04/06/2012 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB224 | |
| SB134 | |
| HB229 | |
| HB274 | |
| Adjourn |
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 229 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 274 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 224 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 134 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
SENATE JUDICIARY STANDING COMMITTEE
April 6, 2012
1:37 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Senator Hollis French, Chair
Senator Bill Wielechowski, Vice Chair
Senator Joe Paskvan
Senator John Coghill
MEMBERS ABSENT
Senator Lesil McGuire
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
SENATE BILL NO. 224
"An Act making privileged certain communications between
employees and employee union representatives; and amending Rule
402 and Rule 501, Alaska Rules of Evidence."
- MOVED CSSB 224(JUD) OUT OF COMMITTEE
SENATE BILL NO. 134
"An Act relating to child support awards; and repealing Rule
90.3, Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure."
- MOVED CSSB 134(JUD) OUT OF COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 229(JUD)
"An Act relating to the duties of the Big Game Commercial
Services Board; relating to activities, including violations and
penalties, under the supervision of the Big Game Commercial
Services Board; creating a retired status license for certain
retired guides and outfitters; and providing for an effective
date."
- HEARD & HELD
HOUSE BILL NO. 274
"An Act relating to the exemption of certain acts and
transactions from the provisions dealing with unfair methods of
competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices."
- HEARD & HELD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: SB 224
SHORT TITLE: EVIDENCE RULES: UNION/EMPLOYEE PRIVILEGE
SPONSOR(s): LABOR & COMMERCE
03/05/12 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
03/05/12 (S) L&C, JUD
03/20/12 (S) L&C AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/20/12 (S) Heard & Held
03/20/12 (S) MINUTE(L&C)
03/22/12 (S) L&C AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/22/12 (S) Moved SB 224 Out of Committee
03/22/12 (S) MINUTE(L&C)
03/23/12 (S) L&C RPT 4DP
03/23/12 (S) DP: EGAN, DAVIS, MENARD, PASKVAN
03/30/12 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/30/12 (S) Heard & Held
03/30/12 (S) MINUTE(JUD)
04/06/12 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
BILL: SB 134
SHORT TITLE: CHILD SUPPORT AWARDS
SPONSOR(s): KOOKESH
01/17/12 (S) PREFILE RELEASED 1/6/12
01/17/12 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
01/17/12 (S) HSS, JUD
02/06/12 (S) HSS AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
02/06/12 (S) Heard & Held
02/06/12 (S) MINUTE(HSS)
02/15/12 (S) HSS AT 1:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
02/15/12 (S) Moved CSSB 134(HSS) Out of Committee
02/15/12 (S) MINUTE(HSS)
02/17/12 (S) HSS RPT CS 2DP 2NR NEW TITLE
02/17/12 (S) DP: DAVIS, EGAN
02/17/12 (S) NR: MEYER, DYSON
02/17/12 (S) FIN REFERRAL ADDED AFTER JUD
03/07/12 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/07/12 (S) Heard & Held
03/07/12 (S) MINUTE(JUD)
04/04/12 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
04/04/12 (S) Heard & Held
04/04/12 (S) MINUTE(JUD)
04/06/12 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
BILL: HB 229
SHORT TITLE: BIG GAME COMMERCIAL SERVICES BOARD
SPONSOR(s): FEIGE
04/06/11 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
04/06/11 (H) RES, JUD
04/08/11 (H) RES AT 1:00 PM BARNES 124
04/08/11 (H) Heard & Held
04/08/11 (H) MINUTE(RES)
02/15/12 (H) RES AT 1:00 PM BARNES 124
02/15/12 (H) Heard & Held
02/15/12 (H) MINUTE(RES)
02/17/12 (H) RES AT 1:00 PM BARNES 124
02/17/12 (H) Moved CSHB 229(RES) Out of Committee
02/17/12 (H) MINUTE(RES)
02/20/12 (H) RES RPT CS(RES) NT 6DP 2NR 1AM
02/20/12 (H) DP: MUNOZ, FOSTER, DICK, P.WILSON,
SEATON, FEIGE
02/20/12 (H) NR: GARDNER, HERRON
