Legislature(2025 - 2026)BUTROVICH 205
04/11/2025 03:30 PM Senate RESOURCES
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB114 | |
| SB130 | |
| SB135 | |
| Confirmation Hearing(s): Big Game Commercial Services Board | |
| SB128 | |
| SB139 | |
| SJR19 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 128 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 139 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SJR 19 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 114 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 130 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 135 | TELECONFERENCED | |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
SENATE RESOURCES STANDING COMMITTEE
April 11, 2025
3:30 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Senator Cathy Giessel, Chair
Senator Bill Wielechowski, Vice Chair
Senator Matt Claman
Senator Forrest Dunbar
Senator Shelley Hughes
Senator Robert Myers
MEMBERS ABSENT
Senator Scott Kawasaki
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
SENATE BILL NO. 114
"An Act relating to an in-state natural gas pipeline developed
by the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation; and providing for
an effective date."
- MOVED SB 114 OUT OF COMMITTEE
SENATE BILL NO. 130
"An Act relating to the fisheries product development tax
credit; providing for an effective date by amending the
effective date of sec. 2, ch. 31, SLA 2022; and providing for an
effective date."
- MOVED CSSB 130(RES) OUT OF COMMITTEE
SENATE BILL NO. 135
"An Act relating to the sharing of tax revenue from the
fisheries business tax and fishery resource landing tax with
municipalities; relating to municipal reports on the shared tax
revenue; and providing for an effective date."
- MOVED CSSB 135(RES) OUT OF COMMITTEE
CONFIRMATION HEARING:
Big Game Commercial Services Board
Aaron Bloomquist - Palmer
Martin Boniek - Glennallen
Keegan McCarthy - Juneau
- CONFIRMATION ADVANCED
SENATE BILL NO. 128
"An Act establishing the Department of Agriculture; relating to
the establishment of the Department of Agriculture; transferring
functions of the Department of Natural Resources related to
agriculture to the Department of Agriculture; and providing for
an effective date."
- HEARD & HELD
SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO. 139
"An Act relating to who may own or hold certain land; relating
to certain agreements having to do with critical infrastructure;
and providing for an effective date."
- HEARD & HELD
SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 19
Urging the United States Congress to honor the terms of the
Mineral Leasing Act and the Alaska Statehood Act and provide the
state with a 90 percent share of all bonuses, royalties, and
rentals received by the federal government from the Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge and the National Petroleum Reserve in
Alaska.
- HEARD & HELD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: SB 114
SHORT TITLE: GAS PIPELINE FAIRBANKS SPUR
SPONSOR(s): SENATOR(s) CRONK
02/28/25 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/28/25 (S) RES, FIN
03/21/25 (S) RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
03/21/25 (S) Scheduled but Not Heard
04/07/25 (S) RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
04/07/25 (S) Heard & Held
04/07/25 (S) MINUTE(RES)
04/11/25 (S) RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
BILL: SB 130
SHORT TITLE: FISHERIES PROD DEVELOPMENT TAX CREDIT
SPONSOR(s): RULES BY REQUEST OF TASK FORCE EVAL ALASKA SEAFOOD
INDUSTRY
03/12/25 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
03/12/25 (S) RES, FIN
03/31/25 (S) RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
03/31/25 (S) Heard & Held
03/31/25 (S) MINUTE(RES)
04/09/25 (S) RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
04/09/25 (S) Heard & Held
04/09/25 (S) MINUTE(RES)
04/11/25 (S) RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
BILL: SB 135
SHORT TITLE: REFUND OF FISH BUSINESS TAX TO MUNIS
SPONSOR(s): RULES BY REQUEST OF TASK FORCE EVAL ALASKA SEAFOOD
INDUSTRY
03/18/25 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
03/18/25 (S) RES, FIN
03/31/25 (S) RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
03/31/25 (S) Heard & Held
03/31/25 (S) MINUTE(RES)
04/09/25 (S) RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
04/09/25 (S) Heard & Held
04/09/25 (S) MINUTE(RES)
04/11/25 (S) RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
BILL: SB 128
SHORT TITLE: CREATE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SPONSOR(s): RULES
03/12/25 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
03/12/25 (S) RES, FIN
03/28/25 (S) RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
03/28/25 (S) Heard & Held
03/28/25 (S) MINUTE(RES)
04/04/25 (S) RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
04/04/25 (S) Heard & Held
04/04/25 (S) MINUTE(RES)
04/11/25 (S) RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
BILL: SB 139
SHORT TITLE: LAND; OWNERSHIP RESTRICTIONS; AG LAND
SPONSOR(s): HUGHES
03/19/25 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
03/19/25 (S) RES, JUD
04/02/25 (S) SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE INTRODUCED-REFERRALS
04/02/25 (S) RES, JUD
04/11/25 (S) RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
BILL: SJR 19
SHORT TITLE: ANWR & NAT'L PETRO RESERVE: STATE SHARE
SPONSOR(s): BJORKMAN
04/10/25 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
04/10/25 (S) RES
04/11/25 (S) RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
WITNESS REGISTER
PAUL MENKE, Staff
Senator Mike Cronk
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Provided a brief overview of SB 114 on
behalf of the sponsor.
TIM LAMKIN, Staff
Senator Gary Stevens
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Commented during discussion of amendments to
SB 130.
TIM LAMKIN, Staff
Senator Gary Stevens
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Commented during discussion of amendments to
SB 135.
AARON BLOOMQUIST, Appointee
Big Game Commercial Services Board
Palmer, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified as the governor's appointee to the
Big Game Commercial Services Board.
MARTIN BONIEK, Appointee
Big Game Commercial Services Board
Glennallen, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified as the governor's appointee to the
Big Game Commercial Services Board.
KEEGAN MCCARTHY Appointee
Big Game Commercial Services Board
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified as the governor's appointee to the
Big Game Commercial Services Board.
INTIMAYO HARBISON, Staff
Senator Cathy Giessel
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Explained Amendment 1 to SB 128.
LEONARDO WASSILIE, representing self
Nenana, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of SB 128.
CHUOL MUT, Legislative Intern
Senator Shelley Hughes
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Gave a presentation on SB 139.
WES WARD, Secretary of Agriculture
State of Arkansas
Little Rock Arkansas
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of SB 139.
KENDELL CULP, representing self
Indianapolis, Indiana
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of SB 139.
SCOTT SHARP, representing self
Ashland, Kentucky
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of SB 139.
DAVID KRUMM, representing self
Big Lake, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of SB 139.
SENATOR MIKE SHOWER, District E
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of SB 139.
SENATOR JESSE BJORKMAN, District D
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Sponsor of SJR 19.
