Legislature(2015 - 2016)BUTROVICH 205

03/17/2015 09:00 AM STATE AFFAIRS

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= SB 42 PERSONAL USE FISHING PRIORITY TELECONFERENCED
Moved SB 42 Out of Committee
-- Continued Public Testimony --
*+ SJR 15 CALL FOR US COUNTERMAND CONVENTION TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
-- Initial Presentation --
*+ SCR 4 US COUNTERMAND CONVENTION DELEGATES TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
-- Initial Presentation --
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
                    ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE                                                                                  
            SENATE STATE AFFAIRS STANDING COMMITTEE                                                                           
                         March 17, 2015                                                                                         
                           9:01 a.m.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
MEMBERS PRESENT                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Senator Bill Stoltze, Chair                                                                                                     
Senator John Coghill, Vice Chair                                                                                                
Senator Charlie Huggins                                                                                                         
Senator Bill Wielechowski                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
MEMBERS ABSENT                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Senator Lesil McGuire                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
COMMITTEE CALENDAR                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 15                                                                                                  
Making  application  to the  United  States  Congress to  call  a                                                               
convention of  the states to  propose a countermand  amendment to                                                               
the Constitution of  the United States as provided  under art. V,                                                               
Constitution of  the United States;  and urging  the legislatures                                                               
of the other 49 states to make the same application.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
     - HEARD AND HELD                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 4                                                                                              
Relating to the  duties of delegates selected  by the legislature                                                               
to  attend  a convention  of  the  states  called under  art.  V,                                                               
Constitution  of the  United States,  to  consider a  countermand                                                               
amendment to the Constitution of  the United States; establishing                                                               
as a joint  committee of the legislature  the Delegate Credential                                                               
Committee and relating to the  duties of the committee; providing                                                               
for  an  oath  for  delegates and  alternates  to  a  countermand                                                               
amendment convention;  providing for a chair  and assistant chair                                                               
of the  state's countermand  amendment delegation;  providing for                                                               
the  duties   of  the  chair   and  assistant   chair;  providing                                                               
instructions  for the  selection of  a convention  president; and                                                               
providing  specific language  for  the  countermand amendment  on                                                               
which  the state's  convention delegates  are  authorized by  the                                                               
legislature to vote to approve.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
     - HEARD AND HELD                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
SENATE BILL NO. 42                                                                                                              
"An Act providing priority to personal use fisheries when                                                                       
fishing restrictions are implemented to achieve a management                                                                    
goal."                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
     - MOVED SB 42 OUT OF COMMITTEE                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
BILL: SJR 15                                                                                                                  
SHORT TITLE: CALL FOR US COUNTERMAND CONVENTION                                                                                 
SPONSOR(s): SENATOR(s) STOLTZE                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
02/13/15       (S)       READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS                                                                        
02/13/15       (S)       STA, JUD                                                                                               
03/17/15       (S)       STA AT 9:00 AM BUTROVICH 205                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
BILL: SCR 4                                                                                                                   
SHORT TITLE: US COUNTERMAND CONVENTION DELEGATES                                                                                
SPONSOR(s): SENATOR(s) STOLTZE                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
02/13/15       (S)       READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS                                                                        
02/13/15       (S)       STA, JUD, FIN                                                                                          
03/17/15       (S)       STA AT 9:00 AM BUTROVICH 205                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
BILL: SB 42                                                                                                                   
SHORT TITLE: PERSONAL USE FISHING PRIORITY                                                                                      
SPONSOR(s): SENATOR(s) STOLTZE                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
02/04/15       (S)       READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS                                                                        
02/04/15       (S)       STA, RES                                                                                               
03/10/15       (S)       STA AT 8:30 AM BUTROVICH 205                                                                           
03/10/15       (S)       Heard & Held                                                                                           