02/20/12 (H) AM: KAWASAKI
03/02/12 (H) JUD AT 1:00 PM CAPITOL 120
03/02/12 (H) Moved CSHB 229(JUD) Out of Committee
03/02/12 (H) MINUTE(JUD)
03/05/12 (H) JUD RPT CS(JUD) NT 7DP
03/05/12 (H) DP: LYNN, GRUENBERG, KELLER, HAWKER,
HOLMES, PRUITT, THOMPSON
03/12/12 (H) TRANSMITTED TO (S)
03/12/12 (H) VERSION: CSHB 229(JUD)
03/14/12 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
03/14/12 (S) JUD
04/06/12 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
BILL: HB 274
SHORT TITLE: UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES
SPONSOR(s): HOLMES, OLSON
01/17/12 (H) PREFILE RELEASED 1/13/12
01/17/12 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
01/17/12 (H) L&C
02/13/12 (H) L&C AT 3:15 PM CAPITOL 106
02/13/12 (H) Moved Out of Committee
02/13/12 (H) MINUTE(L&C)
02/15/12 (H) L&C RPT 4DP 1NR
02/15/12 (H) DP: MILLER, HOLMES, THOMPSON, OLSON
02/15/12 (H) NR: JOHNSON
02/17/12 (H) TRANSMITTED TO (S)
02/17/12 (H) VERSION: HB 274
02/21/12 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/21/12 (S) JUD
04/06/12 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
WITNESS REGISTER
DANA OWEN, Committee Aide
Senate Labor and Commerce Committee
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, AK
POSITION STATEMENT: Explained the changes contained in the CS
for SB 224.
CINDY SMITH, Staff
Senator Hollis French
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, AK
POSITION STATEMENT: Explained the changes contained in the CS
for SB 134.
REPRESENTATIVE ERIC FEIGE
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, AK
POSITION STATEMENT: Sponsor of HB 229.
MICHAEL PASCHALL, Staff
Representative Eric Feige
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, AK
POSITION STATEMENT: Provided a sectional analysis for HB 229.
SENATOR LINDA MENARD
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, AK
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 229.
JOE KLUTSCH, representing himself
King Salmon, AK
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 229.
KELLY VREM, Guide Representative
Big Game Commercial Services Board
Sutton, AK
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 229.
PAUL JOHNSON, Guide Representative
Big Game Commercial Services Board
Elfin Cove, AK
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 229.
VIRGIL UMPHENOUR, representing himself
North Pole, AK
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 229.
JOE WANT, representing himself
Fairbanks, AK
POSITION STATEMENT: Expressed concern with Section 4 of HB 229.
DON QUARBERG, Public Member
Big Game Commercial Services Board
Delta Junction, AK
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 229.
DAN MONTGOMERY, representing himself
Wasilla, AK
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 229.
KAREN POLLEY, Public Member
Big Game Commercial Services Board
Juneau, AK
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 229.
THOR STACEY
Alaska Professional Hunter Association (APHA)
Juneau, AK
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 229.
JAMES R. WALDO, Staff
Representative Lindsey Holmes
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, AK
POSITION STATEMENT: Introduced HB 274 on behalf of the sponsor.
CLYDE "ED" SNIFFEN JR., Senior Assistant Attorney General
Commercial/Fair Business Section
Civil Division
Department of Law (DOL)
Anchorage, AK
POSITION STATEMENT: Provided supporting information on HB 274.
ACTION NARRATIVE
1:37:46 PM
CHAIR HOLLIS FRENCH called the Senate Judiciary Standing
Committee meeting to order at 1:37 p.m. Present at the call to
order were Senators Coghill, Paskvan, and Chair French.
SB 224-EVIDENCE RULES: UNION/EMPLOYEE PRIVILEGE
1:38:07 PM
CHAIR FRENCH announced the consideration of SB 224, "An Act
making privileged certain communications between employees and
employee union representatives; and amending Rule 402 and Rule
501, Alaska Rules of Evidence." He asked for a motion to adopt
the proposed committee substitute (CS).
