Legislature(2021 - 2022)BUTROVICH 205

05/05/2021 03:30 PM RESOURCES

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= SB 133 REMOTE RECREATIONAL SITES; SALES; PERMITS TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
-- Invited & Public Testimony --
*+ SB 134 MASTER GUIDE-OUTFITTER REQUIREMENTS TELECONFERENCED
Moved CSSB 134(RES) Out of Committee
-- Invited & Public Testimony --
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled: TELECONFERENCED
+= SB 79 HUNTING/TRAPPING/FISHING: DISABLED VETS TELECONFERENCED
Moved CSSB 79(RES) Out of Committee
**Streamed live on AKL.tv**
                    ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE                                                                                  
              SENATE RESOURCES STANDING COMMITTEE                                                                             
                          May 5, 2021                                                                                           
                           3:32 p.m.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
MEMBERS PRESENT                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Senator Joshua Revak, Chair                                                                                                     
Senator Peter Micciche, Vice Chair                                                                                              
Senator Click Bishop                                                                                                            
Senator Gary Stevens                                                                                                            
Senator Natasha von Imhof (via teleconference)                                                                                  
Senator Jesse Kiehl                                                                                                             
Senator Scott Kawasaki                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
MEMBERS ABSENT                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
All members present                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
COMMITTEE CALENDAR                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
SENATE BILL NO. 134                                                                                                             
"An Act relating to master guide-outfitter qualifications for                                                                   
licensure."                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
     - MOVED CSSB 134(RES) OUT OF COMMITTEE                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
SENATE BILL NO. 133                                                                                                             
"An Act relating to the sale or lease of state land for remote                                                                  
recreational sites; relating to permits for remote recreational                                                                 
sites; and providing for an effective date."                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
     - HEARD & HELD                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
SENATE BILL NO. 79                                                                                                              
"An Act relating to sport fishing, hunting, and trapping                                                                        
identification cards."                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
     - MOVED CSSB 79(RES) OUT OF COMMITTEE                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
BILL: SB 134                                                                                                                  
SHORT TITLE: MASTER GUIDE-OUTFITTER REQUIREMENTS                                                                                
SPONSOR(s): SENATOR(s) VON IMHOF                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
04/28/21       (S)       READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS                                                                        
04/28/21       (S)       RES                                                                                                    
05/05/21       (S)       RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
BILL: SB 133                                                                                                                  
SHORT TITLE: REMOTE RECREATIONAL SITES; SALES; PERMITS                                                                          
SPONSOR(s): RULES BY REQUEST OF THE GOVERNOR                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
04/28/21       (S)       READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS                                                                        
04/28/21       (S)       RES, FIN                                                                                               
04/28/21       (S)       RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205                                                                           
04/28/21       (S)       -- MEETING CANCELED --                                                                                 
05/05/21       (S)       RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
BILL: SB 79                                                                                                                   
SHORT TITLE: HUNTING/TRAPPING/FISHING: DISABLED VETS                                                                            
SPONSOR(s): KIEHL                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
02/12/21       (S)       READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS                                                                        
02/12/21       (S)       RES, FIN                                                                                               
03/15/21       (S)       RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205                                                                           
03/15/21       (S)       Heard & Held                                                                                           
03/15/21       (S)       MINUTE(RES)                                                                                            
04/28/21       (S)       RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205                                                                           
04/28/21       (S)       -- MEETING CANCELED --                                                                                 
05/05/21       (S)       RES AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
WITNESS REGISTER                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
JULI LUCKY, Staff                                                                                                               
Senator Natasha von Imhof                                                                                                       
Alaska State Legislature                                                                                                        
Juneau, Alaska                                                                                                                  
POSITION STATEMENT: Introduced SB 134 on behalf of the sponsor.                                                               
                                                                                                                                
RENEE HOFFARD, Executive Administrator                                                                                          
Big Game Commercial Services Board                                                                                              
Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development                                                                      
Juneau, Alaska                                                                                                                  
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions regarding SB 134.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MARTY PARSONS, Director                                                                                                         
Division of Mining, Land, and Water                                                                                             
Department of Natural Resources (DNR)                                                                                           
Anchorage, Alaska                                                                                                               
POSITION  STATEMENT:   Introduced  SB   133  on  behalf   of  the                                                             
administration.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
CHRISTOPHER ORMAN, Assistant Attorney General                                                                                   
Civil Division                                                                                                                  
Natural Resources Section                                                                                                       
Department of Law                                                                                                               
Juneau, Alaska                                                                                                                  
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions related to SB 133.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
RACHEL HANKE, Legislative Liaison                                                                                               
Alaska Department of Fish and Game                                                                                              
Juneau, Alaska                                                                                                                  
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions related to SB 79.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
ACTION NARRATIVE                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
3:32:39 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  REVAK  called  the  Senate  Resources  Standing  Committee                                                             
meeting to order  at 3:32 p.m. Present at the  call to order were                                                               
Senators    Kawasaki,   Stevens,    Kiehl,    von   Imhof    (via                                                               