ACTION NARRATIVE
3:30:44 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL called the Senate Resources Standing Committee
meeting to order at 3:30 p.m. Present at the call to order were
Senators Hughes, Myers, Dunbar, and Chair Giessel. Senators
Wielechowski and Claman arrived immediately thereafter.
SB 114-GAS PIPELINE FAIRBANKS SPUR
3:32:08 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 114
"An Act relating to an in-state natural gas pipeline developed
by the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation; and providing for
an effective date."
3:32:37 PM
PAUL MENKE, Staff, Senator Mike Cronk, Alaska State Legislature,
Juneau, Alaska, said SB 114 would create a spur to the City of
Fairbanks and the Fairbanks North Star Borough as part of an
Alaska liquified natural gas (LNG) pipeline project.
3:32:54 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL noted that public testimony was previously left
open. She found no further public testimony.
3:33:08 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL closed public testimony on SB 114.
3:33:15 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL solicited the will of the committee.
3:33:31 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI moved to report SB 114, work order 34-
LS0683\A, from committee with individual recommendations and
attached fiscal note(s). He gave authorization for Legislative
Legal Services to make technical and conforming changes.
3:33:46 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL found no objection and SB 114 was reported from
the Senate Resources Standing Committee.
SB 130-FISHERIES PROD DEVELOPMENT TAX CREDIT
3:34:05 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 130
"An Act relating to the fisheries product development tax
credit; providing for an effective date by amending the
effective date of sec. 2, ch. 31, SLA 2022; and providing for an
effective date."
CHAIR GIESSEL asked Senator Wielechowski if he would like to
offer amendment A.1.
3:34:40 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI said not at this time.
3:35:02 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL solicited a motion.
3:35:05 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI moved to adopt [Amendment 1], work order
34-LS0735\A.2.
34-LS0735\A.2
Gunther/Bullard
4/10/25
AMENDMENT 1
OFFERED IN THE SENATE BY SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI
TO: SB 130
Page 1, following line 4:
Insert a new bill section to read:
"* Section 1. AS 43.05.230(m) is amended to read:
(m) The number of recipients and the total
amount of tax credits claimed for each species [TYPE]
of eligible fish under AS 43.75.037 is public
information. In this subsection, "eligible fish" has
the meaning given in AS 43.75.037(k)."
Page 1, line 5:
Delete "Section 1"
Insert "Sec. 2"
Renumber the following bill sections accordingly.
Page 2, following line 8:
Insert a new bill section to read:
"* Sec. 4. AS 43.75.037(j) is amended to read:
(j) To claim a credit under this section, a
taxpayer shall agree that the department may make
public the number of recipients and the total amount
of tax credits claimed for each species [TYPE] of
eligible fish. Notwithstanding any contrary provision
in AS 40.25.100 or AS 43.05.230, the number of
recipients and the total amount of tax credits claimed
for each species [TYPE] of eligible fish is public
information."
Renumber the following bill sections accordingly.
3:35:08 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL objected for purposes of discussion.
3:35:13 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI explained that Amendment 1 clarifies that
businesses must report the number of recipients and the amount
of tax credit for each species of fish and shellfish. This would
ensure that the Legislative Finance Division has the data needed
to evaluate the tax credit. He explained that Legislative
Finance previously evaluated the tax credit (2021) and found
that it was effective for salmon; however, the data for herring
was insufficient. The legislature added a disclosure of data
requirement in 2022 that included each type of fish. SB 130
expands the tax credit to any species of fish or shellfish. He
surmised that recipients may interpret the tax credit data
requirement to mean an aggregate of the various fish and
shellfish (rather than reporting for individual species). He
reiterated that Amendment 1 would clarify that the reporting
requirement must be provided for each species.
3:36:23 PM
At ease.
3:36:30 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL reconvened the meeting and invited comments on
[Amendment 1].
3:36:46 PM
TIM LAMKIN, Staff, Senator Gary Stevens, Alaska State
Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, expressed appreciation for and
indicated support of [Amendment 1].
3:36:59 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL removed her objection; she found no further
objection and [Amendment 1] was adopted.
3:37:06 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL noted that public testimony on SB 130 was
previously held open. She found no further public testimony.
3:37:36 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL closed public testimony on SB 130.
3:37:38 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL solicited the will of the committee.
3:37:41 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI moved to report SB 130, work order 34-
LS0735\A, as amended, from committee with individual
recommendations and attached fiscal note(s). He gave
authorization for Legislative Legal Services to make technical
and conforming changes.
3:37:56 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL found no objection and CSSB 130(RES) was reported
from the Senate Resources Standing Committee.
SB 135-REFUND OF FISH BUSINESS TAX TO MUNIS
3:38:08 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 135
"An Act relating to the sharing of tax revenue from the
fisheries business tax and fishery resource landing tax with
municipalities; relating to municipal reports on the shared tax
revenue; and providing for an effective date."
3:38:25 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL solicited a motion.
3:38:33 PM
SENATOR HUGHES moved to adopt Amendment 1, work order 34-
LS0768\A.1.
34-LS0768\A.1
Bullard
4/10/25
AMENDMENT 1
OFFERED IN THE SENATE BY SENATOR HUGHES
TO: SB 135
Page 4, following line 9:
Insert a new bill section to read:
"* Sec. 6. AS 43.75.130 is amended by adding a new
subsection to read:
(i) A municipality that receives a payment under
this section shall use 10 percent of the funds
received under this section to support or enhance
commercial fishing."
Renumber the following bill sections accordingly.
Page 4, line 22:
Delete "sec. 6"
Insert "sec. 7"
Page 5, line 25:
Delete "sec. 9"
Insert "sec. 10"
Page 7, line 9:
Delete "sec. 11"
Insert "sec. 12"
Page 8, line 19:
Delete "sec. 13"
Insert "sec. 14"
Page 8, line 25:
Delete "a new subsection"
Insert "new subsections"
Page 8, following line 31:
Insert new material to read:
"(g) A municipality that receives a payment
under this section shall use 10 percent of the funds
received under this section to support or enhance
commercial fishing.
* Sec. 17. AS 43.75.130(i) and AS 43.77.060(g) are
repealed."
Renumber the following bill sections accordingly.
Page 9, line 5:
Delete "Sections 8 and 15"
Insert "Sections 9 and 16"
Page 9, line 6:
Delete "7, 10, 12, and 14"
Insert "8, 11, 13, 15, and 17"
Page 9, line 7:
Delete "secs. 17 and 18"
Insert "secs. 19 and 20"
3:38:36 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL objected for purposes of discussion.
