Legislature(2009 - 2010)SENATE FINANCE 532
04/15/2009 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB113 | |
| HB199 | |
| HB134 | |
| HB26 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 113 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 199 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 134 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 26 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE
April 15, 2009
9:08 a.m.
9:08:54 AM
CALL TO ORDER
Co-Chair Hoffman called the Senate Finance Committee meeting
to order at 9:08 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Senator Lyman Hoffman, Co-Chair
Senator Bert Stedman, Co-Chair
Senator Charlie Huggins, Vice-Chair
Senator Johnny Ellis
Senator Donny Olson
Senator Joe Thomas
MEMBERS ABSENT
None
ALSO PRESENT
David Teal, Director, Legislative Finance Division; Jesse
Kiehl, Staff, Senate District B; Karen Rehfeld, Director,
Office of Management and Budget, Office of the Governor;
Representative John Harris; Larry Hartig, Commissioner,
Department of Environmental Conservation; Chip Thoma,
President, Responsible Cruising in Alaska; Joe Geldhof, Law
Office of J.W. Geldhof; John Bitney, Director, Legislative
Office, Office of the Governor; Juli, Lucky, Staff to
Representative Hawker; Brad Whistler, Dental Officer,
Department of Health and Social Services.
PRESENT VIA TELECONFERENCE
Bruce Bustamante, Vice President, Princess Tours; Jennifer
Gibbens, Executive Director, Prince William Soundkeeper,
Cordova.
SUMMARY
HB 26 "An Act repealing the repeal of preventative and
restorative adult dental services reimbursement
under Medicaid; providing for an effective date by
repealing the effective date of sec. 3, ch. 52,
SLA 2006; and providing for an effective date."
HB 26 was HEARD and HELD in Committee for further
consideration.
CSHB 113(FIN) am(brf sup maj fld)
"An Act making supplemental appropriations,
capital appropriations, and other appropriations;
amending appropriations; making appropriations to
capitalize funds; and providing for an effective
date."
HB 113 was HEARD and HELD in Committee for further
consideration.
CSHB 134(RES) "An Act relating to the terms and conditions
of commercial passenger vessel permits for the
discharge of graywater, treated sewage, and other
wastewater; establishing a science advisory panel
on wastewater treatment and effluent quality in
the Department of Environmental Conservation; and
providing for an effective date."
CSHB134 was HEARD and HELD in Committee for
further consideration.
CSHB NO. 199(FIN) am
"An Act making appropriations, including
supplemental appropriations and capital
appropriations; amending appropriations; and
providing for an effective date."
CSHB NO. 199.(FIN) am was REPORTED out of
Committee with a "do pass" recommendation.
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 113(FIN) am(brf sup maj fld)
"An Act making supplemental appropriations, capital
appropriations, and other appropriations; amending
appropriations; making appropriations to capitalize
funds; and providing for an effective date."
9:09:11 AM
DAVID TEAL, DIRECTOR, LEGISLATIVE FINANCE DIVISION,
presented the supplemental budget via spreadsheet dated
April 9, 2009, titled "FY2009 Supplemental Requests" (Copy
on File). He offered to review the spreadsheet with the
committee. He noted that legislative items were absent in
the bill, as every item was submitted by the governor. The
cost of the bill is noted on Page 1 with the operating
portion of the supplemental budget illustrating general
funds down $59 million and federal funds up $53.6 million
reflecting the substitution of federal Medicaid match for
general funds in the Health and Social Services budget. He
noted a net reduction of $12 million in the "other funds"
category.
9:11:51 AM
Mr. Teal addressed the capital items in the legislation
illustrated on Page 1. He explained the $59 million in
operating reductions with $11.6 million in unallocated
reductions viewed as savings although excluded from the
bill. The total reduction is $70.7 million including capital
of $3.2 million creating a net reduction of $67.5 million.
He explained that the process employed to create the bill
included meetings between House and Senate staff with agency
review when necessary. Changes were made by the four co-
chairs leading to the color coded spread sheet presented to
the committee. He explained that items coded green are
included in the bill, while items coded orange are absent
from the legislation.