teleconference),  and Chair  Revak. Senator  Bishop arrived  soon                                                               
thereafter.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
           SB 134-MASTER GUIDE-OUTFITTER REQUIREMENTS                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
3:33:43 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR REVAK  announced the consideration  of SENATE BILL  NO. 134                                                               
"An  Act relating  to master  guide-outfitter qualifications  for                                                               
licensure."                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
3:34:09 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR NATASHA VON IMHOF, speaking  as sponsor of SB 134, stated                                                               
the purpose of the bill  is to address the unintended consequence                                                               
of  legislation passed  in 2019  regarding  the conditions  under                                                               
which  the  [Big  Game  Commercial  Services  Board]  would  take                                                               
disciplinary   action  against   guides  who   violate  the   law                                                               
pertaining to  their profession.  SB 134  amends the  language to                                                               
work  as  intended.  She  expressed  hope  this  issue  could  be                                                               
resolved  during  this  hunting   season.  She  deferred  a  more                                                               
detailed introduction of the bill to Ms. Lucky.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
3:35:09 PM                                                                                                                    
JULI  LUCKY,  Staff,  Senator Natasha  von  Imhof,  Alaska  State                                                               
Legislature, Juneau, Alaska,  introduced SB 134 on  behalf of the                                                               
sponsor, paraphrasing the following sponsor statement:                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
     Senate  Bill 134  clarifies under  what conditions  the                                                                    
     Big Game  Commercial Services  Board would  be required                                                                    
     to revoke a Master Guide  license. The bill corrects an                                                                    
     unintended     consequence     due     to     different                                                                    
     interpretations  of language  included  in the  board's                                                                    
     last reauthorization bill.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
     The Big  Game Commercial  Services Board  regulates the                                                                    
     activities of professionals  that provide guide, guide-                                                                    
     outfitter,  and  transportation  services to  big  game                                                                    
     hunters. The board had a  sunset review in 2018; Senate                                                                    
     Bill 43 was introduced in  2019 to extend the board for                                                                    
     five years. During deliberation  on the bill, there was                                                                    
     some frustration  regarding the inability of  the board                                                                    
     to  quickly take  action  to revoke  the  license of  a                                                                    
     Master  Guide  who  had   been  convicted  of  criminal                                                                    
     offenses. The board relayed that  it had the ability to                                                                    
     revoke  the   license,  but  the  process   had  to  be                                                                    
     suspended during  the criminal  case, and  the required                                                                    
     investigation and due process was lengthy.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
     A Master  Guide license does not  confer any additional                                                                    
     hunting rights; it is an  honorary designation given to                                                                    
     Registered  Guides  who  have  demonstrated  excellence                                                                    
     over a  long history in their  profession. Legislators,                                                                    
     members of  the public,  and clients expect  those that                                                                    
     use the title to be held to the highest standard.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
     The Senate  Finance committee  added language  that was                                                                    
     intended  to  require  revocation  of  a  Master  Guide                                                                    
     license upon conviction in a  court of law for criminal                                                                    
     offenses related  to the profession. This  language was                                                                    
     reviewed  and   approved  by   the  full   Senate,  all                                                                    
     subsequent    committees,   and    the   full    House.                                                                    
     Unfortunately, during  the December BGCSB  meeting, the                                                                    
     language was reviewed by staff  attorneys and there was                                                                    
     concern that  the statute could  be construed  to apply                                                                    
     to any violation  of the statute    even late paperwork                                                                    
       which was clearly not the legislative intent.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
     The BGCSB undertook a lengthy  process to determine how                                                                    
     to  capture the  legislature's  intent: holding  Master                                                                    
     Guides  to the  high standard  their title  conveys and                                                                    
     requiring  the  revocation  of licenses  for  egregious                                                                    
     offenses that do not honor  the profession. Senate Bill                                                                    
     134  is  the result  of  that  work and  would  require                                                                    
     revocation of  a Master Guide license  after conviction                                                                    
     of an offense  where the offender serves  more than one                                                                    
     day in jail or a $1,500  or greater fine is imposed. It                                                                    
     also  conforms the  qualifications for  a Master  Guide                                                                    
     license to  these standards and also  requires that the                                                                    
     guide has not had a  similar license revoked within the                                                                    
     past five years.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
     I  would  appreciate your  support  of  this bill  that                                                                    
     clarifies  the  statute and  ensures  it  works as  the                                                                    
     legislature intended.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MS.  LUCKY summarized  that SB  134  treats the  narrow class  of                                                               
egregious  offenses for  which  a master  guide  license must  be                                                               
revoked.  The board  proposed the  language  to meet  legislative                                                               
intent and  mirror existing statute  to ensure it  is interpreted                                                               
correctly.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
3:36:03 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR BISHOP joined the committee meeting.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
3:38:15 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR STEVENS asked  what offenses require the  board to revoke                                                               
a master guide license.                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
MS. LUCKY replied  it would apply to offenses where  a person was                                                               
imprisoned for more than one  day or received an unsuspended fine                                                               
of  more than  $1,500 was  imposed.  She said  the board  created                                                               
those standards after a review of  the cases that came before the                                                               
board  and  the disciplinary  actions  it  imposed. She  directed                                                               
attention  to  the  minutes  of   the  Big  Game  Services  Board                                                               
teleconference held February 20, [2020]  in the bill packets. The                                                               
relevant data is  on page 9 of the 9-page  document. It shows the                                                               
board  considered six  master  guide-outfitter violations  [since                                                               
