Legislature(2023 - 2024)SENATE FINANCE 532
03/29/2023 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| University of Alaska - Fy 24 Operating and Capital | |
| Confirmation of Governor's Appointee: Anita Halterman, Alaska Mental Health Trust Authority | |
| SB107 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 107 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE
March 29, 2023
9:01 a.m.
9:01:46 AM
CALL TO ORDER
Co-Chair Hoffman called the Senate Finance Committee
meeting to order at 9:01 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Senator Lyman Hoffman, Co-Chair
Senator Donny Olson, Co-Chair
Senator Bert Stedman, Co-Chair
Senator Click Bishop
Senator Jesse Kiehl
Senator Kelly Merrick
Senator David Wilson
MEMBERS ABSENT
None
ALSO PRESENT
Tim Grussendorf, Staff, Senator Lyman Hoffman.
PRESENT VIA TELECONFERENCE
Pat Pitney, President, University of Alaska; Anita
Halterman, Appointee, Alaska Mental Health Trust Authority
(AMHTA).
SUMMARY
SB 107 PERMANENT FUND DIVIDEND; POMV SPLIT
SB 107 was HEARD and HELD in committee for
further consideration.
CONFIRMATION OF GOVERNOR'S APPOINTEE: ANITA HALTERMAN,
ALASKA MENTAL HEALTH TRUST AUTHORITY
UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA - FY 24 OPERATING and CAPITAL
SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
9:02:02 AM
^UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA - FY 24 OPERATING and CAPITAL
SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
9:02:23 AM
PAT PITNEY, PRESIDENT, UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA (via
teleconference), discussed a presentation entitled
"University of Alaska - Empower Alaska," (copy on file).
President Pitney looked at slide 2, "University of Alaska -
Alaska's System of Higher Education," which showed a map of
the state with the three universities and community
campuses in the state. She noted that the system offered a
breadth of programs from workforce credentialing to
doctoral degrees.
9:04:27 AM
President Pitney spoke to slide 3, " Overview":
•Context
•FY24 Budget Summary
•FY24 Operating & Capital Budgets
•Appendix
oLegislative Priorities
oFY23 Initiatives Update
oFY23 Supplemental
oFiscal Context
9:04:50 AM
President Pitney referenced slide 4, "Budget Context,"
which showed pictorial representations of the challenges
faced by the system: Job Openings Near All-time High,
Population Declines, Inflation, Oil Prices, Transition from
federal COVID to Infrastructure Funding, Nationwide Drop in
High School Graduates, Value of Going to College, and
College Enrollment. She stressed that UA was uniquely
positioned and was the largest workforce provider in the
state. She mentioned the challenges of inflation, down
trending oil prices, and transitioning from federal COVID
funding to infrastructure funding. She was pleased that
current college enrollment was trending up.
9:06:47 AM
President Pitney turned to slide 5, "Enrollment
Highlights,":
Spring 2023 Enrollment:
Headcount up 3 percent over Spring 2022. First year-
to-year increase in 10 years.
Significant enrollment increases at most Community
Campuses, the UAA and UAF Community and Technical
Colleges and the UAS School of Career Education
More students in classes and return to face-to-face
instruction, but there are more online options for
students across the UA system than pre-COVID
Dual enrollment:
In FY22, more than 2,300 high school students were
enrolled in a University course an increase of 10%
over FY21.
UA Scholars:
As of February 1, 48 percent of eligible UA Scholars
secured their award by applying to UAA, UAF or UAS an
increase of 11% percent over 2022.
Teacher Preparation
Re-established BA in Early Childhood Education at UAA
Pilot program to provide financial support for
students in teaching internships
Healthcare
Expansion of the Nursing program
Pilot program to provide financial support for
students in clinical programs
Alaska in the national context
Fall 2022 enrollments were down 1.9 percent
nationwide, and Fall enrollment across UA was similar
The average debt of University of Alaska graduates
and the percentage of graduates with debt is below the
national average.
President Pitney noted that the current year was the first
year in the previous nine years that UA was not facing a
significant budget reduction. She emphasized the need for
stability. She shared that UA had the goal of raising the
number of dual enrollment students to 3,600. She explained
that dual enrolment meant that high school kids were taking
college classes for both high school and college credit.
9:09:36 AM
President Pitney considered slide 6, " UA Priority Focus
Areas," which listed UA priority focus areas.