03/10/15       (S)       MINUTE(STA)                                                                                            
03/17/15       (S)       STA AT 9:00 AM BUTROVICH 205                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
WITNESS REGISTER                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
STUART KRUEGER, Staff                                                                                                           
Representative Shelly Hughes                                                                                                    
Alaska State Legislature                                                                                                        
Juneau, Alaska                                                                                                                  
POSITION STATEMENT:  Presented SJR 15 and SCR 4, on behalf of                                                                 
Representative Hughes, sponsor of HJR 14 and HCR 4, House                                                                       
companion legislation.                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
MIKE COONS, National and State Director                                                                                         
Citizen Initiatives                                                                                                             
Palmer, Alaska                                                                                                                  
POSITION  STATEMENT:    Provided comments  during  discussion  of                                                             
SJR 15 and SCR 4.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
GEORGE PIERCE, representing himself                                                                                             
Kasilof, Alaska                                                                                                                 
POSITION STATEMENT:  Testified in opposition to SB 42.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
RICHARD BISHOP, representing himself                                                                                            
Fairbanks, Alaska                                                                                                               
POSITION STATEMENT:  Testified in favor of SB 42.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
GARY STEVENS, Member                                                                                                            
Board of Directors                                                                                                              
Alaska Outdoor Council (AOC)                                                                                                    
Chugiak, Alaska                                                                                                                 
POSITION STATEMENT:  Testified in support of SB 42.                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
AL BARRETTE, representing himself                                                                                               
Fairbanks, Alaska                                                                                                               
POSITION STATEMENT:  Testified in support of SB 42.                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
TOM BROOKOVER, Acting Director                                                                                                  
Division of Sport Fish                                                                                                          
Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G)                                                                                             
Anchorage, Alaska                                                                                                               
POSITION STATEMENT:  Responded to  questions during discussion of                                                             
SB 42.                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
ACTION NARRATIVE                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
9:01:13 AM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  BILL  STOLTZE called  the  Senate  State Affairs  Standing                                                             
Committee meeting to  order at 9:01 a.m.  Present  at the call to                                                               
order were Senators Huggins, Coghill, and Chair Stoltze.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
           SJR 15-CALL FOR US COUNTERMAND CONVENTION                                                                        
           SCR 4-US COUNTERMAND CONVENTION DELEGATES                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
9:01:34 AM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR STOLTZE [announced  that the first order  of business would                                                               
be  a hearing  on both  SENATE  JOINT RESOLUTION  NO. 15,  Making                                                               
application to  the United States  Congress to call  a convention                                                               
of  the  states  to  propose   a  countermand  amendment  to  the                                                               
Constitution  of the  United  States as  provided  under art.  V,                                                               
Constitution of  the United States;  and urging  the legislatures                                                               
of the other  49 states to make the same  application; and SENATE                                                               
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 4, Relating  to the duties of delegates                                                               
selected by the legislature to  attend a convention of the states                                                               
called  under  art. V,  Constitution  of  the United  States,  to                                                               
consider  a  countermand amendment  to  the  Constitution of  the                                                               
United  States;   establishing  as  a  joint   committee  of  the                                                               
legislature  the Delegate  Credential Committee  and relating  to                                                               
the duties of the committee;  providing for an oath for delegates                                                               
and alternates  to a countermand amendment  convention; providing                                                               
for  a  chair and  assistant  chair  of the  state's  countermand                                                               
amendment delegation; providing  for the duties of  the chair and                                                               
assistant chair;  providing instructions  for the selection  of a                                                               
convention  president; and  providing specific  language for  the                                                               