the sunset audit in 2018].                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
3:40:01 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR VON IMHOF interjected the table is outlined in green.                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MS. LUCKY continued to detail the examples.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
3:40:18 PM                                                                                                                    
At ease to help members find the table in their bill packets.                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
3:40:34 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  REVAK  reconvened  the  meeting and  asked  for  a  better                                                               
description of the  graph because the members'  copies were black                                                               
and white.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MS. LUCKY restated that the relevant data  is on page 9 of the 9-                                                               
page   document.  It   enumerates   six  master   guide-outfitter                                                               
violations the board considered prior  to the statutory change in                                                               
2019. Violations  one and four  met the threshold  for revocation                                                               
after the bill was enacted.  SB 134 would require revocations for                                                               
these types of offenses, she said.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
3:42:00 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  STEVENS  summarized  that   revocations  apply  only  to                                                               
specific hunting violations.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MS.  LUCKY answered  that  is correct.  She  continued, "At  this                                                               
time, the language that was in  Senate Bill 43 was interpreted to                                                               
apply to  any violations and that  is what we are  trying to fix.                                                               
And what  this bill would do  is say that the  fine imposed would                                                               
have to  be more  than $1,500  or if  the person  spent a  day in                                                               
jail. Those  were the two  conditions under which a  Master Guide                                                               
[license] would be required to be revoked."                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
3:42:44 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR STEVENS  asked for confirmation  that a master  guide who                                                               
received a  $1500 fine or spent  time in jail for  something that                                                               
was unrelated to hunting would not be affected by this bill.                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MS. LUCKY  answered that  is correct;  she directed  attention to                                                               
the language  on page  2, lines  19-20 of  the bill  that clearly                                                               
states this is  "related to hunting or the provision  of big game                                                               
hunting or transportation services."                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
3:43:24 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR KIEHL  referenced the eligibility provision  in paragraph                                                               
(4)  of Section  1  and asked  for the  reason  the lookback  for                                                               
hunting violations was  changed from 15 years  preceding the date                                                               
of the application to 5 years.                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
MS. LUCKY answered  that Section 1 relating to  eligibility for a                                                               
master guide  license was  changed to conform  to Section  2 that                                                               
has the "shall revoke" language.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
3:44:12 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR REVAK requested the sectional analysis.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MS. LUCKY presented the following sectional analysis for SB 134:                                                                
                                                                                                                                
   Sec. 1: Amends AS 08.54.610(b), which outlines the                                                                         
             requirements to obtain a master guide-outfitter                                                                    
             license, to  limit  the  violations that  would                                                                    
             make a person ineligible to receive a license.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
             Specifically, the  amendment  limits  the  look                                                                    
             back period to five years and  would only apply                                                                    
             after  conviction  for  an  offense  where  the                                                                    
             person was imprisoned for more than  one day or                                                                    
             there was a fine  of more than  $1,500 imposed.                                                                    
             It also prohibits granting a master guide-                                                                         
             outfitter license to an individual that has had                                                                    
             a hunting, guiding, outfitting,  transporter or                                                                    
             similar    license    revoked     in    another                                                                    
             jurisdiction.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
   Sec. 2: Amends AS 08.54.710(k), which requires revocation                                                                  
             of a master guide-outfitter  license in certain                                                                    
             circumstances, to  limit  the  violations  that                                                                    
             would  require   revocation,  similar   to  the                                                                    
             language in  section  one,  to an  offense  for                                                                    
             which a person is imprisoned for  more than one                                                                    
             day or a fine of more than $1,500 is imposed.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MS. LUCKY advised that one  of the board's guiding principles was                                                               
to  conform AS  08.54.610(b)  to existing  statute. She  directed                                                               
attention  to the  document in  the bill  packets that  shows the                                                               
statute  relating to  eligibility  for licenses  has a  five-year                                                               
lookback. She noted the board suggested this language.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
3:46:22 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR BISHOP  asked if the  statute had something similar  to a                                                               
"Three strikes and you're out" provision.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
MS.  LUCKY said  she  believes  that it  would  be the  five-year                                                               
lookback, but she would defer to the board for confirmation.                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
3:46:56 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR REVAK  offered his  understanding that  somebody who  has a                                                               
qualifying violation has "a five-year  timeout from being able to                                                               
receive a guide license." He asked if that was correct.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
MS.  LUCKY  answered this  would  apply  to individuals  who  are                                                               
otherwise eligible  to hold  a master guide  license, but  it was                                                               
correct that  the lookback  for guide-outfitter  violations would                                                               
be five years.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR REVAK  responded, "So if  you got one of  these violations,                                                               
you wouldn't be able to receive  a guide license for another five                                                               
years."                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
MS.  LUCKY answered,  "That is  correct Mr.  Chairman, but  I did                                                               
want to point out  that you would also still have  to meet all of                                                               
the other  requirements for  the master  guide license.  But this                                                               
would disqualify you for at least a period of five years."                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
3:48:03 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  REVAK repeated,  "At least."  He noted  Renee Hoffard  was                                                               
available for questions.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR BISHOP asked if there was  a limit to the number of times                                                               