1:38:21 PM
SENATOR PASKVAN moved to bring the work draft CS for SB 224,
labeled 27-LS1427\M, before the committee for discussion.
CHAIR FRENCH announced that without objection, version M was
before the committee.
1:38:38 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI joined the committee.
DANA OWEN, aide to the Senate Labor and Commerce Committee, said
the L&C committee supports the changes contained in the CS for
SB 224. He explained the following:
All instances of the word "individual" and one instance of the
word "person" were replaced with the word "advocate," which is
defined in Section 2 [on page 2, lines 27-29.] Also in Section
2, provisions in Sec. 23.40.065(b)(1) and (2) were changed to
more closely track the language of similar provisions in
existing privileges under Court Rules. Paragraph (3) [on page 2,
line 17,] was added to clarify that no privilege exists for
matters of workplace safety.
CHAIR FRENCH found no questions or discussion and asked for a
motion.
1:40:12 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI moved to report CS for SB 224, version M,
from committee with individual recommendations and attached
fiscal note(s).
CHAIR FRENCH announced that without objection, CSSB 224(JUD)
moved from Senate Judiciary Standing Committee.
SB 134-CHILD SUPPORT AWARDS
1:40:33 PM
CHAIR FRENCH announced the consideration of SB 134, "An Act
relating to child support awards; and repealing Rule 90.3,
Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure." He asked for a motion to adopt
the committee substitute (CS).
1:40:46 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI moved to adopt the work draft CS for SB
134, labeled 27-LS0671\D, as the working document.
CHAIR FRENCH announced that without objection, version D was
before the committee.
1:40:53 PM
CINDY SMITH, staff to Senator French, explained that the CS
places Court Rule 90.3 in statute.
CHAIR FRENCH relayed that he was uncomfortable with both moving
the court rule into statute and changing the method for child
support calculations. Because most of the testimony at the last
hearing appeared to oppose the new calculations, he decided on
the one-step process to move the rule into statute The
calculation remains the same. He then noted that he had two
conceptual amendments to offer.
CHAIR FRENCH moved Amendment 1.
AMENDMENT 1
Page 6, line 21, replace the words "a court" with "the
tribunal"
CHAIR FRENCH found no objection and announced that Amendment 1
passed.
CHAIR FRENCH moved Amendment 2.
AMENDMENT 2
Page 9, line 12, following the word "or" insert the
word "monthly"
1:42:49 PM
CHAIR FRENCH found no objection and announced that Amendment 2
passed.
1:42:56 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI moved to report CS for SB 134, version D as
amended, from committee with individual recommendations and
attached fiscal note(s).
CHAIR FRENCH announced CSSB 134(JUD) moved from the Senate
Judiciary Standing Committee.
1:43:12 PM
At ease.
HB 229-BIG GAME COMMERCIAL SERVICES BOARD
1:44:41 PM
CHAIR FRENCH announced the consideration of HB 229, "An Act
relating to activities, including violations and penalties,
under the supervision of the Big Game Commercial Services
Board."
1:44:49 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ERIC FEIGE, sponsor of HB 229, said the bill was
drafted at the request of the Big Game Commercial Services Board
to address concerns about the rules governing the activities and
licensing of commercial guides. The bill does four things.
First, it expands the regulatory authority of the board. Second,
it allows retired licensed guides to be recognized as such.
Third, it clarifies provisions in statute that allow employment
between guides and how they are supervised. Finally, it allows a
judge discretion to order the board to suspend a license for
minor violations instead of requiring the court to order the
suspension of the license.
The regulation of professional guides and the provisions of this
bill pertain to state, federal, and private land. There is no
connection to proposals concerning guide use areas on land by
the Department of Natural Resources.
1:46:45 PM
MICHAEL PASCHALL, staff to Representative Eric Feige, read the
following sectional analysis into the record:
Section 1 provides additional authority to the Big
Game Commercial Services Board to create regulations
to administer the regulation of big game guides. Under
current statute, the board is limited to regulations
that are "required" under statute.
Section 2 creates the provision in statute for a
retiree status license that recognizes those that have
earned a guide license. No privileges are granted
under the license to provide guiding services.
