04/07/2021 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SJR1 | |
| Confirmation Hearing | |
| SB9 | |
| Adjourn |
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 9 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SJR 1 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
SENATE JUDICIARY STANDING COMMITTEE
April 7, 2021
1:34 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Senator Lora Reinbold, Chair
Senator Mike Shower, Vice Chair
Senator Shelley Hughes
Senator Robert Myers
Senator Jesse Kiehl
MEMBERS ABSENT
All members present
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
CONFIRMATION HEARING(S):
Attorney General - Department of Law
Treg Taylor - Anchorage
- CONFIRMATION ADVANCED
SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 1
Proposing amendments to the Constitution of the State of Alaska
relating to the Alaska permanent fund and appropriations from
the Alaska permanent fund.
- HEARD & HELD
SENATE BILL NO. 9
"An Act relating to alcoholic beverages; relating to the
regulation of manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers of
alcoholic beverages; relating to licenses, endorsements, and
permits involving alcoholic beverages; relating to common
carrier approval to transport or deliver alcoholic beverages;
relating to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board; relating to
offenses involving alcoholic beverages; amending Rule 17(h),
Alaska Rules of Minor Offense Procedure; and providing for an
effective date."
- HEARD & HELD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: SJR 1
SHORT TITLE: CONST AM: GUARANTEE PERM FUND DIVIDEND
SPONSOR(s): SENATOR(s) WIELECHOWSKI
01/22/21 (S) PREFILE RELEASED 1/8/21
01/22/21 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
01/22/21 (S) STA, JUD, FIN
02/09/21 (S) STA AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
02/09/21 (S) Heard & Held
02/09/21 (S) MINUTE(STA)
02/11/21 (S) STA AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
02/11/21 (S) Scheduled but Not Heard
03/02/21 (S) STA AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
03/02/21 (S) Moved SJR 1 Out of Committee
03/02/21 (S) MINUTE(STA)
03/03/21 (S) STA RPT 2NR 1AM
03/03/21 (S) NR: SHOWER, REINBOLD
03/03/21 (S) AM: KAWASAKI
03/24/21 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
03/24/21 (S) Scheduled but Not Heard
03/29/21 (S) JUD AT 1:00 PM BUTROVICH 205
03/29/21 (S) Heard & Held
03/29/21 (S) MINUTE(JUD)
04/07/21 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
BILL: SB 9
SHORT TITLE: ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL; ALCOHOL REG
SPONSOR(s): SENATOR(s) MICCICHE
01/22/21 (S) PREFILE RELEASED 1/8/21
01/22/21 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
01/22/21 (S) L&C, JUD, FIN
02/12/21 (S) L&C AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
02/12/21 (S) Heard & Held
02/12/21 (S) MINUTE(L&C)
03/03/21 (S) L&C AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/03/21 (S) Scheduled but Not Heard
03/10/21 (S) L&C AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/10/21 (S) -- MEETING CANCELED --
03/12/21 (S) L&C AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/12/21 (S) Moved SB 9 Out of Committee
03/12/21 (S) MINUTE(L&C)
03/15/21 (S) L&C RPT 3DP 1NR
03/15/21 (S) DP: COSTELLO, GRAY-JACKSON, REVAK
03/15/21 (S) NR: STEVENS
03/24/21 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
03/24/21 (S) Scheduled but Not Heard
03/29/21 (S) JUD AT 1:00 PM BUTROVICH 205
03/29/21 (S) Heard & Held
03/29/21 (S) MINUTE(JUD)
04/07/21 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
WITNESS REGISTER
SENATOR BILL WIELECHOWSKI
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Spoke as sponsor of SJR 1.
TREGARRICK "TREG" TAYLOR, Attorney General Designee
Department of Law
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified as attorney general designee.
SENATOR PETER MICCICHE
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified as sponsor of SB 9.
BUDDY WHITT, Staff
Senator Shelley Hughes
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions on SB 9 on behalf of
Senator Hughes.
GLEN KLINKHART, Executive Director
Alcohol & Marijuana Control Office
Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions on SB 9.
ACTION NARRATIVE
1:34:15 PM
CHAIR LORA REINBOLD called the Senate Judiciary Standing
Committee meeting to order at 1:34 p.m. Present at the call to
order were Senators Myers, Hughes, Shower, Kiehl, and Chair
Reinbold.
SJR 1-CONST AM: GUARANTEE PERM FUND DIVIDEND
1:34:56 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD announced the consideration of SJR 1, SENATE
JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 1, Proposing amendments to the Constitution
of the State of Alaska relating to the Alaska permanent fund and
appropriations from the Alaska permanent fund.
1:35:45 PM
SENATOR BILL WIELECHOWSKI, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau,
Alaska, speaking as sponsor, offered a summary of SJR 1, which
would place the existing permanent fund statute into the Alaska
Constitution. It would also allow a mechanism to withdraw funds
from the Alaska Permanent Fund but cap the total draw at 5
percent. The people will always receive the first call on the
earnings of the Alaska Permanent Fund, ahead of government, he
said.
1:36:36 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD stated the committee would consider amendments.
1:36:52 PM
SENATOR MYERS moved to adopt Amendment 1, work order 32-
LS0015\A.3:
32-LS0015\A.3
Nauman
4/1/21
AMENDMENT 1
OFFERED IN THE SENATE BY SENATOR MYERS
TO: SJR 1
Page 1, line 16:
Delete "five"
Insert "four"
CHAIR REINBOLD objected for discussion purposes.
1:36:55 PM
SENATOR MYERS explained Amendment 1. He stated that Callan
Associates, Inc., who have served as the Alaska Permanent Fund
Corporation's investment consultants, provided some information
recently. He began a PowerPoint showing the Callan Associates
projections for the Earnings Reserve balance over the next
decade, which projected an average fund growth rate of 6.2
percent using an inflation rate of 2 percent. After adjusting
for inflation, the state could only expect to draw 4.2 percent
to maintain the overall value of the fund, in particular, the
earnings reserve account (ERA). He reviewed handouts prepared by
legislative finance. He directed attention to slide 1, "Impact
of FY21-22 Overdraws on ERA Balance and POMV Draw, Constant 6.2%
Returns." He said the large blue bars represent the projected
balance of the ERA given the current 5 percent of market value
(POMV) draw.