a guide  could have  their license  revoked and  reinstated after                                                               
five years.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
3:48:40 PM                                                                                                                    
RENEE  HOFFARD,  Executive  Administrator,  Big  Game  Commercial                                                               
Services Board,  Juneau, Alaska,  referenced subsection  (l) that                                                               
is not being amended and read the following:                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
     Sec. 08.54.710. Discipline  of guides and transporters.                                                                  
     (l) The  board may  issue a  registered guide-outfitter                                                                    
     license  to  a   person  whose  master  guide-outfitter                                                                    
     license is revoked under (k) of this section.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
She highlighted the  provision that says to qualify  for a master                                                               
guide license,  the applicant must  be a registered guide  for 15                                                               
of  the   20  years  immediately   preceding  the  date   of  the                                                               
application. If  the offense is  egregious enough, the  board, in                                                               
consultation with the Department of  Law, may choose to not issue                                                               
the registered guide license.                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR REVAK asked Ms. Lucky if she had anything to add.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
3:50:44 PM                                                                                                                    
MS.  LUCKY  noted the  concern  in  the testimony  the  committee                                                               
received about "may versus shall."  She said everybody agreed the                                                               
language needed to  be amended but the opinions varied  on how to                                                               
do that. Some people want the  board to have discretion to revoke                                                               
a  master guide  license for  certain violations,  but the  board                                                               
suggested  narrowing  the  scope   to  just  the  most  egregious                                                               
offenses and making the revocation mandatory.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
3:51:57 PM                                                                                                                    
MS. LUCKY  said the second  issue relates to the  effective date.                                                               
The hunting  season is  underway and there  is some  concern that                                                               
without  an  immediate effective  date  a  small violation  could                                                               
result in  a guide having  their license revoked for  five years.                                                               
Self-reporting  of  small  violations   is  common  and  that  is                                                               
jeopardized  by the  current interpretation  that all  violations                                                               
result in license revocation.                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MS.  LUCKY said  the sponsor  has an  amendment for  an effective                                                               
date that is retroactive to the  date Senate Bill 43 was enacted.                                                               
This   makes   the  law   consistent,   and   it  clarifies   the                                                               
legislature's understanding  and intention when it  passed Senate                                                               
Bill 43 in September 2019.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
3:54:06 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR REVAK found no committee questions or comments.                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
He opened public  testimony on SB 134; finding  none, Chair Revak                                                               
closed public testimony.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR REVAK asked if there were amendments.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
3:54:32 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR MICCICHE moved Conceptual Amendment 1 to SB 134.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
     OFFERED IN THE SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
     BY SENATOR VON IMHOF                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
     TO: SB 134 (32-LS06096\I)                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
     This is  a conceptual  amendment. Legislative  Legal is                                                                    
     directed  to  make  any changes  or  deletions  to  the                                                                    
     suggest language,  including technical,  conforming, or                                                                    
     bill title changes, in order accomplish the intent.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
     INTENT OF  AMENDMENT: Add an  effective date to  SB 134                                                                    
     to  match the  effective date  of the  enactment of  AS                                                                    
     08.54.710(k) by Senate Bill 43  in 2019 (CHAPTER 26 SLA                                                                    
     19).                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
[There was no explanation of this amendment.]                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
3:54:43 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  REVAK   found  no   objection  and   announced  Conceptual                                                               
Amendment 1 to SB 134 was adopted.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
3:54:51 PM                                                                                                                    
At ease.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
3:56:37 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  REVAK reconvened  the meeting  and asked  the will  of the                                                               
committee.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
3:56:49 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR MICCICHE moved  to report SB 134,  work order 32-LS0696\I                                                               
as   conceptually  amended,   from  committee,   with  individual                                                               
recommendations   and  attached   fiscal  note(s).   He  directed                                                               
Legislative Legal to make changes  or deletions to the conceptual                                                               
amendment to accomplish the intent.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
3:57:20 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR REVAK  found no  objection and  CSSB 134(RES)  was reported                                                               
from the Senate Resources Standing Committee.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
3:57:46 PM                                                                                                                    
At ease                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
        SB 133-REMOTE RECREATIONAL SITES; SALES; PERMITS                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
3:59:22 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR   REVAK   reconvened   the  meeting   and   announced   the                                                               
consideration  of SENATE  BILL NO.  133 "An  Act relating  to the                                                               
sale  or  lease of  state  land  for remote  recreational  sites;                                                               
relating to permits for remote  recreational sites; and providing                                                               
for an effective date."                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
3:59:47 PM                                                                                                                    
MARTY  PARSONS, Director,  Division of  Mining, Land,  and Water,                                                               
Department of Natural Resources  (DNR), Anchorage, Alaska, stated                                                               
SB 133 is  another step to fulfill the intent  of art. VIII, sec.                                                               
1  of  the Constitution  of  the  State  of Alaska  to  encourage                                                               
settlement of  Alaska lands consistent with  the public interest.                                                               
He pointed out  that just three percent of the  land in Alaska is                                                               
in  private ownership  and said  this  administration intends  to                                                               
expand that.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR. PARSONS  displayed the pie  chart on  slide 3 that  shows the                                                               
breakdown of land ownership in  Alaska. The federal government is                                                               
the  largest landowner  with 59  percent; state  ownership is  26                                                               
percent  but will  increase to  about 30  percent once  the state                                                               
receives   all  its   entitlement;  the   Alaska  Native   Claims                                                               