9:14:05 AM
Mr. Teal discussed unallocated operating reductions, which
were all rejected because there was no reason to take
legislative action for something that the executive branch
had accomplished. He noted that the reductions were
categorized as savings in the legislation allowing
expectations that the allocated reductions will be achieved
by the executive branch because they are included in the
savings category of the fiscal summary.
9:15:36 AM
Mr. Teal addressed operating lapse extensions, which were
temporarily removed from the supplemental bill and put in
front of the House Finance Committee. Lapse extensions
typically evade the scrutiny that other extensions receive.
Some lapse extensions were accepted and others rejected.
Some extensions went back into the bill on Page 4, and color
coded orange. Some extensions were incorporated in the
operating budget.
Mr. Teal addressed Page 6 and specific operating reductions.
He explained the items not included in the bill. He noted
page 11, item 61, illustrating five items excluded from the
bill.
Mr. Teal informed about operating requests, which are
generally requests for additional funding including
substitution of federal funds for general funds.
9:17:56 AM
Mr. Teal noted capital items beginning on Page 34. He
explained that most capital items were reappropriations.
Rather than view a reappropriation as a single item, the
choice was split and dead capital projects no longer in need
of money are taken.
9:18:28 AM
Mr. Teal explained that the funds were placed in the capital
income fund, rather than directed immediately to another
project. In some cases the capital income fund was used to
fund supplemental requests. One project included in the dead
projects, Number 218, Page 35, takes money from the capital
project that was a legislative add on. He noted that an
amendment will address this number in the upcoming committee
substitute (CS). All capital projects identified as finished
had money removed from them except for the projects where
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) submitted
amendments reversing the original request, examples of which
begin on Page 43-45.
9:20:41 AM
Mr. Teal referred to Page 34 and the new capital projects
with a number of items included as supplemental projects
extending through Page 43 at which point a few projects are
included that were unaccepted in the legislation. Many
supplemental projects were later included in the capital
budget. He stated that he did not know how many items were
added from the governor's original request.
Senator Huggins asked about Page 4, Item 26, and the federal
requirement for Department of Transportation and Public
Facilities (DOT). He opined that both the in-state gas
pipeline and a larger pipeline are included in this
appropriation language.
Mr. Teal answered that the mentioned item is a lapse
extension applying to gas line right of way applications. He
explained that funds will lapse on June 30, 2009 without the
lapse extension and the Department of Natural Resources
(DNR) states that a need for the money exists. Either the
lapse is extended or a new 2010 appropriation can be made.
9:23:28 AM
HB 113 was HEARD and HELD in Committee for further
consideration.
9:23:40 AM AT EASE
9:54:01 AM RECONVENED
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 199(FIN) am
"An Act making appropriations, including supplemental
appropriations and capital appropriations; amending
appropriations; and providing for an effective date."
9:54:12 AM
JESSE KIEHL, STAFF, SENATE DISTRICT B addressed HB 199,
which appropriates the non transportation stimulus funds
made available by the American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act. He provided a sectional analysis. Section 1 makes
appropriations for operating expenses of government and
operating grants made to a number of school districts. These
items initially required answers from the governor. Section
1 totals approximately $118 million in federal funds with an
additional $40 thousand of general funds matching federal
funds for health information technology. He introduced
Section 4 containing items that the governor accepted
without reservation. The committee as well as its
counterpart in the other body agreed on capital projects and
grants.
9:57:21 AM
Mr. Kiehl stated that Section 4 addresses clean water and
storage tanks as well as forestry, emergency shelter grants,
and low income housing. He mentioned capital appropriations
for the University of Alaska's research vessel through the
stimulus act. Section 4 totals approximately $231 million in
federal authority.
9:58:30 AM
Mr. Kiehl reviewed Section 7 containing capital items and
grants including the community development block grants for
diesel emission reduction programs. He noted that one item
in Section 7 from the Department of Environmental
Conservation (DEC) requires an additional form of
legislation.