9:09:49 AM
President Pitney displayed slide 7, " Empower Alaska
Campaign."
President Pitney highlighted slide 8, " FY24 Budget Summary
Status Quo (maintain stability),"
•FY24 Status Quo Operating Budget
o Maintain Stability -$24.5 million (8.5% increase)
o $6.5 million -FY23 supplemental compensation
(also need in the FY24 base budget)
o $13.2 million ($15.8 million total) FY24
compensation increase
o $4.8 million unavoidable fixed cost increases
o Cyber Security
o Insurance Premiums
o Emergency Response & Disability/Health
Services
o Student library digital access
o Shared Services HR & Procurement
•FY24 Capital Budget
o#1 Facilities Modernization -$2 million space
renovation for WWAMI expansion
o#1 Deferred Maintenance/Renewal & Repurposing -
$17.5 million UAA facility systems
President Pitney said that the $13.2 million compensation
increase covered the 2.75 percent negotiated agreement for
faculty and a 2.5 percent request for staff as well as an
increase in the pension wage base from $42,000 to $52,000
per year. She said that the increased pension wage base
equated to a $700 per year, per person, increase in pension
contribution. She relayed that the UA paid 6.8 percent for
a wage base up to $42,000 and an increase up to $52,000,
which was still one-third of that state employees enjoyed.
She said that the negotiated increases were very modest.
She said that all the compensation requests could be found
in the governors amended budget. She discussed the $2
million capital request in the governors budget for the
expansion of the Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, and
Idaho (WWAMI) Program. She noted it would raise the cohort
from 20 to 30 students.
9:15:24 AM
Senator Wilson asked about insurance premiums and wondered
whether there had been a cost analysis for switching UA
employees to the state insurance program.
President Pitney clarified that the insurance premiums and
unavoidable fixed cost was associated with UA's property
insurance. She recounted that when she took her position in
2020, one of her first actions was to investigate whether
it made sense for UA to go into AlaskaCare. She cited that
the 5 percent increase in the FY 24 budget was the first
increase in 6 years. She said that research had shown that
it would cost the UA system more to switch to AlaskaCare
than to stay with their current insurance plan.
9:17:40 AM
President Pitney looked at slide 9, "FY24 Budget Summary
Moving Forward (advance key priorities):
•FY24 Operating Budget -$7.2 million
o$2.0 million unavoidable fixed costs (facilities
maintenance, commodities and contractual
services)
o$5.2 million programs to build capacity for
Alaska's workforce
•FY24 Capital Budget
o$54.8 million DM/R&R
o$19.2 million Facility Modernization
o UAA College of Health and Library Learning
Commons
o UAF Student Engagement Center
o UAS Lab Consolidation
•Economic Development: Research/Workforce Training
Programs (continuation)
o UA Drone Program Year 2 -$20 million ($10 million in
Governor's Proposed Budget)
•Revenue Assumptions
o $900 million total budget authority, $523
million (58%) is from unrestricted sources
.notdef$320 million in state general funds and
$203 million unrestricted earned revenue
o FY24 UA expects a net $3 million increase in
unrestricted earned revenue
.notdefAssumes additional state support for
programs
.notdef$1 million in tuition and fee revenue as
enrollment stabilizes
.notdef$2 million in other unrestricted earned
revenue, such as interest income,
university receipts, and indirect cost
recovery (from competitive externally funded
research projects)
President Pitney cited the main goal of keeping the
financial stability that was shown on slide 8.
9:22:15 AM
President Pitney showed slide 10, "FY24 Operating Request."
President Pitney advanced to slide 11 and addressed a table
showing the UA FY 24 operating budget. She noted that the
first subset of information after the FY 23 management plan
was the UA Board of Regents budget request. The second
subset of information was the governors amended request.
She noted that the status quo subtotal of $24 million, a
total increase of $28 million, and the additional items
moving forward added another $7 million in general funds.
9:23:43 AM
President Pitney looked at slide 12, "UA Operating Budget
State Reports," which showed a table depicting a table of
expenditure and revenue trends through FY24. She said she
would follow up on questions offline.
9:24:29 AM
President Pitney showed slide 13, "FY24 Compensation,"
which detailed the compensation request.
Co-Chair Hoffman asked about the vacancy rate at UA the
previous year.
