Legislature(2019 - 2020)GRUENBERG 120
04/30/2019 01:00 PM House MILITARY & VETERANS' AFFAIRS
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HR6 | |
| HB129 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HR 6 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 129 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON MILITARY AND VETERANS' AFFAIRS
April 30, 2019
1:05 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Gabrielle LeDoux, Chair
Representative Chris Tuck, Vice Chair
Representative Chuck Kopp
Representative Geran Tarr
Representative Steve Thompson
Representative Sharon Jackson
Representative George Rauscher
MEMBERS ABSENT
All members present
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
HOUSE RESOLUTION NO. 6
Expressing support and appreciation for the National Native
American Veterans Memorial.
- MOVED HR 6 OUT OF COMMITTEE
HOUSE BILL NO. 129
"An Act relating to fees charged to physically disabled state
residents for hunting and fishing licenses and certain state
park permits."
- HEARD & HELD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HR 6
SHORT TITLE: NAT'L. NATIVE AMERICAN VETERANS MEMORIAL
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) LINCOLN
03/18/19 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
03/18/19 (H) TRB, MLV
04/09/19 (H) TRB AT 8:00 AM CAPITOL 106
04/09/19 (H) Heard & Held
04/09/19 (H) MINUTE(TRB)
04/16/19 (H) TRB AT 8:00 AM CAPITOL 106
04/16/19 (H) Moved HR 6 Out of Committee
04/16/19 (H) MINUTE(TRB)
04/17/19 (H) TRB RPT 7DP
04/17/19 (H) DP: VANCE, ORTIZ, EDGMON, TALERICO,
KOPP, LINCOLN, ZULKOSKY
04/25/19 (H) MLV AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
04/25/19 (H) Heard & Held
04/25/19 (H) MINUTE(MLV)
04/30/19 (H) MLV AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
BILL: HB 129
SHORT TITLE: DISABLED ALASKANS F&G LIC/DNR PERMITS
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) LEDOUX
04/11/19 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
04/11/19 (H) MLV, RES
04/30/19 (H) MLV AT 1:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
WITNESS REGISTER
ALPHEUS BULLARD, Attorney
Legislative Legal Counsel
Legislative Legal Services
Legislative Affairs Agency
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the hearing of HB
129.
EDDIE GRASSER, Director
Division of Wildlife Conservation
Alaska Department of Fish and Game
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the hearing of HB
129.
DAN SADDLER, Legislative Liaison
Office of the Commissioner
Department of Natural Resources
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the hearing of HB
129.
ACTION NARRATIVE
1:05:08 PM
CHAIR GABRIELLE LEDOUX called the House Special Committee on
Military and Veterans' Affairs meeting to order at 1:05 p.m.
Representatives Thompson, Tarr, Tuck, and LeDoux were present at
the call to order. Representatives Kopp, Rauscher, and Jackson
arrived as the meeting was in progress.
HR 6-NAT'L. NATIVE AMERICAN VETERANS MEMORIAL
1:05:58 PM
CHAIR LEDOUX announced the first order of business would be
HOUSE RESOLUTION NO. 6, Expressing support and appreciation for
the National Native American Veterans Memorial.
1:06:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK moved to report HR 6 out of committee with
individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes.
There being no objection, HR 6 was reported out of the House
Special Committee on Military and Veterans' Affairs.
The committee took an at-ease from 1:07 p.m. to 1:09 p.m.
HB 129-DISABLED ALASKANS F&G LIC/DNR PERMITS
1:09:05 PM
CHAIR LEDOUX announced the next order of business would be HOUSE
BILL NO. 129, "An Act relating to fees charged to physically
disabled state residents for hunting and fishing licenses and
certain state park permits."
[CHAIR LEDOUX passed the gavel to Vice Chair Tuck.]
CHAIR LEDOUX, speaking as the sponsor of HB 129, informed the
committee HB 129 would enable persons who have a 50 percent or
greater disability to have free [Alaska] hunting and fishing
licenses and free camping privileges at state parks. She
explained the bill was inspired by a constituent who is a
veteran, and who is disabled, but is not considered eligible for
benefits granted to a "disabled veteran," as defined by statute,
because his disability is not the result of his military
service. Chair LeDoux advised, although the changes to statute
brought by HB 129 seem simple to achieve, a later version of the
bill will be used as a vehicle for correcting problems that were
found in the related existing statutes.
