Legislature(2011 - 2012)SENATE FINANCE 532
04/15/2011 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB126 | |
| HB119 | |
| HB13 | |
| HB97 | |
| HB173 | |
| HB160 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 126 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 119 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 13 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 97 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 173 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 160 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE
April 15, 2011
9:27 a.m.
9:27:10 AM
CALL TO ORDER
Co-Chair Stedman called the Senate Finance Committee
meeting to order at 9:27 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Senator Lyman Hoffman, Co-Chair
Senator Bert Stedman, Co-Chair
Senator Lesil McGuire, Vice-Chair
Senator Johnny Ellis
Senator Dennis Egan
Senator Donny Olson
Senator Joe Thomas
MEMBERS ABSENT
None
ALSO PRESENT
Representative Mike Hawker; Ted Leonard, Executive
Director, AIDEA; Mark Davis, AIDEA; Conrad Jackson, Staff,
Representative Olson; Linda Hall, Insurance Director,
Department of Insurance, Department of Commerce, Community,
and Economic Development; Jeanne Ostnes, Staff,
Representative Johnson; Representative Steve Thompson;
Representative Bob Herron; Susan K. Bell, Commissioner,
Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development;
Patti Mackey, President, Ketchikan Visitors Bureau;
PRESENT VIA TELECONFERENCE
SUMMARY
HB 13 Workers' Compensation: Medical Fees
HB 97 Extend Invasive Plants Law
HB 119 AIDEA: Procurement; Projects
HB 126 Board Extensions: Nurses/Dentists/Barbers
HB 160 Tourism Marketing Contracts/Campaigns
HB 173 Sport Fishing Guiding Services
HOUSE BILL NO. 126
"An Act extending the termination dates of the Board
of Nursing, the Board of Dental Examiners, the Board
of Barbers and Hairdressers, the Regulatory Commission
of Alaska, and the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board;
and providing for an effective date."
9:28:51 AM
Co-Chair Stedman requested explanation of HB 126.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE HAWKER explained that HB 126 was an
omnibus bill to renew and extend the dates of the Board of
Nursing, the Board of Dental Examiners, the Board of
Barbers and Hairdressers, the Regulatory Commission of
Alaska, and the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board. The
extension dates in the bill were suggested by the Division
of Legislative audit, with the exception of the Alcohol
Beverage Control Board, which had issues still being
currently debated and had therefore been granted only a
one-year extension.
Co-Chair Stedman highlighted the two fiscal notes. One from
the Department of Commerce Community and Economic
Development showing the cost to extend the Board of
Nursing, the Board of Dental Examiners, and the Board of
Barbers and Hairdressers at $1,431,900 in receipt supported
services. The second fiscal note was a Senate Finance
Committee note from the Department of Public safety for
$1,505,700 in program receipts to extent the Alcohol
Beverage Control Board for one year.
9:30:39 AM
Co-Chair Hoffman MOVED to report SCS for CS for HB 126
(FIN) with SCR title change resolution out of committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
notes. There being NO OBJECTION it was so ordered.
SCS for CS for HB 126 (FIN) with SCR title change
resolution was REPORTED out of committee with a "do pass"
recommendation and with accompanying previously published
fiscal impact note and new fiscal impact note.
HOUSE BILL NO. 119
"An Act relating to the procurement of supplies,
services, professional services, and construction for
the Alaska Industrial Development and Export
Authority; relating to the definition of 'own' for the
economic development account; relating to the
definitions of 'development project', 'plant',
'facility', and 'project' for the Alaska Industrial
Development and Export Authority; and providing for an
effective date."
9:32:11 AM
TED LEONARD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, Alaska Industrial
Development and Export Authority (AIDEA), introduced HB
119. He stated that the legislation would allow AIDEA to
create its own procurement rules under state purchasing
statutes, as well as allow AIDEA to partner with the
private corporate sector by allowing investment in Limited
Liability Corporations and subsidiary corporations. The
bill would also expand the definition of projects to allow
for investment in various sectors of the economy.
Additionally, HB 119 would allow AIDEA to bond for Skagway
improvements up to $65 million.
