Legislature(2017 - 2018)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)

04/02/2018 01:30 PM JUDICIARY

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as
Download Video part 1. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
-- Delayed to 2:40 p.m. --
Consideration of Governor's Appointees
+ State Commission for Human Rights: TELECONFERENCED
- Christa Bruce-Kotrc
+ Workers' Compensation Appeals Commission TELECONFERENCED
- Michael Notar
+ Violent Crimes Compensation Board TELECONFERENCED
- Jeffrey Stubblefield
+= SB 150 PRETRIAL RELEASE; NON-AK CRIM HISTORY TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
+= SB 214 ESTABLISH CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES PROGRAM TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
+ HB 307 MILITARY JUSTICE & MILITIA CIVIL RELIEF TELECONFERENCED
Scheduled but Not Heard
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
                    ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE                                                                                  
              SENATE JUDICIARY STANDING COMMITTEE                                                                             
                         April 2, 2018                                                                                          
                           1:39 p.m.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
MEMBERS PRESENT                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Senator John Coghill, Chair                                                                                                     
Senator Mia Costello                                                                                                            
Senator Bill Wielechowski                                                                                                       
Senator Mike Shower                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
MEMBERS ABSENT                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Senator Pete Kelly                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
COMMITTEE CALENDAR                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
SENATE BILL NO. 214                                                                                                             
"An Act authorizing the commissioner  of corrections to establish                                                               
a  correctional industries  program; establishing  a correctional                                                               
industries board;  authorizing the  Department of  Corrections to                                                               
receive  money from  the employment  of prisoners;  and providing                                                               
for an effective date."                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
     - HEARD & HELD                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
SENATE BILL NO. 150                                                                                                             
"An Act  relating to pretrial  release procedures;  amending Rule                                                               
41,  Alaska Rule  of  Criminal Procedure;  and  providing for  an                                                               
effective date."                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
     - HEARD & HELD                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 307(JUD)                                                                                                  
"An Act  requiring a  person who  commits certain  offenses under                                                               
the code  of military justice  to register  as a sex  offender or                                                               
child  kidnapper; relating  to  the  Servicemembers Civil  Relief                                                               
Act; relating  to contracts made  by servicemembers;  relating to                                                               
nonjudicial  punishment  of  members of  the  organized  militia;                                                               
relating to  offenses subject to court-  martial proceedings; and                                                               
providing for an effective date."                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
     - SCHEDULED BUT NOT HELD                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
BILL: SB 214                                                                                                                  
SHORT TITLE: ESTABLISH CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES PROGRAM                                                                          
SPONSOR(s): RULES BY REQUEST OF THE GOVERNOR                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
03/05/18       (S)       READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS                                                                        
03/05/18       (S)       JUD, FIN                                                                                               
03/19/18       (S)       JUD AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)                                                                      
03/19/18       (S)       Heard & Held                                                                                           
03/19/18       (S)       MINUTE(JUD)                                                                                            
04/02/18       (S)       JUD AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
BILL: SB 150                                                                                                                  
SHORT TITLE: PRETRIAL RELEASE; NON-AK CRIM HISTORY                                                                              
SPONSOR(s): RULES BY REQUEST OF THE GOVERNOR                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
01/18/18       (S)       READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS                                                                        
01/18/18       (S)       JUD                                                                                                    
03/21/18       (S)       JUD AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)                                                                      
03/21/18       (S)       Heard & Held                                                                                           
03/21/18       (S)       MINUTE(JUD)                                                                                            
03/28/18       (S)       JUD AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)                                                                      
03/28/18       (S)       Heard & Held                                                                                           
03/28/18       (S)       MINUTE(JUD)                                                                                            
04/02/18       (S)       JUD AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
WITNESS REGISTER                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
JORDAN SHILLING, Staff                                                                                                          
Senator John Coghill                                                                                                            
Alaska State Legislature                                                                                                        
Juneau, Alaska                                                                                                                  
POSITION STATEMENT: Described the changes in version J of SB 214                                                              
and version O of SB 150.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
GERI FOX, Director                                                                                                              
Division of Pretrial Services                                                                                                   
Department of Corrections                                                                                                       
Anchorage, Alaska                                                                                                               