Settlement Act  (ANCSA) corporations  hold about 12  percent; and                                                               
about  3   percent  is  in  private   ownership,  which  includes                                                               
municipalities.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
MR.  PARSONS reviewed  the  different ways  SB  133 provides  for                                                               
Alaskans to procure land in Alaska. The slide read as follows:                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
        • Lands can be identified and offered through the                                                                       
          State Land Sales program                                                                                              
        • The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) will                                                                        
          maintain a list of lands available for remote                                                                         
          recreational sites                                                                                                    
        • The State will identify areas where land is                                                                           
          properly classified for settlement and may be                                                                         
          staked for remote recreational sites                                                                                  
        • Individuals can nominate open state land not                                                                          
          included in the annual state offering for remote                                                                      
          recreational sites                                                                                                    
        • Multiple ways to procure a site:                                                                                      
             square4 Purchase                                                                                                   
             square4 Lease                                                                                                      
             square4 Permit                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
4:03:24 PM                                                                                                                    
MR. PARSONS described the current  Remote Recreational Cabin Site                                                               
Program under AS  38.05.600. The state identifies up  to 20 acres                                                               
of  state  land   per  parcel  for  disposal   under  a  lottery.                                                               
Successful individuals  are able to  stake their own  parcel. The                                                               
difference  between  the  current  RRCS program  and  the  former                                                               
programs is that  the current program is open  to residents only,                                                               
it  has no  "prove-up"  requirements, and  the  resident has  the                                                               
opportunity to  own the land. He  said DNR goes through  a public                                                               
interest finding and  public process before offering  the land as                                                               
part of the staking program.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
4:05:15 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR VON IMHOF  read the last bullet point on  slide 5, "Since                                                               
2001  DNR  has  offered  staking  in 81  staking  areas  over  14                                                               
offerings." She  asked for  a description of  a staking  area and                                                               
the definition of an "offering."                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
MR. PARSONS directed attention to the  images on slide 7 that are                                                               
examples  of  staking  areas from  previous  RRCS  offerings.  He                                                               
elaborated  that a  staking area  is land  DNR has  identified as                                                               
appropriate  for  staking  within  a larger  offering  area.  For                                                               
example, DNR may identify 15  authorizations within a 20,000 acre                                                               
offering area.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
4:07:19 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR VON  IMHOF asked  how many  individual parcels  and total                                                               
acres has the division sold since 2001.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
MR. PARSONS answered he would follow up with information.                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR VON IMHOF asked for  an estimate and whether each staking                                                               
area has about 50 parcels.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
4:08:07 PM                                                                                                                    
MR. PARSONS answered it depends  on the individual offering. Some                                                               
offerings could be 20,000 acres  with 50 parcels and others could                                                               
be 7,500 acres with just 4 or 5  parcels. He said he did not have                                                               
the numbers in his head, but  he would get the information to the                                                               
committee quickly.                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
4:08:48 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR STEVENS asked  if the difference between  prove-up and no                                                               
prove-up is  that prove-up means a  person builds a cabin  and no                                                               
prove-up means they do not build a cabin.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
MR. PARSONS  answered that is  correct; the old  staking programs                                                               
required  certain  improvements.  Under the  Remote  Recreational                                                               
Cabin Staking  program, the  individual who  staked the  land was                                                               
able to move  into a three-year lease so they  could get the land                                                               
surveyed and  appraised. They were allowed  to make improvements,                                                               
but it  was not  required. After that  the individual  could move                                                               
into a land purchase contract.                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
4:10:01 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  STEVENS commented  he  thought the  idea  was for  these                                                               
parcels  to be  improved.  He  asked if  somebody  could lease  a                                                               
parcel for three years, do nothing, and end up owning the land.                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
MR. PARSONS  answered that  is technically  correct. Most  of the                                                               
parcels are  fairly remote  and it  is up  to the  individual who                                                               
staked the land  to use it for recreational purposes  as they see                                                               
fit.                                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR MICCICHE  asked if the  bill repeals the  current program                                                               
and proposes  a new one.  He shared  that he participated  in the                                                               
Day Harbor staking years ago and  he was not sure the process was                                                               
as sound as it could have been.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
MR. PARSONS  answered yes;  SB 133 repeals  the program  under AS                                                               
38.05.600 and replaces it with a new one.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
4:12:00 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR KAWASAKI asked if a  tent platform would be an acceptable                                                               
prove-up.                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
MR.  PARSONS  answered  the  current  Remote  Recreational  Cabin                                                               
Staking  program  does  not  have   a  prove-up  requirement.  An                                                               
individual stakes  the land then  has it surveyed  and appraised.                                                               
Improvements are  at the individual's  discretion, whether  it is                                                               
tent platforms, camping sites, or a more permanent structure.                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  KAWASAKI asked  if a  parcel under  the staking  program                                                               
could be used for a commercial purpose.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
MR. PARSONS answered no.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
4:13:21 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  BISHOP asked  if commercial  guides  and outfitters  are                                                               
excluded.                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
MR. PARSONS answered the Remote  Cabin Staking program may not be                                                               
used for a  commercial purpose; that was part of  the impetus for                                                               