President Pitney recalled that UA had been in a budget
reduction mode for 8 years, The attrition was one of the
significant keys for UA to meet its budget reduction
requirements. She continued that prior to this years
budget stability, vacancy rates had not been monitored. She
cited issues with hiring like other organizations in the
state. She did not have an exact number.
President Pitney relayed that the remainder of the
presentation was details about the summaries she just
provided.
9:26:39 AM
Senator Bishop mentioned Maritime Program Coordinator in
Ketchikan, which was working with AMHS to fill gaps in the
fleet. He wanted to discuss the Construction Manager
Program in Fairbanks, which he knew was an important
program for contractors in the Fairbanks area. He asked for
a status update on the two programs.
9:27:42 AM
Co-Chair Stedman inquired about the lack of capital budget
for deferred maintenance. He asked about what might be
added to the budget to prevent erosion of UA's assets.
President Pitney turned to slide 21, "Capital Budget DM/R&R
Funding History - Unrestricted General Funds & Backlog,"
and mentioned that for the previous 20 years a target had
been set of $50 million in an annual deferred maintenance
request. She recounted that the $72 million total in the
FY24 budget includes last years the remainder of $50
million, plus this years $50 million. She noted that if
UA had $50 million per year in a planned fashion, deferred
maintenance could be kept under control and reduced.
Co-Chair Stedman wanted to hear more about WWAMI and the
10-student increase.
President Pitney went to slide 15, WWAMI Program," and
mentioned the applications for incoming class for FY 24,
which had already been accepted. She said that the $1.6
million request through APCE would cover the difference
between instate graduate tuition and the out-of-state
tuition. She said that the 24 students in the program had
already been approved and that the funding was critical.
9:31:57 AM
Co-Chair Hoffman thought there was great support in the
legislature for the WWAMI Program. He asked for President
Pitney to provide a ten-year history of where student in
the program went on to practice. He thought there was some
concern that there was no linkage or requirement that WWAMI
graduates go on to practice in Alaska. He lamented that the
state needed medical professionals. He asked President
Pitney for recommendations on how to get student who
graduate from medical school under the program to then
practice in Alaska.
President Pitney thought that 70 to 80 percent of the
students returned to work in the state.
Co-Chair Hoffman understood that was over the last 10
years.
President Pitney answered affirmatively. She thought that
there was a built-in insurance policy for the state, as a
student too advantage of the program who chose not to
return to Alaska to practice, had to pay back the tuition
difference.
Co-Chair Hoffman asked if President Pitney could provide
more detailed information.
President Pitney agreed to provide further information.
9:33:59 AM
Co-Chair Olson referenced the jump from 20 to 30 students
in the WWAMI Program and asked about the progression from
20 to 30 students.
President Pitney shared that UA planned to go directly to
30 students, and the clinicals were being considered with
30 students in mind and starting in FY25.
Co-Chair Olson asked about the make-up of the admissions
committee.
President Pitney replied that she would need to get back to
the committee with the information.
Co-Chair Olson wondered how many Alaskans were on the
admissions committee.
Co-Chair Hoffman relayed that his office had received
interest in the Family Practice Residency Program. He said
that there was interest in having those programs closer to
home. He pondered how to come up with competitive grants to
bring the program to different parts of the state.
9:36:40 AM
Senator Wilson wondered about the teacher practicum
teaching program. He understood that the program would
allow students to attend a teaching program tuition free
for two years, receive a $2000 stipend, and have student
loans forgiven if they taught in a rural area of the state
for 3 years. He wondered whether the program was cost
effective. He spoke about a $7 million for the mariculture
program. He wondered whether the programs were financially
responsible.
President Pitney stated that the plan of building a $100
million mariculture industry for the state had been in
discussion for a long time. She noted that there was
information further in the presentation about the progress
of the funding.
9:39:15 AM
Senator Wilson relayed that he could get in touch offline
with additional questions.
9:39:24 AM
President Pitney thanked the committee for focusing on UA,
which she considered the best investment for the state
workforce. She cited that 80 percent of graduates made
their lives in the state.
Co-Chair Hoffman handed the gavel to Co-Chair Olson.