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions related to SB 150                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
ROBERT HENDERSON, Deputy Attorney General                                                                                       
Criminal Division                                                                                                               
Office of Special Prosecutions                                                                                                  
Department of Law                                                                                                               
Anchorage, Alaska                                                                                                               
POSITION STATEMENT: Provided information related to SB 150.                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
QUINLAN STEINER, Public Defender                                                                                                
Public Defenders Agency                                                                                                         
Anchorage, Alaska                                                                                                               
POSITION STATEMENT: Described the changes  in version O of SB 150                                                             
as  measured  and targeted  to  address  the concerns  that  were                                                               
raised.                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
ACTION NARRATIVE                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
1:39:29 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  JOHN   COGHILL  called   the  Senate   Judiciary  Standing                                                             
Committee meeting  to order at 1:39  p.m. Present at the  call to                                                               
order were Senators Costello, Wielechowski, and Chair Coghill.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
        SB 214-ESTABLISH CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES PROGRAM                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
1:40:05 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR COGHILL  announced the  consideration of  SB 214  and noted                                                               
the proposed committee substitute (CS).                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
1:40:40 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR COSTELLO  moved to adopt  the work  draft CS for  SB 214,                                                               
version 30-LS2145\J, as the working document.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR COGHILL objected for an explanation                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
1:40:59 PM                                                                                                                    
JORDAN  SHILLING,  Staff,  Senator  John  Coghill,  Alaska  State                                                               
Legislature, Juneau,  Alaska, described the changes  in version J                                                               
for SB 214. He noted that  the first three were technical changes                                                               
that  legislative  legal  made  to  conform  to  the  "Manual  of                                                               
Legislative Drafting.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
        (1) There is a new section in the CS amending AS                                                                        
          33.30.191(c). This is to correct a reference to                                                                       
          AS 33.30.191(g)(5), which is repealed in sec. 12                                                                      
          of the bill that has been repealed in the bill.                                                                       
     (2) The language regarding complying with federal and                                                                      
          state  health  and  safety regulations  was  moved                                                                    
          into  sec. 33.30.195(c)(3)  to require  this as  a                                                                    
          contract  term. AS  33.30.191(d) already  requires                                                                    
          this for the commissioner, so it only made sense                                                                      
          in this section as a contract term with an                                                                            
          individual or private organization                                                                                    
        (3) Language from sec. 33.30.195 that referenced                                                                        
          entering into contracts  or cooperative agreements                                                                    
          under AS  33.30.191 was  deleted as  this language                                                                    
          is only  in AS 33.30.191(b)  which is  repealed in                                                                    
          sec. 12.                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
MR.  SHILLING explained  that the  substantive change  is to  the                                                               
advisory board. One of the  designated union seats was changed to                                                               
a designated  business seat with  active engagement  in workforce                                                               
development.  Also,   the  commissioner  of  The   Department  of                                                               
Corrections  seat  was  made  non-voting   and  replaced  by  the                                                               
commissioner  of  the  Department   of  Commerce,  Community  and                                                               
Economic Development, which will be a voting member.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR  COGHILL  advised  that  the  language  for  those  changes                                                               
appears on  page 2, line 23,  through page 3, line  23. He opined                                                               
that it  is more  appropriate to have  the commissioner  of DCCED                                                               
and a business member on the board.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
1:43:26 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR COGHILL  removed his objection  and version J  was adopted.                                                               
He noted  that the department  was notified of these  changes and                                                               
that the matter would be discussed at a future meeting.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
[SB 214 was held in committee.]                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
1:45:24 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR COGHILL  recessed the  Senate Judiciary  Standing Committee                                                               
meeting until 15 minutes after the floor session.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
2:44:52 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR COGHILL reconvened the  Senate Judiciary Standing Committee                                                               
meeting. Present  at the  call to  order were  Senators Costello,                                                               
Shower, Wielechowski, and Chair Coghill.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
          SB 150-PRETRIAL RELEASE; NON-AK CRIM HISTORY                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
2:45:13 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR COGHILL announced  the consideration of SB  150. Finding no                                                               
one  who  wished  to  comment,  he  close  public  testimony  and                                                               