MARK DAVIS, AIDEA, explained that there had been amendments
to the bill; one by the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation
(AHFC) which permitted AHFC to work with the private sector
and make use of federal funds for low income housing, the
other a provision that would allow two ports that were
owned by housing authorities to apply for Department of
Transportation grants.
9:33:28 AM
Co-Chair Stedman discussed the two zero fiscal notes.
Co-Chair Hoffman MOVED to report SCS HB 119 out of
committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION it was
so ordered.
SCSHB 119 was REPORTED out of committee with a "do pass"
recommendation and with a previously published zero fiscal
note from the Department of Commerce, Community, and
Economic Development; and new zero fiscal note from the
Senate Finance Committee for the Department of Commerce,
Community, and Economic Development.
HOUSE BILL NO. 13
"An Act relating to fees and charges for medical
treatment or services as they relate to workers'
compensation; and providing for an effective date."
9:34:52 AM
CONRAD JACKSON, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE OLSON, explained HB
13 was an act relating to the medical treatment and service
fees as related to worker's compensation. He stated that in
2005 the legislature amended AS 23.30.095(J) to expand the
scope of the Medical Services Review Committee to assist
and advise the Department of Labor and the Worker's
Compensation Board in matters involving the
appropriateness, necessity and cost of medical and related
services. He referred to pages 11 and 12 of the excerpt
from the Medical Services Review Committee report dated
November 2009 (copy on file). He stated that one intention
of the report was to set the medical fee schedule in place.
The legislation puts the fee schedule in place prior to the
current expiration of June 30, 2011. He referred to the
sponsor statement (copy on file) which discussed the basis
of the new schedule.
9:37:39 AM
Co-Chair Stedman pointed out the fiscal note.
9:37:49 AM
Senator Olson asked how business owners had reacted to the
legislation.
Mr. Jackson replied that contact with business owners had
not been made. Representatives of industry had been in
agreement that the new fee schedule was necessary. The
expiration of the current fee schedule was problematic and
without the new fee schedule in place increased premiums
were expected.
Senator Olson wondered if medical providers had offered and
opinion on the legislation.
Mr. Jackson remarked that provider attention had been
placed on a different bill. He stressed that the bill did
not change what is already in place.
9:39:25 AM
Senator Olson expressed concern that employees handing the
codes should be properly educated on how to process them.
Mr. Jackson clarified that the codes existed, but not in
the fee schedule. So the people processing the codes were
educated about them, the codes were simply not covered in
the current fee schedule.
LINDA HALL, INSURANCE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY, AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT, discussed the charts; "Medical Benefits
Constitute the Majority of Total Benefit Cost in Alaska",
"Alaska Medical Average Cost per Case vs. Countrywide"(copy
on file). She stated that 75 percent of the system costs in
Alaska were medical benefits, countrywide the average was
58 percent.
9:41:34 AM
AT EASE
9:42:19 AM
RECONVENED
9:42:28 AM
Ms. Hall offered that the state had substantially higher
benefits costs than the lower 48. The "Alaska Medical
Average Cost per Case vs. Countrywide" chart illustrated
that the average cost per case in 2009 was $37,000 and the
average cost countrywide was $27,000, resulting in a 37
percent higher average per case cost for Alaska. She
referred to the two page Oregon study (copy on file), which
showed that Alaska had moved from first place, having the
highest worker's compensation premium, to number 2. She
concluded that the purpose of the charts was to illustrate
the high cost of worker's compensation costs. She stated
that the cost cap would not be onerous. The fee schedule
would be based at the 90th percentile and most health
insurance policies used 70 to 80th percentile. She believed
that the fee schedule was generous and would enable
physicians to treat workers injured on the job and not
prohibit any type of medical care.
9:45:34 AM
Senator Olson wondered what effect the bill would have on
the injured employee.
Ms. Hall felt that the users experience would either get
easier or stay relatively the same.
Senator Olson hoped that workers under Medicare would not
be denied coverage by physicians.
Ms. Hall assured the committee she was not aware of any
medical office that had suggested not caring for patients
under Medicare.
HB 13 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
9:47:09 AM
HOUSE BILL NO. 97
"An Act extending a provision relating to noxious
weeds, invasive plants, and agricultural pest
management and education; providing for an effective
date by repealing the effective date of sec. 2, ch.
102, SLA 2008; and providing for an effective date."