1:13:26 PM
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON remarked, "... I hope somebody can come
up with some answers on what's a 50 percent disability compared
to a 70 percent disability."
1:13:57 PM
CHAIR LEDOUX acknowledged there is not a definition of a 70
percent disability [currently in statute]; she suggested there
should be a definition "of all of the various disabilities."
Current statute requires a disabled person to obtain an
affidavit of his/her 70 percent disability from a physician, or
a certificate of disability from a government agency. The bill
would change the [minimum level of disability] from 70 percent
to 50 percent.
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON questioned whether the sponsor reviewed
the standards of permanent disability that are established by
statutes related to [the Alaska Workers' Compensation Act].
CHAIR LEDOUX indicated she would examine the aforementioned
standards during the course of further work on the bill.
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON observed from his experience, [the
bill's impact by authorizing free licenses] is considered an
indirect expenditure because the state loses funds by not
collecting fees. He remarked:
And I've worked at trying to slow down how much we
lose by not collecting full fees, or giving tax breaks
and things like that, so I'll be interested to see
where this actually ends up. ... All the fiscal
notes - three of them - are indeterminate because they
have no way of knowing what the heck this is going to
cost us.
1:16:41 PM
VICE CHAIR TUCK directed attention to the bill on page 2, [lines
26, 27, and 29] in which existing language read in part:
... as having incurred a 50 percent or greater
disability ... ;
... and incurred a 50 percent or greater disability
while serving ...
VICE CHAIR TUCK pointed out already in statute is language
regarding veterans with a 50 percent [or greater] disability.
He then directed attention to the bill on page 4, [line 1] in
which proposed language changes the percentage of disability
from 70 percent to 50 percent. He surmised HB 129 also expands
[the exemption from certain fees] to not just veterans with
disabilities, but to all persons with disabilities.
CHAIR LEDOUX said that is correct.
REPRESENTATIVE TARR asked how Chair LeDoux's constituent
established the percent of his disability.
1:17:22 PM
CHAIR LEDOUX said, "[He] had some sort of rating, from probably
Workers' Compensation actually, because he was injured on the
job...." She further noted, [the constituent] is a veteran,
although his disability did not occur during military service.
REPRESENTATIVE TARR asked whether the bill's drafter suggested
linking the bill to a related provision in existing statute.
CHAIR LEDOUX deferred to Mr. Bullard.
REPRESENTATIVE TARR agreed with Representative Thompson that
gradation of physical disability is established in the state
Workers' Compensation process. She restated her question and
asked Mr. Bullard if in drafting the legislation, he considered
linking the bill to Workers' Compensation, even though not all
of the circumstances surrounding a disability would be addressed
in Workers' Compensation statutes.
1:19:32 PM
ALPHEUS BULLARD, Attorney, Legislative Legal Counsel,
Legislative Legal Services, advised there are other disability
rating systems outside of Workers' Compensation; for example,
the [U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)] has a disability
rating. He said the language in the bill is an existing
definition and suggested asking the Alaska Department of Fish
and Game (ADFG) how it interprets the statutory requirements in
existing law.
VICE CHAIR TUCK directed attention to the bill on page 3, [lines
24-29] and [beginning on lines 30-31 and continuing to page 4,
lines 1-4] which read:
Sec. 6. AS 16.05.797(c) is amended by adding a new
paragraph to read:
(3) "person with physical disabilities" means a
person who presents to the department either written
proof that the person receives at least 70 percent
disability compensation from a government agency for a
physical disability or an affidavit signed by a
physician licensed to practice medicine in the state
stating that the person is at least 70 percent
physically disabled. [;]
Sec. 7. AS 16.05.940(26) is amended to read:
(26) "person with physical disabilities" means a
person who presents to the department either written
proof that the person receives at least 50 [70]
percent disability compensation from a government
agency for a physical disability or an affidavit
signed by a physician licensed to practice medicine in
the state stating that the person is at least 50 [70]
percent physically disabled;
VICE CHAIR TUCK said, "It sounds like that there are times when
one statute would apply underneath a certain section and [then]
a different applies ...." He asked for clarification on the
provisions of AS 16.05.797(c).
