Legislature(2009 - 2010)SENATE FINANCE 532

02/09/2010 09:30 AM FINANCE


Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
-- Time Change --
*+ SB 253 APPROP: DEFERRED MAINTENANCE/REPLACEMENT TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled
*+ SB 254 SUPPLEMENTAL/CAPITAL/OTHER APPROPRIATIONS TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
*+ SB 229 APPROP: OPERATING BUDGET/LOANS/FUNDS TELECONFERENCED
Scheduled But Not Heard
*+ SB 231 APPROP: MENTAL HEALTH BUDGET TELECONFERENCED
Scheduled But Not Heard
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
                  SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE                                                                                      
                      February 9, 2010                                                                                          
                         9:31 a.m.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
9:31:47 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CALL TO ORDER                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Hoffman called the Senate  Finance Committee meeting                                                                   
to order at 9:31 a.m.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
MEMBERS PRESENT                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Senator Lyman Hoffman, Co-Chair                                                                                                 
Senator Bert Stedman, Co-Chair                                                                                                  
Senator Charlie Huggins, Vice-Chair                                                                                             
Senator Johnny Ellis                                                                                                            
Senator Dennis Egan                                                                                                             
Senator Donny Olson                                                                                                             
Senator Joe Thomas                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
MEMBERS ABSENT                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
None                                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
ALSO PRESENT                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
Karen  Rehfeld, Director,  Office of  Management and  Budget,                                                                   
Office  of  the Governor;  Jack  Kreinheder,  Chief  Analyst,                                                                   
Office  of Management  and Budget,  Office  of the  Governor;                                                                   
Laura  Baker,  Deputy Director,  Division  of  Administrative                                                                   
Services, Transportation; Leta  Simons, Director, Division of                                                                   
Support  Services,  Department   of  Natural  Resources;  Kim                                                                   
Garnero,  Director,   Division  of  Finance,   Department  of                                                                   
Administration.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
PRESENT VIA TELECONFERENCE                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
None                                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
SUMMARY                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
SB 229    APPROP: OPERATING BUDGET/LOANS/FUNDS                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
          SB 229 was SCHEDULED but not HEARD.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
SB 231    APPROP: MENTAL HEALTH BUDGET                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
          SB 231 was SCHEDULED but not HEARD.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
SB 253    APPROP: DEFERRED MAINTENANCE/REPLACEMENT                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
          SB 253 was HEARD and HELD in Committee for                                                                            
          further consideration.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
SB 254    SUPPLEMENTAL/CAPITAL/OTHER APPROPRIATIONS                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
          SB 254 was HEARD and HELD in Committee for                                                                            
          further consideration.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
9:32:01 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Hoffman explained that  the governor requested quick                                                                   
action on SB 253, the deferred maintenance bill.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
SENATE BILL NO. 253                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
     "An  Act  making  capital  appropriations  for  deferred                                                                   
     maintenance   projects,   equipment   replacement,   and                                                                   
     emergency  repairs;  and   providing  for  an  effective                                                                   
     date."                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
     SB 253 was HEARD and HELD in Committee for further                                                                         
     consideration.                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
9:34:06 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
KAREN  REHFELD, DIRECTOR,  OFFICE OF  MANAGEMENT AND  BUDGET,                                                                   
OFFICE  OF  THE GOVERNOR,  explained  that  her task  was  to                                                                   
provide  a  high  level overview  of  both  the  supplemental                                                                   
requests    beginning   with    the   deferred    maintenance                                                                   
legislation.  She explained the  governor's plan  to preserve                                                                   
state  owned  assets and  create  jobs  in the  process.  She                                                                   
announced  that  the state  has  2300  buildings and  a  $1.9                                                                   
billion  backlog   of  deferred  maintenance   projects.  The                                                                   
governor included  the first $100 million in  the December 14                                                                   
budget for FY11.  The governor is requesting  the legislature                                                                   
consider  accelerating  approval  to allow  funding  projects                                                                   
this  construction season.  She  highlighted  the eight  page                                                                   
bill containing five sections.                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
Ms.  Rehfeld   provided  a  sectional  analysis.   Section  1                                                                   
includes a  specific request  by department.  Section 2  is a                                                                   
simple funding  summary by department.  Section 3  includes a                                                                   
total  funding   summary.  Section   4  includes   the  lapse                                                                   
provision  of the bill.  Section 5  informs of the  immediate                                                                   