SENATOR MYERS turned to the next slide, "Impact of FY21-22
Overdraws on ERA Balance and POMV Draw; FY00-FY08 Returns." This
slide shows projections for the ERA if the market conditions
were similar to ones during FY00 to FY08. This slide predicted a
significant drop beginning in FY24 to FY28.
1:39:28 PM
SENATOR MYERS turned to slide 3, "Impact of FY21-22 Overdraws on
ERA Balance and POMV Draw; FY09-FY17 Returns." This slide
provides projections for the ERA using market returns from FY09
to FY17. This slide shows the anticipated significant drop in
the ERA from FY22 through FY30, which he deemed as very
problematic.
SENATOR MYERS explained that Amendment 1 would reduce the POMV
draw to 4 percent to address these concerns.
1:40:09 PM
SENATOR KIEHL asked if the charts reflect the growth in the
fund's corpus or were limited to the ERA.
SENATOR MYERS said the charts refer to the changes in the ERA,
assuming 2 percent inflation. This does not change royalty
deposits or provide statutory inflation proofing until 2024.
1:40:55 PM
SENATOR KIEHL asked if the fund's corpus would achieve real
dollar growth or if it would also deteriorate.
SENATOR MYERS answered that these projections only reflect
changes to the ERA. He was unsure about the changes to the
corpus but predicted it would slowly increase. He said this is
based on 25 percent royalty deposits but noted royalties are
down based on North Slope production levels and statutory
inflation proofing not occurring until 2024.
1:41:42 PM
SENATOR KIEHL said he envisions that SJR 1 will receive more
financial analysis as it goes through the process. He offered
his support to maintain the 5 percent POMV draw because he finds
that it is responsible and will preserve the real-dollar value
of the Permanent Fund for Alaska's future.
1:42:13 PM
SENATOR SHOWER echoed Senator Kiehl's comments. He offered his
view that the legislature has not reduced the size of state
government. He expressed concern that reducing the POMV draw
would unfairly burden the Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD).
Secondly, not taking enough from the draw will mean that taxes
will be necessary. He expressed concern that 4 percent is too
low.
1:44:00 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI said Amendment 1 is not unreasonable. He
acknowledged that some people support using a 4 percent POMV.
However, he is comfortable with 5 percent. He pointed out that
SJR 1 does away with the earnings reserve account (ERA) to avoid
giving the legislature access to spending it.
1:44:42 PM
SENATOR MYERS explained that he offered Amendment 1 to put his
concerns on record. He withdrew Amendment 1.
1:45:24 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD commented that she would like to reduce
government.
1:45:51 PM
SENATOR KIEHL moved to adopt Amendment 2, work order 32-
LS0015\A. 2:
32-LS0015\A.2
Nauman
3/31/21
AMENDMENT 2
OFFERED IN THE SENATE BY SENATOR KIEHL
TO: SJR 1
Page 1, line 14, through page 2, line 12:
Delete all material and insert:
"(b) At the end of each fiscal year, five
percent of the average market value of the fund for
the first five of the preceding six fiscal years,
including the fiscal year just ended, including any
unrealized gains or losses, shall be determined in
accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles.
(c) Each fiscal year, an amount
(1) equal to one and one-fourth percent of
the average market value of the fund, as calculated
under (b) of this section, shall be transferred from
the permanent fund for use in a program of dividend
payments to state residents, as provided by law;
(2) not to exceed three and three-fourths
percent of the average market value of the fund, as
calculated under (b) of this section, may be
appropriated by the legislature from the permanent
fund to the general fund."
CHAIR REINBOLD objected for discussion purposes.
1:45:58 PM
SENATOR KIEHL explained that Amendment 2 would enshrine the
dividend and set a minimum percentage of the dividend below
which the legislature cannot go. It would make the remainder of
the draw available for appropriation, just as it is today. It
allows most of the discretion for appropriations to legislators,
who are the people's representatives. He summarized that under
Amendment 2, a minimum of 25 percent of the draw would be used
for dividends, which leaves 75 percent for deposit to the
general fund for the legislature to consider. He clarified that
the 25 percent draw for the dividend is not a cap.
1:47:46 PM
SENATOR MYERS offered his view that Amendment 2 would go against
the intent of the constitutional framers. Their intent was to
provide dividends as the first draw. Making the guaranteed
portion the smaller portion will place the dividends in the
position of the second draw. He offered his view that the
resource owners should get the first call on the states'
royalties. He expressed concern that Amendment 2 will reduce the
effective rate on royalties even further. Therefore, Amendment 2
is not a good idea.
1:49:12 PM
SENATOR SHOWER agreed with Senator Myers. He expressed concern
that Amendment 2 would result in a smaller permanent fund
dividend and the government would increase in size. He predicted
that the legislature would continue to allow this to happen
unless it has no choice. He emphasized the need for a PFD
solution.
1:51:26 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI stated that SJR 1 is designed to resolve
the PFD issue. He offered his view that the people would not
support this approach. He said he could not support Amendment 2.
1:52:05 PM
SENATOR KIEHL highlighted differing viewpoints on how the Alaska
Constitution is constructed. He said the committee could discuss
what the framers intended. However, the Alaska Constitution's
language requires that the permanent fund's earnings be
deposited to the general fund. The courts have affirmed it, he
said. A majority of the House and the Senate makes
appropriation determinations. Amendment 2 would put the first
call on the PFD for Alaskans. Legislators currently disagree on
the size of that dividend. Early in this legislative session,
there were discussions about having a zero dividend. However,
that is not something he supports, he said. The federal COVID-19
funds have offset the state's revenues. He reminded members that
funding for state government benefits Alaskans. State funding
paves and plows roads, fuels state trooper vehicles, pays
biologist salaries and natural resource managers who enable
resource development to occur. He related his understanding that
there was no support for Amendment 2.
SENATOR KIEHL withdrew Amendment 2.