CHAIR FRENCH asked if this is simply a nice gesture to retired
guides.
MR. PASCHALL replied it will also be helpful to those retired
guides who are involved in marketing guide and other services
outside the state.
Section 3 clarifies language to specify that a guide-
outfitter may provide the services of a class-A
assistant guide under the control of a contracting
guide-outfitter, anywhere the contracting guide-
outfitter is licensed to contract hunts.
Section 4 changes the requirements for a registered
guide-outfitter to require them to primarily be in the
field supervising, participating in and conducting a
hunt as defined under regulations by the board, unless
a class-A assistant guide is conducting the hunt as
regulated by the board.
1:48:42 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI noted that current statute [AS
8.54.610(e)(1)] says the guide shall be physically present in
the field. He asked the rationale for the proposed change to say
"primarily in the field supervising."
MR. PASCHALL explained that this works in conjunction with the
board's additional authority to write regulations. The idea is
to give registered guide-outfitters more of a supervisory role
on guided hunts.
Section 5 provides the board with the power to suspend
or revoke a license of someone engaged in conduct
involving unprofessionalism, moral turpitude, or gross
immorality.
Section 6 changes penalties for certain violations to
allow a court to order the board to suspend a license
instead of requiring the court to order the board to
suspend a license.
Section 7 authorizes the department to set a fee for
the new retired master guide-outfitter license.
Section 8 is conforming language to specify the holder
of a retired guide license may not guide.
Section 9 provides an effective date for Sections 3,
4, and 5 of the bill of April 1, 2013.
Section 10 provides for an immediate effective date
for sections of the bill other than Sections 3, 4, and
5.
1:51:14 PM
CHAIR FRENCH asked for additional explanation of Section 6.
MR. PASCHALL explained that the primary issue is that current
statute requires the court to order a suspension of the license
for any game violation, including even minor violations such as
improperly completed paperwork. This gives the court discretion.
1:52:15 PM
SENATOR LINDA MENARD introduced her staff member Steve Perrins,
who is a registered big game guide. She testified in support of
HB 229 and relayed that she was the sponsor of the Senate
companion bill. It is good policy that will serve both the
guiding community and the Big Game Commercial Services Board
well.
CHAIR FRENCH identified the individuals available to answer
questions.
1:55:02 PM
JOE KLUTSCH, representing himself, King Salmon, AK, said he was
a master guide testifying in support of HB 229. He described the
legislation as well vetted with input from the troopers, guides,
and the Department of Law (DOL). It will help the guiding
industry and other hunters. The enforcement provisions are
particularly important and will help the commercial services
board get rid of repeat offenders.
1:56:40 PM
KELLY VREM, guide representative, Big Game Commercial Services
Board, Sutton, AK, said he was testifying in support of HB 229,
and could confirm that the bill was well vetted. He explained
that the language "primarily in the field supervising" was
inserted to allow a registered guide to leave the field when
necessary to do things in direct support of the hunt. He also
spoke in support of the new subsection that addresses moral
turpitude. It will allow the board to weed out bad actors
relatively quickly.
1:58:28 PM
PAUL JOHNSON, guide representative, Big Game Commercial Services
Board, Elfin Cove, AK, testified in support of HB 229. He agreed
with the previous testimony, and added that some of the
provisions that were added are found in other boards.
1:59:19 PM
VIRGIL UMPHENOUR, representing himself, North Pole, AK,
testified in support of HB 229. He said it's appropriate to
delete the language "physically present in the field with the
client at least once during the contracted hunt" because it
removes a loophole. The guide is supposed to be in the field
guiding, not there just one time during the hunt. He described
the change in Section 6 where paragraph (8) moves from "shall"
to "may" as extremely important to keep a guide from being put
out of business for a minor paperwork violation. He reiterated
his support for the bill.