9:59:23 AM
Mr. Kiehl addressed Section 10 of the bill, which states the
legislature's belief that the money is available one time
only and general funds will not be forthcoming. He noted the
legislative addition of Section 11, Page 17 adding $200
thousand of general funds appropriated to the Department of
Administration (DOA) for oversight accounting. The federal
stimulus law requires a great deal of accountability for the
appropriated funds. The federal government is working
closely with the legislature's audit division.
10:00:48 AM
Mr. Kiehl reviewed Section 12, and the receipt of federal
Medicaid funds should the match rate increase. Section 13
addresses additional federal funds available to the
Department of Revenue (DOR) for child support collection.
The program is a highly efficient way to use federal money.
The program was set to end, yet will continue with the
stimulus act.
Mr. Kiehl addressed Section 14 as the largest single
appropriation. Section 14 appropriates the fiscal
stabilization funds existing in two categories. This bill
appropriates $20.7 million to Alaska municipalities for
revenue sharing.
10:02:05 AM
Mr. Kiehl introduced Line 8, Page 19, which appropriates the
fiscal stabilization Part A funds, $93 million for
education. He concluded that the administration advocates
for the spending of stimulus money only on items without
ongoing obligations. He stated that the governor will take
great care with these funds.
10:03:43 AM
Co-Chair Hoffman asked about the education funds of $93
million and the specific language required for the school
districts agreeing that the funding is available one time
only.
Mr. Kiehl answered that the federal stimulus law does not
grant power to require such a signed document. He noted the
legislative intent sections, which give Department of
Education and Early Development (DEED) the instruction as
seen on Page 16, Line 27. The legislature's intent is for
DEED to ensure that the individual school districts
understand the nature of the funding.
Co-Chair Stedman MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 1, 26-GH1260\PA.1,
Kane, 4/11/09: Co-Chair Stedman OBJECTED for the purpose of
discussion.
Page 19, line11:
Delete "sec. 144002(a)"
Insert "sec. 14002(a)(3)"
10:05:35 AM
Mr. Kiehl explained Amendment 1. He opined that the
amendment settles a large question. He noted that the
amendment takes effect on Page 19, Line 11 and simply
tightens the reference to the federal stimulus law under
which the $93 million is distributed. He noted that
Amendment 1 sets the policy call preferring the state
distributes the funds to school districts as additional
funds using the same proportions as Title 1. Title 1 refers
to the elementary and secondary education act, which is a
reasonable method of statewide fund distribution. He
mentioned the lack of provision in Alaska's education
funding formula to offset Title 1 money. With the adoption
of Amendment 1, the $93 million will be distributed to
school districts as additional monies.
Co-Chair Stedman WITHDREW his OBJECTION. There being NO
OBJECTION, Amendment 1 was ADOPTED.
Co-Chair Stedman MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 2, 26-GH1260\PA.3,
Kane, 4/14/09: Co-Chair Stedman OBJECTED for discussion.
Page 7, line 26, following "2009":
Insert "Entitlement Fund and"
Mr. Kiehl described Amendment 2. He noted Page 7, Line 26
and a $1 million appropriation of federal receipt authority
placed in the office of the governor reading "American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act."
10:09:13 AM
Mr. Kiehl addressed the category of entitlement funds
applying most importantly to transportation funding. In the
event that the state receives additional money in the form
of an entitlement, this amendment allows the state to take
it. Co-Chair Stedman informed that the amendment is a
technical amendment to this amendment by adding an "s" to
the end of "fund."
Co-Chair Stedman MOVED to AMEND Amendment 2 by making
entitlement fund plural.
Co-Chair Stedman WITHDREW his OBJECTION. There being NO
OBJECTION, Amendment 2 was ADOPTED.
10:10:29 AM
Co-Chair Stedman MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 3, 26-GH1260\PA.2,
Kane, 4/14/09: Co-Chair Stedman OBJECTED for discussion.
Page 12, line 10:
Delete "679,900"
Insert "679,936"
Page 12, line 13:
Delete "3,960,000" in both places
Insert "3,962,565" in both places
Page 14, line 5:
Delete "4,639,900:
Insert "4,642,501:
Page 14, line 13:
Delete "$63,262,600"
Insert "$63,265,201"
Page 15, line 7:
Delete "63,262,600"
Insert "63,265,201"
Mr. Kiehl described Amendment 3 as a housekeeping effort,
which simply updates dollar amounts.