requested  a motion  to adopt  the proposed  committee substitute                                                               
(CS).                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
2:46:02 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR COSTELLO  moved to adopt  the work  draft CS for  SB 150,                                                               
version 30-GS2814\O, as the working document.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR COGHILL objected for an explanation.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
2:46:18 PM                                                                                                                    
JORDAN  SHILLING,  Staff,  Senator  John  Coghill,  Alaska  State                                                               
Legislature, Juneau,  Alaska, stated that  the first change  is a                                                               
more  specific title.  The  bill also  has  intent language  that                                                               
states that  once out-of-state convictions are  considered in the                                                               
tool as a predictive variable,  the section of the bill [allowing                                                               
a  defendant   to  be  detained   for  48  hours   and  directing                                                               
presumptive  release on  a  person's own  recognizance  or on  an                                                               
unsecured bond  when the  person has  a criminal  history outside                                                               
the state] would no longer apply.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
The next  change appears in Section  8 on page 5,  lines 11-21. A                                                               
new subsection  (m) to AS  12.30.011 clarifies that  this section                                                               
of law only applies to  the mandatory own recognizance (OR) parts                                                               
of the pretrial release grid  that members have in their packets.                                                               
He noted  that those are the  red boxes. It also  ensures that if                                                               
an out-of-state  conviction exists,  that those red  mandatory OR                                                               
boxes revert to  the process for the presumptive OR  boxes in the                                                               
release grid.  That would require  a judge  to make a  finding on                                                               
the record using the clear  and convincing standard, just like is                                                               
done for most of the  pretrial release grid. The most substantive                                                               
change  in the  CS is  the new  five-year lookback  in subsection                                                               
(m). The out-of-state history would  only be relevant and used in                                                               
the preceding five  years. That is commensurate with  the way in-                                                               
state convictions  are treated,  which is anywhere  between three                                                               
and five years.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Version O  also contains additional  language in Sections  10 and                                                               
11 that  the Department of  Law requested  to make it  clear that                                                               
pretrial  services  officers  can  file  criminal  complaints  in                                                               
court. He read DOL's reasoning:                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
     Because the  law is unclear,  some courts  have decided                                                                    
     not  to  allow  pretrial   services  officers  to  file                                                                    
     complaints.   The   only   other  option   for   filing                                                                    
     complaints is to wait for  a prosecutor to evaluate the                                                                    
     case and file charges on behalf of the state.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR COGHILL  noted that  he had an  amendment that  removes the                                                               
five-year lookback because it was deemed too constraining.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
2:50:19 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked if the  3-5 year in-state lookback was                                                               
in statute or something the department decided on.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
MR.  SHILLING  replied it  is  through  regulation, not  statute.                                                               
Senate  Bill  91 did  not  assign  weights  to these  factors  in                                                               
statute  because there  would be  no way  for the  legislature to                                                               
determine  what  weight to  apply.  Prior  convictions have  been                                                               
found to  be predictive  and the tool  currently only  takes into                                                               
consideration convictions in the last  three years and arrests in                                                               
the last five  years. The bill adopts the higher  number. He said                                                               
it is also notable that the  tool does not take past charges into                                                               
consideration, but the bill does.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
2:51:18 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI  asked if a  pending charge was a  factor in                                                               
the pretrial assessment tool.                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MR.  SHILLING replied  the  tool takes  the  current charge  into                                                               
consideration, not a pending charge.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  WIELECHOWSKI  asked  if  a  judge  or  prosecutor  might                                                               
benefit from  being able  to take a  pending charge  into account                                                               
when considering someone's risk.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
MR.  SHILLING  replied  the developers  of  the  assessment  tool                                                               
tested a lot of factors  and identified six that were predictive.                                                               
If that factor was considered and  it's not part of the tool, the                                                               
assumption   is   it   wasn't  found   predictive   of   pretrial                                                               
performance. He deferred  to Geri Fox to discuss  what was tested                                                               
and found not predictive.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  WIELECHOWSKI  said it  would  be  helpful to  have  that                                                               
information.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
2:53:02 PM                                                                                                                    
GERI FOX, Director, Division of  Pretrial Services, Department of                                                               
Corrections,  Anchorage,   Alaska,  advised   that  one   of  the                                                               
questions in  the assessment  tool is the  total number  of prior                                                               
