Legislature(2015 - 2016)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/18/2015 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB43 | |
| Confirmation Hearing: Attorney General | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 43 | TELECONFERENCED | |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
SENATE JUDICIARY STANDING COMMITTEE
March 18, 2015
1:38 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Senator Lesil McGuire, Chair
Senator John Coghill, Vice Chair
Senator Mia Costello
Senator Bill Wielechowski
MEMBERS ABSENT
Senator Peter Micciche
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
CONFIRMATION HEARING
- Attorney General of the State of Alaska
Craig Richards
- CONFIRMATION ADVANCED
SENATE BILL NO. 43
"An Act relating to immunity for a fire department and employees
or members of a fire department."
- HEARD & HELD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: SB 43
SHORT TITLE: IMMUNITY FOR FIRE DEPT. & MEMBERS
SPONSOR(s): SENATOR(s) COGHILL
02/06/15 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/06/15 (S) CRA, JUD
02/17/15 (S) CRA AT 3:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
02/17/15 (S) Heard & Held
02/17/15 (S) MINUTE(CRA)
03/05/15 (S) CRA AT 3:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/05/15 (S) Moved CSSB 43(CRA) Out of Committee
03/05/15 (S) MINUTE(CRA)
03/06/15 (S) CRA RPT CS 3DP SAME TITLE
03/06/15 (S) DP: BISHOP, EGAN, MACKINNON
03/16/15 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/16/15 (S) Scheduled but Not Heard
03/18/15 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
WITNESS REGISTER
JORDAN SHILLING, Staff
Senator John Coghill
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Reviewed the changes in version P CS for SB
43.
MITCH FLYNN, Fire Chief
Steese Fire Department
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of SB 43.
CRAIG RICHARDS, Attorney General Designee
Department of Law (DOL)
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified as Attorney General Designee.
ACTION NARRATIVE
1:38:16 PM
CHAIR LESIL MCGUIRE called the Senate Judiciary Standing
Committee meeting to order at 1:38 p.m. Present at the call to
order were Senators Costello, Wielechowski, Coghill, and Chair
McGuire.
SB 43-IMMUNITY FOR FIRE DEPT. & MEMBERS
1:38:40 PM
CHAIR MCGUIRE announced the consideration of SB 43. "An Act
relating to immunity for a fire department and employees or
members of a fire department."
SENATOR COGHILL, speaking as sponsor, explained that SB 43
addresses immunity for fire departments. In the Interior some
volunteer fire departments contract with local governments to
provide services and they aren't given the same immunity
protection from liability as the employees of fire departments
operated by municipalities. He deferred further explanation to
Mr. Shilling.
1:40:11 PM
SENATOR COGHILL motioned to adopt the proposed committee
substitute for SB 43, labeled 29-LS0325\P, as the working
document.
1:41:01 PM
At ease
1:41:36 PM
CHAIR MCGUIRE reconvened the meeting and announced that without
objection, version P is before the committee.
1:42:00 PM
JORDAN SHILLING, Staff, Senator John Coghill, explained that the
language on page 1, lines 11-13, clarifies that the immunity
does not apply if the legal action taken is based on an act or
omission of an employee or member of a fire department in the
execution of a duty under contract with a private entity.
MR. SHILLING summarized the intent of the legislation
paraphrasing from the following sponsor statement:
Senate Bill 43 extends protections to certain types of
fire departments.
Under current law, employees of municipal fire
departments receive immunity from liability. However,
some fire departments, such as those in Fairbanks,
Chugiak, and Girdwood, operate as volunteer-based non-
profits that contract with local governments to
provide services. These types of fire departments
aren't similarly protected in statute (AS
09.65.070(c)).
Liability protections should not be exclusive to
employees of fire departments operated by
municipalities and should be extended to include all
fire departments that have a contractual relationship
with local governments.
Senate Bill 43 also extends immunity available to
municipal fire departments and to contracted fire
departments. While municipal fire departments already
have some statutory protections, contract fire
departments have none. Because the current statute
does not protect them from liability, these fire
departments, local governments, and ultimately
taxpayers, are vulnerable.
He reviewed the history of the statute. It was established in
1975 at the request of the Juneau Volunteer Fire Department, and
was modeled after a law from Delaware. He noted that Fairbanks,
Anchorage, and the firefighters themselves support the
legislation.
1:45:51 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked what the rewrite in Section 1 tries
to do.
MR. SHILLING replied the current statute only covers municipally
operated fire departments. Section 1 on page 2, lines 2-3,
redefines fire department to include fire departments that
operate under contract or agreement with a municipality or
village.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI observed that the repealed and reenacted AS
09.65.070(c) is a lot longer than the current statute.
