04/17/2015 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB15 | |
| HB75 | |
| Adjourn |
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 15 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 75 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
SENATE JUDICIARY STANDING COMMITTEE
April 17, 2015
4:11 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Senator Lesil McGuire, Chair
Senator John Coghill, Vice Chair
Senator Mia Costello
Senator Peter Micciche
Senator Bill Wielechowski
MEMBERS ABSENT
All members present
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 15(FIN)
"An Act relating to credits toward a sentence of imprisonment
for certain persons under electronic monitoring."
- MOVED SCS CSHB 15(JUD) OUT OF COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 75(JUD) AM
"An Act relating to the registration of marijuana establishments
by municipalities; relating to the definition of 'marijuana';
clarifying standards for personal use of marijuana by persons 21
years of age or older; prohibiting the public consumption of
marijuana; authorizing the registration of marijuana clubs;
relating to established villages and to local option elections
regarding the operation of marijuana establishments; and
providing for an effective date."
- HEARD AND HELD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HB 15
SHORT TITLE: CREDITS FOR TIME SERVED/GOOD TIME
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) WILSON
01/21/15 (H) PREFILE RELEASED 1/9/15
01/21/15 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
01/21/15 (H) STA, FIN
01/23/15 (H) STA REFERRAL REMOVED
01/23/15 (H) JUD REFERRAL ADDED BEFORE FIN
02/18/15 (H) BILL REPRINTED 2/16/15
02/20/15 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM CAPITOL 120
02/20/15 (H) Heard & Held
02/20/15 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
03/18/15 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM CAPITOL 120
03/18/15 (H) Heard & Held
03/18/15 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
03/23/15 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM CAPITOL 120
03/23/15 (H) Moved CSHB 15(JUD) Out of Committee
03/23/15 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
03/25/15 (H) JUD RPT CS(JUD) NT 2DP 4NR
03/25/15 (H) DP: CLAMAN, LEDOUX
03/25/15 (H) NR: MILLETT, KELLER, GRUENBERG, FOSTER
04/03/15 (H) FIN AT 1:30 PM HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/03/15 (H) <Bill Hearing Canceled>
04/06/15 (H) FIN AT 1:30 PM HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/06/15 (H) Heard & Held
04/06/15 (H) MINUTE(FIN)
04/10/15 (H) FIN AT 1:30 PM HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/10/15 (H) Moved CSHB 15(FIN) Out of Committee
04/10/15 (H) MINUTE(FIN)
04/11/15 (H) FIN RPT CS(FIN) NT 6DP 3AM
04/11/15 (H) DP: SADDLER, PRUITT, WILSON, GATTIS,
EDGMON, THOMPSON
04/11/15 (H) AM: GARA, KAWASAKI, GUTTENBERG
04/13/15 (H) TRANSMITTED TO (S)
04/13/15 (H) VERSION: CSHB 15(FIN)
04/14/15 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
04/14/15 (S) JUD
04/15/15 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
04/15/15 (S) Heard & Held
04/15/15 (S) MINUTE(JUD)
04/17/15 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
BILL: HB 75
SHORT TITLE: MARIJUANA REG;CLUBS;MUNIS;LOCAL OPT ELECT
SPONSOR(s): COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS
01/23/15 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
01/23/15 (H) CRA, JUD
02/21/15 (H) CRA AT 10:00 AM BARNES 124
02/21/15 (H) -- MEETING CANCELED --
02/24/15 (H) CRA AT 8:00 AM BARNES 124
02/24/15 (H) Heard & Held
02/24/15 (H) MINUTE(CRA)
03/03/15 (H) CRA AT 8:00 AM BARNES 124
03/03/15 (H) Moved CSHB 75(CRA) Out of Committee
03/03/15 (H) MINUTE(CRA)
03/05/15 (H) CRA AT 8:00 AM BARNES 124
03/05/15 (H) Moved CSHB 75(CRA) Out of Committee
03/05/15 (H) MINUTE(CRA)
03/06/15 (H) CRA RPT CS(CRA) NT 3DP 3NR
03/06/15 (H) DP: NAGEAK, SEATON, TILTON
03/06/15 (H) NR: DRUMMOND, REINBOLD, HUGHES
03/11/15 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM CAPITOL 120
03/11/15 (H) Heard & Held
03/11/15 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
03/18/15 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM CAPITOL 120
03/18/15 (H) <Bill Hearing Canceled>
03/25/15 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM CAPITOL 120
03/25/15 (H) <Bill Hearing Canceled>