arrests in  the last five years.  If an individual has  a pending                                                               
charge,  they would  receive a  point for  having an  arrest. She                                                               
noted  that more  than 4,000  calculations were  run to  identify                                                               
what is most predictive.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  WIELECHOWSKI referenced  the pretrial  assessment detail                                                               
in the packet under NCA (new  crime arrest) and asked if a person                                                               
receives two points if they have  had three prior arrests or zero                                                               
points if they had just two arrests.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
MS. FOX replied  she believes that is correct but  at some point,                                                               
the numbers of arrests are no more predictive.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  WIELECHOWSKI asked  if a  person with  10 prior  arrests                                                               
would  get two  points, but  if two  of the  arrests resulted  in                                                               
convictions the  person would  get two  more points  under "total                                                               
number of convictions in the past three years."                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
MS. FOX  said she didn't have  the scoring guide, but  that's the                                                               
basic concept.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
2:56:55 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  COSTELLO  noted  that  a  memo  from  Legislative  Legal                                                               
Services and  opined that  it's important  to recognize  that the                                                               
regulations  that  Senate  Bill  91  called  for  have  not  been                                                               
written.  She understands  that the  reason is  that there  was a                                                               
rush to get the law on the books by the effective date.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
She  offered  her understanding  that  the  state does  not  have                                                               
access  to out-of-state  criminal histories  because the  federal                                                               
government  considers using  the  information  for assessment  as                                                               
research and  thus a  violation of privacy.  She asked  how other                                                               
states implemented  these risk assessment tools  when they didn't                                                               
have access to out-of-state criminal histories.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
MS. FOX  said she understands that  many states do not  take out-                                                               
of-state criminal histories into account.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR  COGHILL said  his  research agrees  with  that; Alaska  is                                                               
breaking ground by including out-of-state convictions.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
He asked  Mr. Henderson to  comment on the  committee substitute,                                                               
which still  has the  five-year lookback.  He reiterated  that he                                                               
had an amendment to remove that provision.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
3:00:49 PM                                                                                                                    
ROBERT  HENDERSON, Deputy  Attorney  General, Criminal  Division,                                                               
Office  of Special  Prosecutions, Department  of Law,  Anchorage,                                                               
Alaska,  said  version  O  addresses many  of  the  concerns  the                                                               
department  identified. The  only  area of  concern  is that  the                                                               
lookback is limited to five years.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
The department agrees with the  change in Section 8 regarding the                                                               
standard for  bail and appreciates that  the Pretrial Enforcement                                                               
Division can  file criminal complaints. Some  judges have refused                                                               
to  allow   pretrial  enforcement   officers  to   file  criminal                                                               
complaints  and that  creates a  delay and  potentially a  public                                                               
safety concern.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
MR. HENDERSON  outlined the  significant concerns  the department                                                               
had  with limiting  the lookback  to  five years.  This does  not                                                               
allow  judges sufficient  discretion to  evaluate the  extent and                                                               
significance of  out-of-state criminal  histories. There  are too                                                               
many  scenarios  where someone  who  was  recently released  from                                                               
prison in another  state for a significant crime  moves to Alaska                                                               
and  commits   a  misdemeanor   or  class   C  felony.   In  that                                                               
circumstance, the  state would not  be able  to ask the  judge to                                                               
set monetary bail. The individual would be mandatory OR.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
He  pointed  out  that  the  five-year  limit  is  not  based  on                                                               
empirical evidence.  Further, the tool considers  certain aspects                                                               
that are not based on a  limited lookback of three to five years.                                                               
For example, the tool looks at  age at first arrest. A person who                                                               
has an arrest  that occurred before age 19 will  receive at least                                                               
one point.  The total number  of FTA  warrants that a  person has                                                               
looks at the  entire criminal history. Also, the  total number of                                                               
the  probationary sentence  looks at  a person's  entire criminal                                                               
history.  He  pointed  out  that  in-state  criminal  history  is                                                               
validated and  until out-of-state  criminal history  is validated                                                               
placing a time limitation is  not something the Department of Law                                                               
would support.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
3:05:21 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI  asked for an explanation  of the difference                                                               
between  points on  the  FTA and  NCA scales  and  how they  work                                                               
together.                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
MR. HENDERSON  explained that the risk  assessment tool generates                                                               
two scores;  one for the  risk regarding failure to  appear (FTA)                                                               