1:21:25 PM
CHAIR LEDOUX said the bill "kept in place" AS 16.05.797(c) as it
relates to proxy hunting.
MR. BULLARD advised [on page 3, line 24] section 6 of the bill
amends [AS 16.05.797(c)] only as it relates to computer-assisted
remote hunting prohibited; thus, the bill keeps the existing
rating of 70 percent [disability] for persons to engage in
computer-assisted remote hunting. He added the definition of
physical disabilities for other purposes was changed [in the
bill] to 50 percent. In response to Vice Chair Tuck, Mr.
Bullard explained computer-assisted remote hunting means the use
of a computer or any other equipment to remotely control the
aiming and discharge of a firearm, bow and arrow, or any other
weapon used to hunt a gamebird, game animal, or fur-bearing
animal, while not in the physical presence of the animal.
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON questioned why statutes specific to
military and veteran [disabled persons] are amended, rather than
creating a new subsection specific to nonmilitary and nonveteran
[disabled persons].
MR. BULLARD asked if Representative Thompson was referring to
section 3 of the bill.
VICE CHAIR TUCK pointed out [AS 16.05.341. Free license for
disabled veterans and active members of the Alaska National
Guard and military reserves] refers to hunting and fishing, and
[AS 26. Military Affairs, Veterans, Disasters, and Aerospace]
relates to military and veterans' affairs.
1:24:08 PM
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON restated his question. In response to
Chair LeDoux, he clarified the bill includes language referring
to [existing statutes that relate to] military and veterans but
has nothing to do with military and veterans.
CHAIR LEDOUX said [AS Title 16] are the statutes regulating fish
and game; for example, [AS 16.05.341 directing free license for
disabled veterans and active members of the Alaska National
Guard and military reserves], and other provisions, pertain to
one's age or disability. She questioned how the placement of
the bill [in Alaska Statutes] would change the outcome of the
bill.
VICE CHAIR TUCK suggested the placement may to due to
enforcement provisions.
REPRESENTATIVE JACKSON opined there are already benefits to
veterans with a 70 percent disability.
CHAIR LEDOUX pointed out veterans with a 50 percent disability
receive benefits; certain others require a 70 percent
disability, which the bill seeks to reduce to 50 percent.
VICE CHAIR TUCK returned attention to page 2, [lines 19-22]
which read:
Sec. 16.05.341. Free license for certain disabled
residents and disabled veterans and for active members
of the Alaska National Guard and military reserves. A
person may receive a resident hunting and sport
fishing license under AS 16.05.340(a)(5) without
charge if the person
VICE CHAIR TUCK said the [proposed] section includes disabled
and disabled veterans, but the existing section includes only
disabled veterans; the bill adds a [paragraph] to include
persons "with a 50 percent disability who are not veterans."
1:27:43 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP agreed and in response to Representative
Thompson, observed [AS 16.05.300] - ADFG's code, definitions,
and violations - frequently refers to exemptions for the
Department of Military & Veterans' Affairs (DMVA), but are
[provisions of AS Title 16, the ADFG statutes]. He concluded
the bill would add disabled persons, who are at least 50 percent
disabled, to the section that had previously just referred to
veterans.
CHAIR LEDOUX stated her legislative intent is to include people
who are 50 percent disabled, whether through HB 129 as drafted,
or through a committee substitute.
[There followed discussion of various ways the legislation could
be drafted to clarify legislative intent.]
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON said he would like to know what
standards would be used to determine the percentage of
disability. From his experience serving on [the Workers'
Compensation Board], he said doctors and medical specialists do
not agree on the terms that define a disability. He cautioned
not having standards would cause a problem.
CHAIR LEDOUX acknowledged as long as individuals practice
medicine or law, they will come to different conclusions, which
is not a problem inherent to HB 129.
1:32:59 PM
VICE CHAIR TUCK directed attention to page 2, lines 28-30, which
read:
(3) [(2)] served in the Alaska Territorial Guard, is
eligible for a loan under AS 18.56.101, and incurred a
50 percent or greater disability while serving in the
Alaska Territorial Guard; or
VICE CHAIR TUCK suggested language that said, "any Alaska
resident with a physical disability of 50 percent or greater,"
would negate page 2, lines 24-27, and [lines 28-30, text
previously provided] which read:
(2) has been discharged from military service under
honorable conditions, is eligible for a loan under AS
18.56.101, and is certified by the United States
Department of Veterans Affairs as having incurred a 50
percent or greater disability during military service;
MR. BULLARD advised if the intent [of HB 129] is that all
persons currently experiencing a 50 percent disability may
receive a free sportfishing or hunting license, and the forms of
proof currently in statute are acceptable, there would be no
need for all of its provisions.