countermand amendment  on which the state's  convention delegates                                                               
are authorized by the legislature to vote to approve].                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
At ease from 9:02 a.m. to 9:04 a.m.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
9:04:31 AM                                                                                                                    
STUART  KRUEGER,  Staff,  Representative  Shelly  Hughes,  Alaska                                                               
State Legislature,  on behalf  of Representative  Hughes, sponsor                                                               
of HJR  14 and HCR  4, House companion legislation,  relayed that                                                               
SJR 15  and SCR 4  would together  address an application  by the                                                               
State  of  Alaska to  pursue  a  constitutional convention  under                                                               
powers granted  by Article  V of the  Constitution of  the United                                                               
States.  Under the  proposed resolutions,  however, the  proposed                                                               
constitutional convention is  supposed to be limited  to just one                                                               
subject,  that  being  what  he referred  to  as  a  "countermand                                                               
amendment" as  outlined in SCR  4.  He offered  his understanding                                                               
that such  an amendment  to the  U.S. Constitution  would provide                                                               
the states with "veto power" over federal law.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI joined the committee meeting.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
MR.  KRUEGER, referring  to SCR  4, paraphrased  the language  on                                                               
page 11, line 14, through page 12, line 16, which read:                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
     "Section 1.  The  Article restores State sovereignty in                                                                  
     our   Constitutional   Republic  by   providing   State                                                                    
     Legislatures Countermand authority.                                                                                        
     "Section 2.   State Legislatures in  the several States                                                                  
     shall  have the  authority to  Countermand and  rescind                                                                    
     any    Congressional   Statute,    Judicial   decision,                                                                    
     Executive    Order,    Treaty,   government    agency's                                                                    
     regulatory  ruling, or  any  other  government or  non-                                                                    
     government  mandate (including  excessive spending  and                                                                    
     credit)  imposed on  them  when in  the  opinion of  60                                                                    
     percent  of  State  Legislatures   the  law  or  ruling                                                                    
     adversely  affects their  States' interest.   When  the                                                                    
     Countermand  threshold has  been  reached,  the law  or                                                                    
     ruling   shall   be   immediately   and   automatically                                                                    
     nullified  and repealed.    This Countermand  authority                                                                    
     shall also apply to existing laws and rulings.                                                                             
     "Section 3.   From the time the  initial Countermand is                                                                  
     issued by  a State Legislature, the  other Legislatures                                                                    
     shall  have  18  months  to  complete  the  Countermand                                                                    
     process.   If the Countermand process  is not completed                                                                    
     in  18 months,  then the  law or  ruling that  is being                                                                    
     challenged shall remain enforceable.                                                                                       
     "Section  4.   Each  State  Legislature shall  complete                                                                  
     their  Countermand affidavit  and  deliver a  certified                                                                    
     copy to the Chief Justice  of the United States Supreme                                                                    
     Court,  the Leader  of the  United  States Senate,  the                                                                    
     Speaker of the House  of Representatives, the President                                                                    
     of  the   United  States,   and  when   applicable  the                                                                    
     Government Agency or Body that is being challenged.                                                                        
     "Section 5.   Congress shall have the  power to enforce                                                                  
     this Article by appropriate legislation.                                                                                   
     "Section 6.  Individual  States shall have authority to                                                                  
     prosecute violators  of this  Article under  State laws                                                                    
     in  the absence  of Federal  prosecution after  90 days                                                                    
     from  the  date of  the  alleged  violation.   Multiple                                                                    
     prosecutions, by multiple States,  for the same alleged                                                                    
     crime are prohibited.                                                                                                      
     "Section 7.   The Article shall be  immediately part of                                                                  
     the  United States  Constitution  upon ratification  by                                                                    
     three  quarters  of  the   State  Legislatures  in  the                                                                    
     several States.                                                                                                            