the commercial provision in what is currently SB 97.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
4:14:05 PM                                                                                                                    
MR. PARSONS  directed attention to  slides 7 and 8  and explained                                                               
they are  intended to illustrate  the remote staking  program has                                                               
had offerings  and authorizations statewide. The  offerings range                                                               
from Nome to Lake Louise, to Southcentral to Southeast.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
4:14:56 PM                                                                                                                    
MR. PARSONS paraphrased  slides 9-10 that provide  an overview of                                                               
what is in SB 133. The slides read as follows:                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
        • Repeals existing RRCS program                                                                                         
        • Provides for Commissioner to identify areas where                                                                     
          land is properly classified for settlement and                                                                        
          offer those lands for staking of remote                                                                               
          recreational sites                                                                                                    
        • Identifies who is eligible to participate in the                                                                      
          program                                                                                                               
        • Establishes what parcel size may be staked by an                                                                      
          eligible participant  10 acres                                                                                        
        • Provides for Alaskans to nominate lands for                                                                           
          inclusion                                                                                                             
        • Requires information necessary for identifying                                                                        
          staked parcel                                                                                                         
      • Process for handling conflicting staked parcels                                                                         
        • Directs the Commissioner to establish regulations                                                                     
          to implement the program                                                                                              
        • Establishes process for staking and purchasing a                                                                      
          piece of state land for a remote recreational                                                                         
          site                                                                                                                  
             square4 Sale  price is fair market value                                                                           
             square4 Applicant must survey and appraise the site                                                                
        • Also establishes a process for staking and                                                                            
          leasing of state land for remote recreational                                                                         
          sites                                                                                                                 
        • Establishes process   for   leasing   a   remote                                                                      
          recreational site                                                                                                     
             square4 Initial 10-year leasing period                                                                             
             square4 Two additional 10-year lease renewal periods                                                               
             square4 Restricts assignment of a lease                                                                            
             square4 Termination of lease for non-compliance                                                                    
             square4 Establishes timeframe for surveying and                                                                    
               appraising                                                                                                       
             square4 Requirement for marking of parcel boundaries                                                               
                                                                                                                                
4:18:27 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR BISHOP asked if DNR does the appraisal and bills for it.                                                                
                                                                                                                                
MR. PARSONS  answered the intention  is for the individual  to be                                                               
responsible for both  the survey and appraisal and  the rules for                                                               
that can be handled through the regulatory process.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  BISHOP said  he assumes  the surveyor  would need  to be                                                               
licensed in this state.                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
MR. PARSONS answered that is  correct; an official survey must be                                                               
done by a licensed surveyor.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR MICCICHE  referenced earlier  conversations that  in part                                                               
led to the  bill. He said the problem is  that some families have                                                               
leased land for  generations. He asked if those  parcels that are                                                               
under lease  could be included  in this program with  the current                                                               
leaseholders being given the right of first refusal.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
4:20:44 PM                                                                                                                    
MR. PARSONS  advised that  the reference is  to the  Personal Use                                                               
Cabin Program.  He said DNR  believes that except in  areas where                                                               
the cabins  would be  in a  legislatively designated  area, there                                                               
will be  an opportunity  for the  leaseholders to  participate in                                                               
this program and convert their lease to a purchase.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR MICCICHE  asked if "we  believe" could be  interpreted to                                                               
mean that there is a path forward.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
MR.  PARSONS  answered the  division's  intent  is to  allow  the                                                               
individuals who  participated in the  PUCP program to  gain title                                                               
to those lands.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
4:21:46 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  STEVENS asked  him to  talk  about the  assignment of  a                                                               
lease  and   the  restrictions  that   will  be  placed   on  the                                                               
assignment.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
MR. PARSONS  answered the language  on paragraph (1) on  page 10,                                                               
lines 13-14, states  the lease may not be  assigned, conveyed, or                                                               
otherwise  transferred,  except  though an  estate  or  intestate                                                               
succession.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
4:22:40 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  STEVENS summarized  that a  lease could  pass to  family                                                               
through a will.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
MR.  PARSONS answered  that is  correct  and Mr.  Orman with  the                                                               
Department of Law was available to correct him if he misspoke.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR REVAK asked Mr. Orman for his opinion.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
4:23:08 PM                                                                                                                    
CHRISTOPHER    ORMAN,   Assistant    Attorney   General,    Civil                                                               
Division,   Natural  Resources   Section,   Department   of  Law,                                                               
Juneau,  Alaska,  answered  Mr.  Parsons is  correct.  The  lease                                                               
may  not  be  assigned  or  conveyed  but  it  can pass  through                                                                
estate  or intestate  succession.  He  also noted  that language                                                                
in  paragraph   (3)  on   page  10,  lines   18-19  talks   about                                                               
restrictions  DNR has  the discretion  to impose  on the lease.                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