MR. SHILLING clarified that the changes are to cover contract
fire departments and to create an exception to the immunity for
intentional misconduct or gross negligence. That language was
lifted from the 911 statutes.
SENATOR COGHILL added that these standards are not unusual in
these types of circumstances.
MR. SHILLING pointed out that AS 09.65.070(c) provides immunity
primarily to staff of a fire department but also to the
department itself and subsection (d) provides immunity to the
department itself.
CHAIR MCGUIRE asked Mr. Shilling to bring a copy of the existing
AS 09.65.070(c) to the next hearing with the proposed
substantial changes highlighted.
1:49:40 PM
MITCH FLYNN, Fire Chief, Steese Volunteer Fire Department,
Fairbanks, Alaska, said he works for a nonprofit in Fairbanks to
provide fire and EMS services under contract to the Fairbanks
North Star Borough. This past year he learned about the lack of
immunity protection the fire department has because it is a
contractor. This exposes the fire department to potential
litigation and large judgments. He urged the committee to pass
the legislation.
1:50:41 PM
CHAIR MCGUIRE announced she would hold SB 43 in committee for
further consideration.
^Confirmation Hearing: Attorney General
Confirmation Hearing
Attorney General of the State of Alaska
1:50:57 PM
CHAIR MCGUIRE announced the next order of business would be the
confirmation hearing for Craig Richards for Attorney General for
the State of Alaska. She asked him to tell the committee about
himself and why he wants to assume this position.
1:51:04 PM
CRAIG RICHARDS, Attorney General Designee, Anchorage, Alaska,
told the committee that he grew up in Fairbanks, studied finance
at the University of Virginia and law at the Washington and Lee
University School of Law. After graduation he clerked for Judge
Ralph Beistline, worked in public finance to research whether or
not the gas pipeline could be built with tax exempt bonds, was
hired by Bill Walker for a short-term job, and subsequently
joined the firm. The practice focused on oil and gas tax matters
and gas pipeline development and he continued to do public
finance work. He noted that he took time off to attend Duke
University where he received an MBA, focusing on oil and gas
quantitative modeling and oil and gas finance.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS related personal information including
that his wife teaches English and English as a second language
at West High School in Anchorage. They have one child.
Responding to the question about his interest in the job, he
said it took him by surprise when Governor Walker offered him
the position. After some thought and consultation with his wife,
he decided it was a once in a lifetime opportunity to serve
Alaskans.
1:57:59 PM
CHAIR MCGUIRE asked what aspects of the job present the biggest
challenges and how the legislature can provide support.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS related that the largest challenge for
the department is dealing with the budget reductions. The eight
percent reduction for FY2016 is manageable, but the next series
of cuts will present be more difficult.
CHAIR MCGUIRE commented that the department will be competing
with the private sector looking for expertise, particularly on
oil and gas.
2:01:08 PM
SENATOR COGHILL asked if he expects to retain the current roster
of Criminal Division employees, given his lack of criminal
experience.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS pointed out that his lack of criminal
experience wasn't unique among previous attorneys general. He
stated support for engaging the Criminal Division because of the
rethinking justice initiatives and highlighted that he didn't
foresee any dramatic changes other than the impact of budget
reductions that will reduce staff by 10 people this year, half
of which will be attorneys. He noted that a lot of the
reductions can be managed through the department's annual 10
percent turnover, but it will take some thought to resize the
Criminal Division without just shrinking out of rural Alaska.
SENATOR COGHILL commented on protecting families and children
and asked if he'd had experience with family law.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS replied he doesn't have a strong
background, but he isn't unfamiliar with that area of law.
SENATOR COGHILL asked him to comment on the issue of working
with tribal governments while staying within the bounds of the
constitution that says governments are supposed to be boroughs
and cities.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS said he's had to dive in head first
because of pending cases and also because it's an issue of
importance to both the tribal communities and law enforcement.
He noted that tribal issues have to be taken one-by-one because
different bodies of law control the different issues. He noted
that one initiative has been to work with DHSS Commissioner
Valerie Davidson and local tribes and rural constituencies to
figure out how to make it a little easier to place Indian
children with Indian families in rural communities in compliance
with the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). The Department of Law
is also continuing its work on the civil diversion agreements,
which will provide tribal communities the ability to have cases
diverted from the state criminal justice system to the tribal
justice system for some class B misdemeanors and other cases for
first-time and nonviolent offenders.
2:09:18 PM
SENATOR COGHILL talked about the structural differences and how
to blend the rights of the individual as opposed to tribal
rights. He encouraged Attorney General Richards to continue to
work on this conundrum and to talk to the Alaska Supreme Court
about the work it had done.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS related that the state constitution is
his guiding document and he believes that a lot can be done
working with tribes to make justice better in rural Alaska.