3:38:39 PM
SENATOR HUGHES acknowledged previous testimony from Alaska
Marine Lines (AML) that requested freedom for communities to use
the tax collected as they see fit. She said that community
revenue sharing addresses this. She pointed out that SB 135 was
brought forward by the Seafood Industry Task Force to help the
industry. She opined that it is important to ensure those funds
are used to benefit the industry. She explained that Amendment 1
would require that 10 percent of the funds (rather than the full
60 percent the communities receive) be used on projects that
directly benefit the seafood industry. She stated that Amendment
1 does not include an additional reporting requirement. She
explained that she attempted to keep the language broad enough
to allow for general application by inland communities (e.g. the
funds could be used for a road to the airport).
SENATOR HUGHES reiterated that Amendment 1 is intended to ensure
that the funds received from the tax credit are used on projects
directly related to the seafood industry. She said that the
fishing industry requested SB 135 to increase community support
for the industry. She opined that it is important to honor that
request. She pointed out that the commercial fishing industry
faces seasonal uncertainties; therefore, community support for
the industry is important. She recalled that the tax credit
distribution was previously 10 percent to communities and 90
percent to the State of Alaska. She indicated that the
distribution later changed to a 50/50 split. SB 135 would adjust
this even further, giving 60 percent to communities and 40
percent to the state. She acknowledged that the State of Alaska
is experiencing fiscal strain; however, she indicated that
supporting the seafood industry is a positive investment.
3:40:47 PM
SENATOR DUNBAR expressed a willingness to support Amendment 1.
He recalled his experience growing up around commercial
fishermen in Cordova and surmised that they would encourage him
to support this amendment. He directed attention to the phrase,
"to support or enhance commercial fishing" and stated that this
language offers a broad interpretation. He offered an example to
illustrate how the fishing industry benefits from infrastructure
that may seem unrelated. He expressed hope that Amendment 1
would be interpreted broadly and that this would give
communities flexibility. He pointed out that the amendment
applies to ten percent of the 60 percent communities would
receive, which is a relatively small amount. He stated that, for
those reasons, he would support Amendment 1. He added that he
would offer two amendments that may address the concerns of AML.
3:42:47 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL invited the sponsor of SB 135 to comment on
Amendment 1.
3:42:56 PM
TIM LAMKIN, Staff, Senator Gary Stevens, Alaska State
Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, said the sponsor does not object to
Amendment 1 or to any forthcoming amendments.
3:43:09 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL removed her objection. She found no further
objection and [Amendment 1] was adopted.
3:43:18 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL solicited a motion.
3:43:20 PM
SENATOR DUNBAR moved to adopt [Amendment 2], work order 34-
LS0768\A.2.
34-LS0768\A.2
Nauman/Bullard
4/10/25
AMENDMENT 2
OFFERED IN THE SENATE BY SENATOR DUNBAR
TO: SB 135
Page 1, line 9, following "facilities":
Insert ", if the municipality operates harbor
facilities"
Page 5, line 5, following "AS 43.75.130 - 43.75.137":
Insert ", if the municipality operates a harbor"
Page 8, line 30, following "revenue":
Insert ", if the municipality operates a harbor"
3:43:26 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL objected for purposes of discussion.
3:43:28 PM
SENATOR DUNBAR said that Amendment 2 is in response to concerns
brought forward by AML relating to communities that receive the
tax credit but do not have harbor facilities. He stated that
this amendment would add language to specify the intent for the
funds if a community has harbor facilities. If the community
does not have harbor facilities, the funds can be used in other
ways.
3:44:07 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL removed her objection; she found no further
objection and [Amendment 2] was adopted.
3:44:18 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL solicited a motion.
3:44:23 PM
SENATOR DUNBAR moved to adopt Amendment 3, work order 34-
LS0768\A.3.
34-LS0768\A.3
Wallace/Bullard
4/10/25
AMENDMENT 3
OFFERED IN THE SENATE BY SENATOR DUNBAR
TO: SB 135
Page 4, line 29:
Delete "Not"
Insert "Except as provided in (c) of this
section, not"
Page 5, following line 7:
Insert a new subsection to read:
"(c) A report is not required under this section
if 10 percent of the total tax revenue a municipality
receives under AS 43.75.130 - 43.75.137 is less than
$1,000."
Page 8, line 25:
Delete "a new subsection"
Insert "new subsections"
Page 8, following line 31:
Insert a new subsection to read:
"(g) A report is not required under this section
if 10 percent of the total tax revenue a municipality
receives under this section is less than $1,000."
3:44:25 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL objected for purposes of discussion.
3:44:27 PM
SENATOR DUNBAR expressed concerns regarding the wording of
Amendment 3. He said he would like to offer a conceptual
amendment to Amendment 3.
3:44:46 PM
SENATOR DUNBAR explained that the conceptual amendment would
correct a drafting error that resulted from a miscommunication
between himself, Alaska Marine Lines (AML), and Legislative
Legal Services. He briefly discussed the error in Amendment 3.
He pointed out that $1,000 is ten percent of $10,000; therefore,
the language could be simplified to "is less than $10,000."
3:45:14 PM
[SENATOR DUNBAR moved to adopt Conceptual Amendment 1 to
Amendment 3.]
CONCEPTUAL AMENDMENT 1 to AMENDMENT 3
Page 1, line 7:
Delete "10 percent of"
Page 1, line 8:
Delete "$1,000"
Insert "$10,000"
Page 1, line 16:
Delete "10 percent of"
Page 1, line 17:
Delete "$1,000"
Insert "$10,000"
[CHAIR GIESSEL objected for purposes of discussion.]
3:45:42 PM
SENATOR DUNBAR explained the intent behind Conceptual Amendment
1 to Amendment 3. He emphasized that reports are costly and take
time. Some communities receive a very small amount from the tax
credit (in some cases as little as $300). For those communities,
the cost of writing a report is greater than the amount
received. He surmised that $10,000 is a reasonable cutoff for
the reporting requirement. He pointed out that this is a new
reporting requirement.
3:46:37 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL directed attention to lines 14-17 of Amendment 3
and asked whether the conceptual amendment changes would also
apply to that section.
3:46:46 PM
SENATOR DUNBAR replied yes. He clarified that the same changes
would be made to both sections (lines 7-8 and 16-17) of
Amendment 3. This would remove "10 percent of" and change
"$1,000" to "$10,000" in both sections.
3:47:02 PM
SENATOR CLAMAN agreed that some communities receive a very small
amount from the tax credit. He recalled the change made by
Amendment 1 and asked whether designating how the money can be
spent is necessary for communities that only receive $100. He
opined that it is reasonable for larger amounts (e.g. $10,000).
He briefly discussed the anti-dedicated funds provisions in the
Constitution of the State of Alaska. He acknowledged that his
comments are not directly related to Amendment 3; however, he
shared that the discussion of Amendment 3 (which emphasizes that
some communities receive small amounts and therefore would
remove the reporting requirement) has brought up additional
questions regarding the need for Amendment 1.
