electric personal motor vehicle"
Section 6 (page 4) Amends AS 28.90.990(a)(18) to state
that an electric-assisted bicycle does not fall under
the definition of a "motor vehicle"
Section 7 (page 4) Amends AS 28.90.990(a)(18) to state
that an electric-assisted bicycle does not fall under
the definition of a "motorcycle"
Section 8 (page 4) Amends AS 28.90.990(a)(20) to state
that an electric-assisted bicycle does not fall under
the definition of a "motor-driven cycle"
Section 9 (page 4) Amends AS 28.90.990(a)(33-36)
states that the term "bicycle" includes electric
assisted bicycles in the three following classes: (34)
Class 1: bicylces that assist only while the rider is
pedaling and that stop providing assistance at the
speed of 20 miles per hour, (35) Class 2: bicycles
that can propel whether or not the rider is pedaling
and that stop providing assistance at the speed of 20
miles per hour, and (36) Class 3: bicycles that assist
only while the rider is pedaling and that stop
providing assistance at the speed of 28 miles per
hour
Section 9 (page 4) Amends AS 28.90.990(a)(37) defines
electric-assisted bicycles as a bicycle that is
designed to travel with not more than three wheels in
contact with the ground, has fully operative pedals
for human propulsion, is equipped with an electric
motor that has a power output of not more than 750
watts, and includes Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3
electric-assisted bicycles
Section 10 (page 5) Amends AS 41.23.300 states that
"bicycling" includes the use of electric-assisted
bicycles, and that "electric-assisted bicycles" have
the meaning provided in the previous section
4:46:14 PM
MS. CARRICK stated that the use of electric-assisted bicycles is
relatively new in Alaska and there are no laws pertaining to
their use, operating and safety requirements, or definitions.
She began the presentation on slide 2 that states the goals of
HB 87:
1. Regulate electric-assisted bicycles as bicycles;
2. Update statute to reflect technological advances; and
3. Bring clarity to consumers and retailers on electric-
assisted bicycle laws
4:47:52 PM
MS. CARRICK discussed the proposed new definition for electric-
assistance bicycle outlined on slide 3:
A bicycle that is:
• Designed to travel with not more than three wheels in
contact with the ground
• Has fully operative pedals for human propulsion
• Is equipped with an electric motor that has a power
output of not more than 750 watts (1 hp)
Electric-bicycles are further defined by the following
three classes:
Class 1: bicycles that assist only while the rider is
pedaling and that stop providing assistance at the
speed of 20 miles per hour
Class 2: bicycles that can propel whether or not the
rider is pedaling and that stop providing assistance
at the speed of 20 miles per hour
Class 3: bicycles that assist only while the rider is
pedaling and that stop providing assistance at the
speed of 28 miles per hour
MS. CARRICK relayed that the industry and retailers requested
adding the description of the three classes to further define
electric-bicycles.
4:48:29 PM
MS. CARRICK turned to the color-coded state map of the U.S. on
slide 4 that shows the states colored green that had enacted
model legislation, the states colored yellow that had acceptable
legislation that regulated electric bikes as a bicycle, and
states colored red, like Alaska, whose laws were problematic or
confusing.
She pointed out that 37 (green) states had enacted model
legislation that included the three classes of electric
bicycles; several (yellow) states had laws that defined electric
bicycles, but not the three classes; and just four (red) states
that either had no language in statute about electric bicycles
or had problematic language. She noted that Alaska fell into
this last category.
MS. CARRICK pointed to the images on slide five that illustrate
what electric bikes are not, and advised that each was defined
elsewhere in statute.
E-Bikes are NOT:
Mopeds
Motor Scooters
Dirt Bikes
Segways
Motorcycles
Cars
Electric Wheelchairs
MS. CARRICK clarified that electric bicycles must have fully
operative pedals and an engine size that is not more than 750
watts.