03/27/15 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM CAPITOL 120
03/27/15 (H) Moved CSHB 75(JUD) Out of Committee
03/27/15 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
03/30/15 (H) JUD RPT CS(JUD) NT 1DP 3NR 3AM
03/30/15 (H) DP: LEDOUX
03/30/15 (H) NR: MILLETT, CLAMAN, FOSTER
03/30/15 (H) AM: LYNN, KELLER, GRUENBERG
04/02/15 (H) TRANSMITTED TO (S)
04/02/15 (H) VERSION: CSHB 75(JUD) AM
04/03/15 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
04/03/15 (S) CRA, JUD
04/07/15 (S) CRA AT 3:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
04/07/15 (S) Heard & Held
04/07/15 (S) MINUTE(CRA)
04/14/15 (S) CRA AT 3:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
04/14/15 (S) Moved SCS CSHB 75(CRA) Out of Committee
04/14/15 (S) MINUTE(CRA)
04/15/15 (S) CRA RPT SCS 1DP 3AM NEW TITLE
04/15/15 (S) DP: BISHOP
04/15/15 (S) AM: EGAN, STEDMAN, HOFFMAN
04/15/15 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
04/15/15 (S) Heard & Held
04/15/15 (S) MINUTE(JUD)
04/17/15 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
WITNESS REGISTER
REPRESENTATIVE TAMMIE WILSON
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Sponsor of HB 15.
REPRESENTATIVE CATHY TILTON
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Provided introductory comments on HB 75
speaking as Chair of the House Community and Regional Affairs
Standing Committee.
HEALTH HILYARD, Staff
Representative Tilton
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Discussed the policy points of HB 75 and
responded to questions.
BRUCE SCHULTE, Spokesman
Coalition for Responsible Cannabis Legislation
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 75.
NANCY MEADE, General Counsel
Administrative Staff
Alaska Court System
POSITION STATEMENT: Discussed the provision in HB 75 that the
Court System requested.
JOE HARDENBROOK
Mayor's Office
Fairbanks North Star Borough
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support the provision in HB 75
to allow marijuana clubs and voiced concern with Sections 16 and
19.
DENNIS WHEELER, Municipal Attorney
Municipality of Anchorage
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 75.
AMY MEAD, Municipal Attorney
City and Borough of Juneau
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 75.
TIM HINTERBERGER, Chair
Campaign to Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 75 and offered
three suggestions for amendments.
FRANK BERARDI, Chair
Coalition for Responsible Cannabis Legislation
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 75.
ACTION NARRATIVE
4:11:32 PM
CHAIR LESIL MCGUIRE called the Senate Judiciary Standing
Committee meeting to order at 4:11 p.m. Present at the call to
order were Senators Costello Coghill, Wielechowski, and Chair
McGuire.
HB 15-CREDITS FOR TIME SERVED/GOOD TIME
4:11:47 PM
CHAIR MCGUIRE announced the consideration of HB 15. "An Act
relating to credits toward a sentence of imprisonment for
certain persons under electronic monitoring." She noted that the
Senate CS, version X, was before the committee and the only
outstanding issue was addressed in a legal memo that was in the
packets. She asked the sponsor if that was her recollection.
REPRESENTATIVE TAMMIE WILSON, sponsor of HB 15, answered yes.
CHAIR MCGUIRE asked if there were any further questions.
4:12:08 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked the sponsor to clarify the discussion
about the last "and" on page 1, line 12.
4:12:36 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WILSON advised that the conversation was whether
or not it would make a difference to change the last word on
line 12 from "and" to "or." She spoke to the Department of Law
and their preference was to keep the term "and."
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI indicated he was satisfied with the
explanation.
4:13:13 PM
SENATOR COGHILL added that there was also discussion about
whether someone on electronic monitoring would lose their
accumulated credit if they committed a criminal offense while on
electronic monitoring. His expectation was yes they'd lose it
all.
4:13:33 PM
SENATOR COGHILL moved to report the Senate CS for CS for HB
15(JUD) from committee with individual recommendations and
attached fiscal note(s).
CHAIR MCGUIRE found no objection and announced that SCS CSHB
15(JUD) is reported from the Senate Judiciary Standing
Committee.