3:47:52 PM
SENATOR DUNBAR replied that there is a push and pull between the
desire to give communities the maximum flexibility to use the
funds while ensuring communities spend the funds responsibly. He
agreed that the legislature cannot dedicate funds; however, he
suggested that intent language is useful. He shared his
understanding that similar intent language is already in statute
(e.g. intent language related to the alcohol tax).
CHAIR GIESSEL brought the discussion back to Amendment 3.
SENATOR DUNBAR encouraged support of Amendment 3.
[The committee treated Conceptual Amendment 1 to Amendment 3 as
adopted.]
3:48:46 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL removed her objection to [Amendment 3], as
amended.
CHAIR GIESSEL found no further objection and [Amendment 3], as
amended, was adopted.
3:49:20 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL opened public testimony on SB 135; finding none,
she closed public testimony.
3:49:34 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL solicited the will of the committee.
3:49:37 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI moved to report SB 135, work order 34-
LS0786\A, as amended, from committee with individual
recommendations and attached fiscal note(s). He gave
authorization for Legislative Legal Services to make technical
and conforming changes.
3:49:52 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL found no objection and CSSB 135(RES) was reported
from the Senate Resources Standing Committee.
^CONFIRMATION HEARING(S): Big Game Commercial Services Board
CONFIRMATION HEARING:
BIG GAME COMMERCIAL SERVICES BOARD
3:50:09 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL announced the consideration of the governor's
appointees to the Big Game Commercial Services Board.
3:51:31 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL asked Mr. Bloomquist to tell the committee about
himself and his interest in serving on the Big Game Commercial
Services Board (BGCSB).
3:51:58 PM
AARON BLOOMQUIST, Appointee, Big Game Commercial Services Board
(BGCSB), Palmer, Alaska, said he is the current board chair and
holds one of the guide seats. He has guiding operations in the
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), in Wrangell-St. Elias
National Park and Preserve, and on Kodiak Island. He has served
one full term on BGCSB (4 years). He was active with the board
in various advisory committee capacities for 20 years prior to
this. He shared that he has several board-related projects
(addressing board efficiency) that he would like to complete. He
indicated that it is difficult to find good staff and expressed
hope that the current board staff would remain. He stated that
he spends hundreds of hours per year on board projects. He said
he was available to answer questions.
3:53:30 PM
SENATOR CLAMAN asked Mr. Bloomquist his perspective on the
independence of BGCSB.
3:53:42 PM
MR. BLOOMQUIST asked to hear the question again.
3:53:52 PM
SENATOR CLAMAN repeated the question. He clarified that he is
asking about the board's level of independence in its decision-
making. He contrasted this with a board that makes decisions at
someone's instruction.
3:53:59 PM
MR. BLOOMQUIST opined that the board is very independent. He
shared his belief that this independence is due to the make-up
of the board, which includes a wide range of industry members
and others. He explained that the board chair is usually also a
guide and estimated that roughly 90 percent of licensees are
guides. The remainder are transporters. He noted that BGCSB also
contains public members and public landowners. He noted that the
latter typically represent corporations and there is often only
one of those seats filled at any time. He emphasized the
diversity of the board. He acknowledged that special interests
do sometimes lobby BGCSB but indicated that lobbyists do not
impact board decisions. He reiterated that it is an independent
board that generally runs smoothly.
3:55:49 PM
SENATOR HUGHES expressed appreciation for Mr. Bloomquist's
contributions to the board, as well as to conservation efforts
and guiding disabled veterans.
3:56:47 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL asked Mr. Boniek to tell the committee about
himself and his interest in serving on the Big Game Commercial
Services Board (BGCSB).
3:56:54 PM
MARTIN BONIEK, Appointee, Big Game Commercial Services Board
(BGCSB), Glennallen, Alaska, said he operates Copper Valley Air
Services and gave a brief overview of that company. He indicated
that he holds a transporter seat on BGCSB. He said transporters
fall into two categories: marine transporters and air taxis. He
is an air taxi transporter. He opined that having representation
on the board is beneficial to the constituents who are air taxi
transporters. He said there is also a marine transporter on
BGCSB. He shared that his first term on the board involved a
great deal of experiential learning and surmised that this would
likely continue in the second term. He indicated that others
have not shown interest in taking over his seat on the board and
expressed a willingness to continue in his appointed position.
3:58:47 PM
SENATOR MYERS asked how many air taxis and marine transporters
BGCSB licenses.
3:59:04 PM
MR. BONIEK replied that he does not know. He noted that state
and federal regulations do not require air taxis hauling
incidental hunting operations to hold a special license.
However, state regulations do require a transporter license for
air taxis that charge a different than normal rate for a
particular flight.
4:00:37 PM
SENATOR CLAMAN asked Mr. Boniek's perspective on the
independence of the Board.
MR. BONIEK said he agreed with Mr. Bloomquist. He opined that
the board is very independent and said he has not heard of any
outside pressure that would impact decision-making. Some
constituents have opinions for or against certain ideas;
however, there is no organized lobby for transporters (unlike
what other boards may experience). He opined that it is valuable
to have public input on decisions and added that the board holds
public hearings at most meetings. He stated that he would like
to see more public hearings.
4:02:21 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL asked Mr. McCarthy to tell the committee about
himself and his interest in serving on the Big Game Commercial
Services Board.
4:02:42 PM
KEEGAN MCCARTHY Appointee, Big Game Commercial Services Board,
Juneau, Alaska, said that he is a new appointee to the board. He
has attended several meetings and is honored to be an appointee.
He shared a brief history of his experience working in the
fishing and hunting industries. He emphasized his work as a
hunting guide in several locations across the state. In 2005, he
started a business specializing in boat-based hunting
operations. He emphasized that he is actively involved in the
industry and is a member of several national and international
conservation organizations. He is active with the Alaska
Professional Hunters Association. He shared that hunting ethics
and conservation are paramount to his work. He expressed
excitement for the opportunity to bring a new perspective while
learning and working with the board to perpetuate the industry.
4:04:26 PM
SENATOR CLAMAN noted that Mr. McCarthy indicated previous
criminal convictions on his application and asked for more
information.
4:04:40 PM
MR. MCCARTHY replied that one was plea agreement in 2006 or 2007
for a Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) violation
for improper permitting while commercial fishing. He explained
that it resulted from a miscommunication with the processor and
roughly 20 others received the same violation. He said he was
harvesting salmon roe and did not know that a special DEC permit
was needed. He explained that he pled guilty and was placed on
probation for two years (this was referred to as a suspended
sentence). He stated that he has not had any significant
violations since.
4:05:47 PM
SENATOR CLAMAN shared his understanding that this is considered
a "suspended imposition of sentence" for which Mr. McCarthy
completed probation. He suggested that, while Mr. McCarthy was
convicted, this allows him to declare that he has not been
convicted of any crime.