effective date.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
9:36:31 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Rehfeld  highlighted by  agency the department  requests.                                                                   
Some  departments   requested  allocations  within   a  total                                                                   
amount. She reported that the  Department of Administration's                                                                   
(DOA)  allocation  of  $100 million  is  $7.25  million.  The                                                                   
proposal  is to split  between facilities  with the  deferred                                                                   
maintenance at  approximately $4.25 million and  the State of                                                                   
Alaska  Telecommunications  System  (SATS)  telecommunication                                                                   
system  deferred maintenance  at  $3 million.  She  continued                                                                   
with  the Department  of  Corrections  (DOC)  which has  $6.5                                                                   
million in  deferred maintenance  projects. She depicted  the                                                                   
Department  of  Education  and   Early  Development's  (DEED)                                                                   
request  of $1.7  million  for  deferred maintenance  at  Mt.                                                                   
Edgecombe high school.                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Hoffman  asked  Ms. Rehfeld  about  potential  jobs                                                                   
provided in the state. She invited  the senior policy analyst                                                                   
from the Office  of Management and Budget (OMB)  who has been                                                                   
working on Institute  of Social and Economic  Research (ISER)                                                                   
studies of employment information.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
JACK  KREINHEDER, CHIEF  ANALYST,  OFFICE  OF MANAGEMENT  AND                                                                   
BUDGET,   OFFICE  OF   THE  GOVERNOR,   explained  that   the                                                                   
projections available  for this type of  deferred maintenance                                                                   
package and  repair work  result in  $100 million in  general                                                                   
funds  and approximately  $106  million in  total funds.  The                                                                   
direct jobs are estimated at 700  on an annual average basis.                                                                   
If employees  are hired for  a six month  job, more  than 700                                                                   
people could  be hired. The  multiplier effects of  the money                                                                   
spent  in the  economy equals  approximately  1100 jobs.  Ms.                                                                   
Rehfeld pointed  out the potential  projects funded  with the                                                                   
approval  this legislation.  Most  agencies do  not have  the                                                                   
internal capacity  to do  the work  themselves, so  they must                                                                   
contract.                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Rehfeld  continued with  the Department of  Environmental                                                                   
Conservation  (DEC) who  allocated $200  thousand to  address                                                                   
the deferred  maintenance needs  at the environmental  health                                                                   
lab.  The allocation  for  the Department  of  Fish and  Game                                                                   
(DFG) is  $2 million  with specific  allocations within  that                                                                   
including  $850  thousand  for   statewide  employee  housing                                                                   
needs,  $700   thousand  for   statewide  storage   and  shop                                                                   
facilities,  and  $450  thousand  for  the  Kodiak  warehouse                                                                   
compound upgrades.                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
9:41:04 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Rehfeld  discussed  the Department  of Health and  Social                                                                   
Services (DHSS)  and their decision  to split the  $7 million                                                                   
allocation.  She  continued  with  the  deferred  maintenance                                                                   
allocation  for   the  Department  of  Labor   and  Workforce                                                                   
Development  (DLWD)  including  $1  million  for  the  Alaska                                                                   
Vocational Technical  Center. The Department of  Military and                                                                   
Veterans  Affairs  (DMVA)  allocates $4  million  in  general                                                                   
funds and $6.3  million in federal funds to  support a number                                                                   
of components.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
Ms.  Rehfeld   explained  that  the  Department   of  Natural                                                                   
Resources proposed  to receive  a $4 million allocation.  The                                                                   
Department  of   Public  Safety   (DPS)  proposed   a  single                                                                   
allocation  of  $1.3  million  to  statewide  facilities  for                                                                   
statewide  deferred maintenance.  Ms.  Rehfeld addressed  the                                                                   
Department of Transportation and  Public Facilities (DOT) and                                                                   
the proposed allocation of $25  million of the entire package                                                                   
allocated across  the various modes of  transportation within                                                                   
the department.  The airport deferred maintenance  request is                                                                   
$3.5  million,  the Alaska  Marine  Highway  Vessel  Facility                                                                   
request of  $3 million,  facilities deferred maintenance  for                                                                   
$1 million,  harbor deferred  maintenance for $600  thousand,                                                                   
and  highway deferred  maintenance package  request of  $16.9                                                                   
million.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
9:43:46 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Hoffman  acknowledged the committee's  initiation of                                                                   