HB 75-MARIJUANA REG;CLUBS;MUNIS;LOCAL OPT ELECT
4:14:11 PM
CHAIR MCGUIRE announced the consideration of HB 75. "An Act
relating to the registration of marijuana establishments by
municipalities; relating to the definition of 'marijuana';
clarifying standards for personal use of marijuana by persons 21
years of age or older; prohibiting the public consumption of
marijuana; authorizing the registration of marijuana clubs;
relating to established villages and to local option elections
regarding the operation of marijuana establishments; and
providing for an effective date." She asked for a motion to
adopt the Senate committee substitute (CS), version R.
4:14:31 PM
SENATOR COGHILL motioned to adopt Senate CS for HB 75, labeled
29-LS0345\R, as the working document.
CHAIR MCGUIRE found no objection and version R was before the
committee.
4:15:00 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CATHY TILTON, speaking as Chair of the House
Community and Regional Affairs Standing Committee stated that HB
75 provides the definitions and guidance that municipal
attorneys and mayors requested in order to adopt local
ordinances relating to the marijuana initiative. She said the
bill follows Title 4.
4:17:03 PM
At ease from 4:17 p.m. to 4:19 p.m.
SENATOR MICCICHE joined the committee.
4:19:27 PM
HEALTH HILYARD, Staff, Representative Tilton, reviewed the more
substantive and policy changes between version U.A that passed
the House and version R for HB 75.
Page 2, lines 21-23, stipulates that a person may
possess not more than 24 marijuana plants for personal
use.
Page 3, lines 8-10, states that notwithstanding the 24
plant limit established in the bill, municipalities,
by ordinance, may limit the number of marijuana plants
per dwelling to fewer than 24 plants.
Section 6 on page 3 changes from 10 days to five days
the timeframe for the board to notify a municipality
of receipt of an application or renewal application to
operate a marijuana establishment.
Page 7 has conforming amendments to the timeline for
the issuance of registrations.
Section 8 on page 4, lines 6-12, reinserts language
amending AS 17.38.100(d). It clarifies the board
process in the event there are more applicants seeking
registration of a marijuana establishment than are
available in the municipality.
Section 20 on page 9, lines 7-8, stipulates that after
a local village has had a local election and chose to
ban commercial marijuana establishments, nothing in
that ban would prohibit any of the activities provided
for in the personal use statute, AS 17.38.020.
Page 10, lines 20-22, provides that the supreme court
shall establish a bail schedule that allows
individuals to pay fines for certain violations
without a court appearance. This change was made at
the request of the Court System.
Page 11, line 15, clarifies that "manufacture" has the
meaning given in AS 11.71.900. He read the statute and
summarized that it means that growing for personal use
is not considered manufacturing.
MR. HILYARD offered to answer questions.
4:24:15 PM
CHAIR MCGUIRE found no questions and opened public testimony.
4:24:27 PM
BRUCE SCHULTE, Spokesman, Coalition for Responsible Cannabis
Legislation, stated support for HB 75. Noting the potential
amendment to remove marijuana clubs as a type of marijuana
business, he highlighted that municipalities and boroughs have
articulated interest in having that type of marijuana
businesses. He suggested the committee leave the local option in
the bill and clarify the operating parameters through the
regulatory process, before any permits are issued.
He said the Coalition supports the six plant per person limit,
but he understands law enforcement's desire to have a bright
line for the total number of plants in a single dwelling. If the
concern is that people might try and get around the regulations
and have a small commercial growing operation in their home, he
suggested a better strategy might be to provide an easy entry
into a regulated market. That may address the problem, whereas
allowing municipalities to set the limit creates confusion when
someone moves from one community to another.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked if he said that communities have
specifically asked for marijuana clubs.
MR. SCHULTE answered yes; Fairbanks is specifically looking at
allowing that type of business.
4:28:23 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI observed that communities would have to
adopt an ordinance to allow marijuana clubs.
MR. SCHULTE offered his expectation that if they're allowed
under state law, communities additionally would impose
boundaries so they'd have control over whether or not a business
received a permit to operate.
4:29:01 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE expressed concern about what happens after
someone is served marijuana in a marijuana club because
presumably they'd be "high" and couldn't be served any more. He
asked "What is a marijuana club?"
MR. SCHULTE said he envisions a membership-only private
establishment for people 21 and older where people could spend
time with their friends and consume marijuana. The establishment
likely would have some other types of entertainment that's the
focus of the gathering, but it would be "marijuana friendly." He
reiterated the suggestion to leave the local option for
marijuana clubs in the bill and clarify the operating parameters
through the regulatory process.
