Legislature(2025 - 2026)GRUENBERG 120
02/21/2026 03:15 PM House STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HJR22 | |
| HJR23 | |
| HB290|| HCR10 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HJR 22 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HJR 23 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 290 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HCR 10 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE STATE AFFAIRS STANDING COMMITTEE
February 21, 2026
3:17 p.m.
DRAFT
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Ashley Carrick, Chair
Representative Andi Story, Vice Chair
Representative Rebecca Himschoot
Representative Ky Holland (via teleconference)
Representative Sarah Vance
Representative Kevin McCabe
Representative Steve St. Clair
MEMBERS ABSENT
All members present
OTHER LEGISLATORS
Representative Mia Costello
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 22
Requesting the United States Congress to propose an amendment to
the Constitution of the United States to set a limit on the
number of terms that a person may be elected as a member of the
United States House of Representatives and as a member of the
United States Senate; and requesting the United States Congress
to call for a constitutional convention of the states to propose
a single amendment to the Constitution of the United States to
set a limit on the number of terms that a person may be elected
as a member of the United States House of Representatives and as
a member of the United States Senate.
- HEARD & HELD
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 23
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the State of
Alaska requiring the governor to submit a balanced budget to the
legislature.
- HEARD & HELD
HOUSE BILL NO. 290
"An Act relating to delivery of resolutions by the governor."
- HEARD & HELD
HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 10
Proposing an amendment to the Uniform Rules of the Alaska State
Legislature relating to resolutions.
- HEARD & HELD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HJR 22
SHORT TITLE: FEDERAL CONST. CONVENTION: TERM LIMITS
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) TOMASZEWSKI
04/22/25 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
04/22/25 (H) STA, JUD
02/21/26 (H) STA AT 3:15 PM GRUENBERG 120
BILL: HJR 23
SHORT TITLE: CONST. AM: GOVERNOR'S PROPOSED BUDGET
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) UNDERWOOD
04/28/25 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
04/28/25 (H) STA, JUD, FIN
02/21/26 (H) STA AT 3:15 PM GRUENBERG 120
BILL: HB 290
SHORT TITLE: DELIVERY OF RESOLUTIONS
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) HOLLAND
02/04/26 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/04/26 (H) STA
02/21/26 (H) STA AT 3:15 PM GRUENBERG 120
BILL: HCR 10
SHORT TITLE: UNIFORM RULES: RESOLUTION DISTRIBUTION
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) HOLLAND
02/04/26 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/04/26 (H) STA
02/21/26 (H) STA AT 3:15 PM GRUENBERG 120
WITNESS REGISTER
REPRESENTATIVE FRANK TOMASZEWSKI
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: As prime sponsor of HJR 22, provided an
introduction.
CONNOR MERRINER, Staff
Representative Frank Tomaszewski
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Presented and answered questions on behalf
of Representative Tomaszewski, prime sponsor of HJR 22.
CONSTANTIN QUERARD, Regional Director
U.S. Term Limits
Washington, D.C.
POSITION STATEMENT: Gave invited testimony in support of HJR
22.
ED MARTIN representing self
Kenai, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support on HJR 22; testified
on HJR 23; testified in support of HB 290; and testified in
support of HCR 10.
REPRESENTATIVE JUBILEE UNDERWOOD
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: As prime sponsor, introduced HJR 23.
BUDDY WHITT, Staff
Representative Jubilee Underwood
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Presented on HJR 23, on behalf of
Representative Underwood, prime sponsor.
LARISA FONOV, representing self
Wasilla, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HJR 23.
RYAN SHELDON, representing self
Talkeetna, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HJR 23.
AYDEN NICHOL, Staff
Representative Ky Holland
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Presented on HB 290 and HJR 10 on behalf of
Representative Holland, prime sponsor.
ACTION NARRATIVE
3:17:23 PM
CHAIR ASHLEY CARRICK called the House State Affairs Standing
Committee meeting to order at 3:17 p.m. Representatives St.
Clair, Himschoot, Holland (via teleconference), Vance, McCabe,
and Carrick were present at the call to order. Representative
Story arrived as the meeting was in progress.
HJR 22-FEDERAL CONST. CONVENTION: TERM LIMITS
3:18:42 PM
CHAIR CARRICK announced that the first order of business would
be HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 22, Requesting the United States
Congress to propose an amendment to the Constitution of the
United States to set a limit on the number of terms that a
person may be elected as a member of the United States House of
Representatives and as a member of the United States Senate; and
requesting the United States Congress to call for a
constitutional convention of the states to propose a single
amendment to the Constitution of the United States to set a
limit on the number of terms that a person may be elected as a
member of the United States House of Representatives and as a
member of the United States Senate.
