Legislature(2019 - 2020)SENATE FINANCE 532
03/23/2020 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB139 | |
| HB96 | |
| HB106 | |
| HB235 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 106 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 96 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 139 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 235 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE
March 23, 2020
9:13 a.m.
9:13:02 AM
CALL TO ORDER
Co-Chair von Imhof called the Senate Finance Committee
meeting to order at 9:13 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Senator Natasha von Imhof, Co-Chair
Senator Bert Stedman, Co-Chair
Senator Click Bishop
Senator Lyman Hoffman
Senator Donny Olson
Senator Bill Wielechowski
Senator David Wilson
MEMBERS ABSENT
None
ALSO PRESENT
Juli Lucky, Staff, Senator Natasha von Imhof; Angela
Rodell, Executive Director, Alaska Permanent Fund
Corporation; Clinton Lasley, Deputy Commissioner,
Department of Health and Social Services; Representative
Zach Fields, Sponsor; David Scott, Staff, Senator Bert
Stedman; Representative Adam Wool, Sponsor; Miles Baker,
Government Relations, University of Alaska.
PRESENT VIA TELECONFERENCE
Teri Cothren, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Health and
Social Services
SUMMARY
CSHB 96(FIN)
PIONEERS' HOME AND VETERANS' HOME RATES
SCS CSHB 96(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee
with a "do pass" recommendation and with two
forthcoming fiscal impact notes from the
Department of Health and Social Services.
HB 106 SCHOOL BOND DEBT REIMBURSEMENT
HB 106 was REPORTED out of committee with two "do
pass" recommendations, two "do not pass"
recommendations, three "no recommendation"
recommendations and with one new zero fiscal note
from the Department of Education and Early
Development/Debt Service.
HB 139 AK PERM. FUND CORP. PROCUREMENT EXEMPTION
HB 139 was HEARD and HELD in committee for
further consideration.
CSHB 235(FIN)
AK WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD:ALLOCATIONS
SCS CSHB 235(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee
with a "do pass" recommendation and with six
previously published fiscal impact notes: FN
7(EED), FN 8(LWF), FN 9(LWF), FN 10(LWF), FN
11(LWF), and FN 12(UA).
HOUSE BILL NO. 139
"An Act providing an exemption from the state
procurement code for the acquisition of investment-
related services for assets managed by the Board of
Trustees of the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation."
9:13:23 AM
Co-Chair von Imhof discussed housekeeping. She assured the
committee that the bill would not move from committee
during this meeting.
9:14:06 AM
JULI LUCKY, STAFF, SENATOR NATASHA VON IMHOF, spoke to the
Committee Substitute (CS). She noted that there was no
Explanation of Changes document as the CS entirely replaced
the previous bill. She related that the bill would still
provide an exemption for certain contracts to provide
investment related supplies or services to support the
operations of the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation. The
bill also required a written determination of the following
three factors:
That the contract is in the best interest of the
Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation
That the contract is consistent with the
responsibilities of the board of trustees of the
Alaska Permanent Fund and the corporation under AS
37.13.120
That the contractor is qualified to provide the
supplies or services
Ms. Lucky related that the language had been worked out
between the sponsor and the corporation to provide
sideboards on the broad exemption found in the previous
version of the bill.
9:15:13 AM
Senator Wielechowski thought that the CS made the bill
worse. He stated he was told the reason for the bill was to
be able to react to immediate circumstances. He thought the
CS broadened the scope to investment related supplies and
services and had no immediacy requirement; furthermore,
there was no requirement that any documentation be provided
to justify any determination. He thought it was a bad
policy to give a corporation with so much capital the
ability to issue sole source contracts without oversight.
He relayed that he was working on amendments to the
legislation.
Co-Chair von Imhof solicited comments from Ms. Lucky.
Ms. Lucky deferred to the bill sponsor, or representatives
from the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC). She said
that the corporation and drafted the language for the CS
and could speak to the intent.
Co-Chair von Imhof called upon invited testimony.
9:16:46 AM
ANGELA RODELL, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ALASKA PERMANENT FUND
CORPORATION, spoke to the CS. She explained that the bill
raised the standard under which the corporation could
procure and incorporated the concept of fiduciary duty. She
noted that fiduciary duty meant that the board could be
held personally liable for acts that were in breach of
fiduciary duty; the state could seek damages from personal
financial accounts in order to recover damages. She
expressed appreciation for the committee and any support
for the CS.