4:49:47 PM
MS. CARRICK turned to the example of an electric-assisted
bicycle depicted on slide 6. The image illustrates that there is
an electric motor with a battery pack on the frame and fully
operable pedals. She highlighted that the industry continues to
make advances, one of which is to have the battery pack on the
inside of the frame. This makes for a much sleeker, more
sophisticated design, but it's not readily apparent that it's an
e-bike.
CHAIR SHOWER asked what the horse power (HP) equivalent is for
750 watts.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL answered it's equivalent to one HP.
CHAIR SHOWER referenced slide 4 and asked if the states colored
yellow that have acceptable laws allow e-bikes on the road, and
whether the states colored red that have problematic or
confusing laws do not allow e-bikes on the road.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL offered his understanding that the red
states have no definition of e-bike in statute, the yellow
states have a deviation of the model legislation, and the green
states have enacted the model legislation
CHAIR SHOWER said his understanding of Section 4 was that no DMV
registration or tag would be required for electric bicycles.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL said that's correct, just like the standard
bicycle.
CHAIR SHOWER asked Ms. Carrick to describe the fiscal note.
MS. CARRICK said the Department of Administration (DOA)
submitted a zero fiscal note. There is no fiscal impact to the
state.
4:52:56 PM
CHAIR SHOWER turned to invited testimony. He advised that he
invited Brice Wilbanks to talk about a possible amendment that
the Municipality of Anchorage would like.
4:54:06 PM
At ease
4:54:48 PM
CHAIR SHOWER reconvened the meeting and clarified that the
amendment he referenced earlier would be discussed today but not
offered.
4:55:09 PM
BRICE WILBANKS, Mayor Bronson's Office, Anchorage, Alaska,
relayed that the City of Anchorage would like to allow
additional mobile devices such as e-scooters to be operated
without a license from DMV. The proposed amendment would remove
the words "self-balancing" and "nontandem" and add the number
three in Section 5, page 3, lines 28-29. He said multiple
operators in Anchorage had made this request.
CHAIR SHOWER asked the sponsor if he had any comment on the
proposed amendment.
4:56:34 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL said he supports the amendment because it
does not affect the definition of e-bikes. The proposed
amendment would apply to the definition of "electric personal
motor vehicle" and is directed towards Segway scooters.
CHAIR SHOWER clarified that the committee was merely discussing
an idea for an amendment, and he wanted to hear from the bill
sponsor before moving forward. He asked the sponsor if the
change to apply to three wheels would require a title change.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL replied the definition of e-bikes in the
bill is up to three wheels.
4:59:03 PM
SENATOR HOLLAND reported that the term "nontandem definitely
refers to Segue type vehicles. He expressed appreciation for the
bill.
4:59:54 PM
CHAIR SHOWER held HB 87.
5:00:26 PM
At ease
5:01:07 PM
CHAIR SHOWER reconvened the meeting and acknowledged that there
wasn't time to hear the next bill.
5:01:43 PM
There being no further business to come before the committee,
Chair Shower adjourned the Senate State Affairs Standing
Committee meeting at 5:01 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| W.A.12.pdf |
SSTA 5/12/2022 3:30:00 PM |
HB 234 |
| 22-237lme.pdf |
SSTA 5/12/2022 3:30:00 PM |
HB 234 |
| 22-126boo.pdf |
SSTA 5/12/2022 3:30:00 PM |
HB 234 |
| W.A.8.pdf |
SSTA 5/12/2022 3:30:00 PM |
HB 234 |
| W.A.9.pdf |
SSTA 5/12/2022 3:30:00 PM |
HB 234 |
| W.A.10.pdf |
SSTA 5/12/2022 3:30:00 PM |
HB 234 |
| W.A.11.pdf |
SSTA 5/12/2022 3:30:00 PM |
HB 234 |
| HB123 B.pdf |
SSTA 5/12/2022 3:30:00 PM |
HB 123 |
| hb297 support Tammie Wilson.pdf |
SSTA 5/12/2022 3:30:00 PM |
HB 297 |