3:19:13 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FRANK TOMASZEWSKI, Alaska State Legislature, as
prime sponsor introduced HJR 22. He stated that a conducted in
January 2025 showed that 84 percent of Alaskans favor term
limits. Twelve states have similar legislation, and 14 others
have legislation in committees. He said it takes 34 states to
bypass Congress to call a constitutional convention.
3:22:00 PM
CONNOR MERRINER, Staff, Representative Frank Tomaszewski, Alaska
State Legislature, presented and answered questions on behalf of
Representative Tomaszewski, prime sponsor of HJR 22.
MR. MERRINER began a PowerPoint presentation titled "HJR 22:
U.S. Term Limits," [hard copy in the committee file]. On slide
2, he outlined reasons why there is a need for U.S. term limits:
to restore a citizen legislature, bring state-specific and
private sector experience to D.C. On slide 4, he shared reasons
for restoring a citizen legislature. As states were intended to
be laboratories of innovation, bringing state experience to D.C.
is important. He shared reasons on slide 6 to bring private
sector expertise to D.C. He reiterated the bill sponsor's
statement that 84 percent of Alaskans support implementing U.S.
term limits. Currently, 12 states have passed calls for term
limit amendments, while 14 states have similar legislation.
3:26:00 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ST. CLAIR asked how long resolutions last.
3:26:10 PM
CONSTANTIN QUERARD, Regional Director, U.S. Term Limits, replied
that resolutions last into perpetuity. States can rescind
resolutions.
REPRESENTATIVE STORY asked whether, when a constitutional
convention is called, the issue is just limited to term limits.
MR. MERRINER replied that it doesn't open the entire
constitution, it is just a single item resolution.
CHAIR CARRICK asked, since this is a resolution, what would
prevent it from becoming a more open discussion.
MR. MERRINER replied a delegation is called for a proposed
amendment to the constitution. The states must ratify that
amendment.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked in other democracies whether
there are term limits.
MR. QUERARD replied yes, he can provide a list.
3:29:47 PM
CHAIR CARRICK opened public testimony on HJR 22.
MR. QUERARD began his invited testimony in favor of HJR 22. He
said he is here on behalf of Alaskans who are in support of this
cause. The presentation already outlined several good reasons
for this change and there are many more. Everyone seems to
support it for a lot of different reasons. Congress is
dysfunctional because [the length of time members of Congress
are in office]. Incumbents lean into seniority as a selling
point. It takes a while to get influence in Congress, usually
ten to twenty years.
3:33:10 PM
ED MARTIN, representing self, testified in support of HJR 22.
This is a very good subject for state affairs. He said he has
voted in many elections since 1973. U.S. Representative Don
Young stayed in Congress his whole career. He said too many
people have made this a career. Their oath is subject to their
egos instead of the people. He asked the committee to please
pass this resolution to Congress.
3:35:05 PM
CHAIR CARRICK after ascertaining no further testimony, she
closed public testimony on HJR 22.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT stated that she hasn't come to terms
with term limits. She comes from a rural area with fewer
people. The seniority system gives more say on what happens in
the legislature. She said there should be an exception for
rural folks.
MR. QUERARD replied that with a small delegation like Alaska, it
is difficult. He said states with term limits use more subject
area expertise. He stated this would be good for a state like
Alaska to send congressmen with expertise in an area that
interests the state. With term limits, there will be times when
the congressman has seniority.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT replied that she doesn't disagree. The
state system is partisan. She said at the state level, there is
power and influence in staff. At the federal level, there is
professional level staff with this knowledge.
3:40:47 PM
MR. QUERARD stated that staff influence is not a bad thing. He
is more concerned about a chairperson not having subject area
expertise and being managed by the staff.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT commented on investment potential. She
asked, "How many years has Chuck Grassley been in office?"
MR. QUERARD replied that he is the longest serving congressman.
3:42:25 PM
CHAIR CARRICK said she appreciated the presentation. She
acknowledged that term limits are supported by Alaskans. She
shares some of the concerns that Representative Himschoot
expressed. Legislators are public figures and the staff is less
accountable to the public.
MR. QUERARD said he disagrees that legislators are accountable
to their districts. He said congressmen are not as accountable
to voters. The system is broken and the re-election rates are
high. He gave examples of a couple of Senators. Staff
expertise will not eliminate institutional knowledge, but staff
get hired or fired. Voters don't have many options. He said
quality staff survive and staff and members work well together.