9:18:15 AM
Senator Olson asked whether Ms. Rodell was aware of the
sunset provision in the bill.
Ms. Rodell stated that there was no sunset provision in the
CS.
Senator Olson referenced Senator Wielechowski's concern
about sole-source contracts.
Ms. Rodell thought it was important to remember that APFC
was subject to the public records act. All the contracts
would be subject to the act requirements and payments under
legislative budget appropriation. She reminded the
committee that there would be opportunities to discuss
contracts before they were awarded.
9:19:37 AM
Senator Olson asked whether Ms. Rodell would be opposed to
striking the work supplies from the legislation.
Ms. Rodell responded that the corporation would not be
opposed to an amendment striking the word supplies from
the CS.
9:20:05 AM
Senator Hoffman stated that he had received the CS minutes
ago, he requested more time to review the legislation
before adopting it as a working document. He requested that
committee members be able to compare the CS to the previous
bill version.
9:20:39 AM
Senator Bishop asked Ms. Rodell whether there was a dollar
limit of what could be executed under the CS.
Ms. Rodell stated that there was no dollar limit in the CS,
but there would be in the sense that the budget was
approved and appropriated by the legislature.
Co-Chair von Imhof asked Ms. Rodell how the bill would help
the corporation.
Ms. Rodell explained to the committee that the Permanent
Fund was no longer invested in the way it was at its
inception. The asset allocation had expanded and become
more diverse in securities form private equity, to real
estate, to public equity, to bonds. Over years, the
corporation had taken more of the responsibility in-house
rather than allowing third parties to invest on its behalf.
She asserted that in-house management allowed for the
alignment of the goals of the state with the corporations
strategy, while reducing costs. The purpose of the
exemption was to try to seek all the tools necessary to
pursue services in the most timely, cost-effective manner
possible. She specified that the procurement code could be
cumbersome to getting work done in a timely manner. She
asserted that the legislation would give the corporation
the ability to seek services and be exempt from the code.
9:23:06 AM
Senator Bishop asked whether the CS was more restrictive
than other quasi-state agency policy.
Ms. Rodell stated that it was the corporations view that
the bill created a higher standard than what other boards
(AIDEA, AHFC, ARM) were currently held to because she would
be required to make a written determination whether a
contract was in the best interest of the fund. If it was
found that she had violated the standard, the state could
pursue her personal assets to recoup damages.
9:24:35 AM
Senator Wielechowski pointed out that every corporation had
a fiduciary duty, and such lawsuits to recoup damages were
very rare. He asked whether Ms. Rodell would support an
amendment limiting exemptions to emergency investment
services.
Ms. Rodell responded in the negative.
Senator Wielechowski asked whether Ms. Rodell would support
the committee codifying in state law the AHFC and AIDEA
regulations that applied in emergency procurement
situations.
Ms. Rodell answered in the negative.
9:25:26 AM
Senator Hoffman referenced Line 9 of the bill, which
specified that contracts must be in the best interest of
the fund. He summarized Ms. Rodells testimony that what
was in the interest of the fund might not be in the best
interest of the state. He thought the legislators had to
protect what was in the best interest of the State of
Alaska. He wondered whether this could put the legislature
and the corporation at cross purposes.
Ms. Rodell reiterated that the corporation's duty was to
the fund, and not to the state, and at times the situation
could be conflicted. She used an example that it might not
be in the best interest of the fund to make certain
distributions to the state to help with the economy because
it would prohibit the long-term investment returns and
could violate the standard of care and the corporations
duty to diversify. She emphasized that the corporation was
mandated through statute to consider the fund first.
9:27:49 AM
Co-Chair von Imhof set the bill aside. She noted that the
CS would not be adopted. She stated that the CS had been
sent to members two days prior and expressed her
displeasure that committee members had not reviewed the CS
prior to the meeting. She categorized the hearing as a
show.
9:28:12 AM
Senator Wielechowski took exception to Co-Chair von Imhof's
statement that the hearing was a show.
Co-Chair von Imhof felt that the issues raised at the table
could have been discussed prior to the meeting. She
contended that time was limited, and the committee had 3
bills left to consider.