1:54:17 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD remarked that the 25 percent to 75 percent split
would "throw people for a loop." However, she liked the minimum
floor aspect in Amendment 2.
1:54:57 PM
SENATOR KIEHL moved to adopt Amendment 3, work order 32-
LS0015\A.1:
32-LS0015\A.1
Nauman
3/31/21
AMENDMENT 3
OFFERED IN THE SENATE BY SENATOR KIEHL
TO: SJR 1
Page 1, lines 14 - 15:
Delete "in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles"
Insert "as provided by law"
CHAIR REINBOLD objected for discussion purposes.
1:55:02 PM
SENATOR KIEHL explained Amendment 3. He said the legislature
does not set generally accepted accounting principles. Amendment
3 would allow the legislature to establish the principles.
CHAIR REINBOLD remarked that she likes Amendment 3.
SENATOR SHOWER offered his support for Amendment 3.
1:56:47 PM
SENATOR MYERS asked if the bill sponsor could comment on
Amendment 3.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI responded that this language is the current
language in the permanent fund statutes. The term is used 25
times in the statutes. He offered his view that Amendment 3
makes a reasonable change.
1:57:41 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD withdrew her objection. There being no further
objection, Amendment 3 was adopted.
SENATOR SHOWER remarked that he thought this change would help.
[SJR 1 was held in committee.]
1:59:18 PM
At ease
^CONFIRMATION HEARING
CONFIRMATION HEARING
Attorney General
2:00:58 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD reconvened the meeting and announced the
consideration of the Governor's Appointees, Treg Taylor,
Attorney General, Department of Law.
2:01:33 PM
TREGARRICK "TREG" TAYLOR, Attorney General Designee, Department
of Law, Anchorage, Alaska, introduced himself.
2:01:55 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD said she would focus on the attorney general's
lack of experience in criminal law since Mr. Taylor indicated he
does not have much experience in this area. She reviewed some of
the statutory requirements for the attorney general under AS
44.23.020, as follows:
(a) The attorney general is the legal advisor of the
governor and other state officers.
(b) The attorney general shall
(1) defend the Constitution of the State of
Alaska and the Constitution of the United States
of America;
(2) bring, prosecute, and defend all necessary
and proper actions in the name of the state for
the collection of revenue;
(3) represent the state in all civil actions in
which the state is a party;
2:02:56 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD said she also researched what attorneys general
typically do in other states. She reported that attorneys
general are the top legal officers of the state or territory.
They advise and represent the legislature and the state agencies
and act as the peoples' lawyer.
CHAIR REINBOLD, on behalf of Senator Hughes, who had not yet
arrived due to other legislative duties, asked how he proposes
to address rampant sexual assault crimes including human
trafficking.
2:03:38 PM
ATTORNEY GENERAL DESIGNEE TAYLOR responded that his lack of
criminal law experience concerns him. He indicated that he asked
for John Skidmore, Deputy Attorney General, Criminal Division,
for help related to criminal procedures. Mr. Skidmore developed
a plan to fully brief him. He stated his goal is to be an asset
for the criminal division and make good recommendations and
decisions. He acknowledged that sexual assault crimes, domestic
violence, and human trafficking are issues the state faces. The
department is developing a collaborative plan with other
departments and the governor's office to coordinate efforts.
2:05:41 PM
ATTORNEY GENERAL DESIGNEE TAYLOR elaborated on the Department of
Law (DOL) efforts. DOL created a full-time position in the
criminal division to train prosecutors and support staff
primarily on sex crimes. While all prosecutors can prosecute sex
crimes, the DOL has a dedicated sex crime unit consisting of
five prosecutors and support staff. However, that unit has
experienced a 125 percent turnover in staff over two years. This
has made it impossible for the prosecutors to gain the expertise
and ability to work cases effectively or to mentor others. This
is because the caseloads are astronomical, averaging 67 cases
per prosecutor. Typically, a prosecutor working full-time can
work 30 cases. Prosecutors come to the job desiring to
effectuate good changes. It is troubling to these prosecutors
when time constraints force them to operate in crisis mode
continually. The DOL has requested 10 additional prosecutors and
nine support staff to lower individual caseloads to allow them
time to work cases effectively. It should also allow prosecutors
time to better communicate with survivors of sex crimes. He said
this is often the first time victims have dealt with the justice
system. One way to help is to give prosecutors relief to have
adequate time to inform victims about their cases.
2:09:13 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD asked if DOL's plans would work and the state
could reduce its statistics and improve justice in Alaska.
2:09:48 PM
ATTORNEY GENERAL DESIGNEE TAYLOR offered to do his best. If the
DOL's proposal does not work, he said he would be prepared to
take another approach to solve the problem. He stated that
sexual assault crimes are difficult to prosecute by their very
nature. He said he feels strongly about these crimes. He
acknowledged that some perpetrators have gone unpunished and
that the state must change that paradigm. He emphasized the
necessity of enhancing public trust in the judicial system and
giving victims and survivors of sex crimes throughout Alaska the
confidence to come forward.
2:10:53 PM
SENATOR MYERS said he did a Google search. He expressed concern
that 97 percent of criminal cases are resolved through plea
bargains rather than through the trial process.
ATTORNEY GENERAL DESIGNEE TAYLOR answered that he would like to
address the issue. While department resources are part of the
issue, most plea bargains are based on the strength of the
cases. He offered his belief that adding additional prosecutors
could help. Further, as prosecutors gain experience, it gives
them a better sense of the strength of their cases. Still,
sometimes plea bargains are in the best interests of the people.
Plea bargains will always be part of the criminal justice
system. Some changes are being made within the department to
bring additional cases to his attention to review the plea
bargain decisions.
2:13:47 PM
SENATOR SHOWER asked if he would support an elected inspector
general similar to the military inspector general. He
highlighted that an inspector general would not report to the
governor but would independently investigate and pursue cases
that constitute an important breach of the law. In this way,
Alaska would have a system for the public to pursue an avenue
outside the traditional government framework. He said he could
also see the value of having an elected attorney general to
investigate many issues independently.