4:24:07 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  KIEHL  asked  if the  biggest  difference  is  there  is                                                               
not  a best  interest  finding  and  instead,  people  can  stake                                                               
all the  vacant unreserved  land  in a given  parcel.                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
MR. PARSONS answered  yes; there is no best  interest finding. He                                                               
said  it is  DNR's  understanding that  the  areas available  for                                                               
people to stake would be  a subset of the Vacant, Unappropriated,                                                               
Unreserved (VUU) land, and the  commissioner could include all or                                                               
a portion of that land.                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  KIEHL   asked  how  to  prevent   the  staking  program                                                                
acreage  from  being  on  top of  a  coal  seam or  a  site  with                                                               
commercial  mineral  potential.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
MR. PARSONS answered  certain non-conveyable land classifications                                                               
would not be available to participate in the program.                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  KIEHL  commented,  "We  keep hearing  we've  got  better                                                               
maps  of  the  moon  than  of  Alaska.   I wonder   if  we're  as                                                               
confident  as all that."                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
4:26:06 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  VON  IMHOF asked  about  the  intent  and need  to  hire                                                               
five  full-time  employees  as part  of  establishing  a process                                                                
for  leasing  a  remote  recreational   site.  She  specifically                                                                
mentioned   hiring   a  surveyor   when   DNR  already   has   10                                                               
surveyors   on  staff  and   referenced  an   earlier  statement                                                                
about   outsourcing    surveying   and   appraisal    work.   She                                                               
questioned  the  necessity  of these  hires, particularly   given                                                               
that  this administration   is trying  to  reduce  the footprint                                                                
of government.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
4:26:58 PM                                                                                                                    
MR. PARSONS answered  the division believes this  program will be                                                               
very  popular. If  their analysis  is correct,  the program  will                                                               
require a surveyor who primarily  will write survey instructions,                                                               
review  plats, and  do the  administrative work  to identify  the                                                               
parcels  and  ownership  and  ensure all  the  criteria  for  the                                                               
platting process  are met. The anticipated  workload will require                                                               
additional appraisers,  land surveyors,  and staff  to administer                                                               
the program.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  VON IMHOF  highlighted  that the  Department of  Natural                                                               
Resources has 210  employees, including 10 fulltime  level I land                                                               
surveyors,  12 fulltime  level I  natural  resource managers,  52                                                               
fulltime level  II natural resource  specialists, and  4 fulltime                                                               
level II appraisers.  She said she did not  know these employees'                                                               
current  workload or  if the  land  surveying needs  in DNR  were                                                               
"huckity buck,"  but she  wanted it  on the  record that  she was                                                               
cautious  and wary  of the  $750,000 fiscal  note that  calls for                                                               
five new fulltime employees.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
4:29:41 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  BISHOP asked  if individuals  would have  the option  to                                                               
purchase these  parcels under  the same  terms and  conditions as                                                               
the current process;  the state carries the  note and individuals                                                               
make payments to the state.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
MR. PARSONS answered yes.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
4:30:43 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR KAWASAKI referenced  the state map of VUU  lands on slide                                                               
12 and asked if DNR has  determined that each of the blue colored                                                               
parcels are  not critical  habitat or  have something  that would                                                               
preclude a sale.                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
MR.  PARSONS answered  that map  is the  division's current  best                                                               
estimate of what  VUU lands would be available  for this program.                                                               
He added  the caveat, "I cannot  tell you 100 percent  every acre                                                               
of that  is unencumbered or is  available." He said he  could say                                                               
the land  is not classified  for habitat  or minerals and  it has                                                               
not been approved for municipal  land entitlements. He added that                                                               
before  the  land  is  offered  to the  public  a  more  rigorous                                                               
analysis would be necessary.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
4:32:35 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR KAWASAKI  referenced Section 2 and  asked what additional                                                               
studies  would be  required for  the director  to make  a written                                                               
finding that  the best interest  of the  state will be  served by                                                               
the process going forward. He cited  a bill he worked on with the                                                               
director to make the current process easier.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR.  PARSONS answered  the  "035" best  interest  finding is  not                                                               
necessary, but  the division  would still  go through  a rigorous                                                               
process  to  ensure the  relevant  lands  are not  encumbered  by                                                               
pipelines, easements, leases, or  other authorizations. This will                                                               
be similar to the current process  initially, but at the end less                                                               
work  will  be  required  to   convey  the  land  and  enter  the                                                               
authorization, he said.                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
4:35:44 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR MICCICHE  asked if he  agreed that this iteration  of the                                                               
remote cabin  site program had  a different system  for basically                                                               
the same thing.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
MR. PARSONS agreed that was  fairly accurate; instead of discrete                                                               
parcels, this program  looks statewide at what  might be included                                                               
in the program.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR MICCICHE referred  to the fiscal note  analysis and asked                                                               
if $750,000 to $2.5 million in sales is expected over time.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
MR. PARSONS  answered that is  the revenue estimate  and $569,900                                                               
is the estimated expense for a net of less than $200,000.                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
4:38:24 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR BISHOP  referenced the map on  slide 10 and asked  if the                                                               
parcels in blue are available for staking and lease.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
MR.  PARSONS  answered  it should  be  considered  a  preliminary                                                               
analysis of locations where land may be available.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR BISHOP noted  the bill says an  individual could nominate                                                               
outside those quadrants.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
MR. PARSONS confirmed that was correct.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