Co-Chair Stedman WITHDREW his OBJECTION. There being NO
OBJECTION, Amendment 3 was ADOPTED.
10:12:57 AM AT EASE
10:14:26 AM RECONVENED
KAREN REHFELD, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET,
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR, expressed appreciation for the
efforts of both bodies in reviewing the federal stimulus
bill. She agreed that the policy questions were important.
She noted that it is allowable to make use of the
stabilization funds for the school funding formula increases
based on the timing and statutory language of the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Given the current revenue
shortfall, which was not the case when the school funding
bill was passed, it is appropriate to bring the policy
questions forward. She felt the recommendations were
appropriate for consideration. Another policy decision was
chosen as indicated by the amendment proposed.
10:16:20 AM
Co-Chair Stedman clarified that the previous finance meeting
included recommended administrative amendments that were not
brought forward. (Copy on File) He apologized to Ms. Rehfeld
for falling out of order yesterday. He acknowledged Ms.
Rehfeld for the amount of effort she contributes. He
commended Ms. Rehfeld's staff for their work on the stimulus
bill policy discussions.
Co-Chair Hoffman MOVED to report HB 199 out of Committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
CSHB NO. 199.(FIN) am was REPORTED out of Committee with a
"do pass" recommendation.
10:18:13 AM AT EASE
10:21:42 AM REONVENED
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 134(RES)
"An Act relating to the terms and conditions of
commercial passenger vessel permits for the discharge
of graywater, treated sewage, and other wastewater;
establishing a science advisory panel on wastewater
treatment and effluent quality in the Department of
Environmental Conservation; and providing for an
effective date."
10:22:00 AM
Co-Chair Hoffman MOVED to ADOPT work draft 26-LS0570\D,
Bullard, 4/14/09. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so
ordered.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHN HARRIS, spoke about the legislation and
the Committee Substitute (CS). He explained that the CS
eliminates five words. He revealed that the last
modification addresses the quality of water discharged from
the ships into Alaska waters. He informed that the CS
includes a six year sunset and allows a scientific panel to
meet every three years in a six year period rather than
every two.
10:24:17 AM
LARRY HARTIG, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSERVATION, testified on SCSCSHB 134 (FIN). He informed
that the goal is to maintain Alaska's clean water. He
expressed appreciation from the Department of Environmental
Conservation (DEC) over the last few weeks to work with
Representative Harris on the bill. With the bill's passage,
DEC will be able to protect Alaska waters while providing
temporary relief to the cruise ship industry. One important
decision requires the cruise ships to reduce the amount of
pollutants in their waste before they discharge it so that
they meet state water quality criteria at the point of
discharge or as soon as it leaves the vessel. He mentioned a
technology conference several months ago sponsored by DEC to
review the potential technologies available to treat cruise
ship waste. He explained that the conference confirmed that
technologies are unavailable at this time to allow cruise
ships to consistently meet the point of discharge
requirement. He noted that the quality of the ship's
effluent is high relative to other dischargers, but they
have not yet achieved the goal of the initiative. He
explained that the legislation allows the cruise ships
additional time (six years) to achieve the goal with interim
steps. The steps include a science advisory panel of eleven
experts who would work with DEC to review the records that
the cruise ship companies present. A report will be
presented to the legislature following the conferences. The
six year sunset date will be readdressed through the process
to assess the necessary time span.
10:28:02 AM
Mr. Hartig provided a sectional analysis of the bill. The
intent section (Section 1) states the initiative to achieve
the at the point of discharge requirements. Section 2 allows
"the waiver provision" from the point of discharge
requirement stating that cruise ships must meet the
requirement except as provided in Section E below the waiver
provision. Section 3 eliminates the waiver provision with
the idea that Section 2 becomes effective on passage of this
act after the six year sunset allowing Section 3 to remove
the waiver.