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 96(FIN)
"An Act relating to Alaska Pioneers' Home and Alaska
Veterans' Home payments, rates, and services."
9:28:37 AM
Co-Chair von Imhof shared that the bill had been heard on
March 9, 2020. She relayed that a CS had been distributed
for consideration.
Ms. Lucky discussed the changes in the CS. She spoke to an
Explanation of Changes document (copy on file):
The criteria for the levels of care are removed from
statute and will be defined by regulation. These
changes can be seen in sections 7, 10, and 11 of the
bill.
NEW: Section 1: Changes the word "lease" to "use" to
allow Pioneer Homes more flexibility in increasing
revenue with excess space. NEW:
Section 2: Decreases the age of eligibility to 60
(from 65) for Alaskan residents due to dementia,
physical disabilities, and other physical needs. This
will allow more flexibility, especially in allowing
spouses to move into the home together.
AMENDED: Section 7: Two rate caps were increased:
1. the level IV rate was increased to $9,333 (from
$8,500) in (4); and
2. the daily rate for "respite" care was increased to
$200 (from $160) in (6).
NEW: Effective date of July 1, 2020.
The changes to the monthly income threshold in the
bill are removed; income thresholds will remain as
they are in current statute. The language previously
appeared in sections 3 and 4 of the bill.
Ms. Lucky explained that the monthly threshold change had
been made due to concern that the rates would be changed
for Pioneer Homes only and similar facilities in the state
would have a different rate.
9:32:35 AM
Co-Chair Stedman asked for clarity regarding the spendable
monthly allowance for residents who received financial
assistance. He understood that and earlier version had
allowed for $500, the current version allowed for $200.
Ms. Lucky replied in the affirmative. She said that the
previous bill would have increased the amount a resident
could keep to $500 per month.
Co-Chair Stedman reminded the committee that the base rates
were being changed. He asked about the rate of growth in
the current version.
Ms. Lucky deferred to the Department of Health and Social
Services.
9:33:39 AM
Co-Chair von Imhof clarified Co-Chair Stedmans question.
CLINTON LASLEY, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
AND SOCIAL SERVICES, stated that in the CS the rate was not
tied to cost of living increase (COLA). He believed that
the bill sponsor could speak to the question.
9:34:41 AM
Ms. Lucky stated that the rate of growth had not changed in
the CS. The rate of growth remained the same as the
original bill.
Co-Chair Stedman asked what the calculation was based on.
Ms. Lucky specified that the amount was the Social Security
benefits cost of living.
Co-Chair von Imhof spoke to the Social Security Act:
under the Social Security Act the department shall
adjust the monthly and daily rates of this section by
percentage equal to the percentage increase in the
cost of living adjustment provided of the Social
Security benefits.
9:35:45 AM
Senator Wielechowski asked whether there were provisions in
the bill requiring notice for rate increases.
Ms. Lucky responded in the negative and deferred to the
bill sponsor.
Co-Chair von Imhof understood that notification
requirements would be discussed my Mr. Lasley.
9:36:23 AM
Mr. Lasley stated that residential licensing for the state
required at least 30-days' notice be given to a resident
prior to a rate increase. He said that the department
followed this requirement in their practices.
Co-Chair von Imhof understood that residents and their
families would receive 30-days notice on rate changes.
Mr. Lasley replied in the affirmative.
9:36:55 AM
Senator Olson asked whether the sponsor supported the
changes in the current CS.
Ms. Lucky stated that the sponsor had been involved in the
crafting of the CS. She deferred to the sponsor for further
clarification.
Co-Chair von Imhof suggested inviting the sponsor to the
table.
9:37:29 AM
REPRESENTATIVE ZACH FIELDS, SPONSOR, expressed support for
the CS.
9:37:56 AM
Co-Chair Stedman MOVED to ADOPT proposed committee
substitute for CSHB 96(FIN), Work Draft 31-LS0646\E (Marx,
3/21/20). There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
9:38:32 AM
AT EASE
9:40:28 AM
RECONVENED
Co-Chair von Imhof relayed that while the committee was
waiting for documents to be distributed Senator Wilson
would speak to Amendment 1, regarding a sunset date.
Senator Wilson MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 1, 31-LS0646\E.1
(Marx, 3/22/20) [note: due to length, Amendment 1 is not
included here. See copy on file].