CHAIR LEDOUX recalled the reason to keep specificity in the bill
related to military and National Guard service is because
certification for a veterans' disability [due to military
service] is issued by VA. This is the reason to leave "a
discreet section with respect to the veterans, as opposed to
lumping everybody together."
MR. BULLARD said:
There may be good reasons to leave these provisions in
place. I took Representative Tuck's question as a
hypothetical question, as to whether, if you want to
just ensure that all people - no matter how they
arrived at that point, who currently have a 50 percent
disability, you might want to widen the range of, of
proof, or proof satisfactory to the department that
would be ... accepted. ... Before [the changes]
being brought in by your bill, it was necessary to
have these standards of proof for what 50 percent
constituted.
1:36:01 PM
VICE CHAIR TUCK restated the intent of the bill is to remove
barriers to a disabled person, who is a military veteran, and
who was not disabled during military service.
CHAIR LEDOUX said the circumstances of the aforementioned
constituent brought the issue to her attention.
VICE CHAIR TUCK asked whether the sponsor's intent is to extend
the benefit to anyone with a 50 percent disability, or just to
those who served in the military.
CHAIR LEDOUX said no; the intent is to include any state
resident who has a 50 percent disability.
VICE CHAIR TUCK noted the bill also extends the benefit to any
active member [of the military services listed on page 3, lines
1-6]. He opined paragraphs (2) and (3) are not necessary.
CHAIR LEDOUX acknowledged she had considered the point raised by
Vice Chair Tuck but was concerned about language in the bill
that might be perceived as disrespectful to members of the
military and to veterans.
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER returned to the topic of computer-
assisted hunting and asked if provisions in HB 129 allow for the
use of devices such as a bionic arm or eye.
CHAIR LEDOUX assured the committee the bill does nothing to
change [AS 16.05.797(c)(3)], the statute that addresses proxy
hunting or computer-assisted remote hunting.
1:41:00 PM
EDDIE GRASSER, Director, Division of Wildlife Conservation,
ADFG, explained ADFG outlawed the use of a computer, while
sitting at home, to see terrain on a computer screen [for the
purpose of hunting]. For example, a person sitting at home in
Georgia, who wants to hunt a wild boar in Texas, can use a
computer to shoot a boar. In response to Representative
Rauscher, he directed attention to AS 16.05.797(b) which allows
a person with physical disabilities to use equipment or devices
designed to assist with a disability while present in the field.
He stressed one cannot be sitting at home, but must be present
in the field, when using equipment or devices.
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON directed attention to [Fiscal Note
Identifier: HB129-DNR-PKS-04-27-19] and noted free camping
permits cost the state approximately $265,300 - plus $500 to
produce free decals - per year.
1:43:29 PM
DAN SADDLER, Legislative Liaison, Office of the Commissioner,
Department of Natural Resources (DNR), said correct.
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON asked whether HB 129 will increase the
number of free camping permits issued by the Division of Parks
and Outdoor Recreation (POR), DNR, to persons with disabilities.
MR. SADDLER confirmed as long as a free camping permit has been
available to disabled veterans, it has been available to
veterans with a disability at the 50 percent level; the level of
disability is easily established because, at the time of
discharge, VA provides a disability rating to each soldier,
airman, sailor, or marine. He was unsure about an equivalent
[document] that would rate the percentage of disability for a
civilian. Further, HB 129 would reduce DNR revenue by expanding
the number of residents eligible for a free permit.
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON clarified $265,300 is the current annual
cost of granting free permits just to disabled veterans; by
including all [disabled] civilians, HB 129 would increase the
number of free campers.
MR. SADDLER directed attention to the fiscal note analysis and
explained the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) estimate 83,634
Alaskan adults have some disability and 38,332 have a mobility
disability; this difference in the number [of those who may be
eligible to apply for a free camping permit] explains why DNR
issued an indeterminate fiscal note.