a boost in  the department's deferred maintenance  last year.                                                                   
He asked the  department to comment. Co-Chair  Stedman echoed                                                                   
Co-Chair Hoffman's  request and noted imbedded  policy issues                                                                   
such as  harbor maintenance  listed on  Page 57. Ms.  Rehfeld                                                                   
suggested   that   the  department   discuss   the   specific                                                                   
questions.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
LAURA  BAKER,  DEPUTY DIRECTOR,  DIVISION  OF  ADMINISTRATIVE                                                                   
SERVICES, TRANSPORTATION,  discussed the estimates.  Co-Chair                                                                   
Stedman requested further information  on harbor maintenance.                                                                   
Ms.  Baker  replied  that  the  harbor  deferred  maintenance                                                                   
funding addresses  the top priority item on  the harbor list,                                                                   
which  is   the  Port  Alexander   Inner  Float   repair  and                                                                   
replacement.  The float is  used by  school children  and the                                                                   
boarding ramp  is not Americans with Disabilities'  Act (ADA)                                                                   
compliant. The project total is estimated at $630 thousand.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
9:46:33 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair   Stedman   acknowledged  that   municipal   harbors                                                                   
received funding  for deferred maintenance. He  informed that                                                                   
many harbors  have been  privatized. These remaining  harbors                                                                   
contain areas that through moorage  could support the harbors                                                                   
themselves. He  felt concern  about policies regarding  small                                                                   
harbors and  docks. Ms. Baker  offered to follow up  with the                                                                   
committee on  the concern including outstanding  projects and                                                                   
plans.  Co-Chair  Hoffman  requested   that  time  frames  on                                                                   
transfers be included in the follow up.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Stedman asked  about  the follow  up. He  expressed                                                                   
opposition to  the state funding  private docks.  He provided                                                                   
the example of Baranof Warm Springs.  Ms. Baker answered that                                                                   
she  would   include  that   information.  Co-Chair   Stedman                                                                   
remarked  that the committee  could commune  and discuss  the                                                                   
issue  further.  He  stressed   that  he  is  philosophically                                                                   
opposed to the  state building and maintaining  private docs.                                                                   
Ms. Baker  agreed to schedule a  meeting to follow up  on the                                                                   
issue.                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Hoffman  requested comment upon funds  in the budget                                                                   
to address deferred  maintenance of pot holes  throughout the                                                                   
state. He  remarked that  the program  was well received.  He                                                                   
received  requests for  additional funds  for roads  and road                                                                   
construction,  especially  for  the road  to  Dillingham.  He                                                                   
opined that  Alaskan citizens prefer  to have funds  spent on                                                                   
the repair and construction of roads.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Ms.  Baker informed  about an  updated  report regarding  the                                                                   
$12.4 million added to the highway  and aviation base budget.                                                                   
A portion  of the  funds were  used to  offset the  potential                                                                   
supplemental  need  this year.  She  offered  to provide  the                                                                   
report  to the  committee. The  funds recently  added to  the                                                                   
operating budget in July will  address work required on roads                                                                   
this construction season and fiscal year.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
9:51:46 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Hoffman asked  about  the $1  million for  deferred                                                                   
maintenance and  critical repairs.  Ms. Baker responded  that                                                                   
the facilities'  deferred maintenance  of $1 million  will be                                                                   
spread   across  the   regions   adding  sprinkler   systems,                                                                   
ventilation   systems,  compliance   for  the   Environmental                                                                   
Protection  Agency (EPA),  and  the addition  of an  overhead                                                                   
hoist for  the Tok  equipment building.  She stated  that she                                                                   
was available to discuss the issue  further. Co-Chair Hoffman                                                                   
asked   about  the   $16.9  million   for  highway   deferred                                                                   
maintenance and  the $37.5  million for maintaining  existing                                                                   
facilities. Ms.  Rehfeld answered  that OMB plans  to provide                                                                   
the  committee  with a  list  including  a breakdown  of  the                                                                   
requested projects.                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
9:54:12 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Senator  Olson  asked  why  only  $3.5  million  dollars  was                                                                   
requested out of a $94 million  backlog.  Ms. Baker responded                                                                   
that current  needs in the  department are approximately  $94                                                                   
million. She agreed that the portion  for aviation was small,                                                                   