Senator Wilson spoke to Amendment 1. He explained that the
amendment was a sunset date for a five-year repeal. The
sunset date was to ensure that rates were on track with the
consumer price index (CPI).
Representative Fields stated he would defer to the will of
the committee. He emphasized that stability and
predictability for Pioneer Home residents was important for
the Pioneer Homes overall finances. He did not see the
need for a sunset, as the legislature could repeal the bill
in the future.
9:42:12 AM
Co-Chair Stedman was concerned with the aggressiveness that
the agency adopted an escalation in fees. He did not think
the process had been long enough nor had the public been
sufficiently informed. He relayed that he was hesitant to
sunset the legislation. He felt that the issue should come
back to the table in the future. He contended that the fees
were still too high and should be lowered.
Co-Chair von Imhof stated that the rate the committee
considered was one of the lowest rates, year over year,
compared to CPI or medical CPI. She affirmed that if an
imbalance was found, the department could alert the
legislature and suggest changes. She asked for verification
the amendment would implement a sunset date of 2025.
Senator Wilson responded affirmatively.
Co-Chair von Imhof MAINTAINED her OBJECTION.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Wilson
OPPOSED: Olson, Wielechowski, Bishop, Hoffman, Stedman, von
Imhof
The MOTION to adopt Amendment 1 FAILED (1/6).
9:45:02 AM
Senator Wilson MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 2, 31-LS0646\E.2
(Marx, 3/21/20) (copy on file):
Page 4, line 9:
Delete "$9,333 a month"
Insert "a monthly rate the department considers
sufficient to compensate the state for the cost of
care and support of the person at the home"
Co-Chair von Imhof OBJECTED for discussion.
Senator Wilson spoke to the amendment.
9:46:57 AM
Representative Fields did not support the amendment. He
reminded that individuals in Level 4 care were already
experiencing large rate increases. He said that the CS
contained a sizeable rate increase for those residents who
had been at Level 3 under previous rate structures. He did
not support uncapping the rate increase and reiterated the
need for stability and predictability in rate levels. He
said that the state should be trying to get more revenue
for skilled nursing level care, but he believed that a
better way to do that would be for the department to pursue
certification for the nursing home level of care.
9:48:27 AM
Senator Wilson lamented that he had not received answers
from questions he had submitted to the department.
Co-Chair von Imhof queried whether Level 4 patients had
left facilitates due to the rate increase.
Mr. Lasley stated that the number of individuals that had
moved out of the Pioneer Homes system since the
announcement of the rate increase on August 1, 2019, was
24. He said that 18 were directly related to the rate
increase. He stated that he would get back to the committee
about Level 4 patients specifically.
Co-Chair von Imhof found it interesting that the state
already provided subsidies for various populations such as
students, special-needs students, college students, and
many kinds of transportations. She acknowledged that the
rates in the bill had increased rates for Level 4 care. She
recalled conversations about the distribution of PFDs that
suggested that $2000 could stand between starvation or
hypothermia. She countered that the bill would make elderly
people pay an additional $4000, per month, for care.
9:51:29 AM
Senator Olson referenced the 24 people that left the
Pioneer Homes and asked whether there were currently
vacancies.
Ms. Lasley confirmed that there were vacancies in all
Pioneer Homes across the state. He noted that there was
currently about a 91 percent occupancy rate.
Senator Olson thought if the idea was to increase revenue
to the state, the state should be working to keep that
occupancy rate a 99 percent.
Co-Chair von Imhof added that when running the numbers, if
a person had a certain level of assets, and was charged
$13,000 per month rather than $9,000, the state would
subsidize them for less time. The assets would last longer
paying slightly less than full rate and the state paid less
overtime.
Senator Olson maintained his opinion.
9:53:06 AM
9:53:08 AM
Co-Chair von Imhof MAINTAINED her OBJECTION.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Wilson
OPPOSED: Olson, Wielechowski, Bishop, Hoffman, von Imhof,
Stedman
The MOTION to adopt Amendment 2 FAILED (1/6).
9:53:34 AM
AT EASE
9:53:51 AM
RECONVENED
Co-Chair von Imhof noted that Amendment 2 had failed, and
Co-Chair Stedman would offer a conceptual amendment.