and one for the risk of  new criminal arrest (NCA) while on bail.                                                               
The  higher of  the  two  scores -  in  addition  to the  current                                                               
charge, dictates what box a person  falls into. For example, if a                                                               
person  is high  on  FTA and  low  on NCA,  the  person would  be                                                               
determined to  be a  high risk for  purposes of  either mandatory                                                               
release or presumptive OR.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI  reviewed the potential points  on the chart                                                               
and observed that it seems difficult  to get above a low score on                                                               
failure to appear (FTA).                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
MR. HENDERSON  suggested that if  Ms. Fox has the  scoring guide,                                                               
she could provide the exact numbers  that lead to a maximum score                                                               
of eight.  In general,  each question  has a value  of up  to two                                                               
points.                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
MS. FOX  confirmed that most of  questions have a value  of up to                                                               
two points. The  combined score is where  the predictive validity                                                               
of  the tool  comes into  play and  is why  it's so  important to                                                               
revalidate the  tool on  a regular  basis. For  example, pretrial                                                               
officers are  currently monitoring individuals on  release and it                                                               
may be that violations will be  found more quickly. Each year the                                                               
tool should  be reevaluated to  determine whether  any predictive                                                               
issues  change  or   if  the  scoring  or   weighting  should  be                                                               
different.  Having a  statute that  calls  for an  evidence-based                                                               
validating tool provides the best  opportunity to have a flexible                                                               
system. Actual  data drives what  information is included  in the                                                               
tool.                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
3:10:20 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI  posed a  hypothetical situation  of someone                                                               
who had  10 failure to  appear (FTA)  warrants in the  last three                                                               
years. He asked if that person would get a total of four points.                                                                
                                                                                                                                
MS. FOX replied  it would depend on the  underlying offense. That                                                               
is also why the preassessment tool  looks at a number of factors.                                                               
In Alaska, the tool looks at FTA, NCA, and the current charge.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked if someone  with 10 prior FTA warrants                                                               
who was  over 21 at  the time of  first arrest and  not currently                                                               
booked  on an  FTA or  property  charge or  motor vehicle  charge                                                               
would score four points.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
MS. FOX said yes.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI observed that they  would be deemed low risk                                                               
even though they failed to appear 10 times.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
MS. FOX answered yes.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR COGHILL  suggested he keep  in mind that there  could still                                                               
be  release  conditions  for  someone deemed  low  risk  who  was                                                               
released OR.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MS. FOX agreed.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR COGHILL  added that any  failure could result in  a warrant                                                               
or the individual being picked.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
MS. FOX said yes.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
3:13:45 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR COGHILL advised  that he had an amendment  that removes the                                                               
five-year lookback, but he wouldn't offer it today.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
He asked Mr. Steiner to comment on version O.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
3:14:50 PM                                                                                                                    
QUINLAN  STEINER,   Public  Defender,  Public   Defender  Agency,                                                               
Anchorage, Alaska, said he believes  the changes in version O are                                                               
measured and targeted  to address the concerns  that were raised.                                                               
He  cautioned that  if  the five-year  lookback  is repealed,  it                                                               
could result in  arbitrary or varied decisions  across the state.                                                               
That could result  in people spending time  in jail unnecessarily                                                               
relative  to their  score  for  failure to  appear  or new  crime                                                               
arrest.                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
3:16:07 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR COGHILL  removed his objection  and version O  was adopted.                                                               
He held SB 150 in committee for future consideration.                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
3:17:11 PM                                                                                                                    
There being  no further  business to  come before  the committee,                                                               
Chair Coghill  adjourned the Senate Judiciary  Standing Committee                                                               
meeting at 3:17 p.m.                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
Christa Bruce-Kotrc - State Commission on Human Rights.pdf SJUD 4/2/2018 1:30:00 PM
Confirmation Hearing
Michael Notar - Workers' Comp Appeals Commission.pdf SJUD 4/2/2018 1:30:00 PM
Confirmation Hearings
Jeffrey Stubblefield - Violent Crimes Compensation Board.pdf SJUD 4/2/2018 1:30:00 PM
Confirmation Hearings
SB 150 - Wielechowski Amendment O.3.pdf SJUD 4/2/2018 1:30:00 PM
SB 150
SB 150 - Wielechowski Amendment O.5.pdf SJUD 4/2/2018 1:30:00 PM
SB 150
SB 150 - Wielechowski Amendment O.4.pdf SJUD 4/2/2018 1:30:00 PM
SB 150
SB 150 - Wielechowski Amendment O.7.pdf SJUD 4/2/2018 1:30:00 PM
SB 150
SB 150 - Wielechowski Amendment O.2.pdf SJUD 4/2/2018 1:30:00 PM
SB 150
CS to SB 214 - Version J.pdf SJUD 4/2/2018 1:30:00 PM
SB 214
HB 307 - Sectional Summary (ver. J).pdf SJUD 4/2/2018 1:30:00 PM
HB 307
HB 307 - Supporting Document - SCRA Enhancement.pdf SJUD 4/2/2018 1:30:00 PM
HB 307
HB 307 - Sponsor Statement.pdf SJUD 4/2/2018 1:30:00 PM
HB 307
HB 307 - Summary of Changes (ver. A to ver. J).pdf SJUD 4/2/2018 1:30:00 PM
HB 307