SENATOR MICCICHE noted that over half the Senate is cosponsoring
a bill that prohibits smoking in places where Alaskans are
employed. He asked how he sees that working with a marijuana
club.
MR. SCHULTE replied it depends on how that bill evolves. If it
allows e-cigarettes, there is an analogous method of consumption
of marijuana that would be compatible. If the bill didn't allow
e-cigarettes it might exclude marijuana clubs unless they
confined consumption to edibles, he said.
SENATOR MICCICHE recalled that marijuana clubs were not
mentioned in the initiative.
MR. SCHULTE agreed they were not discussed in the initiative. He
said this was added at the request of the Fairbanks North Star
Borough and it's a business model that has existed in Amsterdam
for decades. He added that he envisions an opportunity in the
rule-making process to define business types that weren't
discussed in the initiative but may become part of the
legitimate, regulated industry.
SENATOR COSTELLO asked if someone could carry a firearm into a
marijuana club.
MR. SCHULTE replied he didn't know but he'd look to what's done
with bars and restaurants where alcohol is served.
4:33:58 PM
NANCY MEADE, General Counsel, Administrative Staff, Alaska Court
System, stated that the Court System asked the sponsor to
include the language that appears on page 10, lines 20-22. It
requires the Alaska Supreme Court to put the violations on the
bail forfeiture schedule so people can pay their tickets online
or by mail without a mandatory court appearance. That is fairly
standard for a number of minor offenses in the statute, she
said.
4:34:53 PM
JOE HARDENBROOK, Mayor's Office, Fairbanks North Star Borough,
testified in support of the provision in HB 75 to allow
marijuana clubs. He expressed appreciation for the language and
the ability to regulate the clubs at the local level. This
aligns with Article X of the Constitution of the State of Alaska
that provides maximum local self government. Including the
language in HB 75 allows municipalities and local governments to
decide whether or not to allow these consumption venues within
their boundaries, he said.
He voiced concern with Section 16. It says that a registration
issued by a municipality is subject to state regulation, which
is contrary to the initiative language and its intent. He
requested the committee amend HB 75 to match the tenets of the
original initiative.
MR. HARDENBROOK also requested the committee amend Section 19 to
make the powers of a borough area wide. This would allow a city
within a borough to be more restrictive, but not less
restrictive with regard to commercial facilities. This is in
line with the consideration of zoning authority, which is a
borough power.
He pointed out that 60 percent of the residents in the Fairbanks
North Star Borough voted in favor of Proposition 2, which is
more than voted in the election for the legislature. He said it
could therefore be argued that Fairbanks area voters were more
sure of their stance on the marijuana issue than they were on
who they would choose to represent them in the legislature.
4:38:48 PM
DENNIS WHEELER, Municipal Attorney, Municipality of Anchorage,
testified in support of HB 75. He described the legislation as a
good vehicle for giving local governments the opportunity to
decide how to regulate marijuana. With regard to marijuana
clubs, he stressed the importance of a local option to opt in or
opt out or provide local licensing regulations.
4:40:25 PM
AMY MEAD, Municipal Attorney, City and Borough of Juneau,
testified in support of HB 75. She noted that the CBJ Assembly
submitted written testimony. She emphasized the importance of
giving municipalities tools to reasonably and effectively
regulate this industry, and expressed appreciation for the
outreach and being included in the process.
4:41:59 PM
TIM HINTERBERGER, Chair, Campaign to Regulate Marijuana Like
Alcohol, stated that he is testifying in support of HB 75 but he
has potential amendments to suggest. He expressed support for
the previous comments in support of granting municipalities
local control to authorize marijuana clubs. He discussed the two
primary issues with the current committee substitute, version R.
First, the CS appears to grant municipalities the discretion to
set a lower cap on the number of plants in a household, but it
doesn't say how low. Unless the wording is changed, a
municipality could use this mechanism to prevent individuals
from growing any plants. The second concern is that the current
language does not set a timeline for when the marijuana board
would need to address an application for a marijuana
establishment that a municipality protests. He emphasized that
the 90-day deadline set out in the ballot measure should not be
altered.
MR. HINTERBERGER said his final suggestion relates to the fact
that SB 30 doesn't appear to be moving. That bill has important
language setting a civil penalty rather than a criminal sanction
for the possession of marijuana by young adults. He stated
support for inserting language in HB 75 that would have that
same effect. He noted he submitted written comments.