JEANNE OSTNES, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON, explained HB
97 would eliminate the sunset date for a vital position in
Alaska's natural resources. The position coordinated a
network of dedicated individuals both volunteering and
paid. The position had been created with an $80 thousand
dollar fiscal note which had not reflected travel, supplies
or commodities. Details like a desk and phone for the
position had been largely funded by grants acquired by the
position holder. She said that the state had a growing
invasive weed problem that directly affected fish streams.
Co-Chair Stedman referred to the fiscal notes.
9:50:55 AM
Senator Olson wondered if the position holder would be able
to eventually distribute violation citations.
Ms. Ostnes was doubtful. She said that controlling the
evasive weeds would happen through cooperation and
coordination and not police action.
9:52:35 AM
Ms. Ostnes pointed out a chart in the packet "Perception of
an Invasive Species" (copy on file).
HB 97 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
HOUSE BILL NO. 173
"An Act amending the termination date of the licensing
of sport fishing operators and sport fishing guides;
and providing for an effective date."
REPRESENTATIVE STEVE THOMPSON, explained HB 173. He stated
that the program was an amendment of the termination date
of the licensing of sport fishing operators and sport
fishing guides and provided for an effective date. He
stated that the program provided benefits for the state as
well as the industry. The program had been in operation
since 2005 and had received regular extensions, most
recently in 2010. The Department of Fish and Game supported
the legislation.
9:54:53 AM
Co-Chair Stedman noted the fiscal note from the Department
of Fish and Game.
9:55:15 AM
Senator McGuire thanked Representative Thompson for the
simplified version of the bill.
9:55:45 AM
Senator Olson spoke to tensions between commercial and
sport fishermen. He probed the commercial fisheries stance
on the legislation.
Representative Thompson replied that the program helped to
provide information to federal agencies and resource
managers and ensured the long-term ecological
sustainability of the economic statewide fisheries. He
stated that the bill spoke to all fisheries user groups.
Senator Olson commented on the letter from the United
Fisheries of Alaska, which offered support for the
legislation.
HB 173 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
HOUSE BILL NO. 160
"An Act establishing and relating to the Alaska
visitor industry investment fund; relating to matching
funds for state tourism marketing contracts with
qualified trade associations; and providing for an
effective date."
9:57:35 AM
REPRESENTATIVE BOB HERRON explained HB 160. He stated that
the General Fund amount would not exceed $12 million
regardless of the amount put forward by trade associations.
The legislation would require a group within a qualified
trade association to consist of three persons appointed by
the governor, and six selected by the qualified trade
association. The bill contained a limit for lobbying and
repealed AS 44.33.125(d).
9:59:24 AM
Co-Chair Stedman referred to page 3, line 9 of the
legislation. He clarified that public access would not be
excluded.
Co-Chair Stedman referred to two fiscal notes attached to
the bill.
10:00:50 AM
SUSAN K. BELL, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT explained that recently
there had been a wane in visitors to the state. She said
that over the last two years 5,000 jobs in the industry had
been lost. She stated that the issue was statewide, and
stressed that there were signs of recovery and that this
was an important time not to back off the states marketing
efforts. She felt that the bill was a piece of the
strategy. She hoped the state would continue the investment
at $16 million, which would take a combination of
legislation and budget work.
Co-Chair Stedman commented that the economy had recently
emerged from a worldwide recession. He pointed out that
there had been a retreat in the economy partially due to
the issue of the cruise ship head tax. He felt that the two
combined had had a significant impact in visitor decline.
Ms. Bell responded that the 2009 independent markets were
affected by the recession. She thought that changes in the
tax regime and interactions with various markets had played
a role. She stated industry research showed a cruise
recovery, and there were slight increases on the horizon.
She stressed increased marketing and the change in the
dynamics with the industry would aid in recovery.
10:04:12 AM
Co-Chair Hoffman wondered if there were any concerns
regarding differences in the strategies related to
marketing the seafood and the tourism industry.
Ms. Bell replied that the seafood industry marketing was a
model for the tourist industry. She said and appropriate
tax structure, healthy state funding and communication with
the market were all factors that had been incorporated.