This job wasn't ever meant to be a career.
CHAIR CARRICK said she appreciates the dialog. She still has
some concerns with challenges on election reform and the money
in politics. The United States needs to address that Congress
is like a retirement home. She liked the potential for more
subject-matter experts who work well across the aisle.
3:49:50 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT said that some of the ballot issues are
due to open primaries and rank choice voting.
MR. QUERARD replied that rank choice is a newer idea. The
incumbent is still the one to win the election. He asked, "What
changes can be made that will stand up to the courts?" Term
limits are popular in all states.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE stated he is excited to hear that the
committee is interested in campaign finance reform as he is
sponsoring a bill on this issue. He is a member of U.S. Term
Limits. He agrees that the United States needs to stop the
retirement home in Congress. As an elected official, he
oversees the staff as a leader.
3:54:07 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE stated that she fully supports [term
limits] and has co-sponsored previous related bills. The first
President realized that it was not healthy to stay in office.
The Founding Fathers were visionaries. Term limits encourage
more people to participate in self-governance. She opined that
12-year term limits provide a good balance and a respectable
amount of time. She is in support of this resolution.
3:57:20 PM
CHAIR CARRICK announced that HJR 22 was held over.
3:57:52 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 3:57 p.m. to 3:59 p.m.
HJR 23-CONST. AM: GOVERNOR'S PROPOSED BUDGET
3:59:42 PM
CHAIR CARRICK announced that the next order of business would be
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 23, Proposing an amendment to the
Constitution of the State of Alaska requiring the governor to
submit a balanced budget to the legislature.
REPRESENTATIVE JUBILEE UNDERWOOD, Alaska State Legislature, as
prime sponsor introduced HJR 23. This resolution proposes a
constitutional amendment focused on the structure of Alaska's
budget process. It addresses how the process begins with the
governor's budget and accompanying revenue bills. This
resolution asks whether Alaska would benefit from statutory
changes and whether the fiscal framework should be changed to
improve the structure for the future.
4:02:00 PM
BUDDY WHITT, Staff, Representative Jubilee Underwood, Alaska
State Legislature, presented on HJR 23, on behalf of
Representative Underwood, prime sponsor. He said this
resolution is simple, and the presentation shares the
constitutional framework and requirements. He began a
PowerPoint [hard copy included in the committee packet]. He
shared the constitutional requirements under Art. IX, Sec 12
shown on slide 2. Statutory timing requirements are outlined on
slide 3. On slide 4, required bill separation and balanced
budget requirement are shared as outlined in statute. Long-
range planning is addressed, including the six-year capital
improvements program and the 10-year fiscal plan projections on
slide 5. On slide 6, the format and supporting information
required in AS 37.07.050 is presented. He shared amendments &
supplemental budgets information on slide 7. The governor must
submit a balanced budget that doesn't include the constitutional
budget reserve (CBR) which is outlined on slide 8. In closing,
he stated that the bill sponsor believes the budget should begin
with a plan on slide 9. On slide 10, he stated that HJR 23 does
not dictate policy.
4:07:42 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ST. CLAIR said that expenditures don't exceed
revenue. He asked what sources are being used as revenue.
MR. WHITT replied that the legislation doesn't try to answer
that question. The resolution requires a budget that must
balance and not use the CBR.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE said she appreciates the additional charts
that show the budget, revenue, and deficits for the last nine
years. She wondered why the supplemental budget is not listed
and whether HJR 23 would impact the supplemental budget.
MR. WHITT replied that the bill sponsor's intent is that it
would lower supplemental budgets. He said budgets would be more
accurate on expenditures and revenues. This resolution is not
focused on the supplemental budget but focused on the initial
governor's budget.
4:12:59 PM
REPRESENTATIVE UNDERWOOD replied that simply not starting in a
deficit and having a good starting point is the whole intent.
She said it is fiscally responsible to not start in a deficit.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE asked whether this would be on November's
ballot for the voters.
REPRESENTATIVE UNDERWOOD replied yes, if everything goes as
planned.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE stated there have been 28 ballot measures;
12 have been rejected and the last one passed 22 years ago.
4:14:38 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STORY asked whether the long-range plan is
supposed to be balanced and whether other states require a
balanced budget with the accompanying revenue bills.
MR. WHITT replied he doesn't know about other states but will
get back to the committee. Long-range plans are a statutory
requirement. This legislation doesn't touch on the long-range
plan and any of the requirements.