     "Section  8.    The  provisions  of  this  Article  are                                                                  
     enforceable  within  the  United  States,  which  shall                                                                    
     include the  Several States, the District  of Columbia,                                                                    
     the Commonwealth  of Puerto  Rico, the  Commonwealth of                                                                    
     the Northern  Mariana Islands  and the  territories and                                                                    
     possessions of the United States.";                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
MR. KRUEGER indicated that the  concepts embodied in the proposed                                                               
resolutions were brought forth by  Mike Coons and an organization                                                               
called  Citizen  Initiatives, and  offered  his  belief that  the                                                               
resolutions' proposed  countermand amendment to  the Constitution                                                               
of the United States could be  viewed as a nonpartisan issue.  In                                                               
response to  a question,  he indicated  that [if  the resolutions                                                               
are  passed,  and  a  constitutional  convention  addressing  the                                                               
proposed countermand  amendment is convened, and  ratification of                                                               
the  proposed change  to the  Constitution of  the United  States                                                               
occurs, then] any state in  disagreement with a federal law could                                                               
seek  repeal/nullification   of  that  law  through   a  specific                                                               
process.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
9:13:06 AM                                                                                                                    
MIKE  COONS, National  and State  Director, Citizen  Initiatives,                                                               
opined that  a countermand amendment  to the Constitution  of the                                                               
United States is sorely needed,  indicated that an application to                                                               
Congress to call a constitutional  convention must still be made,                                                               
and  mentioned  that  the  resolutions'  proposed  constitutional                                                               
convention is defined in one of  the resolutions.  He, too, noted                                                               
that  the  resolutions'  proposed  constitutional  convention  is                                                               
supposed  to be  limited to  just  the subject  of a  countermand                                                               
amendment to  the Constitution of  the United States.   Referring                                                               
to  what he  termed  a "credentials  committee,"  he offered  his                                                               
understanding that it would be  appointed by the State of Alaska,                                                               
and  would   control  the  delegates,  including   picking  them,                                                               
overseeing them, and responding to their questions.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
MR.  COONS, in  response  to a  request,  offered a  hypothetical                                                               
example  involving state  and federal  lands, and  predicted that                                                               
with ratification of a countermand  amendment to the Constitution                                                               
of  the United  States, resolutions  passed by  the states  would                                                               
then have the  force of law.  In response  to questions involving                                                               
other hypothetical  examples, he, too, offered  his understanding                                                               
that  [if  the  resolutions  are  passed,  and  a  constitutional                                                               
convention  addressing  the  proposed  countermand  amendment  is                                                               
convened,  and  ratification  of   the  proposed  change  to  the                                                               
Constitution  of  the  United  States  occurs,  then]  states  in                                                               
disagreement with  a federal law could  seek repeal/nullification                                                               
of that law.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  COGHILL, mentioning  "federal overreach,"  characterized                                                               
the   resolutions'   proposed   countermand  amendment   to   the                                                               
Constitution of the United States as  a tool to be used by states                                                               
that disapprove of federal law, and expressed support.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR HUGGINS  predicted that should the  resolutions' proposed                                                               
countermand amendment  to the Constitution  of the  United States                                                               
be ratified, it would not be used in his lifetime.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  WIELECHOWSKI cautioned  against allowing  a majority  of                                                               
the states  to overturn U.S.  Supreme Court  decisions, venturing                                                               
that had  the resolutions' proposed countermand  amendment to the                                                               
Constitution of  the United States  been ratified in the  past, a                                                               
majority of  the states  could have  gotten together  to overturn                                                               
the  significant civil-rights  decisions  that have  been made  -                                                               
decisions such as ending segregation, for example.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
[SCR 4 and SJR 15 were held in committee.]                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
At ease from 9:43 a.m. to 9:35 a.m.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
              SB 42-PERSONAL USE FISHING PRIORITY                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