2:15:54 PM
ATTORNEY GENERAL DESIGNEE TAYLOR responded that he reviewed what
other states did last year. He recalled that between 7 to 11
states report findings to the legislature. In most states with
an inspector general, that position has jurisdiction in specific
areas such as workers' compensation or specific labor issues.
However, most inspectors general fall under the executive
branch. The challenge is to achieve a balanced structure where
the inspector general can remain non-partisan and apolitical. He
said he could support this concept since it could save the state
money as it investigates matters. He was unsure if the limited
scale model or an overarching framework similar to the
postmaster inspector general would be best. He characterized it
as a policy issue for the legislature to decide.
SENATOR SHOWER commented that it was difficult to know the
person to turn to when everyone works for someone. He said the
state needs to have someone who works for the people and is
responsible to them.
CHAIR REINBOLD agreed with Senator Shower.
2:18:42 PM
SENATOR KIEHL stated he finds the committee universally supports
prosecution and the importance of consequences. However,
prosecution alone does not change cultures. He said he was eager
to hear the plans to address sex crimes. He noted that
significant discussion has occurred over previous misconduct in
the Department of Law (DOL). He asked what specific steps DOL
would take to ensure DOL has a safe workplace culture.
ATTORNEY GENERAL DESIGNEE TAYLOR answered that the department
knows he has zero tolerance for those behaviors. He wants to
lead by example but act swiftly, fairly, and decisively on those
matters. He offered his view that the worst thing that can
happen is to let issues fester or hope the problems dissipate by
coaching. However, there are consequences once an employee
crosses a certain line, he said.
2:21:18 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD said the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). mRNA
authorized vaccinations for emergency use by She asked for his
stance on government or employer-mandated vaccinations.
ATTORNEY GENERAL DESIGNEE TAYLOR responded that he was unsure of
his stance. He offered his view that in six months or longer,
the state will better understand the courts' ruling on whether
an employer can require employees to receive vaccines as a
condition of employment. However, the governor and Commissioner
Crum have made it clear that it is a personal decision to get
vaccinated. COVID-19 vaccines should be treated like many other
vaccines in many ways. The right to insist on that vaccine is
very similar.
ATTORNEY GENERAL DESIGNEE TAYLOR said the courts would use a
reasonable basis test to decide whether businesses can require
proof of vaccination of their customer, such as a vaccine
passport. Some other states have taken strong stances on these
issues. However, his preference is to wait and see, he said. The
courts will weigh the public interests, including the right to
privacy and the right to freely move about to engage in
commerce, against the serious risks and threats that COVID-19
poses to society. It remains to be seen how the courts will rule
on these issues. If necessary, the state may need to challenge
some actions.
CHAIR HUGHES rejoined the meeting.
2:24:15 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD asked for his actions if the governor decided to
impose mandatory vaccines even though federal emergency orders
prohibit mandatory vaccinations.
ATTORNEY GENERAL DESIGNEE TAYLOR job answered he would never
condone breaking the law. He said he would evaluate and
interpret the law, inform the governor or commissioners on it,
and advise them that pursuing illegal actions will result in
consequences.
2:24:51 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD asked if he understood the emergency use
authorization provision that states could not mandate mRNA
vaccinations.
ATTORNEY GENERAL DESIGNEE TAYLOR answered that he had not read
that specific federal law. However, he understands that once the
emergency abates, the federal government will reevaluate whether
vaccines can continue to be used or mandated under emergency
authorizations.
2:25:53 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD offered her belief that the law was very clear on
vaccine mandates. She emphasized that the mRNA vaccines have not
undergone full FDA approval. She expressed concern that he did
not take a more definitive approach. She asked for the state's
liability if someone is injured, dies, or has an adverse
reaction to the vaccine. For example, the Department of
Corrections mandated that prisoners receive vaccines before
having face-to-face meetings with their lawyers or to see
visitors. She pointed out that a judge recently ruled that this
policy was unconstitutional. She maintained her concern about
his wait-and-see approach.
2:27:07 PM
ATTORNEY GENERAL DESIGNEE TAYLOR answered that he does not make
policy calls. Instead, he provides advice to the governor and
agencies. He said his advice is confidential and not a matter of
public record. He assured the committee that the Department of
Law has experts to inform him and he would follow and uphold the
law. He maintained that elected officials make the policy calls
but ultimately, the courts will rule on these policies. He
stated his goal as attorney general is to remain apolitical and
give frank legal advice to the governor.
2:28:43 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD maintained her concern about the state's
liability related to vaccines.
ATTORNEY GENERAL DESIGNEE TAYLOR responded that the courts would
determine any liability. Suppose the courts determine that
policymakers made the right decisions related to vaccinations to
protect the public versus an individual's rights to privacy. In
that case, it will not result in any liability. If the courts
determine that policymakers made the wrong decisions and
violated an individual's right to privacy, the state could incur
liability.
2:29:58 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD related that people express concern on social
media that they may lose their jobs if they do not get
vaccinated. However, it takes ten years to get a vaccine to
market, but the state is only a year into the process. She
maintained her interest in having the attorney general take
action and not wait for a lawsuit to resolve issues. She asked
if he was the people's lawyer.
ATTORNEY GENERAL DESIGNEE TAYLOR responded that his oath is to
the US Constitution and the Constitution of the State of Alaska.
The Alaska Constitution clearly states, "We the people of
Alaska." He maintained that his role is independent of the
governor in determining which litigation the state pursues in
the public interest. He said he takes his oath very seriously
and he takes his responsibility to Alaskans very seriously.
2:31:30 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD read from an attorney general's opinion (not
identified), "The Constitution is not suspended in the time of
crisis. We must therefore be vigilant to ensure the protections
in the constitution are preserved." She asked if he agreed with
that statement.
ATTORNEY GENERAL DESIGNEE TAYLOR responded that he agreed with
that statement.
CHAIR REINBOLD asked, if confirmed, whether he would promise to
serve the people of Alaska under the oath of office and uphold
and defend the Constitution of the State of Alaska and US
Constitution and not suspend it in the time of crisis.