9:41:23 AM
AT EASE
9:45:35 AM
RECONVENED
^CONFIRMATION OF GOVERNOR'S APPOINTEE: ANITA HALTERMAN,
ALASKA MENTAL HEALTH TRUST AUTHORITY
9:45:39 AM
Co-Chair Olson relayed that the committee would consider
Anita Halterman as an appointee to the Alaska Mental Health
Trust Authority Board.
9:45:59 AM
ANITA HALTERMAN, APPOINTEE, ALASKA MENTAL HEALTH TRUST
AUTHORITY (AMHTA) (via teleconference), discussed her
background. She had initially sought a position on the
board at the request of her employer. This would be her
first full term as an appointee. She spoke of her
application process for the role. She detailed her various
positions on the board. He said that she eventually became
chair of the board and has learned a great deal during her
time with the board. She mentioned that she had spent some
time working in the legislature.
9:49:04 AM
Ms. Halterman discussed her personal history and exposure
to mental illness and living in the foster system. She had
lived in Eagle River for over 28 years. She had spent the
previous seven years working in the Department of Health
and Social Services. She cited her time as a Medicaid
analyst where she drafted fiscal notes. She shared her
personal connection to mental health and addiction issues.
She stressed her desire to provide services and support to
trust beneficiaries. She cited that her exposure to budgets
and program funding had increased her effectiveness as a
board member.
Ms. Halterman noted that she had prioritized her work on
the board over other employment. She looked forward to
continuing to serve trust beneficiaries. She thanked the
committee for its consideration and hoped to continue to
work to improve the lives of trust beneficiaries.
9:53:08 AM
Co-Chair Olson queried Ms. Haltermans postsecondary
education.
Ms. Halterman relayed that she had received an associate
degree from the University of Alaska Anchorage; her
Batchelors Degree form Wayland Baptist University; and her
master's degree from Wayland Baptist University.
Co-Chair Olson asked about her area of study at university.
Ms. Halterman stated that she had received business degrees
with an emphasis in healthcare administration.
9:54:16 AM
Senator Merrick thanked Ms. Halterman for sharing her
personal story, and thought Eagle River was lucky to have
Ms. Halterman in the community.
Co-Chair Olson agreed.
9:54:48 AM
Co-Chair Stedman MOVED to forward the nomination of Anita
Halterman as a member of the Alaska Mental Health Trust
Authority Board to a joint session of the legislature. The
action did not reflect an intent by any member of the
Senate Finance Committee to vote for or against the
confirmation during any other sessions.
9:55:18 AM
AT EASE
9:57:36 AM
RECONVENED
SENATE BILL NO. 107
"An Act relating to the Alaska permanent fund;
relating to income of the Alaska permanent fund;
relating to the amount available for appropriation and
appropriations from the earnings reserve account;
relating to the permanent fund dividend; and providing
for an effective date."
9:57:41 AM
Co-Chair Olson relayed that the committee would consider a
Committee Substitute (cs).
Co-Chair Hoffman MOVED to ADOPT proposed committee
substitute for SB 107, Work Draft 33-LS0349\Y (Nauman,
3/27/23).
Co-Chair Stedman OBJECTED for discussion.
9:58:36 AM
TIM GRUSSENDORF, STAFF, SENATOR LYMAN HOFFMAN, announced
that the initial legislation contained a solid foundation
for the committee to build upon, maintaining the belief
that the 75/25 POMV split was a split that would pencil out
and hold up over time with the current assumptions. He
explained that the new CS offered a 50/50 POMV split if
certain revenue conditions were met. He noted that the
first change in the bill was found on Page 2, new Section
3, which allowed for the 50/50 split. The second change was
located on Page 4, new Section 9(a), which offered a
conditional effect; If $900 million in new revenue was
achieved, Section 3 would take effect. He furthered that
new Section 9(b) set the date for Section 9(a) trigger of
December 1, 2026. He said that Section 10 clarified that
the new revenue had to be in the bank and not an
estimation. Section 11 set the effective date for FY25. He
said that the bill did not set the dividend for FY24. He
stated that 75/25 would be in effect for FY 25 and FY 26
and a 50/50 could be possible in FY 27if the conditions
were met. He relayed that there was an update revenue
forecast to draw assumptions from. He noted the issue of
increased funding for the base student allocation (BSA) and
the future effects of inflation on the POMV draw.