10:29:29 AM
Mr. Hartig revealed that Section 4 describes the waiver and
how the cruise ship companies comply. The conditions state
that the companies must employ the treatment measures that
are technologically effective and economically achievable in
waste reduction. The waiver can only be granted for three
years at a time. With the six year sunset, DEC would issue a
new permit in the spring of 2010 followed by the technology
conference to review the information from the last three
years.
10:33:21 AM
Mr. Hardig informed that Section 5 addresses the science
advisory panel described earlier. He shared a story about a
dilution study assisted by a science panel. Representatives
from various interested groups comprise the panel,
particularly from coastal groups with interest in water
quality matters.
Subsection B under Section 5 described the reports presented
to the legislature from DEC with input from the science
panel. The reports allow the legislature to assess the
science panel's findings prior to issuing the new three year
permit. He noted the final report due 2015 allowing the
sunset provision to "kick in" or to take other action if
necessary.
10:35:05 AM
Mr. Hartig noted that the sunset provisions are contained in
Section 7 and 8. Section 8 provides that Sections 3 and 7
take effect December 31, 2015.
Senator Ellis MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 1:
Page 3, line 11
Insert after "using" "economically feasible"
Page 3, line 13
Delete "and economically feasible"
Page 3, line 18
Insert after "use of" "economically feasible"
Page 3, lines 19-20
Delete "and economically feasible"
Page 4, line 29
Insert after "additional" "economically feasible"
Page 4, lines 30-31
Delete "and economically feasible"
Co-Chair Stedman OBJECTED for the purpose of discussion.
Senator Ellis explained the amendment. He clarified that the
amendment does technically comport and is accurate for the
finance CS. This amendment makes small but important
language changes to the bill. He explained that the current
language requires DEC to impose cruise ship waste water
technologies that are both technologically effective and
economically feasible.
Co-Chair Stedman WITHDREW his OBJECTION. There being NO
OBJECTION, it was so ordered. Amendment 1 was ADOPTED.
10:37:50 AM
Senator Olson asked about infective particles in the
discharge such as living viruses. Representative Harris
asked for clarification of the question. Senator Olson asked
if particles such as living viruses and bacteria are
neutralized. His question was whether these bacteria and
viruses are discharged into the water from the cruise ship.
Mr. Hartig stated that when a cruise ship company applies
for a permit, they must disclose the content of their waste.
The DEC then reviews the application and compares the data
with state water quality standards including provisions to
protect human health. If some portion of the data does not
meet the standard, DEC sets a permit limit or other
conditions that preclude or limit the discharge of that
particular pollutant. A cruise ship's permit includes a list
of prohibitions.
Senator Olson asked about ballast water. Mr. Hartig stated
that ballast water is not addressed in this legislation,
which only concerns water discharged from the ships.
10:40:47 AM
Co-Chair Stedman opened public testimony.
CHIP THOMA, PRESIDENT, RESPONSIBLE CRUISING IN ALASKA,
testified in support of HB 134. He maintained that discharge
from the cruise ships is caustic. He noted that the soap and
other products discharged are the reason for the caustic
discharge. He addressed the six year sunset based on the
year 2009. He compared the difference between the federal
standards and the sunset. He announced that Princess and
Holland America cruise lines have serious problems with the
piping on board the ships. The other cruise ship lines
operating in Alaska are close to achieving full water
quality standards as defined by the 2010 limits. Only
Princess and Holland America have refused to exchange their
pipes, which is the stem root of the problem. He opined that
the sunset could be shorter while remaining effective.
10:44:23 AM
JOE GELDOHOF, LAW OFFICE OF J.W. GELDHOF, testified in
support of HB 134. He noted that he was one of the principle
authors of the initiative that became law in 2006. He
complimented the compromises in this legislation. He opined
that the bill was acceptable to industry and
environmentalists alike.
BRUCE BUSTAMANTE, VICE PRESIDENT, PRINCESS TOURS (testified
via teleconference) in support of HB 134. He commended the
process and the time given to work on the issue with the
science panel. He stated that the point of discharge
component is unfair to the cruise industry. He stated that
the allegations regarding the replacement of copper piping
are not true. The allegations result from accusations that
Princess Cruise Line has older ships and he stated that this
is not true. He stated that the piping on the Princess
cruise ships is comprised of stainless steel and not copper.