but the allocation  was based on needs by mode.  The aviation                                                                   
portion  in the  deferred maintenance  allocation includes  a                                                                   
number of projects at the top of the list.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Stedman  requested information  about  the  process                                                                   
used to  identify and  recommend certain  agencies.  He asked                                                                   
how the process integrates with  last year's reduced deferred                                                                   
maintenance budget. He elucidated  that the state now has the                                                                   
responsibility  to "catch  up" and restructure  for  the next                                                                   
generation.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Rehfeld defined the five year  plan with the goal of $100                                                                   
million appropriated  each year  to address the  backlog. The                                                                   
general  allocation was  based on square  footage by  agency.                                                                   
She noted  that adjustments did  occur, but allocations  must                                                                   
be scrutinized  because some agencies have greater  needs for                                                                   
deferred maintenance funding.                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Hoffman asked  how  the allocation  values  between                                                                   
departments are  determined. Ms. Rehfeld maintained  that the                                                                   
allocations were  determined by observing the  footage of the                                                                   
facilities  within  the agency.  Co-Chair  Stedman  expressed                                                                   
curiosity  about  the  ages  and  condition  of  the  various                                                                   
agencies. Ms.  Rehfeld agreed that  the age and  condition of                                                                   
the  agencies   must  be  reviewed  carefully   to  determine                                                                   
priorities.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
10:00:49 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Senator Thomas  asked about  the intention  to move  the 2011                                                                   
maintenance  list to  2010. Ms.  Rehfeld  responded that  the                                                                   
governor is proposing  that the second year of  the five year                                                                   
plan begin  in FY12.  She explained  that FY11  is the  first                                                                   
year  requesting an  accelerated start  date. Senator  Thomas                                                                   
noted the lack of steady funding  during the various years in                                                                   
the five year plan. He provided examples.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Rehfeld  informed  about the various  agencies'  ten year                                                                   
plans.   She   explained   why   some   years   show   higher                                                                   
appropriations.  Senator Thomas  observed  that the  projects                                                                   
are   more  similar   to  capital   projects  than   deferred                                                                   
maintenance projects.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
10:03:14 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Senator  Egan  asked  a  policy  question  regarding  various                                                                   
projects  and  the  corrosive  salt  used  on  the  Southeast                                                                   
Alaskan  roads in  the  winter. He  observed  that the  state                                                                   
saves money  by resorting to  the less expensive  salt versus                                                                   
the newer varieties  of ice control. The burden  is passed on                                                                   
to the owner  of the vehicle. Ms. Rehfeld commented  that DOT                                                                   
is the  best contact, as  they have had  issues with  the EPA                                                                   
and  other regulatory  agencies.  Ms.  Baker  added that  the                                                                   
department is  considering alternatives  to the salt  mixture                                                                   
used for icy roads. She offered  to provide more information,                                                                   
but maintained that  the belief about salting the  roads is a                                                                   
misconception.  Co-Chair Hoffman  asked if Frank Richards was                                                                   
available  for  questioning.  Ms. Baker  responded  that  Mr.                                                                   
Richards was not available. Co-Chair  Stedman agreed that the                                                                   
concern  about  salt  content  is also  expressed  in  Sitka,                                                                   
Ketchikan, and Anchorage  as the belief exists  that cars are                                                                   
dissolved by the brine mixture.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
10:06:32 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Stedman   referenced  Page  46  and   the  deferred                                                                   
maintenance cost for the Mount  McKinley meat plant. He asked                                                                   
about the meat plant.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Senator Olson  regressed to  a question  for (DOT)  about the                                                                   
road  between  Saint  Mary's  and  Mountain  Village  in  his                                                                   
district,  which is  in need of  repair. He  asked about  the                                                                   
state's  maintenance  of  the  road. Ms.  Baker  promised  to                                                                   
follow  up  with an  answer  as  she was  currently  unaware.                                                                   
Senator  Olson   commented  about   the  resistance   to  the                                                                   
maintenance possibly due to a  misunderstanding about whether                                                                   
equipment  is owned by  the state  or federal government.  He                                                                   
emphasized that  the road must  be maintained for  the safety                                                                   
of the local people.                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
10:08:47 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