ATTORNEY GENERAL DESIGNEE TAYLOR responded that he took that
oath and will vow again today that this is his promise to the
people of Alaska.
2:32:15 PM
SENATOR KIEHL referred to confirmation hearings held in the
House. Governor Dunleavy's former chief of staff took a
governmental affairs position with a large firm, considered a
lobbyist position. He recalled that Mr. Taylor appropriately
indicated he would not grant a blanket waiver to the Executive
Branch Ethics Act. However, what he heard missing was an
acknowledgment that the Executive Branch Ethics Act bars that
type of lateral transfer. He asked if he or his staff counseled
the governor's former chief of staff on what he was permitted to
do and when it would be necessary to request a waiver.
2:33:31 PM
ATTORNEY GENERAL DESIGNEE TAYLOR answered that he held frank
discussions. He offered his view that Mr. Stevens is aware of
his obligations under the Ethics Act. For the next two years,
Mr. Stevens will have access to the Department of Law's
attorneys to ask for advice on this very issue, he said. The
Ethics Act was designed to allow the state to attract the best
individuals for positions within the state. If these individuals
could not work in their field after state service, it is
doubtful they would accept a job with the state. He highlighted
that a mechanism must be in place to allow individuals to
function in their expertise. The Ethics Act prohibits a former
state employee from engaging in an issue for two years when the
employee was personally and substantively involved in the matter
while employed by the State of Alaska. The intent is not to
prohibit employment but to restrict employment unless it's in
the state's best interest. He characterized this as a safety
valve in the Ethics Act. That provision allows the governor and
the attorney general to consider a waiver of the two-year bar if
it is in the state's best interest. As issues arise in Mr.
Steven's work, he will ask for advice from the Department of Law
and that advice may be to advise him to request a waiver. He
reiterated that the Ethics Act specifically restricts a state
employee from engaging in an issue that the employee personally
and substantively engaged in while employed by the State of
Alaska.
2:36:07 PM
ATTORNEY GENERAL DESIGNEE TAYLOR acknowledged that the
governor's chief of staff is involved in many issues, some of
which are tangential and others require advice. The Department
of Law has experts in this area. Assistant Attorney General
Maria Bahr has been advising on ethics issues for the past four
years. He said he anticipated that Mr. Stevens would request
waiver requests over the next two years. If so, he and Governor
Dunleavy will determine if it is in the public's interest to
grant a waiver. If not, Mr. Stevens will be barred from pursuing
that specific issue as an employee of Conoco Phillips.
SENATOR KIEHL remarked that his response concerns him. He stated
that the Executive Branch Ethics Act treats lobbyist jobs
differently because of the risks of manipulation of Alaska's
government. This raises the alarm because the governor, in
consultation with the attorney general, will make decisions
about his own political consigliere.
2:37:49 PM
SENATOR SHOWER offered his view that federal laws, such as HR 1,
are being written that can only be adjudicated in Washington,
DC. He expressed concern that these bills are overreaching
federal authority and a breach of States' rights. He asked
whether he would be willing to join other states on matters of
federal overreach.
ATTORNEY GENERAL DESIGNEE TAYLOR answered yes.
2:38:44 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD asked if he would support blocking vaccination
passports.
ATTORNEY GENERAL DESIGNEE TAYLOR responded that it falls under
policy. Personally, he does not support vaccination passports.
He stated that his job as attorney general is to uphold the law
and interpret the issues. For example, a pool would be different
from a blood donation. He stated that he would decide matters on
a case-by-case basis. If he encounters anything he considers a
violation of constitutional rights, he will take action.
2:39:55 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD offered her view that his job as attorney general
is to uphold the governor's policies. She maintained her belief
that mandatory vaccination passports and requiring mandatory
vaccinations are important issues and he should take a firm
position on them.
ATTORNEY GENERAL DESIGNEE TAYLOR responded that the state would
go to court to seek remedies. He stated that when the governor
and departments ask him about policies, he will provide his
honest opinion. He acknowledged that it is his job to enforce
policy but not create policy. That is the function of the courts
under the separation of powers.
2:42:07 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD asked if the Alaska Constitution gives the
legislature the power to set policy and the executive branch
executes it. She asked him to cite constitutional provisions
that grant the executive branch the power to set policy other
than martial law.
ATTORNEY GENERAL DESIGNEE TAYLOR agreed that is the general
separation of powers. He stated that the Declaration Act itself
delegates the legislature's decision-making ability in times of
disasters to the governor. As previously discussed, those
mandates carry the weight of the law. He maintained that his
goal was to uphold the law.
2:43:13 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD pointed out that martial law allows the governor
to suspend constitutional rights. She asked again if any other
constitutional provision grants the governor the authority to
suspend constitutional rights.
ATTORNEY GENERAL DESIGNEE TAYLOR responded that he is not aware
of any other provisions where the governor can suspend the
constitutional rights of citizens.
2:43:53 PM
SENATOR SHOWER stated that in accordance with AS 39.05.080, the
Senate Judiciary Standing Committee reviewed the following and
recommends the appointment be forwarded to a joint session for
consideration:
Attorney General - Department of Law
Treg Taylor - Anchorage
Signing the reports regarding appointments to boards and
commissions in no way reflects individual members' approval or
disapproval of the appointees; the nominations are merely
forwarded to the full legislature for confirmation or rejection.
2:44:30 PM
At ease
SB 9-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL; ALCOHOL REG
2:45:48 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD reconvened the meeting and announced the
consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 9, "An Act relating to
alcoholic beverages; relating to the regulation of
manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers of alcoholic
beverages; relating to licenses, endorsements, and permits
involving alcoholic beverages; relating to common carrier
approval to transport or deliver alcoholic beverages; relating
to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board; relating to offenses
involving alcoholic beverages; amending Rule 17(h), Alaska Rules
of Minor Offense Procedure; and providing for an effective
date."