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON opined [the passage of HB 129] may more
than double the number of free passes issued.
MR. SADDLER said yes. He noted the legislature has encouraged
DNR to increase its designated general funds (DGF) funding
sources and to reduce its dependence upon unrestricted general
funds (UGF); although POR seeks to achieve this by collecting
parking and other fees, and an additional loss of fees would
further reduce DGF.
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON estimated the reduction in POR fees [by
HB 129] may reach over $1 million.
1:47:20 PM
MR. SADDLER, in response to Chair LeDoux, said currently the
only free passes issued by POR are to veterans with a 50 percent
disability.
CHAIR LEDOUX said, "So there's nothing in the statutes right now
to help people who are 70 percent or over."
MR. SADDLER opined because the bill addresses free camping
passes and discounted, or free, hunting and fishing licenses for
[disabled] veterans and/or [disabled] nonveterans, there is
cause for confusion.
REPRESENTATIVE TARR cautioned the [DNR] fiscal note analysis
indicates free camping permits issued by POR are biennial
passes, and thus may not compare to those issued on an annual
basis. She requested information on [the impact to DNR revenue]
of possible modifications to what other Alaskans normally pay to
camp, such as a longer term or a reduced rate.
MR. SADDLER stressed the division seeks to ensure that every
Alaskan has an enjoyable camping experience, as is provided in
current law; however, DNR has concerns about the cost of
expanding the current [free camping program]. He related the
POR director suggested another way to expand access to disabled
campers would be to provide a certain percentage of camping
spaces that are reserved for all Alaskan disabled campers.
REPRESENTATIVE TARR emphasized the importance of the issue and
recalled her past efforts to provide more cabins and campsites;
however, POR increased camping fees at more popular sites to
raise DGF revenue. She urged the committee to consider the
special circumstances of Alaskans who have disabilities, such as
limited income, and inquired as to the percentage of DNR revenue
that is sourced from [user fees].
MR. SADDLER reported DNR [DGF] revenue is approximately $6
million.
1:52:18 PM
CHAIR LEDOUX remarked:
I may be confusing this now with the hunting and
fishing licenses, but ... I know for hunting and
fishing licenses that if you're 60 or 65 or older
there's, there's no fee. So, how about for camping
permits?
MR. SADDLER observed it costs an average of $15 to camp in state
campgrounds, which he characterized as a bargain. In fact, if
it chooses, the legislature could provide lower cost camping
permits for anybody, which would further reduce DNR's DGF. In
further response to Chair LeDoux, he said he would confirm that
there are currently no [free camping passes available to
disabled nonveterans].
CHAIR LEDOUX surmised [benefits to disabled nonveterans] may not
apply to camping but may apply to hunting and fishing licenses.
She said:
When we talk about how many people are disabled, when
we're already giving hunting and fishing licenses to
people 65, or [who] may even be 60 and over, and those
people probably comprise a large portion of the
numbers who are disabled, so that you'd have to factor
that into account when you're doing the fiscal notes
on that. But it doesn't, obviously, doesn't apply to
the camping.
VICE CHAIR TUCK returned attention to the [DNR fiscal note
analysis] and noted CDC data does not differentiate by
percentage of disability, but basically states 19.2 percent of
Alaskans have some measure of disability. Furthermore, he noted
Alaskans with a 50 percent disability may choose not to
experience outdoor activities, which would serve to lower the
number of free passes issued by POR.
REPRESENTATIVE TARR recalled there are approximately 70,000
Alaska Mental Health Trust Authority (AMHTA) beneficiaries who
have mental illness, developmental disabilities, chronic alcohol
or drug addition, Alzheimer's disease and related dementia, and
traumatic brain injuries. She opined there are younger Alaskans
with disabilities who are more active and who may seek outdoor
opportunities.
1:56:27 PM
MR. SADDLER acknowledged there are various levels of disability
and ability, however, HB 129 would establish a firm standard of
50 percent disability, and it is unclear how to do so. He
advised a civilian rating of disability could come from the
Social Security Administration, [standards set by] Workers'
Compensation, or the Department of Administration, Division of
Motor Vehicles.
VICE CHAIR TUCK pointed out current statutes direct [a
percentage of disability] may be [proven] by a physician or by a
document issued by a government agency.