LETA  SIMONS,   DIRECTOR,  DIVISION   OF  SUPPORT   SERVICES,                                                                   
DEPARTMENT OF  NATURAL RESOURCES, discussed the  Mt. McKinley                                                                   
meat plant. She explained that  the meat plant is an asset of                                                                   
the agricultural revolving loan  fund, which is an enterprise                                                                   
fund.  Mt.   McKinley  meat   plant  is   in  need   of  some                                                                   
improvements to maintain safety  standards and to retain good                                                                   
working conditions in the facility.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Stedman  reviewed the  list of deferred  maintenance                                                                   
repairs.  He opined  that most  of  the items  should have  a                                                                   
sinking fund available for replacement  reserves. He asked if                                                                   
the meat  factory had  a process to  replace equipment.   Ms.                                                                   
Simons noted that the plant was  an asset of the Agricultural                                                                   
Revolving  Loan   Fund.  The  fund's  focus   is  to  provide                                                                   
agricultural loans.                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Stedman  stated that the assets should  be protected                                                                   
by policies. He requested that  the department follow up with                                                                   
the  committee about  the  management of  the  organization's                                                                   
assets. Ms. Baker agreed to comply.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Senator  Huggins   agreed  with  Co-Chair   Stedman's  point.                                                                   
Senator Olson followed up that  the Mt McKinley meat plant is                                                                   
a valuable  processing plant. He  stated that he has  used it                                                                   
himself. He believed that the funding should continue.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
10:12:55 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Rehfeld  noted that a request  was not reflected  for the                                                                   
Alaska  Court  System, which  is  $2.5 million  for  deferred                                                                   
maintenance.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Hoffman  pointed out  a revised update  illustrating                                                                   
that  the  state will  have  $2.2  billion in  reserves.  The                                                                   
Senate  bipartisan  working  group   proposed  to  save  $1.5                                                                   
billion of  the $2.2  billion. The  governor agreed  that the                                                                   
responsible act is to save additional  dollars from FY10. The                                                                   
roller   coaster  effect   on  the  state   budget   may  not                                                                   
necessitate  $100  million  for   the  next  five  years.  He                                                                   
suggested  thinking  twice  about   expenditures  made  today                                                                   
versus later when the future price  of oil is yet unknown. He                                                                   
opined  that  the  state acted  responsibly  by  saving  $1.5                                                                   
billion of the additional revenues.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Senator Thomas  interjected that some departments  listed the                                                                   
total  estimated  deferred  maintenance   cost  listed  as  a                                                                   
number. He appreciated information presented in that form.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
10:15:51 AM    AT EASE                                                                                                        
10:16:50 AM    RECONVENED                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
SENATE BILL NO. 254                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
     "An  Act  making  supplemental  appropriations,  capital                                                                   
     appropriations,   and  other  appropriations;   amending                                                                   
     appropriations;    repealing   appropriations;    making                                                                   
     appropriations  to capitalize  funds; and providing  for                                                                   
     an effective date."                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
     SB 254 was HEARD and HELD in Committee for                                                                                 
     further consideration.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Ms.  Rehfeld   provided   a  high  level   overview   of  the                                                                   
supplemental  bill  before  the  committee.  She  noted  that                                                                   
agency representatives  are available  online for  questions.                                                                   
She explained the proposal to  place funding into savings due                                                                   
to the  potential surplus in  FY10. She mentioned  the public                                                                   
education  fund appropriation  of approximately $1.1  billion                                                                   
as witnessed  in Section 12(a)  of SB 254. She  discussed the                                                                   
various   appropriations    and   the   repayment    of   the                                                                   
Constitutional Budget  Reserve (CBR). The  regular discussion                                                                   
about supplemental funding includes  unanticipated needs. She                                                                   
discussed  the various  operating  components  of the  budget                                                                   
addressed  through  the  supplemental   appropriations.  Fire                                                                   
suppression comprises a significant  component of the budget.                                                                   
She  mentioned Alaska's  significant fire  season this  year.                                                                   
The base amount  in the budget for fire suppression  is $35.4                                                                   
million.  The non  formula  agency operating  requests  equal                                                                   
approximately  $32  million. She  mentioned  statewide  items                                                                   
included in  the operating proposal  in Section  12(b), which                                                                   