4:06:03 PM
MR. MCCARTHY replied that this is his understanding. He said
that he recently spoke with court representatives who informed
him that he is not required to mention the suspended sentence;
however, he chose to acknowledge it to provide full
transparency.
4:06:22 PM
SENATOR CLAMAN expressed appreciation that Mr. McCarthy
disclosed this information even though it was not required. He
opined that the willingness to share this information is a
positive indication of how Mr. McCarthy dealt with that
situation.
4:06:40 PM
SENATOR MYERS stated that court records indicate a previous
charge related to the failure to seal a bear. He asked for more
information.
MR. MCCARTHY replied that, at the time, he was told this was the
equivalent of a parking ticket. He explained that it was not a
misdemeanor, and he did not go to court; rather, he paid a $100
fine. He said that the fine resulted from confusion. He said
that in Juneau Ward Air ships bear hides, and he briefly
described that process. He explained that for the time in
question, Ward Air accidentally left one bear hide in the
freezer. He sent the hide in for sealing as soon as the error
was discovered. As the owner of the business, he offered to take
on the fine. He reiterated that his legal council informed him
that this was the equivalent of a parking ticket.
4:08:20 PM
SENATOR MYERS noted previous appointees who became defensive
when asked about past criminal convictions (and were ultimately
rejected as appointees) and expressed appreciation for Mr.
McCarthy's openness.
4:08:54 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL solicited a motion.
4:08:57 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI stated that [in accordance with AS
39.05.080], the Senate Resources Standing Committee reviewed the
following and recommends the appointments be advanced to a joint
session for consideration:
Big Game Commercial Services Board
Aaron Bloomquist - Palmer
Martin Boniek - Glennallen
Keegan McCarthy - Juneau
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI reminded members that signing the report(s)
regarding appointments to boards and commissions in no way
reflects individual members' approval or disapproval of the
appointees; the nominations are merely advanced to the full
legislature for confirmation or rejection.
4:09:22 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL noted that she had not opened public testimony
prior to the motion. She then opened public testimony on the
confirmation of Aaron Bloomquist, Martin Boniek and Keegan
McCarthy to the Big Game Commercial Services Board. Finding
none, she closed public testimony.
4:09:47 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL affirmed the advancement of the governor's
appointees to the full legislature for consideration.
SB 128-CREATE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
4:09:54 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 128
"An Act establishing the Department of Agriculture; relating to
the establishment of the Department of Agriculture; transferring
functions of the Department of Natural Resources related to
agriculture to the Department of Agriculture; and providing for
an effective date."
4:10:29 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL solicited a motion.
4:10:58 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI moved to adopt Amendment 1, work order 34-
LS 0694\N.2
34-LS0694\N.2
Bullard
4/7/25
AMENDMENT 1
OFFERED IN THE SENATE BY SENATOR GIESSEL
TO: SB 128
Page 20, following line 28:
Insert new material to read:
"Article 1. Administration."
Page 21, line 14:
Delete "Department of Agriculture"
Insert "department"
Page 21, line 29:
Delete "of agriculture"
Page 21, line 31:
Delete "Department of Agriculture"
Insert "department"
Page 21, following line 28:
Insert a new section to read:
"Sec. 44.38.030. Division of mariculture. The
division of mariculture is established in the
department to support and promote mariculture farms
and hatcheries in the state. The commissioner shall
control and supervise the division of mariculture. In
this section, "mariculture" has the meaning given in
AS 16.10.945."
Page 21, line 29:
Delete "Sec. 44.38.030"
Insert "Sec. 44.38.040"
Page 21, following line 31:
Insert new material to read:
"Article 2. General Provisions.
Sec. 44.38.900. Definitions. In this chapter,
(1) "commissioner" means the commissioner
of agriculture;
(2) "department" means the Department of
Agriculture."
4:11:01 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL objected for purposes of discussion.
4:11:16 PM
INTIMAYO HARBISON, Staff, Senator Cathy Giessel, Alaska State
Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, explained that [Amendment 1] to SB
128 would create a new Division of Mariculture within the
Department of Agriculture. This Division would focus on
mariculture issues within the state.
4:11:33 PM
SENATOR MYERS recalled that mariculture currently falls under
the purview of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G).
He asked if Amendment 1 would create a new division or move the
existing division from ADF&G to the Department of Agriculture.
4:11:54 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL replied that the intention is to move the existing
division from ADF&G to the Department of Agriculture.
4:11:59 PM
MR. HARBISION shared his understanding that Amendment 1 would
move the Division of Mariculture from ADF&G to the Department of
Agriculture.
4:12:23 PM
SENATOR DUNBAR expressed appreciation that Amendment 1 uses the
term "mariculture" rather than "aquatic farm."
4:12:31 PM
SENATOR HUGHES recalled a recent discussion that added
"mariculture" to the definition of "seafood" for the Alaska
Seafood Marketing Institute (ASMI). She asked how Amendment 1
would fit with that change.
4:12:46 PM
MR. HARBISON replied that Amendment 1 does not propose to move
ASMI to the Department of Agriculture. He indicated that there
is general agreement that ASMI is better suited for the
Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development
(DCCED).
4:13:32 PM
SENATOR HUGHES asked if mariculture products would be eligible
for the Alaska Grown label.
4:13:45 PM
MR. HARBISON surmised that mariculture products would be
eligible; however, he pointed out that the Department of
Agriculture would decide whether to extend the Alaska Grown
label to proposed mariculture products.
4:14:11 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL removed her objection to [Amendment 1].
4:14:19 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL found no further objection and [Amendment 1] was
adopted.
4:14:22 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL solicited a motion.
4:14:27 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI moved to adopt Amendment 2, work order 34-
LS 0694\N.3.
34-LS0694\N.3
Bullard
4/8/25
AMENDMENT 2
OFFERED IN THE SENATE BY SENATOR GIESSEL
TO: SB 128
Page 20, following line 28:
Insert new material to read:
"Article 1. Administration."
Page 21, line 14:
Delete "Department of Agriculture"
Insert "department"
Page 21, line 29:
Delete "of agriculture"
Page 21, line 31:
Delete "Department of Agriculture"
Insert "department"
Page 21, following line 28:
Insert a new section to read:
"Sec. 44.38.030. Division of food security. The
division of food security is established in the
department to coordinate and develop policies,
programs, and planning related to food security in the
state. The commissioner shall control and supervise
the division of food security."
Page 21, line 29:
Delete "Sec. 44.38.030"
Insert "Sec. 44.38.040"
Page 21, following line 31:
Insert new material to read:
"Article 2. General Provisions.
Sec. 44.38.900. Definitions. In this chapter,
(1) "commissioner" means the commissioner
of agriculture;
(2) "department" means the Department of
Agriculture."
4:14:29 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL objected for purposes of discussion.