MR. SADDLER said the qualification by an affidavit from a doctor
is accepted, although he did not know the standards set by
physicians, how many such affidavits are issued to Alaskans, or
the extent of their misuse.
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON asked whether a tent camper is charged
the same camping fee as a motorhome.
MR. SADDLER was unsure. He stated $100 is the annual fee for a
boat launch permit and $15 per night is an average camping fee,
although some campgrounds charge more or less.
REPRESENTATIVE JACKSON pointed out the benefits in the bill are
specifically addressed to state residents who are physically
disabled and cautioned against expanding the scope of the bill
to include AMHTA beneficiaries.
2:00:22 PM
VICE CHAIR TUCK asked whether the [loss of revenue reflected in
the DNR] fiscal note would be more accurate if the total number
of veterans in the state was factored on the general population,
without the consideration of disability.
MR. SADDLER said correct and explained that is because the
proportion of the "universe" of all veterans, to the smaller
number of disabled veterans, could be compared to the total
number of adult Alaskans, and to the number of disabled
Alaskans; however, he cautioned the number of independent
variables may skew the results. He opined a more accurate
comparison occurs when physical disability is defined.
VICE CHAIR TUCK observed if [disabled] civilians are less active
than [disabled] veterans, that may reduce the loss of revenue.
MR. SADDLER confirmed the implication that if [disabled]
civilians are less active than [disabled] veterans, a smaller
proportion would seek free camping permits.
CHAIR LEDOUX asked if Mr. Saddler could prepare a fiscal note or
analysis that would reveal how many veterans are in the state
and how many disabled veterans have free camping permits.
MR. SADDLER said yes; however, without knowledge of the level of
disability, the number could range from 38,000 to 83,000
Alaskans. In further response to Chair LeDoux, he offered to
research the number of physically disabled [Alaskans], but not
the percentage of their disability.
REPRESENTATIVE TARR surmised HB 129 would be held over.
CHAIR LEDOUX suggested a committee substitute would be
forthcoming to address "all of the proxy statutes".
REPRESENTATIVE TARR urged, at a subsequent hearing, that the
committee hear testimony from AMHTA to answer questions about
disabilities in the general population, such as the number of
Alaskans with co-occurring disabilities.
CHAIR LEDOUX agreed.
[HB 129 was held over.]
2:05:33 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the
Special Committee on Military and Veterans Affairs meeting was
adjourned at 2:05 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HR006 Sponsor Statement 4.8.19.pdf |
HMLV 4/30/2019 1:00:00 PM HTRB 4/9/2019 8:00:00 AM |
HR 6 |
| HR006 ver A 4.9.19.pdf |
HMLV 4/30/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HR 6 |
| HR0006A.PDF |
HMLV 4/30/2019 1:00:00 PM HTRB 4/9/2019 8:00:00 AM |
HR 6 |
| HR 6 Supporting Document Angapak Testimony.pdf |
HMLV 4/30/2019 1:00:00 PM HTRB 4/9/2019 8:00:00 AM |
HR 6 |
| HR 6 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HMLV 4/30/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HR 6 |
| HR006 Additional Document-Photograph of Warriors' Circle of Honor Design.pdf |
HMLV 4/30/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HR 6 |
| HR 06 Additional Document-Photograph of Warriors' Circle of Honor Design.pdf |
HMLV 4/25/2019 1:00:00 PM HMLV 4/30/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HR 6 |
| HR 06 Supporting Document-Letter of Support Nelson Angapak.pdf |
HMLV 4/25/2019 1:00:00 PM HMLV 4/30/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HR 6 |
| HB 129 version A.PDF |
HMLV 4/30/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 129 |
| HB 129 Sponsor Statement 4.29.19.pdf |
HMLV 4/30/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 129 |
| HB 129 Sectional Analysis ver A 04.29.19.pdf |
HMLV 4/30/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 129 |
| HB 129 Fiscal Note DNR Parks 4.29.19.pdf |
HMLV 4/30/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 129 |
| HB 129 Fiscal Note ADFG Wildlife 4.29.19.pdf |
HMLV 4/30/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 129 |
| HB 129 Fiscal Note ADFG Sport Fishing 4.29.19.pdf |
HMLV 4/30/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 129 |
| HB 129 comparison hunting fishing 4.29.19.pdf |
HMLV 4/30/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 129 |