4:16:39 PM
CHAIR CARRICK asks if currently the governor can submit a
deficit budget if he provides revenue measures to fill the
deficit.
MR. WHITT replied yes. The governor must offer revenue bills if
needed.
CHAIR CARRICK stated those revenue bills are supposed to cover
the deficit. She asked whether there has ever been a governor
who has done this.
MR. WHITT replied he doesn't have the information but will get
it.
4:18:36 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT said that she served on the local
assembly. The assembly budget would be balanced but the
opportunity cuts would be included. She asked whether other
levels of government were required to do this as well. She said
it is common practice to know the gap.
REPRESENTATIVE UNDERWOOD responded that in her experience from
the school board budget, it was presented with a few different
options. The budget was built backwards and at the end of the
day it was a balanced budget.
4:21:00 PM
CHAIR CARRICK opened public testimony on HJR 23.
LARISA FONOV, representing self, testified in support of HJR 23.
She stated that starting with a balanced budget that doesn't use
the savings will ensure a more stable future. She asked the
committee to pass HCR 23 out of the committee.
ED MARTIN, representing self, testified that he does not support
HJR 23. He said he e-mailed his testimony to the committee.
RYAN SHELDON, representing self, testified in support of HJR 23.
As a businessperson, he said, it makes sense to work within the
budget. He said HJR 23 has great bipartisan support.
4:26:59 PM
CHAIR CARRICK after ascertaining there was no further testimony,
she closed public testimony on HJR 23.
4:27:15 PM
CHAIR CARRICK announced HJR 23 was held over.
HB 290-DELIVERY OF RESOLUTIONS
HCR 10-UNIFORM RULES: RESOLUTION DISTRIBUTION
4:27:30 PM
CHAIR CARRICK announced that the next order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 290, "An Act relating to delivery of resolutions
by the governor" and HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 10,
Proposing an amendment to the Uniform Rules of the Alaska State
Legislature relating to resolutions.
REPRESENTATIVE HOLLAND, as prime sponsor of HB 290 and HCR 10,
said that the two actions together are about timely joint
resolutions. Currently, there are specific timeframes when
joint resolutions are fully transmitted and set in legislation.
Last year, resolutions about the fire season were transmitted in
the fall.
AYDEN NICHOL, staff, Representative Ky Holland, Alaska State
Legislature presented on HB 290 and HCR 10 on behalf of
Representative Holland, prime sponsor. He said this is a pair
of companion measures about the timely transmittals of joint
resolutions. All resolutions from last session were sent out on
an extreme delay such as the one that missed the fire season.
4:31:48 PM
MR. NICHOLS presented a PowerPoint, titled "HB 290 & HCR 10
Transmittal of Joint Resolutions," [hard copy included in the
committee file]. The current distribution process is reviewed
on slide 2. He stated there is no timeline set for these
resolutions. On slide 3, he outlined issues with the current
process. Delays are an issue as fall was the earliest date that
resolutions were distributed. A sectional analysis of HB 290
including 15 days for transmittal while in session and 20 days
outside of session was outlined on slide 4. On slide 5, showing
a sectional analysis of HCR 10, the resolution changes the
distribution to the Office of the Chief Clerk or Senate
Secretary's Office, with a timeline of within fifteen days of
the resolution being returned by the governor. Additionally,
the notification of the sponsor is required when a resolution is
distributed.
4:35:46 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE asked whether resolutions were hung up in
the Office of the Governor or the legislature.
MR. NICOLS replied there were delays in both the Office of the
Governor and the Office of the Lieutenant Governor.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE asked again about whether it was held up
in the legislature. He asked if the sponsor would be open to an
amendment that bills need to be transmitted out of the
legislature in a timely manner.
MR. NICOL replied that it would be a reasonable amendment.
REPRESENTATIVE HOLLAND replied that he would be happy to
investigate it. There was a great deal of difference in the
timeline. All the resolutions were released on July 16. The
amount of time spent in the executive office varied until the
resolutions were all released. He would investigate a timeline
to put into the initial transmittal.
4:38:49 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE commented about the separation of powers.
She remarked that resolutions are different from bills. She
asked whether legislative resolutions need to touch the
executive branch.
MR. NICOL replied that the office has sought an answer to that
question but has not received an answer.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked, "How do other states deal with
this?" It touches on the separation of powers. She explained
that she wants to protect the power of the legislature. She
expressed concerns about cutting out the Office of the
Lieutenant Governor.