4:14:35 PM
MR. HARBISON explained that [Amendment 2] would create a
Division of Food Security within the proposed Department of
Agriculture. He recalled that earlier discussions of the
executive order relating to a proposed Department of Agriculture
had indicated food security as a primary focus. He stated that
this issue falls within the purview of the Department of
Agriculture.
4:15:07 PM
SENATOR DUNBAR expressed his support for Amendment 2. However,
he shared his understanding that "food security" is not defined
in Alaska Statutes. He surmised that his definition of "food
security" is broader than most. He recommended reading the work
of Nobel Prize winning economist Amartya Sen, whose work is
related to the economics of poverty and the causes of famine. He
explained that famines are driven by a lack of income (rather
than a lack of food supply) and offered examples to illustrate
this. He stated that famine is largely the result of a
distribution issue within a society (not a complete lack of
food). He connected this to the discussion of food security in
Alaska. He emphasized the importance of programs that provide
income for food purchases (e.g. the Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program (SNAP)) in ensuring food security within
communities. He stated that these programs are often more
important than growing or importing food. He reiterated that
food insecurity is a distribution issue. He reiterated his
support of Amendment 2 and expressed hope that a Division of
Food Security would focus on food distribution and food
affordability.
4:17:01 PM
SENATOR HUGHES shared her understanding that there is no plan to
move SNAP or other similar programs to the proposed Department
of Agriculture. She indicated that the proposed Division of Food
Security would have an associated cost and expressed concern
that the progression of SB 128 could be slowed by the addition
of a fiscal note. She asked whether the division would initially
be set up as a part of the office of the Commissioner of the
proposed Department of Agriculture or whether a Division of Food
Security fiscal note is expected.
4:17:59 PM
MR. HARBISON answered that Amendment 3 is broadly written. The
amendment creates the Division of Food Security but is not
prescriptive with respect to how the proposed Department of
Agriculture must shape the division. He said it is within the
Commissioner of the Department of Agriculture's purview to take
on the duties of the proposed Division of Food Security. He
shared his understanding that Amendment 3 (as written) would not
require a fiscal note (unless it was the desire of the
Department of Agriculture).
4:18:43 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL noted that SNAP benefits and other similar
programs are within the Alaska Department of Health (DOH),
Division of Public Assistance. She pointed out that SB 128 has a
fiscal note.
4:19:04 PM
SENATOR MYERS stated that he supports Amendment 2. However, he
expressed concern that the definition of "food security" is very
broad. He commented that the broad definition of "food security"
could impact multiple departments. He offered EBT and SNAP as
one example, as these could potentially be moved from DOH,
Division of Public Assistance to the proposed Division of Food
Security. He briefly discussed transportation-related concerns.
He reiterated his support for Amendment 2; however, he said he
would continue to monitor SB 128 as it moves through the
legislative process to see how these potential impacts play out.
4:20:34 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL stated that the Department of Agriculture was
proposed, in part, due to a lack of focus on food security
issues. She agreed that SB 128 is creating new pathways. She
explained that the intent of the Division of Food Security is to
have a division that would focus on food security issues while
engaging in collaborative discussions with other state agencies.
This would improve the concept of "food security" as broadly as
intended.
4:21:20 PM
SENATOR MYERS briefly discussed how a potential merger between
Kroger, Co. and Albertsons Companies, Inc. would have had an
impact on food security in Alaska. He shared his understanding
that the federal government stopped the merger, but pointed out
that the Department of Commerce, Community and Economic
Development (DCCED) would have addressed this at the state
level. He said that this is another example of an issue that
would potentially fall under the purview of the proposed
Division of Food Security and expressed concern.
4:22:04 PM
SENATOR HUGHES opined that the concerns expressed by Senator
Myers could be considered reasons for supporting the
establishment of the Department of Agriculture and the Division
of Food Security. She shared about her experience on the Alaska
Food Strategy Task Force and highlighted discussions related to
distribution and transportation. She opined that it would be
helpful to have a division that could house those discussions
and engage in collaborative discussions across state agencies.
She shared her belief that the State of Alaska needs the
proposed Division of Food Security.
4:23:06 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL removed her objection to Amendment 2.
CHAIR GIESSEL found no further objection and [Amendment 2] to SB
128 was adopted.
4:23:13 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL solicited a motion.
4:23:17 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI moved to adopt Amendment 3, work order 34-
LS0694\N.7.
34-LS0694\N.7
Bullard
4/11/25
A M E N D M E N T 3
OFFERED IN THE SENATE BY SENATOR GIESSEL
TO: SB 128
Page 21, line 10:
Delete "and"
Page 21, following line 10:
Insert new paragraphs to read:
"(5) support the improvement of food
security for residents of the state;
(6) support agricultural businesses and the
marketing of state agriculture products;
(7) support state mariculture businesses
and the marketing of state mariculture products; and"
Page 21, line 11:
Delete "(5)"
Insert "(8) engage in agricultural research and"
Page 21, following line 28:
Insert a new subsection to read:
"(c) By February 1 of each year, the commissioner of
agriculture shall prepare an annual report containing
a summary of the Department of Agriculture's efforts
and progress under (a)(5) - (8) of this section in
addressing food security, supporting state
agricultural businesses and the marketing of state
agricultural products, supporting mariculture
businesses and the marketing of state mariculture
products, and engaging in agricultural research. The
department shall deliver the report to the senate
secretary and the chief clerk of the house of
representatives and notify the legislature that the
report is available."
4:23:20 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL objected for purposes of discussion.
4:23:23 PM
MR. HARBISON explained that [Amendment 3] defines the duties of
the commissioner of the proposed Department of Agriculture. He
acknowledged that some committee members are concerned about the
increased fiscal note costs related to creating additional
divisions within the department. He said Amendment 3 clarifies
the duties of the commissioner. This includes supporting and
improving food security for Alaskans, supporting agriculture and
mariculture businesses, as well as support for and engagement in
mariculture and agriculture research. In addition, the
commissioner must provide a report detailing improvements in
those areas to the legislature by February 1 of each year.
4:24:35 PM
SENATOR HUGHES recalled a recent discussion with the Director of
the Division of Agriculture at the Food and Farm Caucus. She
shared her understanding that the University of Alaska is
responsible for agricultural research. She noted that the
Division of Agriculture, Alaska Plant Materials Center engages
in some research; however, she sought to clarify that research
is the work of the university. She opined that the commissioner
of the proposed Department of Agriculture would be responsible
for disseminating that research to the agricultural community
across the state. She asked whether Amendment 3 states that the
commissioner must conduct research - or whether the
commissioner's role would be disseminating the information
gained through the University of Alaska's research.