10:02:25 AM
Mr. Grussendorf spoke to a document entitled "Review of
Committee Modeling Assumptions," (copy on file). He turned
to page 3, which showed the model Senate Finance baseline
budget with 25 percent POMV to the permanent fund dividend
(PFD).
Mr. Grussendorf advanced to slide 4, which showed a model
with the assumption of the $900 million being achieved for
FY27, with no other new revenue coming in between FY24 and
FY26. He noted that in FY27 the Constitutional Budget
Reserve (CBR) draw was reined in, but earlier on the CBR
would grow at a modest rate. He shared that there would be
some surplus in the first three years.
10:03:55 AM
Mr. Grussendorf showed slide 5, which portrayed a slow new
revenue build up to the $900 million mark by FY27.
10:05:11 AM
Senator Merrick asked if the CS essentially raised revenue
to pay a larger PFD.
Mr. Grussendorf replied in the negative.
10:05:43 AM
AT EASE
10:06:01 AM
RECONVENED
Co-Chair Stedman WITHDREW his OBJECTION. There being NO
OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
Co-Chair Hoffman commented that the intent was for the
committee to review the legislation and take public
comment. He thought the bill would set in place the 75/25
split for the foreseeable future and if adopted the
conversation would continue about how the state could get
to a 50/50 split. He believed that oil tax structure
legislation currently in play could bring in revenue as
well as some legislation related to carbon capture. He
added that there was legislation in the building that would
raise between $50 and $80 million through an internet fee.
He thought all the bills could bring in additional revenue.
10:09:51 AM
Senator Wilson had questions about the bills at play meant
to increase revenue and whether the new fields or wells
would count as new revenue and if the modification of the
slider in statue would be considered new revenue.
Co-Chair Hoffman thought the bill proposed a change in law
that allowed for an increase in revenue, which he would
consider new revenue.
Senator Wilson reiterated his question about whether new
fields being brought online would be considered new revenue
to the state.
Co-Chair Hoffman thought the matter needed to be
researched.
10:11:07 AM
Co-Chair Stedman thought the committee needed to discuss
the CBR balance and the current minimum balance. He noted
that the CBR was at $2 billion and that the Legislative
Finance Division (LFD) recommended a balance of $3.5
billion. He considered some fiscal projections and thought
it looked as though putting the 50/50 in place, and meeting
the minimum threshold of $900 million, by FY30 the POMV
draw could limit the growth of the CBR. He believed that
the minimum balance of $3.5 billion should be strongly
considered. He did not think that the state was in a strong
financial position with only $2 billion in the CBR. He
believed that the $900 million figure looked a little
light and could be reconsidered. He considered the long
duration of the projected timeline and stressed the need
for further discussion.
10:14:12 AM
Co-Chair Olson asked whether Co-Chair Hoffman wanted to
comment on Co-Chair Stedman's remarks. He asked
specifically about the recently approved Willow Project,
which was projected to generate revenue for the state in
the next decade.
Co-Chair Hoffman referenced Senator Wilson's question about
what should be considered new revenue. To Co-Chair
Stedman's point, he thought the CBR balance was important,
but not as important as coming up with a solution
surrounding the PFD. He thought there would be a lot of
debate about what the dividend should be in the current
fiscal year. He cited that the other body had already
proposed a 50/50 split in the operating budget. He thought
the 50/50 split would cripple the state financially within
3 years and jeopardize other programs. He feared that not
having the necessary revenue to meet whatever number split
was decided upon would lead future legislatures to ignore
the law, as was the current practice with the current
statute governing the 5 percent POMV draw. He considered
that it had not been the intention of the legislature to
ignore the statute but that that was what had happened. He
strongly believed that the PFD should be addressed within
the fiscal year and noted that all spending discussions
within the legislature eventually came down to the question
of what the payout of the dividend should be. He argued for
a long-term solution to the issue of the dividend split and
an end to the reoccurring arguments on the matter.
10:18:53 AM
Co-Chair Stedman referenced the concern about the minimum
CBR balance. He argued that a fiscal package that included
the 50/50 split would gain nothing for the state and would
leave the state on precarious fiscal footing. He stressed
that it was only a matter of time before oil prices dropped
and the state was unable to meet its financial obligations.
10:19:48 AM
AT EASE
10:20:16 AM
RECONVENED
Senator Bishop wanted to discuss the capital budget.