MR. NICOL replied that the role of the lieutenant governor
wasn't clarified. He said the lieutenant governor is tasked
with many recordkeeping duties. The lieutenant governor thought
this change may ease the tension with the legislature. He noted
that the separation of powers is an important part.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked whether HCR 10 and any amendment to
the Uniform Rules must be taken up by a joint session and passed
by two-thirds of the legislature.
MR. NICOL confirmed it was by two-thirds of the legislature.
4:42:49 PM
CHAIR CARRICK said that she requested a bill be transmitted and
it wasn't transmitted for five months. She asked whether this
only relates to resolutions.
MR. NICOL replied that Chair Carrick raised an excellent point.
The scope of the measures is limited to resolutions. He said he
would discuss it with the bill sponsor.
4:44:11 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STORY said she was pleased to have this
information as she was unaware of this large gap. Her question
has to do with bills and resolutions. A bill must be looked at
legally and have conforming changes. She cautioned about the
timeline needed to have a legal review. She asked whether the
sponsor did not receive an explanation of why it takes so long
to get out.
MR. NICOL replied that the sponsor did not receive an
explanation from the Office of the Governor. The lieutenant
governor walked through the process with the sponsor's office.
The workload is heavy as many of these resolutions have large
numbers of recipients.
REPRESENTATIVE STORY asked whether this is the correct timeline.
MR. NICOL replied that this timeline was picked in part with the
constitutional timelines of bills. There was no input from the
Office of the Governor. Legislative Legal Services, the Office
of the Chief Clerk, and Senate Secretary's Office agreed that
the timeline was reasonable.
4:47:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked for a review of the differences
between a resolution, joint resolution and concurrent
resolution.
MR. NICOL replied that a joint resolution is most formal type of
resolution and can have the governor's signature. All other
resolutions go through the Legislative Affairs Agency which
falls to the Office of the Chief Clerk and the Senate
Secretary's Office.
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT asked, "How does one decide which one
to use?"
MR. NICOL said an issue of national politics or constitution
that must be done through a joint resolution. Concurrent
resolutions are used to express concerns to the executive
office. House or Senate special resolution express the will of
one body.
4:50:51 PM
CHAIR CARRICK opened public testimony on HB 290.
ED MARTIN, representing self, stated support for HB 290 and
commended Representative Holland for bringing forward the bill.
He thanked him for trying to fix the bureaucracy of the
legislature. Last year, he sent a letter to the House Judiciary
Standing Committee in mid-March with a sample resolution about
an investigation of Alaska's judiciary. He asked the committee
to refer to the letter.
4:53:33 PM
CHAIR CARRICK after ascertaining there was no further testimony,
she closed public testimony on HB 290.
4:53:41 PM
CHAIR CARRICK opened public testimony on HCR 10.
MR. MARTIN testified in support of HCR 10. He asked for
increased efficiency in the legislature.
4:54:35 PM
CHAIR CARRICK after ascertaining there was no further testimony,
she closed public testimony on HCR 10.
REPRESENTATIVE HOLLAND thanked fellow committee members for
their time considering HB 290 and HCR 10. He said he is looking
forward to the follow-up.
4:55:19 PM
CHAIR CARRICK announced both HCR 10 and HB 290 were held over.
4:56:25 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
State Affairs Standing Committee meeting was adjourned at 4:56
p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HJR 22 Ver. A.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 22 |
| HJR 22 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 22 |
| HJR 23 Version A.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 23 |
| HJR 23 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 23 |
| HJR 23 Sectional Analysis Version A.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 23 |
| HJR 23 Fiscal Note OOG-DOE-02-13-26.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 23 |
| HJR 23 Backup LRS Report Imbalance of Governors Initial Budget Requests FY 17-26.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 23 |
| HJR23 Support Documents - Presentation.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 23 |
| HB 290 Ver. A.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HB 290 |
| HB 290 Sponsor Statement Ver. A.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HB 290 |
| HB 290 Sectional Analysis Ver. A.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HB 290 |
| HB 290 HCR 10 Slides STA.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HB 290 HCR 10 |
| HCR 10 Ver. I.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HCR 10 |
| HCR 10 Sponsor Statement Ver. I.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HCR 10 |
| HCR 10 Secitonal Analysis Ver. I.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HCR 10 |
| HCR 10 Backup Uniform Rule 49.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HCR 10 |
| HB 290 Fiscal Note LEG-SESS-02-20-2026.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HB 290 |
| HCR 10 Fiscal Note LEG-SESS-2-20-26.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HCR 10 |
| HJR 22 Presentation 2-21-26.pdf |
HSTA 2/21/2026 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 22 |