4:25:31 PM
MR. HARBISON replied that Amendment 3 states that the
commissioner would support research. He added that the
department would determine the scope of that support. This could
include grants, disseminating information, etc. He clarified
that Amendment 3 does not explicitly state that the commissioner
must be involved in research.
4:26:06 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL removed her objection.
CHAIR GIESSEL found no further objection and Amendment 3, work
order 34-LS0694\N.7 was adopted.
4:26:21 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL noted that public testimony was previously left
open.
4:26:49 PM
LEONARDO WASSILIE, representing self, Nenana, Alaska, testified
in support of SB 128. He said he is on the National Family Farm
Coalition executive committee and works for the Nenana Native
Association. He also works for Calypso Farm and Ecology Center.
He said he supports movement toward strengthening food security
in Alaska. He indicated support for legislative involvement in
that process. He stated that he supports local agriculture and
expressed support for standards for producers. He emphasized the
importance of healthy soils and regenerative farming practices.
4:29:14 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL held SB 128 in committee.
SB 139-LAND; OWNERSHIP RESTRICTIONS; AG LAND
4:29:24 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL announced the consideration of SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE
FOR SENATE BILL NO. 139 "An Act relating to who may own or hold
certain land; relating to certain agreements having to do with
critical infrastructure; and providing for an effective date."
4:29:58 PM
Senator Hughes, speaking as sponsor of SB 139, said her staff
would give a presentation on SB 139.
4:30:25 PM
CHUOL MUT, Legislative Intern, Senator Shelley Hughes, Alaska
State Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, introduced himself.
4:30:33 PM
SENATOR HUGHES said SB 139 is an attempt to fix the problem of
foreign countries purchasing agricultural land in the US. She
stated that foreign countries have purchased roughly 40 million
acres of agricultural land in the Lower 48. Of these, China has
purchased 384 thousand acres. She pointed out that, while this
is not a large amount, the location of the land may negatively
impact the US. She stated that 384 acres is roughly half of the
total land in production in Alaska.
SENATOR HUGHES explained that SB 139 makes 3 changes. First, it
would prohibit citizens of foreign adversaries (there are 6,
based on US code) from purchasing agricultural land. It would
also prohibit land purchases within 100 miles of a military
base. Finally, companies that are owned or controlled by foreign
adversaries would not be granted access to critical
infrastructure or related cyber security. She emphasized that SB
139 would ensure that Alaska's military installations remain
secure, agricultural lands remain productive and unassailable,
and communities remain strong and safe.
4:32:12 PM
MR. MUT advanced to slide 2:
[Original punctuation provided.]
SB 139
Land restrictions on Foreign Adversaries Regarding
Military Installations and Agricultural Lands.
• Prohibits citizens of China, Cuba, Iran, North
Korea, Russia and Venezuela from acquiring any
land within 100 miles of military installations.
• Prohibits citizens including foreign business
entities from these same countries from acquiring
agricultural land.
• Exceptions: U.S. citizens from these countries
are not restricted. Allows non-citizen to enter
into a residential lease agreement.
MR. MUT stated that "foreign adversaries" are identified as such
by the US Secretary of Commerce under 15 C.F.R. 791.4.
4:33:49 PM
MR. MUT advanced to slide 3:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Enforcement of Provisions
• A report is made to the Attorney General
• An investigation is conducted
• If violation, land is seized and sold
• Funds owed are returned to lien holders and
remainder goes to general fund.
4:35:03 PM
MR. MUT advanced to slide 4:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Balancing Restrictions with Fairness
• U.S. citizens from restricted countries are
exempt.
• Pre-existing agricultural leases (before July 1,
2025) can continue under original terms.
• Residential leases are unaffected.
• Bona fide liens and mortgages remain valid post-
forfeiture.
4:36:14 PM
MR. MUT advanced to slide 5:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Why SB 139?
Foreign-owned agricultural land data points
Increase in foreign-owned acres
• Over 45 million acres of U.S. farmland were
foreign owned as of 2021, with continued growth.
Chinese ownership
• China owns over [384,000] acres, sparking
concerns over strategic land acquisitions.
SENATOR HUGHES emphasized that the 45 million acres of foreign-
owned US farmland are not owned solely by US adversaries.
4:37:26 PM
MR. MUT advanced to slide 6:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Why SB 139 IS Necessary for National Security
Oregon
A Chinese company invested in a wind farm near a US
naval base in Oregon used for weapons testing and
training.
Wyoming
A Chinese firm had holdings in a crypto mining
operation in Wyoming located within a mile of Warren
Air Force Base
North Dakota
A Chinese Farm in North Dakota is located about twelve
miles from a military site.
Michigan
A Chinese electric battery plant in Michigan is
located within one hundred miles of a US National
Guard base that hosts joint training with the
Taiwanese military.
4:39:07 PM
MR. MUT advanced to slide 7:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Why SB 139?
Protecting Critical Infrastructure
• In 2009, Chinese and Russian hackers infiltrated
America's electrical grid and installed malware.
• In 2010, Russia hacked NASDAQ stock exchange with
"digital bomb" to damage financial networks.
• In 2013, Iranian hackers infiltrated control
systems of Bowman Avenue Dam in NY, almost
flooding a town.
• In 2022, Russian hackers attacked a food company,
which temporarily closed its meatpacking plants
in the US.
• In 2023, China-backed hacker network Volt Typhoon
accessed Guam critical infrastructure.
4:40:42 PM
MR. MUT advanced to slide 8:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Purpose of Protection
Alaska Resource Protection
Safeguards agricultural land for local use and our
domestic food supply.
National Military Protection
Prevents opportunities for gathering intelligence.
Geopolitical Protection
Amid global tensions, bolsters national security,
economic security, and food security.
This is how we, as the Alaska State Legislature, can
do our small part to help ensure no tyrannical nation
gains a foothold as a dominant world power.
4:42:02 PM
SENATOR HUGHES shared that Mr. Mut was born in Nairobi, Kenya
and attended school in England. He came to Alaska on his own at
age 19. He is now a homeowner and soon-to-be graduate of the
University of Alaska. She expressed appreciation for his work.
4:42:26 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL announced invited testimony on SB 139.
4:42:43 PM
WES WARD, Secretary of Agriculture, State of Arkansas, Little
Rock Arkansas, expressed appreciation for Alaska and shared
several personal anecdotes. He said Arkansas has dedicated
significant time to the issue of foreign land ownership. The
Arkansas governor was the first to remove Chinese landowners
from agricultural land. The Arkansas State Legislature passed
legislation in 2023 that further restricted foreign land
ownership. He stated that 1.6 million acres of land in Arkansas
is foreign owned. He said that this is not always problematic
and offered Canada as one example of a good relationship between
Arkansas and a foreign landowner. He explained that Arkansas
restricted land ownership for the 6 countries that are
adversarial to the US. He briefly described the process of
removing the Chinese landowners in 2023. He noted that Arkansas
is currently fine-tuning the law that restricts foreign land
ownership to protect critical infrastructure. He noted several
agricultural and national security concerns. He expressed
support for SB 139.