2:46:37 PM
SENATOR PETER MICCICHE, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau,
Alaska, speaking as the sponsor, stated that 90 percent of the
bill is a reorganization of Title 4. SB 9 will place items into
the code to protect public health and safety. It will help the
alcohol industry avoid piecemeal amendments to Title 4. He
characterized the bill as providing the alcoholic beverage
industry with options to encourage a healthy and lucrative
industry.
2:47:17 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD stated that the committee would take up
amendments.
2:47:20 PM
SENATOR HUGHES moved to adopt Amendment 1, work order 32-
LS0124\B. 13:
32-LS0124\B.13
Bruce
4/1/21
AMENDMENT 1
OFFERED IN THE SENATE BY SENATOR HUGHES
TO: SB 9
Delete "at an annual fair"
Insert "during an event"
Page 21, line 14, following "on":
Insert "the"
Page 21, lines 19 - 21:
Delete all material.
CHAIR REINBOLD objected for discussion purposes.
2:47:37 PM
SENATOR HUGHES referred to page 21 of SB 9, language relating to
fairs. This would remove the language "at an annual event" and
replace it with "during an event." She stated that the Alaska
State Fair has about 400,000 people who live within an hour's
drive of the fairgrounds. The fairgrounds are used for multiple
events throughout the year, which is important to Anchorage, the
Mat-Su Valley and the surrounding area. According to the
director, the Alaska State Fair would be prevented from carrying
out its typical operations.
2:48:46 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE stated that he supports the Alaska State Fair.
Passage of SB 9 will allow the fair to operate. He advised
members that another amendment would put sideboards on Amendment
1. However, Amendment 1 would turn the Alaska State Fair and any
other annual fair into a bar. He said he advised the Alaska
State Fair that a subsequent amendment would cover every event
the fair offers.
2:49:58 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD asked how Amendment 1 would turn the fairgrounds
into a bar.
SENATOR MICCICHE answered that currently, the Alaska State Fair
would be limited to a permit for the three days of the annual
fair. Amendment 1 would allow the fair to hold an event every
night and allow operating at will, similar to a Beverage
Dispensary License (BDL). In addition, the sporting permit and
other types of permits could be used.
2:50:36 PM
SENATOR HUGHES offered her view that characterizing it as a bar
would be inaccurate. She stated that people would be required to
purchase tickets. She agreed the fairgrounds have been busy,
although the events are not held every night. She said the
fairground's operator has a record of being a responsible
operator. She stated that at least one fair has been struggling
financially and this revenue could help.
2:51:49 PM
SENATOR SHOWER asked for information on the sideboards.
SENATOR MICCICHE related that Senator Myers would be offering a
subsequent amendment, labeled 32-LS0124\B.12, which will address
the concerns.
SENATOR HUGHES clarified that Senator Micciche is referring to
Amendment 4.
SENATOR SHOWER asked if Amendment 4 would address the concerns
raised and whether Amendment 1 would apply to all fairgrounds.
He stated that he does not want to limit opportunities.
SENATOR HUGHES answered that the Alaska State Fair would be
limited to holding about 20 events per year. It would apply to
all fairs. She said she had observed events at the fairgrounds
nearly every weekend. She said that she served on the Recover
Alaska board over ten years ago. The initial goal of the Title 4
rewrite was to curb consumption and address alcoholism which was
rampant in some Alaskan communities. She expressed concern that
since the Mat-Su Valley is growing, Amendment 1 would limit
development, which she said was not the intent of the rewrite.
2:54:50 PM
SENATOR SHOWER asked if the sponsor of Amendment 1 would be
willing to consider language limited explicitly to the Alaska
State Fairgrounds.
SENATOR HUGHES said she would be open to it, but she was unsure
what would be legally permissible.
CHAIR REINBOLD asked for the sponsor's will.
2:55:48 PM
SENATOR HUGHES said she would like Amendment 1 to pass.
SENATOR KIEHL pointed out that Amendment 1 retains the use of
the word "event." He asked if a definition of "event" exists.
2:56:37 PM
BUDDY WHITT, staff, Senator Shelley Hughes, Alaska State
Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, on behalf of Senator Hughes, stated
he believes it would be a common-use definition. The term
"event" is not defined in the bill. He suggested the committee
may need Legislative Legal Services to provide clarification.
2:57:11 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE clarified that someone incorrectly commented
that Amendment 4 would limit events to 22 events per year. That
is not the case, he said. He stated that the director of the
Alaska State Fair previously indicated that due to COVID-19,
about 20 events were held during the year, which was an increase
in fairground use. He was unsure if that increased use would
continue. The Alaska State Fair nonprofit license allows for
sporting event licenses and caterer's permits.
2:57:57 PM
At ease
[The LIO moderator left the meeting because Chair Reinbold
removed her mask contrary to the Legislative Council COVID-19
requirements.]
3:02:30 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD reconvened the meeting.
3:02:45 PM
SENATOR KIEHL asked if the sponsor of Amendment 4 plans to offer
his amendment.
SENATOR MYERS said if Amendment 1 were to pass, he planned to
withdraw Amendment 4.
SENATOR KIEHL maintained his objection.
3:03:08 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Senators Myers, Hughes, and Reinbold
voted in favor of Amendment 1 and Senators Kiehl and Shower
voted against it. Therefore, Amendment 1 was adopted by a 3:2
vote.
3:03:34 PM
SENATOR HUGHES moved to adopt Amendment 2, work order 32-
LS0124\B.14:
32-LS0124\B.14
Bruce
4/1/21
AMENDMENT 2
OFFERED IN THE SENATE BY SENATOR HUGHES
TO: SB 9
Page 107, line 12, following "course":
Insert "and allow a licensee, permittee, agent,
or employee to complete an alcohol server education
course online or in person"
Page 107, line 19, following "test":
Insert ", online or in person,"
CHAIR REINBOLD objected for discussion purposes.
3:03:49 PM
SENATOR HUGHES explained Amendment 2. She reported that close to
20 percent of the notice of violations issued by the Alcohol &
Marijuana Control Office (AMCO) were for expired or missing
server education. The Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (ABC
Board) allowed online courses due to COVID-19. Amendment 2 would
make that change permanent. It would benefit people who need to
travel to take the alcohol server education course. Amendment 2
would allow people to take the alcohol server education course
online but still allow the board to hold in-person classes. This
would reduce the number of violations issued.