includes  the  movement  of funds  into  the  small  business                                                                   
economic development revolving  loan fund. Additionally, a $5                                                                   
million request is included to  replenish the disaster relief                                                                   
fund  under  Section  12(c). Specific  capital  requests  are                                                                   
"emergency"  in nature  and address areas  where funding  was                                                                   
not  sufficient  to complete  a  project.  The total  of  the                                                                   
capital component of the budget is $58.3 million.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
10:21:43 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Ms.  Rehfeld   observed  that  the  review   of  supplemental                                                                   
requests  includes  discernment  of standalone  items  versus                                                                   
those that  can be addressed in  the next budget  cycle. Some                                                                   
items were  not incorporated  into the  FY11 budget,  but are                                                                   
currently discussed in terms of  budget amendments. She noted                                                                   
that  inmate  health  care is  another  area  of  significant                                                                   
concern with  a supplemental request  based on the  number of                                                                   
catastrophic  cases. She  noted  the number  of  catastrophic                                                                   
cases. The state  must not charge other federal  programs for                                                                   
health  care  of  inmates  when   they  enter  incarceration.                                                                   
Medicaid growth causes concern,  as the authorization in FY10                                                                   
was not sufficient.                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
10:23:46 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Rehfeld  highlighted sections  of the  17 page  bill. The                                                                   
first  section  of the  bill  is the  operating  supplemental                                                                   
request by departments.  Section 2 summarized  the funding by                                                                   
agency. Section  3 provides the  capital requests.  Section 4                                                                   
summarizes  the capital  funding. Section  5 is the  language                                                                   
section  and  spurs discussion  about  the  Federal  Matching                                                                   
Assistance Program  (FMAP) rate  under the American  Recovery                                                                   
and  Reinvestment  Act (ARRA).  In  order  for the  state  to                                                                   
receive the benefit under the  ARRA funds requires conditions                                                                   
of  no change  to  current  Medicaid  program and  the  state                                                                   
cannot place the  savings in a "rainy day"  account. Included                                                                   
in the  supplemental bill  is language  clarifying that  that                                                                   
the state's ability to utilize  the higher reimbursement rate                                                                   
has  allowed  the  use  of  general   funds  to  cover  other                                                                   
increased  costs  in  our  budget.  Section  6  includes  the                                                                   
request for  funding to  implement the arbitrator's  decision                                                                   
from  March  19,  2009  regarding   the  Alaska  Correctional                                                                   
Officer Association.  Section 7 includes a specific  item for                                                                   
pupil  transportation  under   DEED.  Section  8  involves  a                                                                   
miscellaneous  claim for  the Division  of Juvenile  Justice.                                                                   
Section 9  is a correction  to an  appropriation in  the FY10                                                                   
budget  concerning $85  thousand for  pipeline training  from                                                                   
DLWD.  Section 10  from  the Department  of  Law  (DOL) is  a                                                                   
request for  $28 thousand for  judgments and claims.  Section                                                                   
11 allows the  Department of Natural Resources  (DNR) the use                                                                   
of program  receipts from the  sale of aircraft  estimated at                                                                   
$2 million.  Section  12 addresses  fund transfers  proposing                                                                   
the transfer  of $1.1  billion to  the public education  fund                                                                   
and also  addresses the  Alaska International Airport  System                                                                   
(AIDEA) revolving  loan fund to  the small business  economic                                                                   
development  fund  along with  the  $5 million  for  disaster                                                                   
relief    referenced    earlier.   Section    13    addresses                                                                   
ratifications.  Ratification   is  sometimes  known  as  zero                                                                   
balancing  and is a  term used  to request authorizations  to                                                                   
cover expenditures  that have  already occurred  and resulted                                                                   
in   an   over   expenditure   of   an   appropriation.   The                                                                   
legislature's  authorization  to  ratify  the  appropriations                                                                   
gives the  department the  additional authorization  for what                                                                   
occurred in  a prior year,  but does  not affect cash  in the                                                                   
current year.                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Hoffman  asked for the ratification  history for the                                                                   
last  five   years.  He   recalled  that   the  category   of                                                                   
expenditures  is now in  excess of $10  million. He  asked if                                                                   
departments  are  spending  unauthorized  funds  because  the                                                                   