4:46:18 PM
[KENDELL CULP], representing self, Indianapolis, Indiana, shared
that as a Representative in the Indiana General Assembly he
passed legislation to limit foreign adversaries' access to
farmland. He noted that this legislation had overwhelming
support. He explained that the intention was to enhance food
security by protecting the food supply. He indicated that the
adversarial countries are China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia
and Venezuela. He explained that, during its passage, the
legislation was amended to include protections for military
installations. This prohibited foreign adversaries from
purchasing land within a ten-mile radius of a military facility.
He briefly discussed how this change impacted the state. He
acknowledged concerns and briefly discussed publicly traded
companies for which stock ownership is unknown. To address this,
the Indiana General Assembly prohibited majority ownership by
adversarial countries. He briefly discussed his desire to
strengthen this language in the future. He noted that the
Indiana law is similar to SB 139. He opined that it is important
to be vigilant. He said Indiana also protected water, mineral,
and repairing rights from foreign ownership. He stated that this
law was well-received in Indiana and farmers appreciate the
added protection.
4:49:55 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL invited Representative Scott Sharp from the
Kentucky State House of Representatives to testify.
4:50:07 PM
[SCOTT SHARP], representing self, Ashland, Kentucky, stated that
the Kentucky General Assembly passed legislation (House Bill
315) that is similar to that passed in Indiana and Arkansas. He
noted that the Kentucky legislation linked "hostile countries"
to those identified in 22 CFR 126, Section 126.1. This section
lists eight adversaries: Belarus, Burma, China, Cuba, Iran,
North Korea, Syria, and Venezuela. He explained that linking the
state law with 22 CFR 126.1 allows the state law to change as
countries are added and/or removed from the list of adversaries.
He opined that the Kentucky General Assembly needs to tighten
the law and expressed hope that this would be done in the coming
year.
4:51:25 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL opened public testimony on SB 139.
4:51:46 PM
DAVID KRUMM, representing self, Big Lake, Alaska, testified in
support of SB 139. He said he is the former Alaskan Command
Commander and former Eleventh Airforce Commander. He expressed
support for SB 139. He briefly discussed national security
concerns and emphasized Alaska's position in national security
operations. He stated that if adversaries are able to locate
themselves near or around military bases or training locations,
they could potentially impede activities at those locations. He
recommended securing areas in and around military operations,
including airspace where advanced fighters and bombers fly.
4:53:40 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL expressed appreciation for Mr. Krumm's testimony.
She added that she is chair of the Special Committee on Arctic
Affairs and agreed that Alaska is strategically located.
4:54:02 PM
SENATOR MIKE SHOWER, District E, Alaska State Legislature,
Juneau, Alaska, testified in support of SB 139. Expressed
confidence in Mr. Krumm's knowledge and encouraged strong
consideration of his testimony. He stated that Alaska is
strategically located. He said that some countries are
attempting or may attempt asymmetric warfare. He explained that
those countries do not want to engage in direct conflict with
the US; however, there are many methods of indirect conflict.
These include purchasing land, cross-border drug sales, and
obtaining jobs on the Alaska pipeline. He briefly discussed a
letter Governor Dunleavey received from China regarding China-
Alaska relations. He emphasized the potential for indirect
conflict that may not be visible. He stated that SB 139 is
important and emphasized the need to protect Alaska's residents,
resources, and strategic location. He suggested that the
prohibitions in SB 139 should extend to the land below military
airspace. He directed attention to SB 139, page 2, and suggested
that the sponsor consider amendments related to dwellings.
CHAIR GIESSEL held public testimony on SB 139 open.
4:56:35 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL held SB 139 in committee.
SJR 19-ANWR & NAT'L PETRO RESERVE: STATE SHARE
4:56:48 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL announced the consideration of SENATE JOINT
RESOLUTION NO. 19 Urging the United States Congress to honor the
terms of the Mineral Leasing Act and the Alaska Statehood Act
and provide the state with a 90 percent share of all bonuses,
royalties, and rentals received by the federal government from
the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and the National Petroleum
Reserve in Alaska.
4:57:15 PM
SENATOR JESSE BJORKMAN, District D, Alaska State Legislature,
Juneau, Alaska, paraphrased the sponsor statement for SJR 19:
[Original punctuation provided.]
SJR 19 ANWR & Nat'l Petro Reserve: State Share
Version G Sponsor Statement
April 10, 2025
With the release of President Donald J. Trumps
Executive Order, "Unleashing Alaska's Extraordinary
Resource Potential," Alaskans are optimistic that
we'll see increased production of our petroleum and
mining resources. However, this enthusiasm is tempered
because Congress has gone back on its promise to
provide Alaska with 90 percent of the royalty revenues
from production on federal land. Alaska's present and
future revenues are also weighed down by the write-
offs against State taxes that oil companies can claim
for activity on federal lands and necessary upgrades
to Alaska's aging infrastructure to support production
activity.
When Congress was deliberating granting Alaska
statehood, there was recognition that our large,
remote state wouldn't have enough of a population and
industrial base to be self-sufficient. In exchange for
taking on the financial responsibility of providing
public services, Alaska was promised 90 percent of the
royalties from production on federal lands in both the
Alaska Statehood Act of 1958 and an amendment to the
Mineral Act of 1920.
It was also acknowledged at the time the Statehood Act
was under consideration that some of the most valuable
land in Alaska, in particular the Naval Petroleum
Reserve (now the National Petroleum Reserve Alaska)
and the Arctic Wildlife Range (now the Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge), had been reserved by the federal
government and was not available for the state to
select. With roughly two-thirds or more of the North
Slope under federal control, Alaska's ability to
determine its own revenue stream has been severely
impacted.
Senate Joint Resolution 19 asks Congress to uphold the
promise made in the Alaska Statehood Act to provide 90
percent of the revenues from production in the Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge and to extend that promise to
production in the National Petroleum Reserve Alaska.
This will allow the state to support the programs and
infrastructure projects necessary for the petroleum
industry and provide services for our citizens.
4:59:34 PM
SENATOR HUGHES expressed appreciation for SJR 19. She opined
that this is an important issue and noted that Alaska has a
higher percentage of federal lands than most other states - an
estimated 60-65 percent. She contrasted this with states such as
New York, where less than 1 percent of the land is federally
owned. She opined that what SJR 19 proposes is the least the
federal government can do, and it is the right thing to do.
5:00:27 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL held SJR 19 in committee.
5:01:09 PM
There being no further business to come before the committee,
Chair Giessel adjourned the Senate Resources Standing Committee
meeting at 5:01 p.m.