Co-Chair Stedman MOVED to ADOPT Conceptual Amendment 1. He
explained that the original bill had included $500 for
spend money for Pioneer Home residents. The amount in the
current bill was $200. The amendment would increase the
amount by $100 to a total of $300 per month.
Co-Chair von Imhof OBJECTED for discussion.
Representative Fields asked the department what the maximum
level residents could collect without any negative
unintended consequences in terms of Medicaid eligibility or
other.
Ms. Lasley stated that the department would not be opposed
to raising the amount.
Representative Fields thought the conceptual amendment made
sense.
9:55:40 AM
Senator Olson reiterated the question about any negative
consequences due to the raise from $200 to $300.
Mr. Lasley addressed the previously proposed $500 limit for
monthly spending. He stated that the long-term unintended
consequences for the $500 limit pushed against the limit of
assets an elder could have and qualify for Medicaid. The
worry was that if the elder could not spend the money each
month, they could build up assets that could get them
kicked out of the program and disqualify them for the
Medicaid program. He did not feel that the $300 amount
would have unintended consequences for residents.
9:56:58 AM
Co-Chair Stedman recognized that there had been an erosion
of purchasing power for seniors and it was good for elders
and seniors to participate in gift-giving for birthdays and
Christmas or visit a hair salon using their $300 per month
spending money. He said that residents in Pioneer Homes
would not be able to hoard cash and giving seniors the
ability to have spending money was important.
9:58:18 AM
Ms. Lucky wanted to confirm that the conceptual amendment
would be on page 2, line 7 and on page 2, line 28. The
amount of $200 would change to $300 on each of those pages.
Co-Chair Stedman thought the amount also appeared on page 4
of the bill, line 13.
Ms. Lucky understood that Co-Chair Stedman's reference was
to a respite charge and not an asset limit. She deferred to
the department for clarification.
Ms. Lucky asked if Mr. Lasley could confirm the reference
on page 4, line 13.
Mr. Lasley confirmed that the $200 respite charge found on
page 4, line 13 did not relate to the monthly spending
amount referenced in Co-Chair Stedman's amendment.
Co-Chair von Imhof WITHDREW her OBJECTION. There being NO
further OBJECTION, Conceptual Amendment 1 was ADOPTED.
10:00:37 AM
Mr. Lasley announced that an updated fiscal note from the
department would be provided to the committee.
Co-Chair von Imhof requested a motion to move the bill.
Co-Chair Stedman MOVED to report SCS CSHB 96(FIN) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
SCS CSHB 96(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with two forthcoming fiscal impact
notes from the Department of Health and Social Services.
HOUSE BILL NO. 106
"An Act relating to school bond debt reimbursement."
10:02:23 AM
Co-Chair von Imhof discussed the bills hearing history in
committee. She said that the debt reimbursement program had
been successful and had allowed municipal districts to
prioritize, maintain and build needed schools with the
approval and participation of local taxpayers and included
a certain amount of reimbursement from the state. She said
that due to economic pressure, a moratorium was put in
place 5 years ago. Since then the legislature had fully
funding payment on existing debt prior to 2015 and has not
allowed new projects into the program since then. She said
that this year, payments for existing debt were cut in half
by a veto. The legislatures proposed operating budget
fully funded the program but with the uncertainty of
potential executive action, as well as the fiscal
uncertainty of the state, a pause would be necessary on any
new constructions for schools. The bill would extend the
moratorium another 5 years. She stressed that the goal was
to revise the program for consideration during the next
legislative session. She asked that the committee pass HB
106 in its current form. She noted that there were invited
testifiers online to answer questions.
Co-Chair Stedman MOVED to report HB 106 out of Committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
HB 106 was REPORTED out of committee with two "do pass"
recommendations, two "do not pass" recommendations, three
"no recommendation" recommendations and with one new zero
fiscal note from the Department of Education and Early
Development/Debt Service.
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 235(FIN)
"An Act relating to allocations of funding for the
Alaska Workforce Investment Board; and providing for
an effective date."
10:05:00 AM
Co-Chair von Imhof announced that a new CS would be
presented to the committee for consideration.
DAVID SCOTT, STAFF, SENATOR BERT STEDMAN, discussed the CS
being considered. He relayed that the CS made one change on
Page 1, line 6, changing the effective date from 2023 to
2021.