9:35:23 AM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR STOLTZE  announced that the  final order of  business would                                                               
be SENATE  BILL NO.  42, "An Act  providing priority  to personal                                                               
use  fisheries  when  fishing  restrictions  are  implemented  to                                                               
achieve a management goal."                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR STOLTZE, sponsor,  explained that under SB 42,  in times of                                                               
shortages,  personal  use fisheries  would  be  given a  priority                                                               
after subsistence use fisheries, and  that the Board of Fisheries                                                               
would make allocation determinations.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
9:37:47 AM                                                                                                                    
GEORGE PIERCE, representing  himself, said he opposes  SB 42, and                                                               
used the  term, "overreach" to  describe the Board  of Fisheries.                                                               
He offered  his beliefs that  so-called "personal  use fisheries"                                                               
have already  been ruled unconstitutional  by the  Alaska Supreme                                                               
Court,  and that  by  providing for  such  fisheries, the  Alaska                                                               
State  Legislature  and  the Board  of  Fisheries  are  therefore                                                               
breaking the law.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
9:42:02 AM                                                                                                                    
RICHARD BISHOP,  representing himself,  testified in favor  of SB
42.   He  offered his  understanding that  Alaska's personal  use                                                               
fishery is the  largest Alaska-resident fishery in  the state and                                                               
constitutes  an  important  source  of  wild  foods  for  various                                                               
peoples  in the  state, particularly  those with  limited income.                                                               
Noting  that  Article   I,  Section  23,  of   the  Alaska  State                                                               
Constitution   specifically   says    that   the   Alaska   State                                                               
Constitution   does  not   prohibit  the   State  from   granting                                                               
preferences, on  the basis of  Alaska residence, to  residents of                                                               
the State  over non-residents, he offered  his understanding that                                                               
personal use  fisheries are an  instance where such  a preference                                                               
has been  granted.  In conclusion,  he ventured that SB  42 would                                                               
ensure that the  people who want access to  Alaska's personal use                                                               
fisheries  can  continue   to  have  access  by   being  given  a                                                               
preference.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
9:45:37 AM                                                                                                                    
GARY STEVENS, Member, Board of  Directors, Alaska Outdoor Council                                                               
(AOC),  said he  is in  support of  SB 42  because he  is of  the                                                               
opinion  that Alaska's  personal  use fisheries  are really  just                                                               
subsistence use fisheries for Alaska  residents that live in what                                                               
he  termed,  "non-subsistence   areas";  personal  use  fisheries                                                               
should therefore  be given the  same priority as  subsistence use                                                               
fisheries.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
9:46:33 AM                                                                                                                    
AL BARRETTE,  representing himself, said  he is in support  of SB
42, and considers  it to be a  long time coming.   Noting that he                                                               
is an  "Interior guide" and uses  what he called "the  Chitna dip                                                               
netery," and  remarking that he  would like  to be able  to catch                                                               
more fish than  he is currently allotted, he ventured  that SB 42                                                               
would provide  statutory guidance to  the Board of  Fisheries for                                                               
prioritizing fisheries other than  subsistence use fisheries.  He                                                               
opined that  personal use fisheries  are really  just subsistence                                                               
use fisheries occurring in urban areas of Alaska.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR  STOLTZE, after  ascertaining that  no one  else wished  to                                                               
testify, closed public testimony on SB 42.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
9:51:26 AM                                                                                                                    
TOM  BROOKOVER,   Acting  Director,   Division  of   Sport  Fish,                                                               
Department of  Fish and Game  (ADF&G), in response  to questions,                                                               
confirmed that the  ADF&G has not taken a position  on SB 42, and                                                               
explained that personal use fisheries  are regulated by the Board                                                               
of Fisheries.   He then paraphrased portions of  5 AAC 77.001(a),                                                               
which read:                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
     5 AAC 77.001. Intent and application of this chapter                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
     (a) The Board of Fisheries finds that                                                                                      
          (1) before the enactment of the state's                                                                               