4:39:18 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR REVAK requested the sectional analysis for SB 133.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
MR. PARSONS deferred to Mr. Orman for the sectional analysis.                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
4:39:42 PM                                                                                                                    
MR.  ORMAN stated  he  was primarily  available  to answer  legal                                                               
questions about the bill, but he could provide a summary.                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR  REVAK  stated   he  would  wait  to  hear  the  sectional                                                                
analysis  during a  subsequent hearing.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
4:40:27 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  MICCICHE  asked Mr.  Parsons  to provide  better detail                                                                
on the  lands available  under the  bill.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR  REVAK requested  he  send the more  detailed  maps to  the                                                               
committee.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  KIEHL  noted  the  chair's   staff  had  posted  a  more                                                               
detailed  map on BASIS.                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
MR. PARSONS  agreed a more detailed  map was posted on  BASIS. He                                                               
reiterated  that this  was just  a preliminary  look at  the land                                                               
that potentially would be available.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR REVAK advised the committee  would look at the detailed map                                                               
and follow  up if there were  questions on that or  the sectional                                                               
analysis.                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
4:42:48 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR REVAK opened  public testimony on SB 133;  finding none, he                                                               
closed public testimony.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
4:43:12 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR REVAK held SB 133 in committee.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
         SB 79-HUNTING/TRAPPING/FISHING: DISABLED VETS                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
4:43:26 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR REVAK  announced the  consideration of  SENATE BILL  NO. 79                                                               
"An  Act  relating  to  sport   fishing,  hunting,  and  trapping                                                               
identification cards."                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
He  stated the  bill was  first  heard on  3/15/2021 when  public                                                               
testimony was heard  and closed. He noted  the proposed committee                                                               
substitute (CS).                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
4:43:41 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR JESSE  KIEHL, speaking as sponsor,  reminded members that                                                               
the  original  bill  qualifies veterans  with  a  service-related                                                               
disability  to  receive the  permanent  ID  card senior  citizens                                                               
receive  for hunting,  fishing, and  trapping. Without  the bill,                                                               
these  veterans  only qualify  for  an  annual free  hunting  and                                                               
fishing   license.  The   proposed  CS   reflects  requests   and                                                               
suggestions from the Alaska Department  of Fish and Game (ADF&G).                                                               
First it addresses the technical  issue that the disabled veteran                                                               
license  is annual,  but the  department's practice  has been  to                                                               
issue a  permanent card for hunting  and fishing. The CS  adds it                                                               
to  the statute  so that  the law  matches current  practice. The                                                               
more substantive  change is  to add trapping  to the  free annual                                                               
hunting  and  fishing  license for  active  duty  National  Guard                                                               
members and members of the reserves who are residents                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  KIEHL said  he wanted  to  correct a  statement he  made                                                               
during the initial presentation  about the trapping licenses sold                                                               
in  Alaska  each  year.  He  should  have  said  just  under  900                                                               
exclusively trapping licenses are sold  in Alaska each year. That                                                               
is the possible revenue loss under  SB 79. The number of combined                                                               
hunting/fishing/trapping licenses sold in the  state each year is                                                               
vastly larger.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR STEVENS commented on the title.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR KIEHL responded to the comment.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
4:47:07 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  MICCICHE moved  to adopt  the committee  substitute (CS)                                                               
for SB 79, work order 32-LS0003\W, as the working document.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
4:47:29 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR REVAK found no objection and version W was adopted.                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR MICCICHE asked  the sponsor if the fiscal  note was still                                                               
zero.                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR KIEHL answered the department  opined the original fiscal                                                               
note for the bill is still appropriate.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
4:48:14 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR MICCICHE  said he  supported the bill,  but he  wanted to                                                               
make sure the committee is looking at real numbers.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR REVAK asked Ms. Hanke to comment.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
4:48:47 PM                                                                                                                    
RACHEL HANKE, Legislative Liaison,  Alaska Department of Fish and                                                               
Game,  Juneau, Alaska,  stated the  number of  exclusive trapping                                                               
licenses will  remain the same.  The CS adds trapping  for active                                                               
duty reserve members and the  expectation is that number will not                                                               
be large so the fiscal impact will be minimal.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
4:49:11 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR REVAK found no further  questions or comments and asked the                                                               
will of the committee.                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
4:49:56 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR MICCICHE  moved to report  the CS  for SB 79,  work order                                                               
32-LS0003\W, from  committee with individual  recommendations and                                                               
attached zero fiscal note(s).                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
4:50:11 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  REVAK found  no objection  and CSSB  79(RES) was  reported                                                               
from the Senate Resources Standing Committee.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
4:50:51 PM                                                                                                                    
There being no further business to come before the committee,                                                                   
Chair Revak adjourned the Senate Resources Standing Committee                                                                   
meeting at 4:50 p.m.                                                                                                            

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
SB 134 Background - Related Statutes.pdf HRES 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM
SRES 5/5/2021 3:30:00 PM
SB 134
SB 134 Sponsor Statement 4.30.2021.pdf HRES 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM
SRES 5/5/2021 3:30:00 PM
SB 134
SB 134 Fiscal Note 4.31.21.pdf SRES 5/5/2021 3:30:00 PM
SB 134
SB 134 Sectional Analysis 4.30.2021.pdf SRES 5/5/2021 3:30:00 PM
SB 134
SB 134 Support Doc-BGCSB Final minutes 2.2020.pdf HRES 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM
SRES 5/5/2021 3:30:00 PM
SB 134
SB 133 Sponsor Statement 4.27.21.pdf SRES 5/5/2021 3:30:00 PM
SB 133
SB 133 Fiscal Note 4.26.21.pdf SRES 5/5/2021 3:30:00 PM
SB 133
SB 133 Sectional Analysis 5.3.2021.pdf SRES 5/5/2021 3:30:00 PM
SB 133
SB 79 CS ver W.pdf SRES 5/5/2021 3:30:00 PM
SB 79
SB 79 ver W Explanation of changes.pdf SRES 5/5/2021 3:30:00 PM
SB 79
SB 133 Remote Rec Presentation 5.5.2021.pdf SRES 5/5/2021 3:30:00 PM
SB 133
SB 133 VUU Map (No Layers - Reduced).pdf SRES 5/5/2021 3:30:00 PM
SB 133
SB 134 Support Letter APHA 5.5.21.pdf HRES 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM
SRES 5/5/2021 3:30:00 PM
SB 134