legislature  will ratify  them.  What is  the  administration                                                                   
doing to control the unauthorized spending?                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
10:29:36 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Rehfeld answered  that ratifications include  a couple of                                                                   
outstanding items.  The largest portion is the  $10.3 million                                                                   
ratification for  firefighting. Ratifications are  an area of                                                                   
the budget  where a base  appropriation is decided  upon, not                                                                   
knowing what  the fire season  will look like. The  next step                                                                   
is to approach the legislature  with the supplemental request                                                                   
based on the estimates from the  firefighting that took place                                                                   
during the  last fire session.  Following adjournment  of the                                                                   
legislature,  language   in  the  supplemental   bill  allows                                                                   
ratification  for the  following  year.  Because last  year's                                                                   
fire season  was so  dramatic, the  $10.3 million  represents                                                                   
funding needed for firefighting during the end of FY09.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Rehfeld  announced another  significant piece  concerning                                                                   
the  Department of  Corrections (DOC)  who overestimated  the                                                                   
amount that  they would receive  from the federal  government                                                                   
for  housing federal  prisoners. The  department reduced  the                                                                   
authorization  in the  budget  because DOC  does not  receive                                                                   
funding to house federal prisoners.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
10:33:17 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Stedman  asked the ramifications if  the legislature                                                                   
does not  ratify. Ms. Rehfeld  responded that  the accounting                                                                   
system  clean  up will  not  be effective.  Co-Chair  Hoffman                                                                   
asked if  the departments  would have to  pay the  costs from                                                                   
their current budget.  Ms. Rehfeld answered that  she was not                                                                   
sure that  the department  could revisit  past years  because                                                                   
the statute prohibits it.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
KIM  GARNERO, DIRECTOR,  DIVISION OF  FINANCE, DEPARTMENT  OF                                                                   
ADMINISTRATION,   stated  that   departments  cannot   accrue                                                                   
expenditures from  previous years  that have now  expired due                                                                   
to uncollectable  receivables because  of the legal  sanctity                                                                   
of the appropriations.  The appropriation level  at which the                                                                   
legislature creates the language  locks the accounting system                                                                   
and  the users  of the  funds  at the  legal level.  Co-Chair                                                                   
Stedman compared  the ratification situation with  the Alaska                                                                   
Marine   Highway   System's   compliance   with   legislative                                                                   
appropriations.                                                                                                                 
Co-Chair   Hoffman  understood   the   situation  with   fire                                                                   
suppression and  correction officers.  He agreed that  a plan                                                                   
was  necessary to  correct expenditures  that  have not  been                                                                   
appropriated by the legislature.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Ms.   Rehfeld  informed   that   an  authorization   of   the                                                                   
expenditures was  approved, but were unavailable  in the end.                                                                   
She  explained  that  areas identified  as  problems  in  the                                                                   
ratification  process   must  be  corrected  in   the  budget                                                                   
document.   Several   corrections   are   proposed   in   the                                                                   
supplemental bill and in the FY11 budget.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Garnero  noted that  $481 thousand  of ratifications  are                                                                   
related  to several  departments.  The process  is a  onetime                                                                   
clean up  of the  accounting system  receivables. The  future                                                                   
intention is to reconcile annually.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Rehfeld addressed Section  14 and the correction allowing                                                                   
DOL to address the receipt of  restitution in juvenile cases.                                                                   
The state debt  and other obligations require  adjustments to                                                                   
address    international    airport    revenue    fund    and                                                                   
recommendations  from  their  bond council  to  minimize  the                                                                   
revenue  needed  from  customers   within  the  international                                                                   
airport.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Rehfeld stated that Section  16 extends the lapse for the                                                                   
instate gas pipeline appropriation.  The budget was scheduled                                                                   
to  lapse  on February  28,  2010.  The  department  requests                                                                   
authority to extend  the lapse date to the end  of the fiscal                                                                   
year, June 30, 2010.                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
10:38:58 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Stedman   wished  to   discuss  the  gas   pipeline                                                                   
appropriation  further   in  the  future.   Co-Chair  Hoffman                                                                   