10:20:50 AM
Senator Bishop referenced a document entitled "Capital
Budget Estimate," (copy on file). He spoke of the shock he
felt when he first began work in the Palin Administration
and was told of a $1.2 billion deferred maintenance
schedule. He referenced United States Senator Lisa
Murkowskis most recent state-of-the-state as well as a
speech by the late Senator Stevens that warned that the
days of earmarked funds on the federal level were numbered.
He mentioned the IIJA but noted that those funds had a
limited lifetime.
Senator Bishop considered figures on the capital budget
estimate document.
10:24:08 AM
Senator Bishop read from the prepared document:
Capital Budget estimate
200$ State Match for federal funds
Most likely will increase as more IIJA grants are
put forth.
125$ Department-wide Capital Rebuild/replace
dilapidated buildings/equipment.
Based on GOV current budget of $303m minus the
match, rounded up
75$ Department-wide Initiatives, New Builds, New
Equipment
For NEW GOV initiatives, i.e. Statehood defense,
DPS initiatives, F&G research.
155$ 2% Deferred Maintenance
2-4% rule to avoid accruing new Deferred
Maintenance, the 2% figure would halt the backlog
from growing, but not address the $2.2B Backlog
(4% would be $310m)
50$ AEA Bulk Fuel Deferred Maintenance backlog of
$800m per AEA in 2021 Annual Report
100$ University DM
Priority list typically is $50-75m. Current
Backlog is over $1.5B.
Following the 2-4% rule would be $98-196m per
year.
50$ School Major Maintenance
Current FY24 list is $413.5m. List is recurring
yearly.
50$ School Construction
Current FY24 list is $195.6m. List is recurring
yearly.
20$ Legislative Adds
Estimated based on $1m per Senate District.
Potentially a low estimate, for example last year
the State put match forward for Port of Nome,
Army Corps projects.
825$ million - total
*Gov proposed Cap budget of $303m does not include:
University DM
School Major Maintenance
School Construction
Harbor Matching Grants
State supported match for Muni's who received federal
BUILD grants, or the like
Co-Chair Bishop thought the Capital Budget items should be
part of the conversation.
10:26:25 AM
Co-Chair Stedman asked whether the request for discussion
was about increasing the $400 million for the Capital
Budget in the LFD modeling in the presentation.
Senator Bishop responded that his intention was to
highlight that the $400 million was not going to cover many
of the estimated Capital Budget projects.
10:27:27 AM
Senator Kiehl appreciated Senator Bishop's additional
information regarding capital needs. He thought additional
modelling including a BSA increase would be helpful. He
thought it was reasonable to model with additional
education spending in the Operating Budget. He agreed with
Co-Chair Hoffman that SB 107 stabilized both state revenue
and state spending.
10:29:36 AM
Co-Chair Hoffman noted that there was $400 million included
in the modelling and wondered whether that number was
adequate. He suggested that the committee needed to discuss
various ways of looking at the problem.
10:30:53 AM
Co-Chair Hoffman commented that the legislation did not
limit the committee from exploring other revenue measures.
He commended Senator Bishop for coming up with an alternate
revenue measuring with the Education Raffle and the Fuel
Tax Measure. He stressed that not all new revenue measures
had to be in the form of taxes. He felt that it was
important that the other body have adequate time to
consider the legislation before the end of the legislative
session.
10:33:07 AM
SB 107 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
Co-Chair Olson discussed housekeeping.
ADJOURNMENT
10:33:39 AM
The meeting was adjourned at 10:33 a.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 032923 FY24 SFin UA Financial Overview 3 29 2023 FINAL.pdf |
SFIN 3/29/2023 9:00:00 AM |
|
| 032923 Anita Halterman AMHTA resume_redacted.pdf |
SFIN 3/29/2023 9:00:00 AM |
|
| SB 107 work draft version Y.pdf |
HW&M 5/8/2023 6:00:00 PM SFIN 3/29/2023 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/12/2023 9:00:00 AM |
SB 107 |
| SB 107 Capital Budget assumption Backup Packet.pdf |
HW&M 5/8/2023 6:00:00 PM SFIN 3/29/2023 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/12/2023 9:00:00 AM |
SB 107 |
| SB 107 Modeling Slides_20230328.pdf |
HW&M 5/8/2023 6:00:00 PM SFIN 3/29/2023 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/12/2023 9:00:00 AM |
SB 107 |