2:01:35 PM
JOE WANT, representing himself, Fairbanks, AK, said his only
concern with the bill is the amendment to AS 8.54.610(e) in
Section 4, because it reduces the obligation to supervise and
participate. Current regulations do not require an assistant
guide to be supervised by a guide. The regulations for
supervision and participation allow an 18-year-old who has never
seen a sheep, goat, or bear to be in camp without any
supervision from a guide or class-A assistant guide. Yet a
retired biologist from the Alaska Department of Fish and Game
(ADF&G) who has hunted for 30 years cannot accompany a friend on
a hunt. He said that sort of dichotomy puts the whole system at
risk. He noted that he submitted written comments to the
committee.
2:03:17 PM
CHAIR FRENCH said he distributed copies to the members and the
sponsor.
2:04:04 PM
DON QUARBERG, public member, Big Game Commercial Services Board,
stated that HB 229 protects the intent of the law and makes it
easier to enforce. It will also make it easier for guides to
operate and will ease the workload for the Division of
Occupational Licensing. He explained that the word "primarily"
was used [in Section 4 on page 3, line 2,] because it tends to
allow an exemption for people to leave the field in case of
emergency. He pointed out that if the bill passes, the board
will look at regulations to address in the future. It is already
forming a committee to look at definitions for the terms
"supervision," "participation," and "field."
2:06:06 PM
DAN MONTGOMERY, representing himself, Wasilla, AK, said he was a
master guide and had attended every Big Game Commercial Services
Board meeting for the past several years. It's a good bill that
has his full support. He said the amended language in Section 4
will make it easier to operate. He explained that his base camp
is in the small village of Port Heiden, and he has to drive his
clients five miles to village corporation lands in order to hunt
bear.
2:07:43 PM
KAREN POLLEY, public member, Big Game Commercial Services Board,
Juneau, AK, stated support for HB 229. It will lead to more
professionalism among guides and the industry in general. She
highlighted the importance of the retired status license for
certain retired guides and outfitters, and reiterated her
support for the bill.
2:08:48 PM
THOR STACEY, Alaska Professional Hunter Association (APHA), said
APHA is in strong support of HB 229.
2:09:16 PM
CHAIR FRENCH asked if Mr. Want's concerns were about regulation
or statute.
MR. STACY said he believes the overall concern is about
supervision by a qualified professional to ensure positive
outcomes for the client. It's a valid concern; it is important
to define "supervision" but the deleted language is a
superfluous supervision requirement that does not carry out the
intent. The board is committed and the current redraft of the
statute will allow regulations that have more or less
restriction.
CHAIR FRENCH commented that removing the loophole (page 1, line
31 through page 2, line 1) appears to encourage the presence of
the guide more strongly.
MR. STACY agreed; the key is to have supervision requirements
with proximity attached so that the guide is in the area of the
hunt and can train assistant guides. The bill does not address
Mr. Want's concerns about assistant guide qualifications and
where they can be.
2:13:01 PM
MR. PASCHALL said the goal was to give the Big Game Commercial
Services Board the authority to write regulations necessary to
regulate the industry, as opposed to the legislature process.
CHAIR FRENCH said the committee would contemplate HB 229 over
the weekend and likely take action at the next meeting.
HB 274-UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES
2:14:15 PM
CHAIR FRENCH announced the consideration of HB 274, "An Act
relating to the exemption of certain acts and transactions from
the provisions dealing with unfair methods of competition and
unfair or deceptive acts or practices."
2:14:43 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LINDSEY HOLMES, sponsor of HB 274, stated that
the bill clears up a potential ambiguity in the Alaska Consumer
Protection Act (CPA). It clarifies that the state can step in to
protect Alaskan consumers when the federal government is not
doing so. The bill makes it clear that the state and its
citizens are not without remedy due to a misapplication of the
safe harbor provision in the CPA.
2:15:42 PM
JAMES R. WALDO, staff, Representative Lindsey Holmes, confirmed
that there is an ambiguity about where the Alaska Consumer
Protection Act can apply when federal laws prohibit or regulate
the same conduct, but don't explicitly preempt state law.
CHAIR FRENCH asked if that was in paragraph (1).