4:45:32 PM
FRANK BERARDI, Chair, Coalition for Responsible Cannabis
Legislation, testified in support of HB 75 and emphasized the
importance of local control for onsite consumption for marijuana
establishments. This will reduce public consumption of marijuana
and provide tourists an outlet for consuming cannabis. He said
visitors can't smoke in their hotel, in public, inside a
facility, and they can't take anything they buy home with them.
He maintained that the way to have a viable cannabis industry
that draws tourists and brings dollars to the state is to allow
onsite consumption facilities.
Pointing out that the Fairbanks North Star Borough supports
local control for onsite consumption, he opined that when
citizens voted to regulate marijuana like alcohol they also
intended for it to be regulated like alcohol. "We want to see a
viable and money-making marijuana industry, and this is the
first step towards making that happen," he said.
4:47:38 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE asked what he meant when he said tourists can't
take marijuana home, because that's not permitted by any laws.
MR. BERARDI replied there is no legal avenue for a tourist to
take part in Alaska's legal cannabis industry if they can't take
it home and they can't consume it in a legal cannabis
establishment. He surmised that this would lead to more public
consumption and the possibility of smuggling.
SENATOR MICCICHE said the initiative never mentioned clubs and
he believes that's because they're challenging in a number of
ways, public health among them. Employees would more than likely
be exposed constantly to plant particulate matter, and that
doesn't sound healthy.
MR. BERARDI responded that it could be mitigated with the use of
a proper HVAC system and carbon filter so that smoke isn't
lingering and the smell isn't projected into the street. "It is
possible for an employee to work in an onsite consumption
facility without actually being exposed to cannabis," he said.
4:50:25 PM
CHAIR MCGUIRE closed public testimony.
4:50:40 PM
SENATOR COGHILL motioned to adopt Amendment 1, labeled 29-
LS0345\R.2.
AMENDMENT 1
OFFERED IN THE SENATE
TO: SCS CSHB 75(JUD), Draft Version "R"
Page 1, line 4:
Delete "authorizing the registration of marijuana
clubs;"
Page 5, line 25:
Delete "[OR]"
Insert "or"
Delete ", or marijuana clubs"
Page 7, line 26:
Delete "retail marijuana stores, or marijuana
clubs"
Insert "or retail marijuana stores"
Page 11, lines 5 - 8:
Delete all material.
Renumber the following bill sections accordingly.
Page 11, lines 16 - 18:
Delete all material.
Renumber the following paragraph accordingly.
Page 11, lines 23 - 24:
Delete "; "public place" does not include a
marijuana club"
CHAIR MCGUIRE objected for discussion purposes.
SENATOR COGHILL explained that the amendment removes the option
for marijuana clubs. He reasoned that it's a matter of public
safety because so much is unknown about the effect of marijuana
intoxication. He said he agrees with the argument about local
control, but the legislature needs to provide better direction.
This will allow the opportunity to figure things out before
municipalities put regulations in place.
CHAIR MCGUIRE asked the net effect of the proposed change on
page 5, line 25.
SENATOR COGHILL replied it removes the reference to marijuana
clubs, which aligns with his view that municipalities and
boroughs need more direction before these clubs are referenced
in statute.
4:55:37 PM
MR. HILYARD said this was an effort to be responsive to
municipalities, but it was probably premature.
CHAIR MCGUIRE said she's inclined to support the amendment as a
middle ground. There's nothing in the amendment that says a
municipality can't adopt regulations, but it sends a message
that the legislature recognizes that the matter needs more
study.
MR. HILYARD agreed, adding that the amendment returns the bill
to the original initiative language.
4:57:12 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE stated support for maintaining the verbatim
language of the initiative.
SENATOR COSTELLO observed that it's written in the affirmative
and then it lists the things that are prohibited. She asked if
something that isn't on the list is inherently not prohibited.
MR. HILYARD replied the legal opinions agree that the amendment
returns the bill to the language in the ballot initiative, which
is silent on marijuana clubs.
SENATOR COSTELLO asked if he'd contemplated how to respond if
someone submits an application for a marijuana club.
MR. HILYARD responded that an application for a commercial
establishment isn't possible if it doesn't exist in statute or
regulation.
5:00:48 PM
CHAIR MCGUIRE maintained her objection to Amendment 1 and
recessed the Senate Judiciary Standing Committee meeting to a
call of the chair. [The committee reconvened on 4/18/15.]