10:05:26 AM
PATTI MACKEY, PRESIDENT, KETCHIKAN VISITORS BUREAU,
testified in support of HB 160. She stressed the importance
of funding for tourism marketing. She pointed out that
revenues had dropped and small business closures had
occurred across the state. She felt that there should be a
comprehensive marketing strategy in place. She stated that
due to the FY 11 appropriation, the state achieved a
substantial increase in visibility. Television spots were
airing on 7 different networks, and magazine and internet
advertising was significantly expanded. Maintaining the
level of state funding was necessary to open the door to
future growth and development.
Co-Chair Stedman looked at the language of page 3, line 8,
specifically referring to exclusions of funding lobbyists.
He felt that the language was odd.
Ms. Mackay remarked the language referring to lobbyists was
not a n issue with the organization.
Co-Chair Stedman clarified that the organization was
comfortable not having paid lobbyists in the Capitol
Building working for additional funding.
Ms. Mackay replied that she was willing work with the
legislation if it would result in a sustainable marketing
program.
10:10:18 AM
Senator Thomas understood that as long as the trade
association was putting in 50 percent, the state could
contribute up to $12 million.
Representative Herron explained that the formula and
assured the committee that the total contribution from the
state would be $12 million regardless of the trigger or the
formula combination.
Co-Chair Stedman reiterated the question concerning paid
lobbyists. He felt it was strange that a marketing entity
would be barred by statue from hiring a paid lobbyist.
Representative Herron responded that the provision had
surfaced in the House Finance Committee CS, and had
remained without debate.
10:12:32 AM
Senator McGuire referred to discussions concerning changing
the match once it exceeded $3 million.
Representative Herron replied that the funding level in the
department was $16 million of General Funds. Changing the
transitional trigger might get closer to current year
preferred funding levels.
Senator McGuire wondered if he would be supportive of the
concept.
Representative Herron responded that he was supportive of
the concept of the amendment and helping the industry.
10:14:35 AM
Senator Ellis understood that the governor would appoint
three cruise ship industry representatives to the marketing
board of 9, whereas the current 32 member marketing board
offered only three seats to the industry. He queried the
dramatic increase of industry influence on the new
marketing board.
Representative Herron replied that there had been concern
about such a dramatic change. He added that there was no
requirement of significant financial input from the cruise
interests. The hope was that there would be additional
attention and possible additional financial contribution to
a marketing campaign because of the new board structure.
10:16:52 AM
Co-Chair Stedman pointed out that the industry would have
one-third control of the board, regardless of their
contribution.
Representative Herron said that the scenario had been
recognized.
10:17:28 AM
HB 160 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
10:17:40 AM
AT EASE
10:17:59 AM
RECONVENED
10:18:01 AM
RECESS
ADJOURNMENT
4:50:56 PM
The meeting was adjourned at 4:51 PM.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 13 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
|
| HB 13 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
|
| HB13 Supporting Documents - Letter NFIB 1-31-2011.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
|
| HB13 Supporting Documents - Letter PSPA 2-8-2011.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
|
| HB13 Supporting Documents 2010 NCCI AK Med.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
|
| HB13 Supporting Documents OR Rate Study Comparison.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
|
| HB13 Supporting Documets - MSRC Nov 2009 Report pages 11-12.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/16/2011 10:00:00 AM |
|
| HB 97 - 02 HB097 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/16/2011 10:00:00 AM |
HB 97 |
| HB 97 - 06 HB097 LOS AK Sealife Center.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/16/2011 10:00:00 AM |
HB 97 |
| HB 97 - 06 HB097_Perception_of_an_Invasive_Species author.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 97 |
| HB 97 - 04 HB097 Invasive Weeds and Agriculture Pest Coordinator Accomplishments.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 97 |
| HB 97 - 06 HB097 Report on the Alaska Weed Project authorship.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 97 |
| HB 97 - 06 HB097 Testify Zaumzeil.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 97 |
| HB 97 - 06 HB097 LOS AK Comte for Noxious and Inv Plants Mgment.PDF |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 97 |