CHAIR MCGUIRE highlighted that this administration has
demonstrated a willingness to work on tribal issues.
She asked if he'd looked into the Environmental Protection
Agency's (EPA) proposed expansion of critical habitat areas.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS answered yes; the state recently
joined the lawsuit challenging the critical habitat designation
of the ringed seal.
CHAIR MCGUIRE highlighted that the Alaska Arctic Policy
Commission believes that the EPA will try to use the Endangered
Species Act in critical habitat areas to block development in
the Chukchi Sea and Beaufort Sea. She also noted that the
federal government stated the top two goals of the Arctic
Council for the next two years are climate change and marine
stewardship. The idea of mapping new marine protected areas has
been introduced as part of marine stewardship, all of which is
very different than Alaska's goal of economic development for
the people of the North. She opined that it will be critically
important for the Department of Law to develop a specific
expertise in this area because Alaska is hamstrung if it is
unable to develop its natural resources.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS expressed gratitude that his
predecessors built an excellent Endangered Species Act (ESA)
team within the department. He noted the successful challenges
for the bearded seal and the Polar Bear critical habitat
designations and committed to continue such challenges and force
the EPA to return to science-based decision making.
2:15:44 PM
SENATOR COSTELLO asked what he sees as the next largest
challenge after the budget.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS replied it's the idea of re-
envisioning justice in Alaska, particularly up through
sentencing. Right now, there is a collective effort to make
justice smarter and he is committed to developing a plan to
administer justice more cheaply and efficiently without
affecting the quality of justice for Alaskans.
SENATOR COSTELLO asked if the administration is willing to make
an up-front investment to get to the long-term improvements.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS replied he believes there will be
support once there is a plan.
SENATOR COSTELLO asked if he believes that Alaska's juvenile
justice system is working.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS replied he isn't aware of any
fundamental failures, but the department intends to look at the
issues that have been brought forward.
SENATOR COSTELLO asked how he would characterize his role as
attorney general.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS stated that the Attorney General for
the State of Alaska is not a constitutionally defined position,
but the legislature has characterized the role as consistent
with that of an attorney general at common law. He represents
the heads of almost all the departments and agencies of the
state within the executive branch, the Governor's Office, and
the people. Ultimately, his final representation is to the
public interest and to the interests of the people of Alaska.
SENATOR COSTELLO asked if he is satisfied with the conviction
rates of Alaska's district attorneys.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS voiced a qualified yes and noted that
in the next few months the department will revisit the decision
to no longer plea on sentencing. The judiciary, public
defenders, and some legislators have complained that that is
resulting in more trials and lower conviction rates.
SENATOR COSTELLO asked if he expects any more changes to the
regional district attorneys and if he sees those decisions as
political or policy driven.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS answered that he sees changes as a
function of retirement and budget reductions, but every effort
will be made to manage the reductions proportionally through
urban and rural areas.
2:22:43 PM
SENATOR COSTELLO noted that he did not have to file an APOC
statement and asked if he received proceeds from the sale of
Governor Walker's law firm.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS clarified that he does have to file an
APOC form and the information is disclosed on the form. He
explained that when the firm was sold, he received about one-
third of the proceeds.
SENATOR COSTELLO asked if he stands by the comment he made in
the Valdez Star when he agreed with a previous governor who
characterized the state's current oil tax system as crony
capitalism.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS replied he would stand by his
characterization of what said in the article. The sentiment he
was expressing is that he didn't feel that Senate Bill 21 struck
the right balance between what was good for independents and
what was good for the existing legacy producers on the North
Slope. He said he continues to have concerns.
SENATOR COSTELLO asked how he would characterize the Point
Thomson settlement.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS stated that the fundamental gravamen
was that the Point Thomson settlement agreement went around the
DNR regulatory process and adopted a contractual structure to
guide management of the field.
SENATOR COSTELLO asked if he agrees with the governor's
characterization that "It was the worst, dirtiest, backroom deal
in state history."
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS replied he didn't know about that, but
the deal was done in secret and in a manner that was
inconsistent with Alaska law.
SENATOR COSTELLO noted that he had to relinquish the authority
to participate in decisions regarding Point Thomson settlement
litigation. She asked if he foresees having to recuse himself on
other matters and, if so, who would assume the lead.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS answered that he wasn't aware of any
issues other than the few items that were in the initial
delegation of authority that occurred in late December.