10:06:08 AM
AT EASE
10:06:22 AM
RECONVENED
Co-Chair von Imhof asked the committee to support the one-
year extension and address the issue further in the next
legislative session.
Co-Chair Stedman MOVED to ADOPT proposed committee
substitute for CSHB 235(FIN), Work Draft 31-LS1480\O
(Wayne, 3/20/20). There being NO OBJECTION, it was so
ordered.
Co-Chair von Imhof asked to hear from the bill sponsor.
REPRESENTATIVE ADAM WOOL, SPONSOR, supported the changes in
the CS.
Mr. Scott explained that the fiscal note attached to the
bill showed zero fiscal impact in the out years. This would
be updated when the legislature took up the matter in the
next legislative session.
10:08:34 AM
Co-Chair von Imhof OPENED public testimony.
TERI COTHREN, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
SOCIAL SERVICES (via teleconference), stated she was
available for questions. She stated that the University
supported the bill.
10:09:27 AM
MILES BAKER, GOVERNMENT RELATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA,
stated that he was available for questions pertaining to
the fiscal note.
10:10:16 AM
Co-Chair von Imhof CLOSED public testimony.
Co-Chair Stedman addressed FN 7, from Department of
Education and Early Development, OMB Component 2796:
This bill extends the length of time to disperse
Technical and Vocational Education Program funds
appropriated for distribution to various institutions
for adult and higher education from June 30, 2020 to
June 30, 2023.
Co-Chair Stedman addressed FN 8, from the Department of
Labor and Workforce Development, OMB Component 2659:
This legislation extends the sunset date for existing
funding allocations for program and grant
distributions under AS 23.15.835(d) for the Alaska
Technical and Vocational Education Program (TVEP)
through June 30, 2023. Funding authorization for the
TVEP recipients was included in the FY2021 Governor
Amended request.
Co-Chair Stedman addressed FN 9, from the Department of
Labor and Workforce Development, OMB Component 3117:
This legislation does not change the budgeted
authorization needed for the Workforce Development
component.
Co-Chair Stedman addressed FN 11, from the Department of
Labor and Workforce Development, OMB Component 2276.
Co-Chair Stedman addressed FN 10, for the Department of
Labor and Workforce Development, OMB Component 2686.
Co-Chair Stedman addressed FN 12, for the University of
Alaska, OMB Component 1296.
10:13:11 AM
Senator Hoffman pointed out that the fiscal notes would
need to be updated to reflect the one-year extension.
Co-Chair von Imhof agreed.
10:13:23 AM
AT EASE
10:13:38 AM
RECONVENED
Co-Chair Stedman MOVED to report SCS CSHB 235(FIN) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
SCS CSHB 235(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with six previously published
fiscal impact notes: FN 7(EED), FN 8(LWF), FN 9(LWF), FN
10(LWF), FN 11(LWF), and FN 12(UA).
10:14:10 AM
AT EASE
10:14:17 AM
RECONVENED
Co-Chair von Imhof informed that the committee would stand
in recess.
10:14:28 AM
RECESSED
[Co-Chair von Imhof ADJOURNED the meeting at 5:10pm]
ADJOURNMENT
10:14:56 AM
The meeting was adjourned at 5:10 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 96 Work Draft v. E 3.21.2020 Explanation of Changes.pdf |
SFIN 3/23/2020 9:00:00 AM |
HB 96 |
| HB 96 Work Draft v. E 3.21.2020.pdf |
SFIN 3/23/2020 9:00:00 AM |
HB 96 |
| HB 235 Sponsor Statement 2.21.2020.pdf |
SFIN 3/23/2020 9:00:00 AM |
HB 235 |
| HB 235 Support Letters provided by Sponsor.pdf |
SFIN 3/23/2020 9:00:00 AM |
HB 235 |
| HB 235 TVEP Annual Report 2019.pdf |
SFIN 3/23/2020 9:00:00 AM |
HB 235 |
| HB 235.Backup Flow Chart 2.21.2020.pdf |
SFIN 3/23/2020 9:00:00 AM |
HB 235 |
| HB 235 work draft version O.pdf |
SFIN 3/23/2020 9:00:00 AM |
HB 235 |
| HB 139 Work Draft v. S 3.20.2020.pdf |
SFIN 3/23/2020 9:00:00 AM |
HB 139 |