recalled  that the  legislature  "short funded"  so that  the                                                                   
department  could justify their  accomplishments. He  pointed                                                                   
out  that the  short  fund equaled  $3  million. Ms.  Rehfeld                                                                   
responded  that  the  instate pipeline  coordinator  has  not                                                                   
requested  additional  funds in  the current  year.  Existing                                                                   
contracts are in  place, and work is ongoing.  Only a request                                                                   
for an extension exists.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Ms.  Rehfeld   announced  that   Section  17  addresses   the                                                                   
Constitutional  Budget Reserve  (CBR) and  the management  of                                                                   
the  funds.  The  department  is  proposing  to  replace  the                                                                   
management with  general funds at $1.673 million.  Section 17                                                                   
also  authorizes a  draw from  the  Statutory Budget  Reserve                                                                   
(SBR) if  revenues are not  sufficient to cover  expenditures                                                                   
in FY10.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
10:41:13 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair   Stedman  requested   clarification  on   the  $1.6                                                                   
million. He  asked if  it included the  cost of handling  the                                                                   
$400 million over the next 90  days or is it a portion of the                                                                   
management  funds  by DOR.  Ms.  Rehfeld explained  that  the                                                                   
mentioned funds are  the management fees for  the entirety of                                                                   
the CBR.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Hoffman asked for justification.  He asked if it was                                                                   
because  the administration  does  not believe  that a  three                                                                   
quarter  vote in the  legislature was  possible. Ms.  Rehfeld                                                                   
explained  that if  the goal  is to  retain the  CBR then  it                                                                   
should  not  be drawn  from  to  manage the  funds.  Co-Chair                                                                   
Stedman  declared  that  a discussion  about  plans  for  the                                                                   
sizable state savings should be held this session.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Ms.  Rehfeld referred  to Section  18 and  the regular  lapse                                                                   
provisions for capital projects.  Appropriations requested in                                                                   
Section 12 and the deposit to  the public education fund does                                                                   
not lapse.  Section 19 is  a repeal  of Section 43c  known as                                                                   
the  17(b) provision.  The  administration  does not  believe                                                                   
that the provision is necessary  given the objective to repay                                                                   
the  CBR.  Section 20  requires  an  effective date  for  the                                                                   
passage  of the bill.  Section  21 states that  the act  will                                                                   
take effect April 18, 2010.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
10:44:59 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Senator  Ellis  asked  about Section  6  and  the  bargaining                                                                   
agreement with DOC. He asked about  an adjustment to the FY11                                                                   
budget regarding the agreement.  Ms. Rehfeld answered that if                                                                   
the government  approves this, these funds will  be allocated                                                                   
to the personal services components  within the DOC budget in                                                                   
order  to  pay   the  increased  wages  as   incorporated  in                                                                   
arbitrator's decision.  She stated  that the $3  million will                                                                   
be spread  where their  personal services  cost exist  within                                                                   
their budget.                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
10:46:14 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Rehfeld noted that if the  legislature chooses to approve                                                                   
the funding,  then the FY11  budget must be amended.  Senator                                                                   
Ellis  asked  if  the agreement  would  exist  in  a  section                                                                   
related to the department. Ms.  Rehfeld revealed that a large                                                                   
bargaining  unit   agreement  that  covers   all  departments                                                                   
requires a  single section that  allocates across all  of the                                                                   
agencies  and the funding  sources and  is spread  throughout                                                                   
all of the budgets if approved by the legislature.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
10:47:15 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Hoffman elaborated that  the committee would address                                                                   
the  legislation  further in  the  future. He  requested  the                                                                   
questions about SB 253 be answered tomorrow.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Senator  Olson asked  a  question about  Section  11 and  the                                                                   
Department  of Natural  Resources  (DNR).  He voiced  concern                                                                   
about an appropriation  for aircraft replacement.  He assumed                                                                   
that the  aircraft referred to  was the CL214 used  for water                                                                   
bombing. He  asked why the  parts and accessories  were sold.                                                                   
Ms.  Rehfeld could  not answer  the  question. Senator  Olson                                                                   
suggested a future meeting regarding the issue.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
ADJOURNMENT                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
The meeting was adjourned at 10:49 AM.                                                                                          

Document Name Date/Time Subjects