     subsistence  priority  law in  ch.  151,  SLA 1978,  an                                                                    
     individual  could  fulfill that  individual's  personal                                                                    
     use   needs   for   fish  under   subsistence   fishing                                                                    
     regulations;                                                                                                               
          (2) the state's subsistence priority law changed                                                                      
     the  definition of  subsistence  in a  manner that  now                                                                    
     precludes  some   individuals  from   participating  in                                                                    
     customary  and  traditional subsistence  fisheries  and                                                                    
     efficiently harvesting fish for their personal use;                                                                        
          (3) there presently are areas of the state with                                                                       
     harvestable  surpluses  of  fish   in  excess  of  both                                                                    
     spawning  escapement   needs  and  present   levels  of                                                                    
     subsistence, commercial and sport uses; and                                                                                
          (4) it is necessary to establish a fishery                                                                            
     classified as "personal use" because                                                                                       
               (A) since the sale of fish is not                                                                                
     appropriate  or  permissible,  this fishery  cannot  be                                                                    
     classified as commercial;                                                                                                  
               (B) since the use is not a customary and                                                                         
     traditional use,  this fishery cannot be  classified as                                                                    
     subsistence; and                                                                                                           
               (C) since the gear for this fishery is often                                                                     
     different from that  historically associated with sport                                                                    
     fishing,  this fishery  should not  be classified  as a                                                                    
     sport fishery, to prevent confusion among the public.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MR.  BROOKOVER,  offering his  understanding  that  5 AAC  77.001                                                               
became  effective in  1982,  noted that  the  Board of  Fisheries                                                               
considers  certain  criteria  for  the  allocation  of  resources                                                               
between  the   personal  use,  sport  use,   and  commercial  use                                                               
fisheries.   In response to  further questions, he  provided some                                                               
allocation  statistics for  some personal  use fisheries  in some                                                               
locations during some times.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR  STOLTZE mentioned  that  the ADF&G  has  submitted a  zero                                                               
fiscal note for SB 42.                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR COGHILL offered  his belief that SB  42's proposed change                                                               
would  be  allowed  under  the  Alaska  State  Constitution,  and                                                               
characterized it as a good approach.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
10:06:44 AM                                                                                                                   
SENATOR  HUGGINS moved  to report  SB  42 out  of committee  with                                                               
individual  recommendations and  attached  fiscal  notes.   There                                                               
being  no  objection, SB  42  was  moved  from the  Senate  State                                                               
Affairs Standing Committee.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
10:07:35 AM                                                                                                                   
There being  no further  business to  come before  the committee,                                                               
Chair  Stoltze  adjourned  the   Senate  State  Affairs  Standing                                                               
Committee at 10:07 a.m.                                                                                                         

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
SB42 ADF&G Provided - Res and Nonres Commercial Fishing Statistics.pdf SSTA 3/17/2015 9:00:00 AM
SB 42
SB42 Support Document - ADF&G Personal Use Statewide Regulations.pdf SSTA 3/17/2015 9:00:00 AM
SB 42
SB42 Support Document - Letter Chitina Dipnetters Association 3-15-15.pdf SSTA 3/17/2015 9:00:00 AM
SB 42
SB42 Opposition Document - Letter Alaska Trollers Association 3-16-15.pdf SSTA 3/17/2015 9:00:00 AM
SB 42
SJR15 Support Document - Letter Louisiana Senator A.G. Crowe.pdf SSTA 3/17/2015 9:00:00 AM
SJR 15
SJR15 Support Document - Letter North Dakota Rep Alan Fehr.pdf SSTA 3/17/2015 9:00:00 AM
SJR 15
SJR15 Support Documents - Emails 3-16-15.pdf SSTA 3/17/2015 9:00:00 AM
SJR 15
SJR15 Support Document - Charles Kacprowicz Commentary.pdf SSTA 3/17/2015 9:00:00 AM
SJR 15
SCR4 Support Document - Letter Citizens Initiatives (Charles Kacprowicz).pdf SSTA 3/17/2015 9:00:00 AM
SJR 15
SJR15 Support Document - New Hampshire Resolution.pdf SSTA 3/17/2015 9:00:00 AM
SJR 15
SJR15 Support Document - New Mexico Resolution.pdf SSTA 3/17/2015 9:00:00 AM
SJR 15
SJR15 Fiscal Note LEG-SESS 3-16-15.pdf SSTA 3/17/2015 9:00:00 AM
SJR 15
SCR4 Fiscal Note LEG-SESS 3-16-15.pdf SSTA 3/17/2015 9:00:00 AM
SCR 4
SJR15 Sponsor Statement.pdf SSTA 3/17/2015 9:00:00 AM
SJR 15
SCR4 Sponsor Statement.pdf SSTA 3/17/2015 9:00:00 AM
SCR 4
SCR 4 Sectional Summary.pdf SSTA 3/17/2015 9:00:00 AM
SCR 4
SB42 Opposition Documents - Emails & Written Testimony 3-16-15.pdf SSTA 3/17/2015 9:00:00 AM
SB 42
SB42 Support Documents - Emails 3-17-15.pdf SSTA 3/17/2015 9:00:00 AM
SB 42
SCR4 Support Document - Charles Kacprowicz Commentary.pdf SSTA 3/17/2015 9:00:00 AM
SCR 4
SCR4 Support Document - Email Mike Coons 3-26-15.pdf SSTA 3/17/2015 9:00:00 AM
SCR 4
SCR4 Support Document - Letter Citizens Initiatives (Charles Kacprowicz).pdf SSTA 3/17/2015 9:00:00 AM
SCR 4