2:26:54 PM
SENATOR COSTELLO asked if he serves as an advisor to the
governor on the direction he's taking on oil and gasline
matters.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS replied it's dropped to virtually
nothing in the last few months.
CHAIR MCGUIRE summarized the conversation they had in her office
including that she said the only challenge he'll have is the
unusual circumstance that he practiced law with the Governor.
She asked him to walk through what will happen in the event
there is a conflict with a former client.
2:28:47 PM
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS discussed the process he went through
when Governor Walker asked him to serve as attorney general. He
hired outside counsel to provide legal advice on how to handle
the circumstance that he had litigated against the State of
Alaska, and that attorney gave him a letter suggesting the
potential conflicts. Prior to taking office the DOL ethics
attorneys independently looked at his ethical situation,
including a fact pattern rundown of all his cases. They
recommended that his ethical advisor should be the lieutenant
governor rather than the governor and that he delegate his
authority to the section head of oil, gas and mining when
appropriate. In the event of future conflicts, the DOL ethics
attorneys would take the issue to his ethics advisor, Byron
Mallott. As a belt and suspenders measure the lieutenant
governor received permission to hire outside counsel for any
potential conflict issues related to the attorney general or the
governor. He noted that the governor also has independent legal
counsel to provide advice on potential conflicts his attorney
general has.
2:31:35 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI highlighted that in the legislature people
who work for industries vote on issues and write bills that
directly affect their industries. He asked him to discuss the
different standards for the attorney general and the
legislature.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS responded that he isn't too familiar
with the rules for the legislature but he falls under the Rules
of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Executive Branch
Ethics Act. His hope is that all officials in Alaska understand
their ethical obligations and follow the appropriate rules. He
intends to do so and suspects the legislative body does too.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI pointed out that legislators regularly note
their conflict and then they're forced to vote, whereas the
Rules of Professional Conduct prohibit Attorney General Richards
from doing that. He couldn't hear a case from Valdez because he
represented Valdez.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS replied that's usually correct; the
test is a substantially related matter.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked if he had a sense of how previous
attorneys general handled conflicts and who some of their
clients were.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS replied they delegated their
authority. He didn't remember their clients other than that John
Burns represented one of the utilities from Fairbanks.
2:35:47 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked how many different plans of
development were in place before Point Thomson was finally
developed.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS recalled it was the 23rd plan of
development that resulted in development.
2:36:46 PM
CHAIR MCGUIRE turned the discussion back to smart justice and
asked if he'd had conversations with the PEW Charitable Trusts
and MacArthur Foundation and if he intended to accept their
offer of free help with data research.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS said he hasn't had conversations with
PEW, but he believes they require the heads of both houses of
the legislative body, the chief justice, and the governor to
agree to accept their services. He's had two meetings with the
Governor's Office encouraging him to accept that offer and
believes he's leaning in that direction. He noted that no one
has come forward with a reason not to accept advice.
SENATOR COGHILL asked him to discuss his participation in the
Hillcorp deal.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS explained that the Department of Law
is representing AIDEA in the Fairbanks Natural Gas (FNG)
purchase in an agency client role. In its role as a people's
attorney, the Regulatory Affairs & Public Advocacy (RAPA)
section of DOL is continuing the former attorney general's
policy that the sale of the liquefaction plant at Point
MacKenzie should not go forward to Hillcorp from an affiliate of
FNG until there is a determination as to whether or not the
plant should be subject to cost-based rate regulation. Generally
a utility that is integrated with a supply or production system
that leads to the ultimate distribution is regulated on the same
cost of service basis as the actual distribution of the public
utility.
SENATOR COGHILL commented that the news accounts in Fairbanks
made it appear that the two were tied together when they
weren't.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS agreed they weren't tied and pointed
out that the RAPA situation had been ongoing for about a year.
SENATOR COGHILL asked if he was familiar with the Morey case
that's about all Alaskans being able to participate in a Tier I
harvest.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS replied he wasn't familiar with the
fact pattern in the case.
CHAIR MCGUIRE asked if the issue with the Hillcorp transaction
is that a contract was already in place.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS reviewed the timeline. About eight
months ago there was an attempt to sever the affiliate
relationship between the liquefaction plant and the distribution
system owned by FNG. The state challenge it. Early this year the
FNG affiliate Titan Alaska LLC entered into a deal to sell the
liquefaction plant to the independent company Hillcorp. One of
the first official actions he took was to say not to allow the
sale to go through without guidance from the RCA about whether
the plant should or should not be rate regulated. A month or two
after that he learned that AIDEA was looking at the acquisition
of FNG.