10:49:08 AM
JENNIFER GIBBENS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, PRINCE WILLIAM
SOUNDKEEPER, CORDOVA (testified via teleconference), in
support of the legislation. She opined that the sunset
granted was generous. She encounters many citizens concerned
about the clean water issue. She stated that she can view
the issue from both environmental and tourism standpoints.
She opined that the legislation was crafted in a fair and
generous fashion including an important deadline.
10:51:12 AM
SCSCSHB134 was HEARD and HELD in Committee for further
consideration.
HOUSE BILL NO. 26
"An Act repealing the repeal of preventative and
restorative adult dental services reimbursement under
Medicaid; providing for an effective date by repealing
the effective date of sec. 3, ch. 52, SLA 2006; and
providing for an effective date."
10:52:01 AM
JULI, LUCKY, STAFF TO REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER, reviewed the
bill. She noted that the bill presented a preventive
approach to dental care. She explained that the current
legislation allows coverage of incidence including pain and
infection and preventive care was not included. Restorative
care such as fillings or root canals was also exempt from
coverage. The proposed legislation covers preventive care,
root canals, fillings and dentures.
10:54:52 AM
BRAD WHISTLER DDS, DENTAL OFFICER, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
SOCIAL SERVICES, explained the coverage allowed by the bill.
He agreed that the legislation allows coverage of routine
dental visits, routine fillings, denture services,
periodontal maintenance, and root canal therapy.
Co-Chair Hoffman asked if Alaska natives are eligible for
dental care through Medicaid. Mr. Whistler answered yes as
long as the individuals are enrolled in Medicaid.
Senator Ellis requested more information regarding Medicaid
and dentures. Mr. Whistler explained that an annual limit
per recipient was set at $1,150, which is enough to cover
either an upper or a lower denture.
10:57:26 AM
Senator Olson asked what happens during an abscess or
detrimental problem that might prove fatal. Mr. Whistler
stated that these situations are not subject to the annual
limit.
Senator Thomas noted that missed appointments with Medicaid
patients are a common complaint from dentists. He asked if
there was an attempt to ameliorate this issue. Mr. Whistler
responded that the department addressed a variety of issues
with the Medicaid program. The issue of missed appointments
can be addressed by tracking those patients who repeatedly
miss appointments. Senator Thomas opined that a proper
provision might deter a patient from missing appointments.
11:00:09 AM
Ms. Lucky noted that the caps were not altered in this
legislation. She explained that the prior committees were in
agreement about a policy call regarding the annual limit.
She explained that one set of dentures was decided upon as
the other body was concerned that costs may balloon out of
control. She acknowledged those people who believed that the
program is new and should proceed for a couple of years
prior to changing the cap.
Co-Chair Stedman mentioned the fiscal note from the
Department of Health and Social Services reflecting
$2,529,700 general fund to secure $5,755,800 in federal
receipts as funding for the general fund match. The fiscal
note is included in the FY10 operating budget.
HB 26 was HEARD and HELD in Committee for further
consideration.
11:02:29 AM
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 11:02 AM.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| ACA backup.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 134 |
| 4 9 9 Supplemental.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 113 |
| HB026 Background Materials.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 26 |
| HB026 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 26 |
| HB026 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 26 |
| HB026 Testimony.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 26 |
| Cruise Ship Discharge Assessment Report.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 134 |
| Governor's reponse to Harris 19 March 2009.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 134 |
| Harris letter to governor 11 March 2009.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 134 |
| Hearing Request and Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 134 |
| HB134 Letters.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 134 |
| HB 134 Amendment 1 SFC.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 134 |
| SCS CSHB 134 (FIN) Version D.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 134 |
| SFC HB 199 Amendment 1 PA 1.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 199 |
| SFC HB 199 Amendment 2 PA 3.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 199 |
| SFC HB 199 Amendment 3 PA.2.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 199 |
| Timeline by DEC.pdf |
SFIN 4/15/2009 9:00:00 AM |
HB 134 |