3:04:38 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE offered his view that Amendment 2 was a great
amendment. It is something that the ABC Board currently offers,
so the board supports it.
CHAIR REINBOLD removed her objection. There being no further
objection, Amendment 2 was adopted.
3:05:04 PM
SENATOR HUGHES moved to adopt Amendment 3, work order 32-
LS0124\B.15.
32-LS0124\B.15
Bruce
4/1/21
AMENDMENT 3
OFFERED IN THE SENATE BY SENATOR HUGHES
TO: SB 9
Page 73, line 26:
Delete "restaurant or eating place"
Page 73, line 27:
Delete "first class city, a home rule city, or a
unified"
Page 73, lines 29 - 30:
Delete "restaurant or eating place licenses under
AS 04.11.100"
Insert "licenses under this chapter"
Page 74, line 2:
Delete "restaurant or eating place licenses under
AS 04.11.100"
Insert "licenses of each type under this chapter"
Page 74, lines 5 - 9:
Delete all material.
Reletter the following subparagraphs accordingly.
Page 74, lines 12 - 13:
Amendment 3 continued, as follows:
Delete "restaurant or eating place licenses
issued under AS 04.11.100;"
Insert "each type of license requested in the
petition; and"
Page 74, lines 15 - 16:
Delete "; and
(3) granting the additional licenses is in
the public interest"
Page 74, line 20, following "section;":
Insert "and"
Page 74, line 21, through page 75, line 11:
Delete all material and insert:
"(2) the number of existing licenses of
each type requested in the petition within the
boundaries of the municipality."
Page 75, line 13:
Delete "first class city, a home rule city, or a
unified"
Page 75, lines 15 - 16:
Delete "restaurant or eating place licenses under
AS 04.09.210 [AS 04.11.100]"
Insert "licenses under AS 04.09 [THIS CHAPTER]"
Page 75, line 20:
Delete "restaurant or eating place licenses under
AS 04.09.210 [AS 04.11.100]"
Insert "licenses of each type under AS 04.09
[THIS CHAPTER]"
Page 75, lines 23 - 27:
Delete all material.
Reletter the following subparagraphs accordingly.
Page 75, lines 30 - 31:
Delete "restaurant or eating place licenses
issued under AS 04.09.210 [AS 04.11.100];"
Insert "each type of license requested in the
petition; and"
Page 76, lines 2 - 3:
Delete "; and
(3) granting the additional licenses is in
the public interest"
CHAIR REINBOLD objected for discussion purposes.
3:05:19 PM
SENATOR HUGHES stated that the Mat-Su Borough is one of the
fasted growing areas in the state. She explained that Amendment
3 would not change the population criteria, but it will change
the petition process above the population limits. It would allow
the ABC Board to make final decisions. Still, it would allow
municipalities to petition for additional licenses if the area
has experienced growth in population and business activity. She
offered her belief that this was a reasonable compromise.
3:06:14 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE reminded members that the bill added
"substantial increases" for the ability of municipalities to get
additional licenses. He cautioned members that if these changes
go too far, it risks losing support from some stakeholders for
the bill. Amendment 3 would allow licenses in municipalities
without law enforcement oversight. He acknowledged that the
committee could consider adopting Amendment 3, but members
should be aware of its overall effect on Title 4.
SENATOR HUGHES commented that this is not automatic since
municipalities still need to apply for the license and the ABC
Board still needs to consider other things. She offered her
belief that this would provide a balanced approach.
3:06:59 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE reiterated his concern that this would open it
up to all communities. It would delete language "first class
city, a home rule city, or a unified" municipality. It would
mean that anyone in the state could apply for licenses. If the
parties place enough political pressure on the ABC Board, they
might get one. It could happen in places without law
enforcement, which is key to responsible management of alcohol
licensees. That's what this whole bill is about, he said.
3:07:34 PM
SENATOR HUGHES said limiting access points can sound great on
the surface, but it has other effects. For example, people will
be out on the road for longer distances. She argued that
ensuring that people are not on the road for longer distances
could even be safer.
3:08:02 PM
SENATOR REINBOLD maintained her objection.
A roll call vote was taken. Senators Kiehl, Shower, Hughes and
Myers voted in favor of Amendment 3 and Senator Reinbold voted
against it. Therefore, Amendment 3 was adopted by a 4:1 vote.
3:08:40 PM
SENATOR MYERS withdrew Amendment 4, work order 32-LS0124\B.12.
3:08:53 PM
SENATOR KIEHL withdrew Amendment 5, work order 32-LS0124\B.16.
3:09:04 PM
SENATOR KIEHL moved to adopt Amendment 6, work order 32-
LS0124\B.17.
32-LS0124\B.17
Bruce
4/5/21
AMENDMENT 6
OFFERED IN THE SENATE BY SENATOR KIEHL
TO: SB 9
Page 45, lines 28 - 29:
Delete "for a conditional contractor's permit
issued under AS 04.09.690"
Insert "as provided under (g) of this section"
Page 46, line 13:
Delete "The"
Insert "Except as provided under (g) of this
section, the"
Page 46, following line 15:
Insert a new subsection to read:
"(g) A person who will serve or sell alcohol or
check identification of a patron during a permitted
event is not required to complete an alcohol server
education course under AS 04.21.025 before the first
day of the permitted event if the permittee holds
(1) a conditional contractor's permit
issued under AS 04.09.690; or
(2) a nonprofit organization event permit
issued under AS 04.09.650 or an alcoholic beverage
auction permit issued under AS 04.09.660 and the
director approves a server plan submitted by the
permittee."
Reletter the following subsections accordingly.
Page 102, line 27, following "course":
Insert "or server plan"
Page 103, line 5, following "course":
Insert "or complied with a server plan"
Page 107, line 1:
Delete "(e) and (f)"
Insert "(e) - (g)"
Page 107, line 27, following "subsection":
Insert "and except as provided under
AS 04.09.600(g)"
Page 108, following line 11:
Insert a new subsection to read:
"(g) The holder of a fair license under
AS 04.09.290 and agents and employees of the holder of
a fair license may sell or serve alcoholic beverages
or check the identification of a patron without
completing an alcohol server education course under
this section if the director approves a server plan
submitted by the holder of the fair license."