| HB 173 - KRSA Sportfishing Overview Slide 19am - Feb 15 Meeting - Transition Team Topics - Sportfishing Guide Service Board.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
|
| HB 173 - Licensing Reauthorization Sport Fish Briefing - ADF&G - 2011.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
|
| HB 173 - Saltwater Logsheet and Vessel Registartion - 2011.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/16/2011 10:00:00 AM |
HB 173 |
| HB 173 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
|
| HB 173 - UFA Ltr - Support.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
|
| HB 160 - ATIA - AK Tourism Marketing FAQ.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 160 |
| HB 160 - Explanation of Changes (For Senate Finance).pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 160 |
| HB126 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HL&C 2/9/2011 3:15:00 PM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 126 |
| HB126 Supporting Documents-ABC Audit Summary 2009.pdf |
HL&C 2/9/2011 3:15:00 PM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 126 |
| HB126 Supporting Documents-ABC Sunset Review.pdf |
HL&C 2/9/2011 3:15:00 PM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 126 |
| HB126 Supporting Documents-Barbers and Hairdressers Sunset Review.pdf |
HL&C 2/9/2011 3:15:00 PM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 126 |
| HB126 Supporting Documents-Dental Examiners Audit Summary.pdf |
HL&C 2/9/2011 3:15:00 PM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 126 |
| HB126 Supporting Documents-Dental Examiners Sunset Review.pdf |
HL&C 2/9/2011 3:15:00 PM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 126 |
| HB126 Supporting Documents-LB&A Subcommittee Recommendation ABC Board.pdf |
HL&C 2/9/2011 3:15:00 PM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 126 |
| HB 160 - Letters of Support 3.1.11-1.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 160 |
| HB 160 - Sectional Analysis (for Senate Finance).pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 160 |
| HB 160 - Sponsor Statement (Senate Finance).pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 160 |
| HB126 Supporting Documents-Nursing Audit Summary.pdf |
HL&C 2/9/2011 3:15:00 PM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 126 |
| HB126 Supporting Documents-Nursing Sunset Review.pdf |
HL&C 2/9/2011 3:15:00 PM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 126 |
| HB126 Supporting Documents-RCA Audit Summary.pdf |
HL&C 2/9/2011 3:15:00 PM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 126 |
| HB126 Supporting Documents-RCA Sunset Review.pdf |
HL&C 2/9/2011 3:15:00 PM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 126 |
| HB 126 SCS FIN Version E.pdf |
SFIN 4/13/2011 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 126 |
| HB 126 SFIN for DPS.pdf |
SFIN 4/13/2011 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 126 |
| HB119_Bill-Projects.pdf |
HEDT 2/3/2011 10:15:00 AM HEDT 2/8/2011 10:15:00 AM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 119 |
| HB119_FiscalNote-Projects.pdf |
HEDT 2/3/2011 10:15:00 AM HEDT 2/8/2011 10:15:00 AM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 119 |
| HB119_SectionalAnalysis-Projects.pdf |
HEDT 2/3/2011 10:15:00 AM HEDT 2/8/2011 10:15:00 AM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 119 |
| HB119_Amendment-Projects.pdf |
HEDT 2/3/2011 10:15:00 AM HEDT 2/8/2011 10:15:00 AM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 119 |
| HB 119 - AIDEA Response to questions.doc |
HEDT 2/8/2011 10:15:00 AM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 119 |
| HB 119 Sectional Analysis CS EDT.pdf |
HFIN 2/22/2011 1:30:00 PM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 119 |
| HB 119 AIDEA Bill Information Sheet and letter.pdf |
HFIN 2/22/2011 1:30:00 PM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 119 |
| HB 119 - CSC CSHB119 Questions and Answers.pdf |
SFIN 4/14/2011 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 119 |
| HB 119 - SCS CSHB119 Explanation of Changes.pdf |
SFIN 4/14/2011 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 119 |
| HB 119 - SCS CSHB119 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SFIN 4/14/2011 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 119 |
| HB 119 HarborTransfers.pdf |
SFIN 4/13/2011 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 119 |
| HB 119 SCS FIN Version E.pdf |
SFIN 4/13/2011 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 119 |
| HB 119 AHFC Letter 020811.pdf |
SFIN 4/13/2011 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 119 |
| HB 119 Buccanerr Energy Letter.pdf |
SFIN 4/13/2011 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 119 |
| HB 160 - Tourism Marketing Expenses by FY (DCCED) CORRECTED.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 160 |