MR. WALDO said yes; the safe harbor provision says the CPA does
not apply to conduct that is regulated and prohibited by state
or federal law. The bill removes the exemption for conduct
regulated and prohibited by federal law. He said it's a good
idea to preserve the exemption for state law. For example, if a
consumer finds troubling conduct from an insurance company, the
Division of Insurance (DOI) can solve the problem using state
insurance laws, not the Consumer Protection Act. Additionally,
if the state decides that enforcement is too much or too little,
it can change those laws as it sees fit.
The state is preempted when state law and federal law regulates
or prohibits the same conduct. However, there are gray areas
when there is shared jurisdiction or when the federal government
has laws or regulations it doesn't intend to enforce or intends
the state to so its own enforcement. In those cases, the CPA
arguably would not apply. This was at issue in a case involving
two pharmaceutical companies. He noted that the judicial order
from Judge Beistline was included in the packet. This bill would
make it very clear that the state has the power to enforce the
CPA in cases where the federal government is not going to take
action and the state sees need to protect Alaskan consumers.
SENATOR FRENCH asked on what page in the order Judge Beistline
discusses the issues that impinge on the bill.
MR. WALDO directed attention to page 18.
2:19:41 PM
CLYDE "ED" SNIFFEN JR., Assistant Attorney General,
Commercial/Fair Business Section, Civil Division, Department of
Law (DOL), said his responsibilities include enforcement of
Alaska's consumer protection and antitrust laws. He confirmed
that there have been situations where a federal court or agency
announced shared state/federal jurisdiction over certain areas
like drug labeling. The state believes it should be able to take
action against companies that violate the CPA on those issues.
Because of the ambiguity in statute, if a federal law or
regulation covers that conduct, whether it's enforced or not,
defendants are using that as a shield against the state's
enforcement activity. HB 274 removes the federal exemption from
the CPA and allows the state to take action if need be.
He agreed with Mr. Waldo said that the state could not take
action if the federal government preempts an area, but that
wasn't really the issue. He said there are cases where the
federal government has specifically found there is no preemption
and the state still can't take action because the conduct is
still regulated or prohibited. The state takes the position that
the statutory language is strong enough that it can take action
if the federal government isn't enforcing the law. That's what
the state is arguing in the case referenced above, but this
amendment makes it very clear.
CHAIR FRENCH asked if the bill would make it easier to protect
Alaskan consumers.
MR. SNIFFEN said yes, particularly in cases of shared
jurisdiction where the federal government is not taking any
action.
CHAIR FRENCH announced he would hold HB 274 in committee.
2:22:03 PM
There being no further business to come before the committee,
Chair French adjourned the meeting at 2:22 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB274 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HL&C 2/13/2012 3:15:00 PM SJUD 4/6/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 274 |
| HB274 Supporting Documents-Beistline Order re MTD.pdf |
HL&C 2/13/2012 3:15:00 PM SJUD 4/6/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 274 |
| HB 229 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 3/2/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/8/2011 1:00:00 PM SJUD 4/6/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 229 |
| HB 229 BGCS Fact Sheet.pdf |
HJUD 3/2/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/8/2011 1:00:00 PM SJUD 4/6/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 229 |
| HB 229 BGCS Roster.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2011 1:00:00 PM SJUD 4/6/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 229 |
| HB229 Support Letter - Kubat.pdf |
HJUD 3/2/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/15/2012 1:00:00 PM SJUD 4/6/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 229 |
| HB229 Support - BGCSB.pdf |
HRES 2/15/2012 1:00:00 PM SJUD 4/6/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 229 |
| HB229 Support - Gunlogson.pdf |
HRES 2/15/2012 1:00:00 PM SJUD 4/6/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 229 |
| HB229 Support Letter - Vrem.pdf |
HRES 2/15/2012 1:00:00 PM SJUD 4/6/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 229 |
| HB 229 BGCS Statutes.pdf |
HJUD 3/2/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/8/2011 1:00:00 PM SJUD 4/6/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 229 |
| HB229-CCED-CBPL-04-07-11.pdf |
HJUD 3/2/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/8/2011 1:00:00 PM SJUD 4/6/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 229 |
| HB229 Support - APHA.pdf |
HRES 2/15/2012 1:00:00 PM SJUD 4/6/2012 1:30:00 PM |
HB 229 |