Reletter the following subsections accordingly.
Page 108, line 12:
Delete "(a) - (c) or (e)"
Insert "(a) - (c), (e), or (g)"
Page 108, line 13, following "education":
Insert "or server plan"
Page 108, line 14, following "education":
Insert "or server plan"
CHAIR REINBOLD objected for discussion purposes.
3:09:14 PM
SENATOR KIEHL explained Amendment 6. He stated that sometimes
not everyone has an alcohol server education (TAP) card. This
would allow the organizer of a nonprofit fair licensee event to
serve alcoholic beverages by having a plan for other servers
approved by the Alcohol & Marijuana Control Office (AMCO). He
said many small nonprofits hold small events. However, not every
volunteer has a TAP card. For example, alcohol professionals
from out of state pour beer at an event in his district.
However, these professionals do not have an Alaska TAP card. It
seems appropriate not to allow anyone to pour alcoholic
beverages in those limited situations, but to allow AMCO to
approve a serving plan that does not require everyone to have a
TAP card.
CHAIR REINBOLD asked the sponsor to comment.
3:10:29 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE responded that he had no comment.
3:10:34 PM
SENATOR KIEHL emphasized that this would have limited effects on
nonprofit organizations for events such as the Haines State
Fair.
CHAIR REINBOLD maintained her objection.
3:11:21 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE stated that nonprofits could always auction off
a bottle of wine. Amendment 6 would allow fairs throughout
Alaska to allow anyone to serve so long as someone has a TAPS
card. It would dramatically expand the number of servers that do
not receive training.
3:12:16 PM
SENATOR HUGHES asked for clarification on whether the person
would need to supervise.
3:12:38 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE answered no. He said he often oversees
nonprofit events and uses servers who have passed a Training for
Alcohol Professionals (TAP) course and hold a TAP card. He
emphasized the importance of using trained people to serve
alcoholic beverages because otherwise, it creates liability for
the organization. For example, a server might overserve
customers who could later drive drunk and injure or kill people.
He offered his view that this is very important. Amendment 6
would require someone with a TAP card to supervise all the
people serving. He characterized some of the events as large
events with numerous servers.
3:13:48 PM
SENATOR KIEHL offered that the bill requires a person to hold a
TAP card to serve or sell. That language would include an
auctioneer at an event. Amendment 6 would require director
approval from AMCO for an alternate plan. He acknowledged that
some events are large ones, as described by the sponsor. He
related that a TAP-certified person currently oversees a random
number of volunteers without incident. However, it is certainly
not a requirement in Amendment 6 that one TAP-certified person
oversees 20 servers. Instead, the nonprofit must have a server
plan approved by the Alcohol & Marijuana Control Office. He
cautioned that without Amendment 6, it could shut down many
events.
SENATOR HUGHES asked if the Alcohol & Marijuana Control Office
could comment.
3:15:36 PM
GLEN KLINKHART, Executive Director, Alcohol & Marijuana Control
Office, Department of Commerce, Community and Economic
Development, Anchorage, Alaska, advised members that it is now
much easier to take courses and obtain TAP server cards online.
As online courses are offered more frequently, it will be
possible for people to get certified within a week. He offered
his view that server education is paramount from a public safety
perspective. He expressed concern about the ratio of servers to
those holding TAP cards because it would be difficult to
supervise all the servers.
3:17:09 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD said it sounds like he does not support Amendment
6.
MR. KLINKHART expressed concern that without proper supervision
and education, it could open up issues for public safety.
3:17:55 PM
SENATOR HUGHES asked for the cost and hours to obtain a TAP
card.
MR. KLINKHART answered that the Cabaret, Hotel, Restaurant and
Retailers Association (CHARR) alcohol server classes take about
half a day.
3:18:35 PM
SENATOR KIEHL offered his view that the cost for the CHARR
course is $65.
3:18:43 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE referred to page 49. He stated that the
alcoholic beverage auction permit fees of $50 would cover the
gift baskets.
3:19:04 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD maintained her objection.
3:19:07 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Senator Kiehl voted in favor of
Amendment 6 and Senators Hughes, Shower, Myers, and Reinbold
voted against it. Therefore, Amendment 6 failed by a 1:4 vote.
[Public testimony was not opened or closed.]
[SB 9 was held in committee.]
3:19:49 PM
There being no further business to come before the committee,
Chair Reinbold adjourned the Senate Judiciary Standing Committee
meeting at 3:19 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Agenda 4.7 UPDATE.pdf |
SJUD 4/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
Agenda 4.7 UPDATE |
| Agenda 4.7.pdf |
SJUD 4/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
Senate Judiciary Hearing April 7, 2021 Agenda |
| SJR1 Amendment Presentation Senator Myers.pdf |
SJUD 4/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 1 |
| Amendment SJR1 Myers A.3.pdf |
SJUD 4/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 1 |
| Amendment SJR1 Kiehl A.2.pdf |
SJUD 4/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 1 |
| Amendment SJR1 Kiehl A.1.pdf |
SJUD 4/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 1 |
| ALL AG Taylor Public Testimony Against.pdf |
SJUD 4/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
Governor's Appointee Attorney General Nominee Treg Taylor, All Public Testimony |
| Amendment SB9 Hughes B.13.pdf |
SJUD 4/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 9 |
| Amendment SB9 Hughes B.14.pdf |
SJUD 4/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 9 |
| Amendment SB9 Hughes B.15.pdf |
SJUD 4/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 9 |
| Amendment SB9 Myers B.12.pdf |
SJUD 4/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 9 |
| Amendment SB9 Kiehl B.16.pdf |
SJUD 4/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 9 |
| Amendment SB9 Kiehl B.17.pdf |
SJUD 4/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 9 |
| SB9 ALL Public Testimony February 10- April 7.pdf |
SJUD 4/7/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 9 |