SENATOR COGHILL noted that part of the discussion was that
Walker Richards, LLC sold to a law firm that happens to
represent the North Star Borough, which is looking at the
purchase of FNG.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS agreed that the firm that purchased
Walker Richards, LLC does represent the Interior Gas Utility
(IGU). He clarified that he had no professional interaction with
that firm in their representation of IGU. In fact, the opposite
was true because he represented the Alaska Gasline Port
Authority that looked at an independent purchase of FNG 4-5
years before.
SENATOR COGHILL expressed appreciation for the answer.
2:48:02 PM
CHAIR MCGUIRE asked if he had any comments on the Indian Child
Welfare Act (ICWA) case in the Native village of Tununak.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS noted that the state won that case.
The issue was whether the Native person seeking to have the ICWA
preference applied had to apply for the adoption first. The
Alaska Supreme Court ruled that they did, based largely on a
reading of a U.S. Supreme Court case that the state contended
said the same thing. The grandmother filed for rehearing and the
state intends to join and support its prior position, but asked
for a 30-day extension to reach out to the stakeholders and
listen to what they have to say.
SENATOR COGHILL asked if he had any experience or ideas as
attorney general about how to protect people from cyber scams.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS replied the Department of Law has
employees in the Consumer Protection Unit that are working to
keep up, but it's something that every attorney general's office
in the country is struggling with.
SENATOR COGHILL advised that the legislature and this committee
in particular is interested in learning about potential
loopholes and blind spots.
CHAIR MCGUIRE flagged sex trafficking, sex assault, and domestic
violence as matters of great concern that need to be addressed
differently. Just as Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD)
changed the acceptance of drunk driving, she would like to see
Alaska become the last state that a sex abuser wants to come.
She encouraged him to work with the first lady on this.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI noted that yesterday he was questioned
about opposing the state when he represented Valdez in the TAPS
case. He said he never understood the state's position because
had the state prevailed, local communities and property owners
would have lost tens of millions of dollars and the oil industry
would have made tens of millions of dollars. He asked if the
characterization was correct.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS responded that it's fair to say that
the state's position was closer to the municipalities' position
than to the TAPS owners. For a good portion of the case the
municipalities asserted that TAPS was worth about $13 billion
and the state maintained it was in the $7 Billion or $8 Billion
range.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI noted the $5 billion difference and asked
how much the state would get.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS replied the difference in $5 billion
at 20 mils is $100 million.
SENATOR COGHILL flagged ANILCA as an important topic to delve
into.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS responded that his staff is preparing
a binder and he looks forward to diving in in the next month or
two.
CHAIR MCGUIRE encouraged him to be candid about areas within DOL
that should not be cut.
ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARDS replied he's tried to do that already.
CHAIR MCGUIRE thanked him for taking the position.
3:01:37 PM
SENATOR MCGUIRE motioned to forward the name Craig Richards for
the position of Attorney General for the State of Alaska to the
full body for consideration in accordance with AS 39.05.080. She
reminded members that this does not reflect any intent by the
members to vote for or against the confirmation during any
further sessions.
3:02:14 PM
There being no further business to come before the committee,
Chair McGuire adjourned the Senate Judiciary Standing Committee
meeting at 3:02 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 1 SB43 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SJUD 3/18/2015 1:30:00 PM |
SB 43 |
| 2 SB43 Version H.pdf |
SJUD 3/18/2015 1:30:00 PM |
SB 43 |
| 3 SB43 Summary of Changes Version W to H.pdf |
SJUD 3/18/2015 1:30:00 PM |
SB 43 |
| 4 SB43 Letter of Support Fire Chiefs Assoc.pdf |
SJUD 3/18/2015 1:30:00 PM |
SB 43 |
| 4.1 SB43 Letter of Support FNSB.pdf |
SJUD 3/18/2015 1:30:00 PM |
SB 43 |
| 4.2 SB43 Letter of Support Interior Fire Chiefs.pdf |
SJUD 3/18/2015 1:30:00 PM |
SB 43 |
| 4.3 SB43 Letter of Support - AFD.pdf |
SJUD 3/18/2015 1:30:00 PM |
SB 43 |
| 4.4 SB43 Letter of Support - City of Fairbanks.pdf |
SJUD 3/18/2015 1:30:00 PM |
SB 43 |
| 5 SB43 FN #1.pdf |
SJUD 3/18/2015 1:30:00 PM |
SB 43 |
| 5.1 SB43 FN #2.pdf |
SJUD 3/18/2015 1:30:00 PM |
SB 43 |
| 6 CS SB43 Version P.pdf |
SJUD 3/18/2015 1:30:00 PM |
SB 43 |
| Attorney General -Craig Richards.pdf |
SJUD 3/18/2015 1:30:00 PM |
Craig Richards |